You are the same people who probably think Hollywood has not corrupted and
trivialized out motion picture industry....HOW MANY TIMES DID YOU PAY TO SEE
TITANIC?
LONG LIVE INDEPENDENT FILM
maybe they don't have all the big money of Hollywood but they make much
better products targeted at small segments of the population rather than the
mainstream sell-out lowest-common-denominator crap you like...oh, but I
guess you just care about special fx and not any rational plot line or
story...much like all of the games you will be able to buy very soon - BIG
BUDGET PILES OF SHIT WITH PRETTY PICTURES.
So, why couldn't Papy survive? I think they would do better without the rule
of iron-fisted bottom-line-minded big-brother Sierra...
Tony Rickard <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:fSdB4.602$[email hidden]...
shopping
boxes
> with pretty pictures then maybe they can withstand the luxury of letting
> developers produce some flagship products which make relatively littlemoney
Argument over a pro-warez rant
L_NiN0 posted a rant urging people to download games illegally and only pay for the truly great ones. Others replied that piracy would push publishers away from niche PC sims and towards consoles. The thread wandered into arguments about Hollywood and Star Wars Episode 1, and a disputed claim that 250,000 people raced GPL online each weekend.
community/metaoff-topic
Automated summary.
This coming from someone who quotes Obi-Wan Kenobi -
Ken Beard <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:6leB4.391$[email hidden]...
> And this folks is what was brought in with all the warez hype....thanks.
>
> When all the publishers have moved on to PSX2 and X-Box - due to havingdisk
> formats that are hard / impossible to make copies of on burners, and withno
truly
> > truly satisfied (aka GPL) don't spend money on it.
> >
> > OH, no Bluto...don't download that warez software - someone might get
> hurt.
> > Well, GOOD!...because a few publisher need to be put on the hit list for
> > releasing poor titles with a lot of hype and no demo hoping to rake inon
> > the drones that shop by the pretty pictures on the box alone. Oh, ormaybe
> > they go by the game mag review on page 32...followed by a full page ADon
> > page 35.
> >
> > I personally do not download warez anymore because it takes too damnlong
> > (analog line) - however, I do not buy just released titles either(burned
are
> > loosing to piracy? Well, first off - tell me how you accuratelycalculate
> > how much money was lost to pirated software? IF they know who is buyingit
> > and how much they are spending on it then why don't they stop them? ORare
> > they counting everyone the downloads a title like F1-2000? I don't see
> that
> > as being accurate either because many people will download somethingjust
> > because it is there and they can - when in fact, if not given a piracy
> > option, those same people would have easily done without a title and not
> > even thought about paying for it.
> >
> > I for one would like to see these big names REALLY take a hit (where it
> > counts - the WALLET) be it from WAREZ or just plain common senseshopping
> > (which in all likelihood will never happen because of the millions of
> pretty
> > picture drones). LET THE FUCKERS GO UNDER -- SELL THE FARM -- BITE THEBIG
does
a
> > legend...or just another reunion tour to CASH IN?
> >
> >
>
>
Quoted text (22 lines)
> possibility of downloading games for them, we'll have no one to blame but > the folks with this attitude - and ourselves. > > -- > Ken's Sig 3.01 > > "Who is the more foolish? The fool, or the fool who follows him?" - > Obi-Wan Kenobi > > Go #43 and #44! > > volksy (at) yahoo (dot) com > > > > L_NiN0 <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:[email hidden]... > > Say it with me.... > > > > LONG LIVE WAREZ! TO HELL WITH PUBLISHERS..... > > > > If you can find a game online - DOWNLOAD IT - play it and unless areQuoted text (9 lines)
> > way too much). A game will have to pass the test of time from the online > > community before I purchase it. This is often a bonus because the price > has > > come down....my machine will more likely run it smoother and I WILL KNOW > it > > is a good game by the way the online community still talks about it. > > > > Well, I for one am sick and tired of the game publishers pushing us > > around...then they have the NERVE to complain about all the money theyQuoted text (14 lines)
> > ONE. > > > > OH, but who will make our great SIMS then....Well, how many of you cried > for > > MICROSOFT? Most of you were glad to see them taken down a "psuedo" notch > > because that would open the playing field for the smaller and more > inventive > > guys.... > > > > But what if they just take their money and put it into some other genre? > > GOOD LET THEM because they are just wasting their time and our money > anyway. > > > > -F1 2000 is EASports hyped bullshit built for EVERYMAN...COME ON - EAQuoted text (11 lines)
> > not make a titles for the niches of the world. > > > > -PAPYRUS - what have you done for me lately? sold me two awful rehashed > > version of N2 with better graphics? Then sell an add on pack but only > > include it in a boxed set of all three for the same price I paid for one > of > > them? OH, but they gave us GPL...SO FUCKING WHAT - They forgot what got > them > > to the point they are at and need to be reminded. > > > > GP3....a glimmer of hope shines in the far off distance...the return ofYou mean a 20 year old film like Star Wars? or are you talking about the
most recent pile of crap Lucas spit out ... hmmmm, loved all those computer
effects...just seems he got too caught up in them and forgot to build any
characters or plot...zzzz.
Like playing a bad racing game with pretty pictures, lots of smoke, bad
physics and unintelligent AI.
ymenard <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:N%eB4.49982$[email hidden]...
realise
> how hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world.
>
>
>
>
Quoted text (14 lines)
> "L_NiN0" <[email hidden]> wrote > > LONG LIVE INDEPENDENT FILM > > You mean... independant film like.. Star Wars? > > > Hehe. > > > -- > -- Fran�ois M�nard <ymenard> > -- May the Downforce be with you... > -- http://www.WeRace.net > -- People think it must be fun to be a super genius, but they don'tSay it with me....
LONG LIVE WAREZ! TO HELL WITH PUBLISHERS.....
If you can find a game online - DOWNLOAD IT - play it and unless are truly
truly satisfied (aka GPL) don't spend money on it.
OH, no Bluto...don't download that warez software - someone might get hurt.
Well, GOOD!...because a few publisher need to be put on the hit list for
releasing poor titles with a lot of hype and no demo hoping to rake in on
the drones that shop by the pretty pictures on the box alone. Oh, or maybe
they go by the game mag review on page 32...followed by a full page AD on
page 35.
I personally do not download warez anymore because it takes too damn long
(analog line) - however, I do not buy just released titles either (burned
way too much). A game will have to pass the test of time from the online
community before I purchase it. This is often a bonus because the price has
come down....my machine will more likely run it smoother and I WILL KNOW it
is a good game by the way the online community still talks about it.
