Race Sim Central
Rec.Autos.Simulators Archive

EA Nascar SimRacing...

19 posts by 12 people · 16 Dec 2004 05:33 UTC - 16 Jan 2005 03:11 UTC

Will EA's NASCAR SimRacing be good, and boycotting EA

A poster hoped EA's hiring of former Papyrus staff would make NASCAR SimRacing a success; David G Fisher said it used an ISI engine with ISI and ex-Papyrus staff. Several vowed never to buy EA games over exclusive licences and labour practices, while JP and J. Todd Wasson argued the leagues share the blame and boycotts are futile.

industry/businessrumour/speculationNASCAR SimRacing

Automated summary.

Shock 16 Dec 2004 05:33 UTC#28007
Ok, correct me if I am wrong, but I think EA has made a good decision by hiring former Papyrus employees. Also, it appears that possibly they are taking already written code and putting a EA face on a Papyrus engine. Here's a link: http://www.easports.com/games/nascarsimracing/home.jsp Does anybody have any inside information on this? What is going on? Can we look to EA to keep the Papyrus tradition alive? -- Shock
I think they are using a version of the ISI game engine, some ISI employees, along with some former Papyrus employees. -- David G Fisher "Shock" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:Qd9wd.9845$[email hidden]... > Ok, correct me if I am wrong, but I think EA has made a good decision by > hiring former Papyrus employees. Also, it appears that possibly they > are taking already written code and putting a EA face on a Papyrus > engine. Here's a link: > > http://www.easports.com/games/nascarsimracing/home.jsp > > Does anybody have any inside information on this? What is going on? > Can we look to EA to keep the Papyrus tradition alive? > > -- > Shock
JP 16 Dec 2004 13:04 UTC↳ reply to Shock#28012
"Shock" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:Qd9wd.9845$[email hidden]...
Quoted text (12 lines)> Ok, correct me if I am wrong, but I think EA has made a good decision by > hiring former Papyrus employees. Also, it appears that possibly they > are taking already written code and putting a EA face on a Papyrus > engine. Here's a link: > > http://www.easports.com/games/nascarsimracing/home.jsp > > Does anybody have any inside information on this? What is going on? > Can we look to EA to keep the Papyrus tradition alive? > > -- > Shock
Here's hoping a new tradition is starting. Time for a change.
Buck411 16 Dec 2004 13:04 UTC↳ reply to Shock#28013
I refuse to purchase an EA game due to their business practices with exclusive licenses. This includes Nascar SimRacing. "Shock" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:Qd9wd.9845$[email hidden]...
Quoted text (12 lines)> Ok, correct me if I am wrong, but I think EA has made a good decision by > hiring former Papyrus employees. Also, it appears that possibly they are > taking already written code and putting a EA face on a Papyrus engine. > Here's a link: > > http://www.easports.com/games/nascarsimracing/home.jsp > > Does anybody have any inside information on this? What is going on? Can > we look to EA to keep the Papyrus tradition alive? > > -- > Shock
Mitch_A 16 Dec 2004 17:06 UTC↳ reply to JP#28022
Amen brotha... "JP" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:2Kfwd.4> > Here's hoping a new tradition is starting. Time for a change. > > >
Mitch_A 16 Dec 2004 17:06 UTC#532246
Amen brotha... > Here's hoping a new tradition is starting. Time for a change.
Dick 16 Dec 2004 18:20 UTC↳ reply to Shock#28029
EA can keep that game I don't care who is on the team or how good it is. I'm not supporting that company ever again. Excusive right everyehere. Classaction lawsuits for poor treatment of it's workers. I hope I'm still alive they day the company folds and the current CEO dies so I can send my regards :) Just one guys choice. "Shock" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:Qd9wd.9845$[email hidden]...
Quoted text (12 lines)> Ok, correct me if I am wrong, but I think EA has made a good decision by > hiring former Papyrus employees. Also, it appears that possibly they are > taking already written code and putting a EA face on a Papyrus engine. > Here's a link: > > http://www.easports.com/games/nascarsimracing/home.jsp > > Does anybody have any inside information on this? What is going on? Can > we look to EA to keep the Papyrus tradition alive? > > -- > Shock
Bob Gee 17 Dec 2004 04:17 UTC↳ reply to Buck411#28042
