The results of cars are very up an down.
Teams like Prost and Arrows can pull good qual results sometimes yet other
times fail miserably (realistic, yes!)
BAR can have good and bad days too.
Jaguar are done well, they can do well enough but don't get the win too
often. Johnny Herbert is a little faster than he ahs been this season
though, that was hard to predict.
The usuals are at the front,
I love how the Jordans and Williams can have races where they are at the
front all weekend yet at the next they're stuck way down:-)
Driving a race in Brazil for example seems to have many DNF's as the cars
either pick up damage or spin out. Where as others such as the Aussie Gp,
apart from the odd tip, there is a much larger finishing rate.
Its not perfect but its very good IMO for a guess
David Mountjoy (Tectonic RW) <[email hidden]> wrote in
message news:FrZJ4.17904$Q5.101743@stones...
> I don't know if this has been asked before (I'm new here), but howrealistic
> are the results in F1 2000? They won't have had many races to guage the
> quality of the cars, so how good have they done it? Have they predictedhw
I don't know if this has been asked before (I'm new here), but how realistic
are the results in F1 2000? They won't have had many races to guage the
quality of the cars, so how good have they done it? Have they predicted hw
disappointing Jaguar would be, and how good BAR is?
Thanks
David
http://www.robotwarsuk.cjb.net
