Race Sim Central
Rec.Autos.Simulators Archive

F1 2000 Graphics

7 posts by 5 people · 25 Mar 2000 - 25 Mar 2000 17:48 UTC

Ivan 25 Mar 2000#284206
Just picked up F1 2000 today and I must say I'm VERY dissapointed :( When the game actually started I thought, oops this must be in software mode, better change the 3d device setup. So I did. No difference. It was already in d3d :( Then I changed to software mode to double check. That was of course even worse. I haven't heard anyone else mention the POOR graphics (IMHO). I was expecting something close to SCGT, if not better. Nope. The first track I played, Hockenheim, looked just awful. Then I tried Monaco. Better. But still some of the buildings looked horrible. The screenshots look MUCH better (looks like a different game to me). The trees and many of the buildings look especially poor. Its like I'm playing @640*480 (I'm actually playing @ 1024*768) It's actually hard to make out the cars in front of you at a distance. The tracksides need to be anti-aliased in a big way. Its very distracting. The screenshots show the cars with 3d wheels. They are not. (that I have seen). Am I missing something? I've got all the details maxed out and options turned on. The frame rates are poor too even on my P3 600E @ 702 +V3. (even after turning down the options) I was of course warned about this. I'm also getting kicked to the desktop after hitting anything when FF is turned on (Act Force RS). I see alot of others are having the same problem. I agree the sound needs some work. I'm sure it wont be long before we see 3rd party support for that. I WILL still play this game because of course graphics are not everything. It's just not what I had expected after seeing all the screenshots and lack of complaints about the graphics. Oh well sorry for the rant......at least I also picked up Thief2 tonight :) Ivan Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy.
rrevved 25 Mar 2000#284257
On Fri, 24 Mar 2000 21:48:39 -0800, Falcon26 <[email hidden]> wrote: >I agree with you 100% , you couldn't have said it any better > >falcon26 > But, falcon26, you are attempting to run F1-2000 on Win2000 which is not supported. I am surprised it ran at all. >Ivan wrote: > >> Just picked up F1 2000 today and I must say I'm VERY dissapointed :( >> -- * rrev at mindspring dot com *
rrevved 25 Mar 2000#284280
On Sat, 25 Mar 2000 07:18:54 -0000, "Iain Mackenzie" <[email hidden]> wrote: >Why do you insist on going on about W2K? I've said it several times >previously to you - IT WORKS FINE IN W2K! Why are you surprised it works? Because it specifically excludes Win2K support, on the bottom of the box?
Quoted text (8 lines)>Almost everything else does too - F1RS, MGPRS2, GPL, N3, etc. etc. >Iain > >> But, falcon26, you are attempting to run F1-2000 on Win2000 >> which is not supported. I am surprised it ran at all. >> >> * rrev at mindspring dot com * >
-- * rrev at mindspring dot com *
Falcon26 25 Mar 2000 05:48 UTC#284382
I agree with you 100% , you couldn't have said it any better falcon26 Ivan wrote:
Quoted text (41 lines)> Just picked up F1 2000 today and I must say I'm VERY dissapointed :( > > When the game actually started I thought, oops this must be in software > mode, better change the 3d device setup. So I did. No difference. It > was already in d3d :( Then I changed to software mode to double check. > That was of course even worse. > > I haven't heard anyone else mention the POOR graphics (IMHO). I was > expecting something close to SCGT, if not better. Nope. The first track > I played, Hockenheim, looked just awful. Then I tried Monaco. Better. > But still some of the buildings looked horrible. > > The screenshots look MUCH better (looks like a different game to me). > The trees and many of the buildings look especially poor. Its like I'm > playing @640*480 (I'm actually playing @ 1024*768) It's actually hard > to make out the cars in front of you at a distance. The tracksides need > to be anti-aliased in a