This is kinda funny. Takes two to make an exclusive license agreement, and just who do you think was really in the driver's seat on a deal like this? Also I wonder just how upset EA's stockholders are. Trading at 44 in October, close to 60 now. "Buck411" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:UJfwd.148628$[email hidden]... :I refuse to purchase an EA game due to their business practices with : exclusive licenses. This includes Nascar SimRacing. : : : "Shock" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:Qd9wd.9845$[email hidden]... : > Ok, correct me if I am wrong, but I think EA has made a good decision by : > hiring former Papyrus employees. Also, it appears that possibly they are : > taking already written code and putting a EA face on a Papyrus engine. : > Here's a link: : > : > http://www.easports.com/games/nascarsimracing/home.jsp : > : > Does anybody have any inside information on this? What is going on? Can : > we look to EA to keep the Papyrus tradition alive? : > : > -- : > Shock : :
JP 17 Dec 2004 04:29 UTC↳ reply to Bob Gee#27943
Lol, no kidding. Blaming EA (or anyone for that matter) is hilarious. "Bob Gee" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]... > This is kinda funny. Takes two to make an exclusive license agreement,and
Quoted text (12 lines)> just who do you think was really in the driver's seat on a deal like this? > Also I wonder just how upset EA's stockholders are. Trading at 44 in > October, close to 60 now. > > > "Buck411" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:UJfwd.148628$[email hidden]... > :I refuse to purchase an EA game due to their business practices with > : exclusive licenses. This includes Nascar SimRacing. > : > : > : "Shock" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:Qd9wd.9845$[email hidden]... > : > Ok, correct me if I am wrong, but I think EA has made a good decisionby
Quoted text (8 lines)> : > hiring former Papyrus employees. Also, it appears that possibly they > are > : > taking already written code and putting a EA face on a Papyrus engine. > : > Here's a link: > : > > : > http://www.easports.com/games/nascarsimracing/home.jsp > : > > : > Does anybody have any inside information on this? What is going on?
Can
Quoted text (8 lines)> : > we look to EA to keep the Papyrus tradition alive? > : > > : > -- > : > Shock > : > : > >
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 00:36:34 -0500, David G Fisher wrote: > I think they are using a version of the ISI game engine, some ISI employees, > along with some former Papyrus employees. > I can see the barfight breaking out at the xmas party between the two camps ;-) uwe -- GPG Fingerprint: 2E 13 20 22 9A 3F 63 7F 67 6F E9 B1 A8 36 A4 61
Kyle Roberts 17 Dec 2004 22:32 UTC↳ reply to JP#27967
"JP" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:ihtwd.39$[email hidden]...
Quoted text (9 lines)> Lol, no kidding. Blaming EA (or anyone for that matter) is hilarious. > > > > "Bob Gee" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:[email hidden]... > > This is kinda funny. Takes two to make an exclusive license agreement, > and > > just who do you think was really in the driver's seat on a deal like
this? > > Also I wonder just how upset EA's stockholders are. Trading at 44 in > > October, close to 60 now. Exclusive licensing agreements suck for the consumer. Before, we had several choices and competition in Nascar sims and games and now we have one console game and one PC sim to choose from. How is that better? I blame Nascar and the NFL for going for the cash grab instead of thinking of the people that their businesses are built on. The fans. EA has been begging for these exclusive deals for years. They know they have the deep pockets to afford them and what better way to beat your competition than to just take them out of the game. I love top posting.
Quoted text (24 lines)>SimRacing... >From: "Kyle Roberts" [email hidden] >Date: 12/17/2004 4:32 P.M. Central Standard Time >Message-id: <p8Jwd.122$[email hidden]> > > >"JP" <[email hidden]> wrote in message >news:ihtwd.39$[email hidden]... >> Lol, no kidding. Blaming EA (or anyone for that matter) is hilarious. >> >> >> >> "Bob Gee" <[email hidden]> wrote in message >> news:[email hidden]... >> > This is kinda funny. Takes two to make an exclusive license agreement, >> and >> > just who do you think was really in the driver's seat on a deal like >this? >> > Also I wonder just how upset EA's stockholders are. Trading at 44 in >> > October, close to 60 now. > >Exclusive licensing agreements suck for the consumer. Before, we had several >choices and competition in Nascar sims and games and now we have one console >game and one PC sim to choose from.