Well, I for one am sick and tired of the game publishers pushing us
around...then they have the NERVE to complain about all the money they are
loosing to piracy? Well, first off - tell me how you accurately calculate
how much money was lost to pirated software? IF they know who is buying it
and how much they are spending on it then why don't they stop them? OR are
they counting everyone the downloads a title like F1-2000? I don't see that
as being accurate either because many people will download something just
because it is there and they can - when in fact, if not given a piracy
option, those same people would have easily done without a title and not
even thought about paying for it.
I for one would like to see these big names REALLY take a hit (where it
counts - the WALLET) be it from WAREZ or just plain common sense shopping
(which in all likelihood will never happen because of the millions of pretty
picture drones). LET THE FUCKERS GO UNDER -- SELL THE FARM -- BITE THE BIG
ONE.
OH, but who will make our great SIMS then....Well, how many of you cried for
MICROSOFT? Most of you were glad to see them taken down a "psuedo" notch
because that would open the playing field for the smaller and more inventive
guys....
But what if they just take their money and put it into some other genre?
GOOD LET THEM because they are just wasting their time and our money anyway.
-F1 2000 is EASports hyped bullshit built for EVERYMAN...COME ON - EA does
not make a titles for the niches of the world.
-PAPYRUS - what have you done for me lately? sold me two awful rehashed
version of N2 with better graphics? Then sell an add on pack but only
include it in a boxed set of all three for the same price I paid for one of
them? OH, but they gave us GPL...SO FUCKING WHAT - They forgot what got them
to the point they are at and need to be reminded.
GP3....a glimmer of hope shines in the far off distance...the return of a
legend...or just another reunion tour to CASH IN?
Say it with me....
LONG LIVE WAREZ! TO HELL WITH PUBLISHERS.....
If you can find a game online - DOWNLOAD IT - play it and unless are truly
truly satisfied (aka GPL) don't spend money on it.
OH, no Bluto...don't download that warez software - someone might get hurt.
Well, GOOD!...because a few publisher need to be put on the hit list for
releasing poor titles with a lot of hype and no demo hoping to rake in on
the drones that shop by the pretty pictures on the box alone. Oh, or maybe
they go by the game mag review on page 32...followed by a full page AD on
page 35.
I personally do not download warez anymore because it takes too damn long
(analog line) - however, I do not buy just released titles either (burned
way too much). A game will have to pass the test of time from the online
community before I purchase it. This is often a bonus because the price has
come down....my machine will more likely run it smoother and I WILL KNOW it
is a good game by the way the online community still talks about it.
Well, I for one am sick and tired of the game publishers pushing us
around...then they have the NERVE to complain about all the money they are
loosing to piracy? Well, first off - tell me how you accurately calculate
how much money was lost to pirated software? IF they know who is buying it
and how much they are spending on it then why don't they stop them? OR are
they counting everyone the downloads a title like F1-2000? I don't see that
as being accurate either because many people will download something just
because it is there and they can - when in fact, if not given a piracy
option, those same people would have easily done without a title and not
even thought about paying for it.
I for one would like to see these big names REALLY take a hit (where it
counts - the WALLET) be it from WAREZ or just plain common sense shopping
(which in all likelihood will never happen because of the millions of pretty
picture drones). LET THE ***ERS GO UNDER -- SELL THE FARM -- BITE THE BIG
ONE.
OH, but who will make our great SIMS then....Well, how many of you cried for
MICROSOFT? Most of you were glad to see them taken down a "psuedo" notch
because that would open the playing field for the smaller and more inventive
guys....
But what if they just take their money and put it into some other genre?
GOOD LET THEM because they are just wasting their time and our money anyway.
-F1 2000 is EASports hyped bullshit built for EVERYMAN...COME ON - EA does
not make a titles for the niches of the world.
-PAPYRUS - what have you done for me lately? sold me two awful rehashed
version of N2 with better graphics? Then sell an add on pack but only
include it in a boxed set of all three for the same price I paid for one of
them? OH, but they gave us GPL...SO ***ING WHAT - They forgot what got them
to the point they are at and need to be reminded.
GP3....a glimmer of hope shines in the far off distance...the return of a
legend...or just another reunion tour to CASH IN?
OK, why would I go buy a $20,000 car just off the lot and never take it for
a test drive to find it is doesn't work right and I wasn't informed of the
various problems it had only told of the 'great features'...oh, and the car
dealers policy...you left with it you own it...we might get around to a
service patch for those brakes that don't work sometime in the next year or
so......
So, why wouldn't I download a PRICEY APPLICATION to determine if it is or is
not worth 3 bloody cents before I buy it with no option to get any type of
refund back if its a TURD.
OH and I do have stacks of shitty games that I DID BUY - and it has taught
me that if the industry does not wish to change to offer a more complete and
problem free products to their customers then FUCK THEM.
Your opinions will not stop anyone from downloading pirated software or from
copying cds and Im sure mine will not change yours so
###END###
GraDee <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:8b5qqg$8qn$[email hidden]...
> May I just ask:
> If you are not buying the product because you feel it is not up to your
> standards then why would you download it an play it. Its the same gamewith
truly
> > truly satisfied (aka GPL) don't spend money on it.
> >
> > OH, no Bluto...don't download that warez software - someone might get
> hurt.
> > Well, GOOD!...because a few publisher need to be put on the hit list for
> > releasing poor titles with a lot of hype and no demo hoping to rake inon
> > the drones that shop by the pretty pictures on the box alone. Oh, ormaybe
> > they go by the game mag review on page 32...followed by a full page ADon
> > page 35.
> >
> > I personally do not download warez anymore because it takes too damnlong
> > (analog line) - however, I do not buy just released titles either(burned
are
> > loosing to piracy? Well, first off - tell me how you accuratelycalculate
> > how much money was lost to pirated software? IF they know who is buyingit
> > and how much they are spending on it then why don't they stop them? ORare
> > they counting everyone the downloads a title like F1-2000? I don't see
> that
> > as being accurate either because many people will download somethingjust
> > because it is there and they can - when in fact, if not given a piracy
> > option, those same people would have easily done without a title and not
> > even thought about paying for it.
> >
> > I for one would like to see these big names REALLY take a hit (where it
> > counts - the WALLET) be it from WAREZ or just plain common senseshopping
> > (which in all likelihood will never happen because of the millions of
> pretty
> > picture drones). LET THE FUCKERS GO UNDER -- SELL THE FARM -- BITE THEBIG
does
a
> > legend...or just another reunion tour to CASH IN?