big way. Its very distracting. > > The screenshots show the cars with 3d wheels. They are not. (that I > have seen). Am I missing something? I've got all the details maxed out > and options turned on. > > The frame rates are poor too even on my P3 600E @ 702 +V3. (even after > turning down the options) I was of course warned about this. > > I'm also getting kicked to the desktop after hitting anything when FF > is turned on (Act Force RS). I see alot of others are having the same > problem. I agree the sound needs some work. I'm sure it wont be long > before we see 3rd party support for that. > > I WILL still play this game because of course graphics are not > everything. It's just not what I had expected after seeing all the > screenshots and lack of complaints about the graphics. > > Oh well sorry for the rant......at least I also picked up Thief2 > tonight :) > > Ivan > > Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ > Before you buy.
Iain Mackenzie 25 Mar 2000 07:18 UTC#284268
Why do you insist on going on about W2K? I've said it several times previously to you - IT WORKS FINE IN W2K! Why are you surprised it works? Almost everything else does too - F1RS, MGPRS2, GPL, N3, etc. etc. Iain > But, falcon26, you are attempting to run F1-2000 on Win2000 > which is not supported. I am surprised it ran at all. > > * rrev at mindspring dot com *
Mrv 25 Mar 2000 11:51 UTC#284167
So what if it excludes Win2k support. He is right those other sims do work with Win2k. Don't believe everything you read!!!. rrevved wrote:
Quoted text (18 lines)> On Sat, 25 Mar 2000 07:18:54 -0000, "Iain Mackenzie" <[email hidden]> wrote: > > >Why do you insist on going on about W2K? I've said it several times > >previously to you - IT WORKS FINE IN W2K! Why are you surprised it works? > > Because it specifically excludes Win2K support, on the bottom of the box? > > >Almost everything else does too - F1RS, MGPRS2, GPL, N3, etc. etc. > >Iain > > > >> But, falcon26, you are attempting to run F1-2000 on Win2000 > >> which is not supported. I am surprised it ran at all. > >> > >> * rrev at mindspring dot com * > > > > -- > * rrev at mindspring dot com *
Iain Mackenzie 25 Mar 2000 17:48 UTC#283974
As I said in an earlier thread, it says that on the box probably because the techie support don't know much about it at the moment. Iain rrevved <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]... > On Sat, 25 Mar 2000 07:18:54 -0000, "Iain Mackenzie"<[email hidden]> wrote: > > >Why do you insist on going on about W2K? I've said it several times > >previously to you - IT WORKS FINE IN W2K! Why are you surprised itworks?
Quoted text (14 lines)> > Because it specifically excludes Win2K support, on the bottom of the box? > > >Almost everything else does too - F1RS, MGPRS2, GPL, N3, etc. etc. > >Iain > > > >> But, falcon26, you are attempting to run F1-2000 on Win2000 > >> which is not supported. I am surprised it ran at all. > >> > >> * rrev at mindspring dot com * > > > > -- > * rrev at mindspring dot com *

Sponsors

Affiliate Links

Sim Gaming Expo MOZA Racing Sim-Lab Fanatec TrakRacer Asetek Internet Privacy From NordVPN Dreamhost Capital One Credit Card Application Fanatical CDKeys Amazon Amazon UK Project Motor Racing iRacing Get your racing gloves, boots and more from Demon Tweeks. Enlist at Roberts Space Industries, developers of Star Citizen and Squadron 42


Back from the ashes since July, 2019. First created in 2001 with the merger of Legends Central (founded 1999) and simracing.dk.

A site by a sort of sim racer, for sim racers, about racing sims. News and information on both modern and historic sim racing software titles.

All products and licenses property of their respective owners.


Facebook Threads Bluesky Twitter Mastodon Instagram YouTube Tiktok Twitch Reddit Google News Apple News Subscribe via WordPress Flipboard eBay

Race Sim Central © 1999-2026 | Some links pay RSC a commission. Advertising does not equal endorsement.Cookie Policy