Booohooo..... Probably not true, but if is, then boohoooooo anyway. How is that better? I blame Nascar and >the NFL for going for the cash grab instead of thinking of the people that >their businesses are built on. The fans. EA has been begging for these >exclusive deals for years. You won't blow a freaking measily $50-$70 on a damn game? Better to spend time this way?? If you'll be sorely missed as a customer I'm sure someone will let you know ASAP. They know they have the deep pockets to afford >them and what better way to beat your competition than to just take them out >of the game. > Politics of sim racing and development... Gotta be kidding me...? >I love top posting. Nobody can stop you :-) Todd Wasson Racing Software http://PerformanceSimulations.com http://performancesimulations.com/scnshot4.htm
JP 20 Dec 2004 22:06 UTC↳ reply to Kyle Roberts#27796
"Kyle Roberts" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:p8Jwd.122$[email hidden]... > > "JP" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:ihtwd.39$[email hidden]... > > Lol, no kidding. Blaming EA (or anyone for that matter) ishilarious. > > > > > > > > "Bob Gee" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > > news:[email hidden]... > > > This is kinda funny. Takes two to make an exclusive licenseagreement,
Quoted text (7 lines)> > and > > > just who do you think was really in the driver's seat on a deal like > this? > > > Also I wonder just how upset EA's stockholders are. Trading at 44 in > > > October, close to 60 now. > > Exclusive licensing agreements suck for the consumer. Before, we had
several > choices and competition in Nascar sims and games and now we have oneconsole > game and one PC sim to choose from. How is that better? I blame Nascar and > the NFL for going for the cash grab instead of thinking of the people that > their businesses are built on. The fans. EA has been begging for these > exclusive deals for years. They know they have the deep pockets to afford > them and what better way to beat your competition than to just take themout > of the game. > > I love top posting. > Glad you're anal about posting methods. Try getting out more. Regarding the rest of your post, if you think any major sports org, especially Nascar, cares about the fans, at least the fans in the sense of you and I, I got a bridge to sell ya. In terms of exclusive licenses, who cares. Let's do a hypothetical (or maybe not) Nascar board meeting regarding licensing for the future.... Suits: Chief, it's again time to decide what pc gaming company should get our license. Chief: Right. Who's the contenders this year. Suits: Same as the last several years; Sierra/Papyrus and EA Sports. Chief: Right. I want input. Suits: Sierra/Papyrus have had a license since 1994. EA Sports since 1998, for the pc. Chief: Right. Opinions ? Suits: While having a license for a shorter time, EA has completely sponsored several of our races each year for the last few years, as well as having contigency sponsorships with many of the teams. Also have hosted hospitality events at the races, as well as having a deal with the TV networks, where the latest EA game is used for demonstrations. They've shown a real desire to work with us, to benefit both parties. Chief: Right. Impressive. What about this Sierra/Papyrus ? What have they done with/for us, besides using our license ? Suit: <silence>................................................................... ......................... I know who I'd want to have my license.
MrB 21 Dec 2004 00:58 UTC↳ reply to JP#27805
JP wrote:
Quoted text (94 lines)> "Kyle Roberts" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:p8Jwd.122$[email hidden]... > >>"JP" <[email hidden]> wrote in message >>news:ihtwd.39$[email hidden]... >> >>> Lol, no kidding. Blaming EA (or anyone for that matter) is > > hilarious. > >>> >>> >>>"Bob Gee" <[email hidden]> wrote in message >>>news:[email hidden]... >>> >>>>This is kinda funny. Takes two to make an exclusive license > > agreement, > >>>and >>> >>>>just who do you think was really in the driver's seat on a deal like >> >>this? >> >>>>Also I wonder just how upset EA's stockholders are. Trading at 44 in >>>>October, close to 60 now. >> >>Exclusive licensing agreements suck for the consumer. Before, we had > > several > >>choices and competition in Nascar sims and games and now we have one > > console > >>game and one PC sim to choose from. How is that better? I blame Nascar and >>the NFL for going for the cash grab instead of thinking of the people that >>their businesses are built on. The fans. EA has been begging for these >>exclusive deals for years. They know they have the deep pockets to afford >>them and what better way to beat your competition than to just take them > > out > >>of the game. >> >>I love top posting. >> > > > Glad