> >
> >
>
>
Quoted text (12 lines)
> 100's more bugs and niggly bits to put up with. > > Make some sense! > > > L_NiN0 <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:[email hidden]... > > Say it with me.... > > > > LONG LIVE WAREZ! TO HELL WITH PUBLISHERS..... > > > > If you can find a game online - DOWNLOAD IT - play it and unless areQuoted text (9 lines)
> > way too much). A game will have to pass the test of time from the online > > community before I purchase it. This is often a bonus because the price > has > > come down....my machine will more likely run it smoother and I WILL KNOW > it > > is a good game by the way the online community still talks about it. > > > > Well, I for one am sick and tired of the game publishers pushing us > > around...then they have the NERVE to complain about all the money theyQuoted text (14 lines)
> > ONE. > > > > OH, but who will make our great SIMS then....Well, how many of you cried > for > > MICROSOFT? Most of you were glad to see them taken down a "psuedo" notch > > because that would open the playing field for the smaller and more > inventive > > guys.... > > > > But what if they just take their money and put it into some other genre? > > GOOD LET THEM because they are just wasting their time and our money > anyway. > > > > -F1 2000 is EASports hyped bullshit built for EVERYMAN...COME ON - EAQuoted text (11 lines)
> > not make a titles for the niches of the world. > > > > -PAPYRUS - what have you done for me lately? sold me two awful rehashed > > version of N2 with better graphics? Then sell an add on pack but only > > include it in a boxed set of all three for the same price I paid for one > of > > them? OH, but they gave us GPL...SO FUCKING WHAT - They forgot what got > them > > to the point they are at and need to be reminded. > > > > GP3....a glimmer of hope shines in the far off distance...the return ofYou on a sugar high or did you just snort too much?
--
Regards,
Bruce Kennewell,
Canberra, Australia.
---------------------------
L_NiN0 <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
> You are the same people who probably think Hollywood has not corrupted and
> trivialized out motion picture industry....HOW MANY TIMES DID YOU PAY TO
SEE
> TITANIC?
>
> LONG LIVE INDEPENDENT FILM
> maybe they don't have all the big money of Hollywood but they make much
> better products targeted at small segments of the population rather than
the
> mainstream sell-out lowest-common-denominator crap you like...oh, but I
> guess you just care about special fx and not any rational plot line or
> story...much like all of the games you will be able to buy very soon - BIG
> BUDGET PILES OF SHIT WITH PRETTY PICTURES.
>
> So, why couldn't Papy survive? I think they would do better without the
rule
> of iron-fisted bottom-line-minded big-brother Sierra...
>
>
>
> Tony Rickard <[email hidden]> wrote in message
> news:fSdB4.602$[email hidden]...
> >
> > "L_NiN0" 'wrote' in message
> > >
> > > LONG LIVE WAREZ! TO HELL WITH PUBLISHERS.....
> > >
> > <snip>
> > > I for one would like to see these big names REALLY take a hit (where
it
> > > counts - the WALLET) be it from WAREZ or just plain common sense
> shopping
> > > (which in all likelihood will never happen because of the millions of
> > pretty
> > > picture drones). LET THE F....
> > >
> > Yeh great idea - publishers see profits drop - rationalise their product
> > range - no more niche products.
> >
> > Now on the other hand if the publishers flourish and millions more buy
> boxes
> > with pretty pictures then maybe they can withstand the luxury of letting
> > developers produce some flagship products which make relatively little
> money
> > but offer some prestige.
> >
> > What future for Papyrus if Sierra feel the squeeze?
> >
> > Tony
> >
> >
> >
>
>
"L_NiN0" 'wrote' in message
>
> LONG LIVE WAREZ! TO HELL WITH PUBLISHERS.....
><snip>
> I for one would like to see these big names REALLY take a hit (where it
> counts - the WALLET) be it from WAREZ or just plain common sense shopping
> (which in all likelihood will never happen because of the millions ofpretty
> picture drones). LET THE F....
>Yeh great idea - publishers see profits drop - rationalise their product
range - no more niche products.
Now on the other hand if the publishers flourish and millions more buy boxes
with pretty pictures then maybe they can withstand the luxury of letting
developers produce some flagship products which make relatively little money
but offer some prestige.
What future for Papyrus if Sierra feel the squeeze?
Tony
"L_NiN0" <[email hidden]> wrote
> -PAPYRUS - what have you done for me lately? sold me two awful rehashed
> version of N2 with better graphics? Then sell an add on pack but only
> include it in a boxed set of all three for the same price I paid for oneof
> them?
Just so your simple-mind don't spread more idioties and false information,
Papyrus will ship their Nascar Craftmans Truck Series as a stand-alone
expansion pack for Nascar Racing 3.
--
-- Fran�ois M�nard <ymenard>
-- May the Downforce be with you...
-- http://www.WeRace.net
-- People think it must be fun to be a super genius, but they don't realise
how hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world.
With rationalizations like this, I am really glad I have locks on my doors.
And this folks is what was brought in with all the warez hype....thanks.
When all the publishers have moved on to PSX2 and X-Box - due to having disk
formats that are hard / impossible to make copies of on burners, and with no
possibility of downloading games for them, we'll have no one to blame but
the folks with this attitude - and ourselves.
--
Ken's Sig 3.01
"Who is the more foolish? The fool, or the fool who follows him?" -
Obi-Wan Kenobi
Go #43 and #44!
volksy (at) yahoo (dot) com
L_NiN0 <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
> Say it with me....
>
> LONG LIVE WAREZ! TO HELL WITH PUBLISHERS.....
>
> If you can find a game online - DOWNLOAD IT - play it and unless are truly
> truly satisfied (aka GPL) don't spend money on it.
>
> OH, no Bluto...don't download that warez software - someone might get
hurt.
> Well, GOOD!...because a few publisher need to be put on the hit list for
> releasing poor titles with a lot of hype and no demo hoping to rake in on
> the drones that shop by the pretty pictures on the box alone. Oh, or maybe
> they go by the game mag review on page 32...followed by a full page AD on
> page 35.
>
> I personally do not download warez anymore because it takes too damn long
> (analog line) - however, I do not buy just released titles either (burned
> way too much). A game will have to pass the test of time from the online
> community before I purchase it. This is often a bonus because the price
has
> come down....my machine will more likely run it smoother and I WILL KNOW
it
> is a good game by the way the online community still talks about it.
