SCGT & Video cards

I have got a some extra buks and I wont to upgrade my video card, I am thinking that I will by a VooDoo 3 2000 16 mg AGP around $90. I have a Rage ll C 8mg AGP, AMD 3d 400 128 mg ram. Will I be Able to beat the price and service with anouther card Manufacturer ?

I run a V3 3000 and on some tracks I can easily maintain 1024x760 with 16 cars. But some of the tracks seem to be more of a hardware hog and notice some jerkyness. dave henrie Wishkah wrote:

Quoted text (16 lines)

> > Well I just upgraded from a Voodoo2 to a TNT2 and I'm really disapointed > with SCGT. I can't even go up to 1024x768, the graphics look screwed up and > the screen is really dark eben when i turn up the gamma. Maybe even if the > Voodoo3 2000 is a whole lot slower then a TNT2 Ultra the Voodoo3 will > probably do a better job in SCGT. > > Wishkah > > Bruce Stanley <[email hidden]> wrote in message > [email hidden]... > > I have got a some extra buks and I wont to upgrade my video card, I am > > thinking that I will by a VooDoo 3 2000 16 mg AGP around $90. > > > > I have a Rage ll C 8mg AGP, AMD 3d 400 128 mg ram. Will I be Able to beat > > the price and service with anouther card Manufacturer ?

Well I just upgraded from a Voodoo2 to a TNT2 and I'm really disapointed with SCGT. I can't even go up to 1024x768, the graphics look screwed up and the screen is really dark eben when i turn up the gamma. Maybe even if the Voodoo3 2000 is a whole lot slower then a TNT2 Ultra the Voodoo3 will probably do a better job in SCGT. Wishkah Bruce Stanley <[email hidden]> wrote in message [email hidden]... > I have got a some extra buks and I wont to upgrade my video card, I am > thinking that I will by a VooDoo 3 2000 16 mg AGP around $90. > > I have a Rage ll C 8mg AGP, AMD 3d 400 128 mg ram. Will I be Able to beat > the price and service with anouther card Manufacturer ?

Thanks I will take a look at the TNT2 befor I by A card <GBG>

Quoted text (9 lines)

>On Fri, 08 Oct 1999 04:40:13 GMT, >> Maybe even if the >>Voodoo3 2000 is a whole lot slower then a TNT2 Ultra the Voodoo3 will >>probably do a better job in SCGT. >uhh.. the Voodoo3-2000 is not slower than a TNT Ultra2.

It may end up that I get the V3 2000. thanks for the input. <GBG>

The V3 3000 is outside my price range and I would like one but it seames V3 2000 may do a better job than the Rage ll C. SCGT does not like the ATI card. <GBG> >> Well I just upgraded from a Voodoo2 to a TNT2 and I'm really disapointed >> with SCGT. I can't even go up to 1024x768, the graphics look screwed up and >> the screen is really dark eben when i turn up the gamma. Maybe even if the

Quoted text (12 lines)

>> Voodoo3 2000 is a whole lot slower then a TNT2 Ultra the Voodoo3 will >> probably do a better job in SCGT. >> Wishkah >> > I have got a some extra buks and I wont to upgrade my video card, I am >> > thinking that I will by a VooDoo 3 2000 16 mg AGP around $90. >> > I have a Rage ll C 8mg AGP, AMD 3d 400 128 mg ram. Will I be Able to

beat >> > the price and service with anouther card Manufacturer ?

I Got the Voodoo3 2000 And I am Verry Happy with It It works Much Better than I thought That It would, I am running every thing at hight res. And drict 3d not 3dfx and the driect 3d it runs better. Thanks for your input, your comments helped with the decision. <GBG>