you're anal about posting methods. Try getting out more. > > Regarding the rest of your post, if you think any major sports org, > especially Nascar, cares about the fans, at least the fans in the sense of > you and I, I got a bridge to sell ya. > > In terms of exclusive licenses, who cares. > > Let's do a hypothetical (or maybe not) Nascar board meeting regarding > licensing for the future.... > > Suits: Chief, it's again time to decide what pc gaming company should get > our license. > > Chief: Right. Who's the contenders this year. > > Suits: Same as the last several years; Sierra/Papyrus and EA Sports. > > Chief: Right. I want input. > > Suits: Sierra/Papyrus have had a license since 1994. EA Sports since > 1998, for the pc. > > Chief: Right. Opinions ? > > Suits: While having a license for a shorter time, EA has completely > sponsored several of our races each year for the last few years, as well as > having contigency sponsorships with many of the teams. Also have hosted > hospitality events at the races, as well as having a deal with the TV > networks, where the latest EA game is used for demonstrations. > They've shown a real desire to work with us, to benefit both > parties. > > Chief: Right. Impressive. What about this Sierra/Papyrus ? What have > they done with/for us, besides using our license ? > > Suit: > <silence>................................................................... > ......................... > > > I know who I'd want to have my license. > >
LOL!..........Classic......and right on the money! Mr. B
Bob Gee 21 Dec 2004 03:13 UTC↳ reply to JP#27807
"JP" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:92Ixd.97$4%[email hidden]... : : "Kyle Roberts" <[email hidden]> wrote in message : news:p8Jwd.122$[email hidden]... : > : > "JP" <[email hidden]> wrote in message : > news:ihtwd.39$[email hidden]... : > > Lol, no kidding. Blaming EA (or anyone for that matter) is : hilarious. : > > : > > : > > : > > "Bob Gee" <[email hidden]> wrote in message : > > news:[email hidden]... : > > > This is kinda funny. Takes two to make an exclusive license : agreement, : > > and : > > > just who do you think was really in the driver's seat on a deal like : > this? : > > > Also I wonder just how upset EA's stockholders are. Trading at 44 in : > > > October, close to 60 now. : > : > Exclusive licensing agreements suck for the consumer. Before, we had : several : > choices and competition in Nascar sims and games and now we have one : console : > game and one PC sim to choose from. How is that better? I blame Nascar and : > the NFL for going for the cash grab instead of thinking of the people that : > their businesses are built on. The fans. EA has been begging for these : > exclusive deals for years. They know they have the deep pockets to afford : > them and what better way to beat your competition than to just take them : out : > of the game. : > : > I love top posting. : > : : Glad you're anal about posting methods. Try getting out more. : : Regarding the rest of your post, if you think any major sports org, : especially Nascar, cares about the fans, at least the fans in the sense of : you and I, I got a bridge to sell ya. : : In terms of exclusive licenses, who cares. : : Let's do a hypothetical (or maybe not) Nascar board meeting regarding : licensing for the future.... : : Suits: Chief, it's again time to decide what pc gaming company should get : our license. : : Chief: Right. Who's the contenders this year. : : Suits: Same as the last several years; Sierra/Papyrus and EA Sports. : : Chief: Right. I want input. : : Suits: Sierra/Papyrus have had a license since 1994. EA Sports since : 1998, for the pc. : : Chief: Right. Opinions ? : : Suits: While having a license for a shorter time, EA has completely : sponsored several of our races each year for the last few years, as well as : having contigency sponsorships with many of the teams. Also have hosted : hospitality events at the races, as well as having a deal with the TV : networks, where the latest EA game is used for demonstrations. : They've shown a real desire to work with us, to benefit both : parties. : : Chief: Right. Impressive. What about this Sierra/Papyrus ? What have : they done with/for us, besides using our license ? : : Suit: : <silence>................................................................... : ......................... : : : I know who I'd want to have my license. Right on the money, JP, just one additional comment I would add: Chief (aka: Bill France Jr): Who can possibly afford the outrageous fees I'm going to demand? --Bob
JP 21 Dec 2004 03:20 UTC↳ reply to Bob Gee#27808