>
> Well, I for one am sick and tired of the game publishers pushing us
> around...then they have the NERVE to complain about all the money they are
> loosing to piracy? Well, first off - tell me how you accurately calculate
> how much money was lost to pirated software? IF they know who is buying it
> and how much they are spending on it then why don't they stop them? OR are
> they counting everyone the downloads a title like F1-2000? I don't see
that
> as being accurate either because many people will download something just
> because it is there and they can - when in fact, if not given a piracy
> option, those same people would have easily done without a title and not
> even thought about paying for it.
>
> I for one would like to see these big names REALLY take a hit (where it
> counts - the WALLET) be it from WAREZ or just plain common sense shopping
> (which in all likelihood will never happen because of the millions of
pretty
> picture drones). LET THE FUCKERS GO UNDER -- SELL THE FARM -- BITE THE BIG
> ONE.
>
> OH, but who will make our great SIMS then....Well, how many of you cried
for
> MICROSOFT? Most of you were glad to see them taken down a "psuedo" notch
> because that would open the playing field for the smaller and more
inventive
> guys....
>
> But what if they just take their money and put it into some other genre?
> GOOD LET THEM because they are just wasting their time and our money
anyway.
>
> -F1 2000 is EASports hyped bullshit built for EVERYMAN...COME ON - EA does
> not make a titles for the niches of the world.
>
> -PAPYRUS - what have you done for me lately? sold me two awful rehashed
> version of N2 with better graphics? Then sell an add on pack but only
> include it in a boxed set of all three for the same price I paid for one
of
> them? OH, but they gave us GPL...SO FUCKING WHAT - They forgot what got
them
> to the point they are at and need to be reminded.
>
> GP3....a glimmer of hope shines in the far off distance...the return of a
> legend...or just another reunion tour to CASH IN?
>
>
"L_NiN0" <[email hidden]> wrote
> LONG LIVE INDEPENDENT FILM
You mean... independant film like.. Star Wars?
Hehe.
--
-- Fran�ois M�nard <ymenard>
-- May the Downforce be with you...
-- http://www.WeRace.net
-- People think it must be fun to be a super genius, but they don't realise
how hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world.
And if you thought that quote was foolish - why did you post a followup?
Think about it....it's what the post is about, NOT Star Wars....
--
Ken's Sig 3.01
"Who is the more foolish? The fool, or the fool who follows him?" -
Obi-Wan Kenobi
Go #43 and #44!
volksy (at) yahoo (dot) com
L_NiN0 <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
> This coming from someone who quotes Obi-Wan Kenobi -
>
>
> Ken Beard <[email hidden]> wrote in message
> news:6leB4.391$[email hidden]...
> > And this folks is what was brought in with all the warez hype....thanks.
> >
> > When all the publishers have moved on to PSX2 and X-Box - due to having
> disk
> > formats that are hard / impossible to make copies of on burners, and
with
> no
> > possibility of downloading games for them, we'll have no one to blame
but
> > the folks with this attitude - and ourselves.
> >
> > --
> > Ken's Sig 3.01
> >
> > "Who is the more foolish? The fool, or the fool who follows him?" -
> > Obi-Wan Kenobi
> >
> > Go #43 and #44!
> >
> > volksy (at) yahoo (dot) com
> >
> >
> >
> > L_NiN0 <[email hidden]> wrote in message
> > news:[email hidden]...
> > > Say it with me....
> > >
> > > LONG LIVE WAREZ! TO HELL WITH PUBLISHERS.....
> > >
> > > If you can find a game online - DOWNLOAD IT - play it and unless are
> truly
> > > truly satisfied (aka GPL) don't spend money on it.
> > >
> > > OH, no Bluto...don't download that warez software - someone might get
> > hurt.
> > > Well, GOOD!...because a few publisher need to be put on the hit list
for
> > > releasing poor titles with a lot of hype and no demo hoping to rake in
> on
> > > the drones that shop by the pretty pictures on the box alone. Oh, or
> maybe
> > > they go by the game mag review on page 32...followed by a full page AD
> on
> > > page 35.
> > >
> > > I personally do not download warez anymore because it takes too damn
> long
> > > (analog line) - however, I do not buy just released titles either
> (burned
> > > way too much). A game will have to pass the test of time from the
online
> > > community before I purchase it. This is often a bonus because the
price
> > has
> > > come down....my machine will more likely run it smoother and I WILL
KNOW
> > it
> > > is a good game by the way the online community still talks about it.
> > >
> > > Well, I for one am sick and tired of the game publishers pushing us
> > > around...then they have the NERVE to complain about all the money they
> are
> > > loosing to piracy? Well, first off - tell me how you accurately
> calculate
> > > how much money was lost to pirated software? IF they know who is
buying
> it
> > > and how much they are spending on it then why don't they stop them? OR
> are
> > > they counting everyone the downloads a title like F1-2000? I don't see
> > that
> > > as being accurate either because many people will download something
> just
> > > because it is there and they can - when in fact, if not given a piracy
> > > option, those same people would have easily done without a title and
not
> > > even thought about paying for it.
> > >
> > > I for one would like to see these big names REALLY take a hit (where
it
> > > counts - the WALLET) be it from WAREZ or just plain common sense
> shopping
> > > (which in all likelihood will never happen because of the millions of
> > pretty
> > > picture drones). LET THE FUCKERS GO UNDER -- SELL THE FARM -- BITE THE
> BIG
> > > ONE.
> > >
> > > OH, but who will make our great SIMS then....Well, how many of you
cried
> > for
> > > MICROSOFT? Most of you were glad to see them taken down a "psuedo"
notch
> > > because that would open the playing field for the smaller and more
> > inventive
> > > guys....
> > >
> > > But what if they just take their money and put it into some other
genre?
> > > GOOD LET THEM because they are just wasting their time and our money
> > anyway.
> > >
> > > -F1 2000 is EASports hyped bullshit built for EVERYMAN...COME ON - EA
> does
> > > not make a titles for the niches of the world.
> > >
> > > -PAPYRUS - what have you done for me lately? sold me two awful
rehashed
> > > version of N2 with better graphics? Then sell an add on pack but only
> > > include it in a boxed set of all three for the same price I paid for
one
> > of
> > > them? OH, but they gave us GPL...SO FUCKING WHAT - They forgot what
got
> > them
> > > to the point they are at and need to be reminded.
> > >
> > > GP3....a glimmer of hope shines in the far off distance...the return
of
> a
> > > legend...or just another reunion tour to CASH IN?
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
>You mean a 20 year old film like Star Wars? or are you talking about the
>most recent pile of crap Lucas spit out ... hmmmm, loved all those computer
>effects...just seems he got too caught up in them and forgot to build any
>characters or plot...zzzz.
