Race Sim Central
Rec.Autos.Simulators Archive

Re: Dave's GPL Converter AI

10 posts by 7 people · 05 Apr 2000 - 07 Apr 2000 07:33 UTC

I Think at sometracks they are good like sears point where all the cars go out to practice and qualify, instead of 2-4 cars. Well im clapping my hands for his converter. Good job Dave
Quoted text (16 lines)>Yes, the AI are good. Some tracks are better than others, I like Milwaukee >best, and Indy least (at Indy they sometimes appear drunk, speeding up and >slowing down at strange times). Maybe Dave will do a patch just to tweak >them that little bit more? Its a great converter though. One other thing, >its nice to drive GPL cars in full sunshine for a change! > >Steve > > > >Marc Collins wrote in message ... >>Am I correct to assume that the converter is primarily for hot lapping and >>online racing? There aren't credible AI at the converted tracks, too, are >>there? >> >>Marc.
Yes, the AI are good. Some tracks are better than others, I like Milwaukee best, and Indy least (at Indy they sometimes appear drunk, speeding up and slowing down at strange times). Maybe Dave will do a patch just to tweak them that little bit more? Its a great converter though. One other thing, its nice to drive GPL cars in full sunshine for a change! Steve Marc Collins wrote in message ...
Quoted text (8 lines)>Am I correct to assume that the converter is primarily for hot lapping and >online racing? There aren't credible AI at the converted tracks, too, are >there? > >Marc. > >-- >***************************************************************************
* >Marc Collins >[email hidden] > >Computers will never equal humans until they make mistakes and >blame them on other computers. >**************************************************************************** > > >
Marc Collins 05 Apr 2000 00:15 UTC#280878
Am I correct to assume that the converter is primarily for hot lapping and online racing? There aren't credible AI at the converted tracks, too, are there? Marc. -- **************************************************************************** Marc Collins [email hidden] Computers will never equal humans until they make mistakes and blame them on other computers. ****************************************************************************
Marc Collins 05 Apr 2000 13:10 UTC#280828
Really? So someone (Dave?!?!?) took the time to program competitive AI at all or most of the tracks as well as doing all the graphics conversions? Wow...if this is true I am ordering my converter today!! Racing good AI at a decent (N3) Indy would be worth the price of the converter alone! Marc. "Bruce Kennewell" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted text (12 lines)> Yes, they are not without a reasonably high level of intelligence, glad to > say. > > -- > Regards, > Bruce Kennewell, > Canberra, Australia. > --------------------------- > > Marc Collins <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:KAvG4.45059$[email hidden]... > > Am I correct to assume that the converter is primarily for hot lapping
and > > online racing? There aren't credible AI at the converted tracks, too,are
Quoted text (7 lines)> > there? > > > > Marc. > > > > -- > > >
****************************************************************************
Quoted text (7 lines)> > Marc Collins > > [email hidden] > > > > Computers will never equal humans until they make mistakes and > > blame them on other computers. > > >
**************************************************************************** > > > > > > > >
Kevin Gavitt 05 Apr 2000 17:12 UTC#280593
"Marc Collins" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:PWGG4.45520$[email hidden]... > Really? So someone (Dave?!?!?) took the time to program competitive AI at > all or most of the tracks as well as doing all the graphics conversions? > Wow...if this is true I am ordering my converter today!! Racing good AIat > a decent (N3) Indy would be worth the price of the converter alone! >I guess it depends on what you mean by competitive. You can certainly drive with them at Indy. They don't drive "dumb." On the other hand, I won a novice race against the AI first time out of the box. Pole, fastest lap, and the win. The whole sheebang. It did take a last lap, turn three pass to do it, (Hill beat me at the start and built up a bit of a lead on lap one), but they arn't what you could call tough. (Note, watch T3, the AI overslow there and you're likely to boot one up the bum.) Must be the speed of Indy though, on the other ovals beating them is much tougher. Love those short tracks! They are a bit "dumber" on the "true" ovals though. Watch their lines carefully if you don't want to be collected by them.
Tracey A Miller 05 Apr 2000 19:02 UTC#280631