"Bob Gee" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted text (20 lines)> > "JP" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:92Ixd.97$4%[email hidden]... > : > : "Kyle Roberts" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > : news:p8Jwd.122$[email hidden]... > : > > : > "JP" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > : > news:ihtwd.39$[email hidden]... > : > > Lol, no kidding. Blaming EA (or anyone for that matter) is > : hilarious. > : > > > : > > > : > > > : > > "Bob Gee" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > : > > news:[email hidden]... > : > > > This is kinda funny. Takes two to make an exclusive license > : agreement, > : > > and > : > > > just who do you think was really in the driver's seat on a deal
like
Quoted text (17 lines)> : > this? > : > > > Also I wonder just how upset EA's stockholders are. Trading at 44 > in > : > > > October, close to 60 now. > : > > : > Exclusive licensing agreements suck for the consumer. Before, we had > : several > : > choices and competition in Nascar sims and games and now we have one > : console > : > game and one PC sim to choose from. How is that better? I blame Nascar > and > : > the NFL for going for the cash grab instead of thinking of the people > that > : > their businesses are built on. The fans. EA has been begging for these > : > exclusive deals for years. They know they have the deep pockets to > afford > : > them and what better way to beat your competition than to just take
them
Quoted text (10 lines)> : out > : > of the game. > : > > : > I love top posting. > : > > : > : Glad you're anal about posting methods. Try getting out more. > : > : Regarding the rest of your post, if you think any major sports org, > : especially Nascar, cares about the fans, at least the fans in the sense
of
Quoted text (29 lines)> : you and I, I got a bridge to sell ya. > : > : In terms of exclusive licenses, who cares. > : > : Let's do a hypothetical (or maybe not) Nascar board meeting regarding > : licensing for the future.... > : > : Suits: Chief, it's again time to decide what pc gaming company should > get > : our license. > : > : Chief: Right. Who's the contenders this year. > : > : Suits: Same as the last several years; Sierra/Papyrus and EA Sports. > : > : Chief: Right. I want input. > : > : Suits: Sierra/Papyrus have had a license since 1994. EA Sports since > : 1998, for the pc. > : > : Chief: Right. Opinions ? > : > : Suits: While having a license for a shorter time, EA has completely > : sponsored several of our races each year for the last few years, as well > as > : having contigency sponsorships with many of the teams. Also have hosted > : hospitality events at the races, as well as having a deal with the TV > : networks, where the latest EA game is used for demonstrations. > : They've shown a real desire to work with us, to benefit
both > : parties. > : > : Chief: Right. Impressive. What about this Sierra/Papyrus ? Whathave > : they done with/for us, besides using our license ? > : > : Suit: > : ><silence>...................................................................
Quoted text (11 lines)> : ......................... > : > : > : I know who I'd want to have my license. > > Right on the money, JP, just one additional comment I would add: > > Chief (aka: Bill France Jr): Who can possibly afford the outrageous fees > I'm going to demand? > > --Bob
Yep, very true.
Quoted text (100 lines)>From: "Bob Gee" [email hidden] >Date: 12/20/2004 9:13 P.M. Central Standard Time >Message-id: <[email hidden]> > > >"JP" <[email hidden]> wrote in message >news:92Ixd.97$4%[email hidden]... >: >: "Kyle Roberts" <[email hidden]> wrote in message >: news:p8Jwd.122$[email hidden]... >: > >: > "JP" <[email hidden]> wrote in message >: > news:ihtwd.39$[email hidden]... >: > > Lol, no kidding. Blaming EA (or anyone for that matter) is >: hilarious. >: > > >: > > >: > > >: > > "Bob Gee" <[email hidden]> wrote in message >: > > news:[email hidden]... >: > > > This is kinda funny. Takes two to make an exclusive license >: agreement, >: > > and >: > > > just who do you think was really in the driver's seat on a deal like >: > this? >: > > > Also I wonder just how upset EA's stockholders are. Trading at 44 >in >: > > > October, close to 60 now. >: > >: > Exclusive licensing agreements suck for the consumer. Before, we had >: several >: > choices and competition in Nascar sims and games and now we have one >: console >: > game and one PC sim to choose from. How is that better? I blame Nascar >and >: > the NFL for going for the cash grab instead of thinking of the people >that >: > their businesses are built