Watch it again. Really.
I'm itching to do a major Literary Criticism piece on Episode 1, but
then I have lots of experience in Medieval Lit and, in particular, epics.
-Tim
"L_NiN0" <[email hidden]> wrote
> You mean a 20 year old film like Star Wars?
It's an independant movie, out of the Hollywood structure completely.
> or are you talking about the
> most recent pile of crap Lucas spit out
Even if I could argue with this for days, remember that it's an independant
movie, also out of the Hollywood structure.
> Like playing a bad racing game with pretty pictures, lots of smoke, bad
> physics and unintelligent AI.
You are near an official ymenard plonk.
--
-- Fran�ois M�nard <ymenard>
-- May the Downforce be with you...
-- http://www.WeRace.net
-- People think it must be fun to be a super genius, but they don't realise
how hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world.
"The Enigmatic One" <[email hidden]> wrote
> I'm itching to do a major Literary Criticism piece on Episode 1, but
> then I have lots of experience in Medieval Lit and, in particular, epics.
Good! Finally somebody with sense, who can appreciate Episode 1 on the
second and third level. You can catch me on r.a.s.s.m sometimes, there is
some great stuff there. There was a good debate about the Force as a
religion vs. scientology, and how things like Midi-Chlorians are essential
to the saga. Or how Jar-Jar has roots from Shakespeare. There is flaws, I
mean it's Star Wars not Citizen Kane, but overall it's lived up the hype for
me and I'm one very big hardcore fan.
This shouldn't be here, but anybody who dares to attack Star Wars is to be
ignored as a "rebel scum". Ha ;)
--
-- Fran�ois M�nard <ymenard>
-- May the Downforce be with you...
-- http://www.WeRace.net
-- People think it must be fun to be a super genius, but they don't realise
how hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world.
now now children.
Ken Beard wrote in message ...
hype....thanks.
in
>> on
>> > > the drones that shop by the pretty pictures on the box alone. Oh, or
>> maybe
>> > > they go by the game mag review on page 32...followed by a full pageAD
they
OR
>> are
>> > > they counting everyone the downloads a title like F1-2000? I don'tsee
>> > that
>> > > as being accurate either because many people will download something
>> just
>> > > because it is there and they can - when in fact, if not given apiracy
THE
Quoted text (24 lines)
>And if you thought that quote was foolish - why did you post a followup? > >Think about it....it's what the post is about, NOT Star Wars.... > >-- >Ken's Sig 3.01 > >"Who is the more foolish? The fool, or the fool who follows him?" - >Obi-Wan Kenobi > >Go #43 and #44! > >volksy (at) yahoo (dot) com > > > >L_NiN0 <[email hidden]> wrote in message >news:[email hidden]... >> This coming from someone who quotes Obi-Wan Kenobi - >> >> >> Ken Beard <[email hidden]> wrote in message >> news:6leB4.391$[email hidden]... >> > And this folks is what was brought in with all the warezQuoted text (37 lines)
>> > >> > When all the publishers have moved on to PSX2 and X-Box - due to having >> disk >> > formats that are hard / impossible to make copies of on burners, and >with >> no >> > possibility of downloading games for them, we'll have no one to blame >but >> > the folks with this attitude - and ourselves. >> > >> > -- >> > Ken's Sig 3.01 >> > >> > "Who is the more foolish? The fool, or the fool who follows him?" - >> > Obi-Wan Kenobi >> > >> > Go #43 and #44! >> > >> > volksy (at) yahoo (dot) com >> > >> > >> > >> > L_NiN0 <[email hidden]> wrote in message >> > news:[email hidden]... >> > > Say it with me.... >> > > >> > > LONG LIVE WAREZ! TO HELL WITH PUBLISHERS..... >> > > >> > > If you can find a game online - DOWNLOAD IT - play it and unless are >> truly >> > > truly satisfied (aka GPL) don't spend money on it. >> > > >> > > OH, no Bluto...don't download that warez software - someone might get >> > hurt. >> > > Well, GOOD!...because a few publisher need to be put on the hit list >for >> > > releasing poor titles with a lot of hype and no demo hoping to rakeQuoted text (19 lines)
>> on >> > > page 35. >> > > >> > > I personally do not download warez anymore because it takes too damn >> long >> > > (analog line) - however, I do not buy just released titles either >> (burned >> > > way too much). A game will have to pass the test of time from the >online >> > > community before I purchase it. This is often a bonus because the >price >> > has >> > > come down....my machine will more likely run it smoother and I WILL >KNOW >> > it >> > > is a good game by the way the online community still talks about it. >> > > >> > > Well, I for one am sick and tired of the game publishers pushing us >> > > around...then they have the NERVE to complain about all the moneyQuoted text (7 lines)
>> are >> > > loosing to piracy? Well, first off - tell me how you accurately >> calculate >> > > how much money was lost to pirated software? IF they know who is >buying >> it >> > > and how much they are spending on it then why don't they stop them?Quoted text (11 lines)
>> > > option, those same people would have easily done without a title and >not >> > > even thought about paying for it. >> > > >> > > I for one would like to see these big names REALLY take a hit (where >it >> > > counts - the WALLET) be it from WAREZ or just plain common sense >> shopping >> > > (which in all likelihood will never happen because of the millions of >> > pretty >> > > picture drones). LET THE FUCKERS GO UNDER -- SELL THE FARM -- BITEQuoted text (44 lines)
>> BIG >> > > ONE. >> > > >> > > OH, but who will make our great SIMS then....Well, how many of you >cried >> > for >> > > MICROSOFT? Most of you were glad to see them taken down a "psuedo" >notch >> > > because that would open the playing field for the smaller and more >> > inventive >> > > guys.... >> > > >> > > But what if they just take their money and put it into some other >genre? >> > > GOOD LET THEM because they are just wasting their time and our money >> > anyway. >> > > >> > > -F1 2000 is EASports hyped bullshit built for EVERYMAN...COME ON - EA >> does >> > > not make a titles for the niches of the world. >> > > >> > > -PAPYRUS - what have you done for me lately? sold me two awful >rehashed >> > > version of N2 with better graphics? Then sell an add on pack but only >> > > include it in a boxed set of all three for the same price I paid for >one >> > of >> > > them? OH, but they gave us GPL...SO FUCKING WHAT - They forgot what >got >> > them >> > > to the point they are at and need to be reminded. >> > > >> > > GP3....a glimmer of hope shines in the far off distance...the return >of >> a >> > > legend...or just another reunion tour to CASH IN? >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> >> > >While I realize that Episode 1 did not do nearly as good as Star Wars, I
think too many people are looking at it from a one movie point of view.
