Race Sim Central
Rec.Autos.Simulators Archive

ICR1 speeds at Naz. PA

7 posts by 4 people · 23 Apr 1996 - 25 Apr 1996

Joseph.Led 23 Apr 1996#316487
Howdy ICR1 folks, I know there's still some folks out there who use ICR1 so let's see some times at Nazareth (being that's where the race is this weekend and I'll be checking for passes to get into the pits at gate 13, PSYCHED!). I did a 153.790 last night at Nazareth. Any other times out there? Joe ledva
Phil Thomps 23 Apr 1996#316488
> Howdy ICR1 folks, > I know there's still some folks out there who use ICR1 so let's see some > times at Nazareth (being that's where the race is this weekend and I'll > be checking for passes to get into the pits at gate 13, PSYCHED!). > I did a 153.790 last night at Nazareth. Any other times out there? My best is a 168.096 mph. There's more to come though. I'm using a game pad and because it is non-linear I scrub off too much speed in the corners. Get rid of some of that wing Joe! -- Phillip Thompson Novell Certified NetWare Administrator (CNA)
Buis R 24 Apr 1996#316611
: Howdy ICR1 folks, : : I know there's still some folks out there who use ICR1 so let's see some : times at Nazareth (being that's where the race is this weekend and I'll : be checking for passes to get into the pits at gate 13, PSYCHED!). : I did a 153.790 last night at Nazareth. Any other times out there? Well, I am not sure if we are talking about the same track, but I think I did a 177 mph lap in Nazareth. The computer cars are around 180 mph I think. By the way, any setup tips/cars/engine to choose for Nazareth? I seem to be stuck for this track... I tried low downforce setups but I couldn't handle them. With my own setups I never have to lift. Would lower downforce setups improve the times? Greetings, Rob.
Joseph.Led 24 Apr 1996#316612
Yeh, I just went from no car damage to car damage so I've been using lots o wing to give me better control for now. I guess I'm paranoid about crashing and having to use the ole "A" button. It looks like 168.096 is the time to beat. Catch you later. Joe
Joseph.Led 24 Apr 1996#316613
I take that back, it looks like 177 is the time to beat. Joe
Buis R 25 Apr 1996#316758
Yep, and I guess it could be quicker if I figured out how to do a good qualifying run, my times are usually better in practise. If I set the wings to 9.50 and 7.00 I get my best times. This still means the car will go through the corners flatout. If I set the wings much lower than this I find the car undrivable, or is that just me? Also, I use the Penske93-Ford combination. I found the Buick engine interesting and easy to drive and the times were not far off the best times with the other chassis. Does anyone know at which track the Buick engines are the most effective in ICR1? Greetings, Rob.
Hannu Piis 25 Apr 1996#316759
>I know there's still some folks out there who use ICR1 so let's see some >times at Nazareth (being that's where the race is this weekend and I'll >be checking for passes to get into the pits at gate 13, PSYCHED!). >I did a 153.790 last night at Nazareth. Any other times out there? My best was something like 181.2-181.4... just use low wings ;) -- Hannu Piispa

Sponsors

Affiliate Links

Sim Gaming Expo MOZA Racing Sim-Lab Fanatec TrakRacer Asetek Internet Privacy From NordVPN Dreamhost Capital One Credit Card Application Fanatical CDKeys Amazon Amazon UK Project Motor Racing iRacing Get your racing gloves, boots and more from Demon Tweeks. Enlist at Roberts Space Industries, developers of Star Citizen and Squadron 42


Back from the ashes since July, 2019. First created in 2001 with the merger of Legends Central (founded 1999) and simracing.dk.

A site by a sort of sim racer, for sim racers, about racing sims. News and information on both modern and historic sim racing software titles.

All products and licenses property of their respective owners.


Facebook Threads Bluesky Twitter Mastodon Instagram YouTube Tiktok Twitch Reddit Google News Apple News Subscribe via WordPress Flipboard eBay

Race Sim Central © 1999-2026 | Some links pay RSC a commission. Advertising does not equal endorsement.Cookie Policy