on. The fans. EA has been begging for these >: > exclusive deals for years. They know they have the deep pockets to >afford >: > them and what better way to beat your competition than to just take them >: out >: > of the game. >: > >: > I love top posting. >: > >: >: Glad you're anal about posting methods. Try getting out more. >: >: Regarding the rest of your post, if you think any major sports org, >: especially Nascar, cares about the fans, at least the fans in the sense of >: you and I, I got a bridge to sell ya. >: >: In terms of exclusive licenses, who cares. >: >: Let's do a hypothetical (or maybe not) Nascar board meeting regarding >: licensing for the future.... >: >: Suits: Chief, it's again time to decide what pc gaming company should >get >: our license. >: >: Chief: Right. Who's the contenders this year. >: >: Suits: Same as the last several years; Sierra/Papyrus and EA Sports. >: >: Chief: Right. I want input. >: >: Suits: Sierra/Papyrus have had a license since 1994. EA Sports since >: 1998, for the pc. >: >: Chief: Right. Opinions ? >: >: Suits: While having a license for a shorter time, EA has completely >: sponsored several of our races each year for the last few years, as well >as >: having contigency sponsorships with many of the teams. Also have hosted >: hospitality events at the races, as well as having a deal with the TV >: networks, where the latest EA game is used for demonstrations. >: They've shown a real desire to work with us, to benefit both >: parties. >: >: Chief: Right. Impressive. What about this Sierra/Papyrus ? What have >: they done with/for us, besides using our license ? >: >: Suit: >: ><silence>................................................................... >: ......................... >: >: >: I know who I'd want to have my license. > >Right on the money, JP, just one additional comment I would add: > >Chief (aka: Bill France Jr): Who can possibly afford the outrageous fees >I'm going to demand? > >--Bob >
And if nobody can... No game :-) Welcome to fantasy car/track land. Todd Wasson Racing Software http://PerformanceSimulations.com http://performancesimulations.com/scnshot4.htm
"Shock" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:Qd9wd.9845$[email hidden]...
Quoted text (13 lines)> Ok, correct me if I am wrong, but I think EA has made a good decision by > hiring former Papyrus employees. Also, it appears that possibly they > are taking already written code and putting a EA face on a Papyrus > engine. Here's a link: > > http://www.easports.com/games/nascarsimracing/home.jsp > > Does anybody have any inside information on this? What is going on? > Can we look to EA to keep the Papyrus tradition alive? > > -- > Shock >
Shock! Wazupppp? ($1 Budweiser) You ol' Joonyer fan....... :)
"JP" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:2Kfwd.4$[email hidden]...
Quoted text (20 lines)> > "Shock" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:Qd9wd.9845$[email hidden]... > > Ok, correct me if I am wrong, but I think EA has made a good decision by > > hiring former Papyrus employees. Also, it appears that possibly they > > are taking already written code and putting a EA face on a Papyrus > > engine. Here's a link: > > > > http://www.easports.com/games/nascarsimracing/home.jsp > > > > Does anybody have any inside information on this? What is going on? > > Can we look to EA to keep the Papyrus tradition alive? > > > > -- > > Shock > > Here's hoping a new tradition is starting. Time for a change. > > > >
Here's hoping they remember they are creating a Sim for Sim People instead of some lame assed console game and don't lock up all but 2 tracks and half the field of cars.... :(

Sponsors

Affiliate Links

Sim Gaming Expo MOZA Racing Sim-Lab Fanatec TrakRacer Asetek Internet Privacy From NordVPN Dreamhost Capital One Credit Card Application Fanatical CDKeys Amazon Amazon UK Project Motor Racing iRacing Get your racing gloves, boots and more from Demon Tweeks. Enlist at Roberts Space Industries, developers of Star Citizen and Squadron 42


Back from the ashes since July, 2019. First created in 2001 with the merger of Legends Central (founded 1999) and simracing.dk.

A site by a sort of sim racer, for sim racers, about racing sims. News and information on both modern and historic sim racing software titles.

All products and licenses property of their respective owners.


Facebook Threads Bluesky Twitter Mastodon Instagram YouTube Tiktok Twitch Reddit Google News Apple News Subscribe via WordPress Flipboard eBay

Race Sim Central © 1999-2026 | Some links pay RSC a commission. Advertising does not equal endorsement.Cookie Policy