I never even saw the AI after the starting grid, won a 7 lap race by 3.5 seconds. Maybe in a longer race you would at least get to over take some lappers. "Kevin Gavitt" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:8cfs6f$fl0$[email hidden]... > > "Marc Collins" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:PWGG4.45520$[email hidden]... > > Really? So someone (Dave?!?!?) took the time to program competitive AIat > > all or most of the tracks as well as doing all the graphics conversions? > > Wow...if this is true I am ordering my converter today!! Racing good AI > at > > a decent (N3) Indy would be worth the price of the converter alone! > > > I guess it depends on what you mean by competitive. You can certainlydrive > with them at Indy. They don't drive "dumb." > > On the other hand, I won a novice race against the AI first time out ofthe > box. Pole, fastest lap, and the win. The whole sheebang. > > It did take a last lap, turn three pass to do it, (Hill beat me at thestart > and built up a bit of a lead on lap one), but they arn't what you couldcall > tough. (Note, watch T3, the AI overslow there and you're likely to bootone > up the bum.) > > Must be the speed of Indy though, on the other ovals beating them is much > tougher. Love those short tracks! They are a bit "dumber" on the "true" > ovals though. Watch their lines carefully if you don't want to becollected > by them. > >
Bruce Kennewell 05 Apr 2000 19:04 UTC#280760
Yes, they are not without a reasonably high level of intelligence, glad to say. -- Regards, Bruce Kennewell, Canberra, Australia. --------------------------- Marc Collins <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:KAvG4.45059$[email hidden]... > Am I correct to assume that the converter is primarily for hot lapping and > online racing? There aren't credible AI at the converted tracks, too, are > there? > > Marc. > > -- > **************************************************************************** > Marc Collins > [email hidden] > > Computers will never equal humans until they make mistakes and > blame them on other computers. > **************************************************************************** > > >
Kevin Gavitt 06 Apr 2000 01:26 UTC#280522
"Stephen Barnett" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:8cfoj0$vf$[email hidden]...
Quoted text (8 lines)> Yes, the AI are good. Some tracks are better than others, I like Milwaukee > best, and Indy least (at Indy they sometimes appear drunk, speeding up and > slowing down at strange times). Maybe Dave will do a patch just to tweak > them that little bit more? Its a great converter though. One other thing, > its nice to drive GPL cars in full sunshine for a change! > > Steve >
Fortunately for me the Milwaukee Mile is my favorite Oval. I almost kept CPR just to drive there. If the AI had been worth a damn I probably would have. Now it's irrelavant, ( and how a relavant got into my pajamas I'll never know), an Eagle flies in Wisconson!
I have to make up for their abstinence in that instance Gary. Its a hard job, but somebody has to do it. Steve Gary Stephenson wrote in message <[email hidden]>... >Stephen Barnett wrote: >> >> Yes, the AI are good. Some tracks are better than others, I likeMilwaukee >> best, and Indy least (at Indy they sometimes appear drunk, speeding upand
Quoted text (9 lines)>> slowing down at strange times). > >Shouldn't the Milwaukee AI guys be driving drunk? We're talking about >beer city...Milwaukee Brewers baseball, home of Miller Brewing...Old >Milwaukee the beer that made Milwaukee famous! > >Just wondering, > >Gary
Gary Stephenson 07 Apr 2000 07:33 UTC#280071
Stephen Barnett wrote: > > Yes, the AI are good. Some tracks are better than others, I like Milwaukee > best, and Indy least (at Indy they sometimes appear drunk, speeding up and > slowing down at strange times). Shouldn't the Milwaukee AI guys be driving drunk? We're talking about beer city...Milwaukee Brewers baseball, home of Miller Brewing...Old Milwaukee the beer that made Milwaukee famous! Just wondering, Gary

Sponsors

Affiliate Links

Sim Gaming Expo MOZA Racing Sim-Lab Fanatec TrakRacer Asetek Internet Privacy From NordVPN Dreamhost Capital One Credit Card Application Fanatical CDKeys Amazon Amazon UK Project Motor Racing iRacing Get your racing gloves, boots and more from Demon Tweeks. Enlist at Roberts Space Industries, developers of Star Citizen and Squadron 42


Back from the ashes since July, 2019. First created in 2001 with the merger of Legends Central (founded 1999) and simracing.dk.

A site by a sort of sim racer, for sim racers, about racing sims. News and information on both modern and historic sim racing software titles.

All products and licenses property of their respective owners.


Facebook Threads Bluesky Twitter Mastodon Instagram YouTube Tiktok Twitch Reddit Google News Apple News Subscribe via WordPress Flipboard eBay

Race Sim Central © 1999-2026 | Some links pay RSC a commission. Advertising does not equal endorsement.Cookie Policy