Alot of people who thought the movie sucked are not looking at it in a
trilogy point of view, which is where it is designed. It was not made to be
a one movie smash like Star Wars, it was made to fit into a story line that
will lead into Episode 2 and 3. Episode 2 will not be a huge smash either,
but Episode 3, now that is the movie I am looking forward to.
I love Episode 1, you just have to appreciate it for what it was meant to
be, and that is a leadin to the next two movies.
ymenard <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:Z1iB4.87920$[email hidden]...
> "The Enigmatic One" <[email hidden]> wrote
> > I'm itching to do a major Literary Criticism piece on Episode 1, but
> > then I have lots of experience in Medieval Lit and, in particular,epics.
>
> Good! Finally somebody with sense, who can appreciate Episode 1 on the
> second and third level. You can catch me on r.a.s.s.m sometimes, thereis
> some great stuff there. There was a good debate about the Force as a
> religion vs. scientology, and how things like Midi-Chlorians are essential
> to the saga. Or how Jar-Jar has roots from Shakespeare. There is flaws,I
> mean it's Star Wars not Citizen Kane, but overall it's lived up the hypefor
realise
> how hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world.
>
>
>
Quoted text (11 lines)
> me and I'm one very big hardcore fan. > > This shouldn't be here, but anybody who dares to attack Star Wars is to be > ignored as a "rebel scum". Ha ;) > > > -- > -- Fran�ois M�nard <ymenard> > -- May the Downforce be with you... > -- http://www.WeRace.net > -- People think it must be fun to be a super genius, but they don'tFirst, I think you have alot of built up anger that needs to be resolved.
Learn how to love yourself and then one day you may learn to love the world.
As for your post about Papy, CTS is going to be released as its own addon.
You do not have to buy the 3in1 package. It will probably be released for
about $20.
Oh and about how do they know how much money they are loosing. Well look at
this stat. Did you know that Deer Hunter was the best selling game out on
the market, it beat Quake2. Hmmm.. I would venture to bet that ALOT more
people played Quake 2 than Deer Hunter. So why did a game like Deer Hunter
outsell Quake 2? Because of the people that were pirating the game. What
kind of people play Quake 2? Kids, teenagers mostly, the biggest group
involved in pirating software. What kind of people play Deer Hunter? Well,
not people that I would put into the pirating group.
L_NiN0 <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
hurt.
has
> come down....my machine will more likely run it smoother and I WILL KNOWit
that
pretty
> picture drones). LET THE FUCKERS GO UNDER -- SELL THE FARM -- BITE THE BIG
> ONE.
>
> OH, but who will make our great SIMS then....Well, how many of you criedfor
> MICROSOFT? Most of you were glad to see them taken down a "psuedo" notch
> because that would open the playing field for the smaller and moreinventive
> guys....
>
> But what if they just take their money and put it into some other genre?
> GOOD LET THEM because they are just wasting their time and our moneyanyway.
of
> them? OH, but they gave us GPL...SO FUCKING WHAT - They forgot what gotthem
> to the point they are at and need to be reminded.
>
> GP3....a glimmer of hope shines in the far off distance...the return of a
> legend...or just another reunion tour to CASH IN?
>
>
Quoted text (8 lines)
> Say it with me.... > > LONG LIVE WAREZ! TO HELL WITH PUBLISHERS..... > > If you can find a game online - DOWNLOAD IT - play it and unless are truly > truly satisfied (aka GPL) don't spend money on it. > > OH, no Bluto...don't download that warez software - someone might getQuoted text (10 lines)
> Well, GOOD!...because a few publisher need to be put on the hit list for > releasing poor titles with a lot of hype and no demo hoping to rake in on > the drones that shop by the pretty pictures on the box alone. Oh, or maybe > they go by the game mag review on page 32...followed by a full page AD on > page 35. > > I personally do not download warez anymore because it takes too damn long > (analog line) - however, I do not buy just released titles either (burned > way too much). A game will have to pass the test of time from the online > community before I purchase it. This is often a bonus because the priceQuoted text (8 lines)
> is a good game by the way the online community still talks about it. > > Well, I for one am sick and tired of the game publishers pushing us > around...then they have the NERVE to complain about all the money they are > loosing to piracy? Well, first off - tell me how you accurately calculate > how much money was lost to pirated software? IF they know who is buying it > and how much they are spending on it then why don't they stop them? OR are > they counting everyone the downloads a title like F1-2000? I don't seeQuoted text (8 lines)
> as being accurate either because many people will download something just > because it is there and they can - when in fact, if not given a piracy > option, those same people would have easily done without a title and not > even thought about paying for it. > > I for one would like to see these big names REALLY take a hit (where it > counts - the WALLET) be it from WAREZ or just plain common sense shopping > (which in all likelihood will never happen because of the millions ofQuoted text (7 lines)
> > -F1 2000 is EASports hyped bullshit built for EVERYMAN...COME ON - EA does > not make a titles for the niches of the world. > > -PAPYRUS - what have you done for me lately? sold me two awful rehashed > version of N2 with better graphics? Then sell an add on pack but only > include it in a boxed set of all three for the same price I paid for oneIndeed, only people with brains play Deer Hunter... ;)
I read that Deer hunter was sold in supermarkets etc for a low price.
Here in holland we have the same thing, a company called Davilex made
the worst racing game ever, A2 racer, and went immediately to the
number one position in the software charts. They also were selling
this game in every thinkable store for a low price.
Wifes see the game while they buy their groceries, and think 'hey
look, it's one of those computer thingies, and this is much cheeper
than the games my husband allways buys! He'll love this!'
Andre
On Mon, 20 Mar 2000 12:11:47 GMT, "Cliff Roman" <[email hidden]>
wrote:
<snip>
> Because of the people that were pirating the game. What
>kind of people play Quake 2? Kids, teenagers mostly, the biggest group
>involved in pirating software. What kind of people play Deer Hunter? Well,
>not people that I would put into the pirating group.
>
May I just ask:
If you are not buying the product because you feel it is not up to your
standards then why would you download it an play it. Its the same game with
100's more bugs and niggly bits to put up with.
Make some sense!
L_NiN0 <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
hurt.
has
> come down....my machine will more likely run it smoother and I WILL KNOWit
that
pretty
> picture drones). LET THE FUCKERS GO UNDER -- SELL THE FARM -- BITE THE BIG
> ONE.
