Smith's convention of using the highest speeds at the end of straights, and
the lowest speeds seen through a corner or segment of interest might be
worthwhile. Lap times might be a usable measure, but I think at too gross a
level of detail. Replay analysis of important corners over several laps
would be more telling. I think something like SpyGirl's raised arm
synchronization would do the trick. The important places to look are
probably between turn-in and apex, and somewhat beyond track-out. The
braking zones would show very high variance, and might not be very revealing
for most of us. If you're dead consistent in braking, but still slow, I
can't imagine what might be wrong.
Michael.
<[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:8anqcd$cu5$[email hidden]...
What would be the best way to compare GPL sessions?
Would average laptime + varians be enough info? Does the varians take
the number of laps into concideration?
or do we need number of laps, average laptimes, slowest lap, fastest
lap, variation etc?
BR
Thomas Soerensen
GPL Enthusiast of Denmark
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
Michael
The problem I�m trying to solve is not that I�m slow - I will deal will
deal with that later - I�m trying to get an opinion about what info is
needed to get a standard for measureing that "Consistency" that
everybody is talking about.
Thomas
In article <[email hidden]>,
"Michael Young" <[email hidden]> wrote:
> Smith's convention of using the highest speeds at the end ofstraights, and
> the lowest speeds seen through a corner or segment of interest mightbe
> worthwhile. Lap times might be a usable measure, but I think at toogross a
> level of detail. Replay analysis of important corners over severallaps
> would be more telling. I think something like SpyGirl's raised arm
> synchronization would do the trick. The important places to look are
> probably between turn-in and apex, and somewhat beyond track-out. The
> braking zones would show very high variance, and might not be veryrevealing
> for most of us. If you're dead consistent in braking, but still slow,I
take
--
BR
Thomas Soerensen
GPL Enthusiast of Denmark
http://www.geocities.com/thomas180573/index.html
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
Quoted text (9 lines)
> can't imagine what might be wrong. > > Michael. > > <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:8anqcd$cu5$[email hidden]... > > What would be the best way to compare GPL sessions? > > > > Would average laptime + varians be enough info? Does the variansQuoted text (14 lines)
> > the number of laps into concideration? > > > > or do we need number of laps, average laptimes, slowest lap, fastest > > lap, variation etc? > > > > BR > > Thomas Soerensen > > GPL Enthusiast of Denmark > > > > > > Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ > > Before you buy. > >GPL Replay Analyser?
8-)
*Peter* - http://www.cix.co.uk/~peterpc/home.html
I'm jumping in a bit late here so I'm not sure exactly what you mean
by consistency, but, the easiest way to see a benchmark for
consistency is to save some VROC online races with good drivers, open
it up in SpyGirl, and see the lap time for every lap that every
driver did in the race. You will see the best people capable of 10,
15, or even 20 laps with little more than a 1 second variation.
Don Scurlock
Vancouver,B.C.
In article <8EF97BE62dscurlock@news>, [email hidden] (Don Scurlock)
writes:
An online race(or *any* race) might not be consistent. You still have to lift
for traffic, which will affect your times...
Eldred
--
Tiger Stadium R.I.P. 1912-1999
Own Grand Prix Legends? Goto http://gpl.gamestats.com/vroc
Never argue with an idiot. He brings you down to his level, then beats you
with experience...
Remove SPAM-OFF to reply.