>
> OH, but who will make our great SIMS then....Well, how many of you criedfor
> MICROSOFT? Most of you were glad to see them taken down a "psuedo" notch
> because that would open the playing field for the smaller and moreinventive
> guys....
>
> But what if they just take their money and put it into some other genre?
> GOOD LET THEM because they are just wasting their time and our moneyanyway.
of
> them? OH, but they gave us GPL...SO FUCKING WHAT - They forgot what gotthem
> to the point they are at and need to be reminded.
>
> GP3....a glimmer of hope shines in the far off distance...the return of a
> legend...or just another reunion tour to CASH IN?
>
>
Quoted text (8 lines)
> Say it with me.... > > LONG LIVE WAREZ! TO HELL WITH PUBLISHERS..... > > If you can find a game online - DOWNLOAD IT - play it and unless are truly > truly satisfied (aka GPL) don't spend money on it. > > OH, no Bluto...don't download that warez software - someone might getQuoted text (10 lines)
> Well, GOOD!...because a few publisher need to be put on the hit list for > releasing poor titles with a lot of hype and no demo hoping to rake in on > the drones that shop by the pretty pictures on the box alone. Oh, or maybe > they go by the game mag review on page 32...followed by a full page AD on > page 35. > > I personally do not download warez anymore because it takes too damn long > (analog line) - however, I do not buy just released titles either (burned > way too much). A game will have to pass the test of time from the online > community before I purchase it. This is often a bonus because the priceQuoted text (8 lines)
> is a good game by the way the online community still talks about it. > > Well, I for one am sick and tired of the game publishers pushing us > around...then they have the NERVE to complain about all the money they are > loosing to piracy? Well, first off - tell me how you accurately calculate > how much money was lost to pirated software? IF they know who is buying it > and how much they are spending on it then why don't they stop them? OR are > they counting everyone the downloads a title like F1-2000? I don't seeQuoted text (8 lines)
> as being accurate either because many people will download something just > because it is there and they can - when in fact, if not given a piracy > option, those same people would have easily done without a title and not > even thought about paying for it. > > I for one would like to see these big names REALLY take a hit (where it > counts - the WALLET) be it from WAREZ or just plain common sense shopping > (which in all likelihood will never happen because of the millions ofQuoted text (7 lines)
> > -F1 2000 is EASports hyped bullshit built for EVERYMAN...COME ON - EA does > not make a titles for the niches of the world. > > -PAPYRUS - what have you done for me lately? sold me two awful rehashed > version of N2 with better graphics? Then sell an add on pack but only > include it in a boxed set of all three for the same price I paid for oneMy point was, they sold more copies of Deer Hunter than Q2, but more people
play Q2 than Deer Hunter.
Actually, back before Q3 and UT came out, you could probably go online and
count how many people were playing Q2 at one time and that was probably more
than the number of copies that Deer Hunter even sold. That is bad
considering Q2 sold even less.
I think at one time I read a article where they estimated that over 80% of
the Q2 copies out there were pirated.
Now how can people say that pirating does not hurt the game market? Q2 was
a great game, they deserved the money for the sales and if that many people
are playing it then it must have been good enough to buy. So why didn't
they?
Andre Warringa <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Well,
> >not people that I would put into the pirating group.
> >
>
Quoted text (20 lines)
> Indeed, only people with brains play Deer Hunter... ;) > I read that Deer hunter was sold in supermarkets etc for a low price. > Here in holland we have the same thing, a company called Davilex made > the worst racing game ever, A2 racer, and went immediately to the > number one position in the software charts. They also were selling > this game in every thinkable store for a low price. > Wifes see the game while they buy their groceries, and think 'hey > look, it's one of those computer thingies, and this is much cheeper > than the games my husband allways buys! He'll love this!' > > Andre > > On Mon, 20 Mar 2000 12:11:47 GMT, "Cliff Roman" <[email hidden]> > wrote: > > <snip> > > > Because of the people that were pirating the game. What > >kind of people play Quake 2? Kids, teenagers mostly, the biggest group > >involved in pirating software. What kind of people play Deer Hunter?
ymenard wrote:
>
> "L_NiN0" <[email hidden]> wrote
> > LONG LIVE INDEPENDENT FILM
>
> You mean... independant film like.. Star Wars?
Oh come on....who'd pay for Titanic anyway ? I mean, we all know how it
end, don't we ?
Now, Star Wars was pretty good actually....although I thought Vader was
Chewie's father...
Yeah...think about it...if someone would cover his head with an ugly
helmet...I mean, what the heck would he look like underneath ?
hmmm....
Bart
"Bart-W. van Lith" <[email hidden]> wrote
> Oh come on....who'd pay for Titanic anyway ?
Paramount and a little from 20th Century fox. Episode 1 was fully paid by
Lucas itself (the whole 125million !!<g>), so it's an independant film
without any control at all by Hollywood. Which is why is was brown-nosed a
little at the Oscar (probably diserved 2-3 more nomination such as Makeup,
Art Direction and Costume Design). And probably for Original score, and I
could debate on that alot since I personally feel Rachel Portman only had
her nomination because JW had Angela's Ashes in the 5nominees.
> I mean, we all know how it
> end, don't we ?
Yep, "Titanic II: The Search for More Money" LOL ok sorry... got out of the
subject here (SpaceBalls reference) ;)
> Now, Star Wars was pretty good actually....although I thought Vader was
> Chewie's father...
"No Chewie... _I_ am your father" - Darth Vader
"Grrrooooowwwwlll!" - Chewbacca
> Yeah...think about it...if someone would cover his head with an ugly
> helmet...I mean, what the heck would he look like underneath ?
I suggest you watch the last 15minutes of "Return of the Jedi" ;-)
--
-- Fran�ois M�nard <ymenard>
-- May the Downforce be with you...
-- http://www.WeRace.net
-- People think it must be fun to be a super genius, but they don't realise
how hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world.
DARTH MAUL RULES!!!!!
"ymenard" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:s7BB4.90314$[email hidden]...
> "Bart-W. van Lith" <[email hidden]> wrote
> > Oh come on....who'd pay for Titanic anyway ?
>
> Paramount and a little from 20th Century fox. Episode 1 was fully paid by
> Lucas itself (the whole 125million !!<g>), so it's an independant film
> without any control at all by Hollywood. Which is why is was brown-noseda
the
realise
> how hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world.
>
>
>
>
Quoted text (10 lines)
> little at the Oscar (probably diserved 2-3 more nomination such as Makeup, > Art Direction and Costume Design). And probably for Original score, and I > could debate on that alot since I personally feel Rachel Portman only had > her nomination because JW had Angela's Ashes in the 5nominees. > > > > I mean, we all know how it > > end, don't we ? > > Yep, "Titanic II: The Search for More Money" LOL ok sorry... got out ofQuoted text (26 lines)
> subject here (SpaceBalls reference) ;) > > > > > Now, Star Wars was pretty good actually....although I thought Vader was > > Chewie's father... > > "No Chewie... _I_ am your father" - Darth Vader > > "Grrrooooowwwwlll!" - Chewbacca > > > > Yeah...think about it...if someone would cover his head with an ugly > > helmet...I mean, what the heck would he look like underneath ? > > I suggest you watch the last 15minutes of "Return of the Jedi" ;-) > > > > > > -- > -- Fran�ois M�nard <ymenard> > -- May the Downforce be with you... > -- http://www.WeRace.net > -- People think it must be fun to be a super genius, but they don't"Cliff Roman" <[email hidden]> writes:
I have heard the same being said about GPL. "People who knew what they
were talking about said that GPL sold 30.000 copies, yet 250.000 race
it on the internet each weekend."
What I would like to know is where all those people are.
--
[asbjxrn] [lLd25z*%ds1-100/sLlSdI%ds2-O/sSl1l2*PlL0<l]sl
21172310731916131628237117 3237142523312SSSLllxq
Quoted text (7 lines)
> My point was, they sold more copies of Deer Hunter than Q2, but more people > play Q2 than Deer Hunter. > > Actually, back before Q3 and UT came out, you could probably go online and > count how many people were playing Q2 at one time and that was probably more > than the number of copies that Deer Hunter even sold. That is bad > considering Q2 sold even less.In article <[email hidden]>, [email hidden]
(Asbj�rn Bj�rnstad) writes:
>I have heard the same being said about GPL. "People who knew what they
>were talking about said that GPL sold 30.000 copies, yet 250.000 race
>it on the internet each weekend."
>
>What I would like to know is where all those people are.
250,000 each weekend? Yeah, I'd like to know where they are, too. I think the
most I've seen on VROC is about 100...
Eldred
--
Tiger Stadium R.I.P. 1912-1999
Own Grand Prix Legends? Goto http://gpl.gamestats.com/vroc
Never argue with an idiot. He brings you down to his level, then beats you
with experience...
Remove SPAM-OFF to reply.
In article <fSdB4.602$[email hidden]>, "Tony Rickard"
<[email hidden]> writes:
Wait - are you saying you WANT people to keep buying the games (which may or
may not be worth it) sight unseen? That would just turn more people away from
being legit if they get burned by a bad title...
Eldred
--
Tiger Stadium R.I.P. 1912-1999
Own Grand Prix Legends? Goto http://gpl.gamestats.com/vroc
Never argue with an idiot. He brings you down to his level, then beats you
with experience...
Remove SPAM-OFF to reply.
Quoted text (19 lines)
>> I for one would like to see these big names REALLY take a hit (where it >> counts - the WALLET) be it from WAREZ or just plain common sense shopping >> (which in all likelihood will never happen because of the millions of >pretty >> picture drones). LET THE F.... >> >Yeh great idea - publishers see profits drop - rationalise their product >range - no more niche products. > >Now on the other hand if the publishers flourish and millions more buy boxes >with pretty pictures then maybe they can withstand the luxury of letting >developers produce some flagship products which make relatively little money >but offer some prestige. > >What future for Papyrus if Sierra feel the squeeze? > >Tony > >That is what demos and reviews are for.
You will always have available to you at least one of those if not both.
You can also talk to others who have bought the game.
There is no reason that you need to buy a game the day it comes out unless
you are confident that you will want it. Wait for reviews and/or a demo.
Usually there will be tons of sites doing revies on the games. Read their
other reviews on games that you know you liked or disliked and see how they
reviewed them. You can tell by that if they think along the same lines as
you do and you will be able to find a site that you can trust.
EldredP <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
> In article <fSdB4.602$[email hidden]>, "Tony Rickard"
> <[email hidden]> writes:
>
> >> I for one would like to see these big names REALLY take a hit (where it
> >> counts - the WALLET) be it from WAREZ or just plain common senseshopping
boxes
> >with pretty pictures then maybe they can withstand the luxury of letting
> >developers produce some flagship products which make relatively littlemoney
or
> may not be worth it) sight unseen? That would just turn more people awayfrom
you
> with experience...
> Remove SPAM-OFF to reply.
Quoted text (8 lines)
> >> (which in all likelihood will never happen because of the millions of > >pretty > >> picture drones). LET THE F.... > >> > >Yeh great idea - publishers see profits drop - rationalise their product > >range - no more niche products. > > > >Now on the other hand if the publishers flourish and millions more buyQuoted text (9 lines)
> >but offer some prestige. > > > >What future for Papyrus if Sierra feel the squeeze? > > > >Tony > > > > > > Wait - are you saying you WANT people to keep buying the games (which mayQuoted text (8 lines)
> being legit if they get burned by a bad title... > > Eldred > -- > Tiger Stadium R.I.P. 1912-1999 > Own Grand Prix Legends? Goto http://gpl.gamestats.com/vroc > > Never argue with an idiot. He brings you down to his level, then beatsIn article <CMVE4.121$%[email hidden]>, "Cliff Roman"
<[email hidden]> writes:
Don't get me wrong, I'm not condoning warez. I have no intention of
downloading any. But I can understand people wanting to try the game first.
There still isn't a demo yet, right? And, demos don't always give you correct
info(see:Toca2). As far as listening to other peoples' opinion, look at the
current arguments. Some people love F1 2000 with a passion, some hate it with
that same passion... Some liked GPL but hated SCGT. I like them both, so I
couldn't have used their opinion on SCGT.
I've bought games simply on the reputation of the company. SSI wargames and
Papy racing sims come to mind. I bought GPL the first time I saw it in the
store. Although my system met the minimum requirements, I couldn't run it well
enough to enjoy it. It sat on my shelf for a couple of months until I could
afford to upgrade my system.
If you can find a store that offers return with no questions, then I'd go along
with that. Someone mentioned that there's an EB in a mall near me, so I'll try
that.
Eldred
--
Tiger Stadium R.I.P. 1912-1999
Own Grand Prix Legends? Goto http://gpl.gamestats.com/vroc
Never argue with an idiot. He brings you down to his level, then beats you
with experience...
Remove SPAM-OFF to reply.


































