GP3 at Silverstone?

Could anyone who went to Imola (or Sao Paulo) for the GPs tell me whether GP3 was on show at either? I'm gonna be at Silverstone next weekend and wanna know if it'll be there. David C -- eMail: [email hidden]

yeah, that's why I'm hoping to see it/play it this weekend. Stephen <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]... > I guess you know it was shown at the Melbourne GP > >

I don't know the answer to your question, but if it's there make sure you can slip around the back and have it away with the CD Rom !! ;) Probably the only way any of us will ever get to see a demo of it <G> -- Ian Parker == David Cane <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:E31K4.223$rv6.13973@news1-hme0... > Could anyone who went to Imola (or Sao Paulo) for the GPs tell me whether > GP3 was on show at either? > I'm gonna be at Silverstone next weekend and wanna know if it'll be there. > > David C > > -- > eMail: [email hidden] > >

Bruce Kennewell wrote the following... > You'll _what_ the PC? "Thief" it?! > Sort of like "fireman a fire" or "lumberjack a tree"? > -- HAR! I love it! But it probably won't take. Pops...

tell ya what. After the race when everyone is running to the car park to avoid the rush that they're creating to get home and beat the traffic (themselves), I'll go to the GP3 stand and nick the CD (and if it's not on CD, I'll thief the PC and done with it :)) Ian P <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:HWoK4.13501$[email hidden]...

Quoted text (11 lines)

> I don't know the answer to your question, but if it's there make sure you > can slip around the back and have it away with the CD Rom !! ;) > Probably the only way any of us will ever get to see a demo of it <G> > > -- > Ian Parker > > == > David Cane <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:E31K4.223$rv6.13973@news1-hme0... > > Could anyone who went to Imola (or Sao Paulo) for the GPs tell me

whether > > GP3 was on show at either? > > I'm gonna be at Silverstone next weekend and wanna know if it'll bethere.

Quoted text (9 lines)

> > > > David C > > > > -- > > eMail: [email hidden] > > > > > >

I guess you know it was shown at the Melbourne GP

On Mon, 17 Apr 2000 01:17:21 +0100, "David Cane" <david.cane(spam-off)@btinternet.com> wrote: >tell ya what. >After the race when everyone is running to the car park to avoid the rush >that they're creating to get home and beat the traffic (themselves), I'll go >to the GP3 stand and nick the CD (and if it's not on CD, I'll thief the PC >and done with it :)) Yeah, you do that. Then I'll warn them and get the CD as a reward ;-) JoH

Hehe. Great minds think alike. Nice to see out community pulling for each other as ever <G> MS "Jo Helsen" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]... > On Mon, 17 Apr 2000 01:17:21 +0100, "David Cane" > <david.cane(spam-off)@btinternet.com> wrote: > > >tell ya what. > >After the race when everyone is running to the car park to avoid the rush > >that they're creating to get home and beat the traffic (themselves), I'llgo > >to the GP3 stand and nick the CD (and if it's not on CD, I'll thief thePC

Quoted text (7 lines)

> >and done with it :)) > > Yeah, you do that. > > Then I'll warn them and get the CD as a reward ;-) > > JoH

He, I'm not as bad as I sound: I'll burn a copy for David :-) JoH On Mon, 17 Apr 2000 09:52:05 +0100, "m.seery" <[email hidden]> wrote:

Quoted text (25 lines)

>Hehe. >Great minds think alike. Nice to see out community pulling for each other as >ever <G> > >MS >"Jo Helsen" <[email hidden]> wrote in message >news:[email hidden]... >> On Mon, 17 Apr 2000 01:17:21 +0100, "David Cane" >> <david.cane(spam-off)@btinternet.com> wrote: >> >> >tell ya what. >> >After the race when everyone is running to the car park to avoid the rush >> >that they're creating to get home and beat the traffic (themselves), I'll >go >> >to the GP3 stand and nick the CD (and if it's not on CD, I'll thief the >PC >> >and done with it :)) >> >> Yeah, you do that. >> >> Then I'll warn them and get the CD as a reward ;-) >> >> JoH > >

I guess you know it was shown at the Melbourne GP

Bruce Kennewell wrote the following... HAR! I love it! But it probably won't take. Pops...

Bruce Kennewell <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]... > "Fax" is an abbreviation of "facsimile" and has become an accepted "new > verb" in its own right. We do not say "I will facsimile this document to > you". We say either "I will fax this document to you" or "I will send youa > facsimile of this document". > > "Network" is also a "new verb" when used in the context to which yourefer. > However, "networking" existed long before computers were born. > Well, I thought I was just making a humourous comment, but thanks for the detailed expansion of my one-liner. Personally, I dislike "new verbs" and refuse to "fax" anything. I also don't "telephone" people, but this might have more to do with living in a German-speaking country now, where people call each other rather than telephone. Stephen

Quoted text (33 lines)

> Regards, > Bruce Kennewell, > Canberra, Australia. > --------------------------- > > Stephen Ferguson <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:8dh3uc$7rsnf$[email hidden]... > > > > Pops <[email hidden]> wrote in message > > news:[email hidden]... > > > > > > Bruce Kennewell wrote the following... > > > > > > > You'll _what_ the PC? "Thief" it?! > > > > Sort of like "fireman a fire" or "lumberjack a tree"? > > > > -- > > > > > > HAR! I love it! But it probably won't take. > > > > > > Pops... > > > > > > > Hey, if we can already "fax" a document, or go to a business lunch in > order > > to "network", then the other verbs, which Bruce has proposed, cannot be > far > > behind. > > > > Stephen > > > > > >

Pops <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...

Quoted text (11 lines)

> > Bruce Kennewell wrote the following... > > > You'll _what_ the PC? "Thief" it?! > > Sort of like "fireman a fire" or "lumberjack a tree"? > > -- > > HAR! I love it! But it probably won't take. > > Pops... >

Hey, if we can already "fax" a document, or go to a business lunch in order to "network", then the other verbs, which Bruce has proposed, cannot be far behind. Stephen

"Bruce Kennewell" wrote: > You'll _what_ the PC? "Thief" it?! > Sort of like "fireman a fire" or "lumberjack a tree"? ... I'm a lumberjack and thats okey I sleep all night and work all day.. Ooops! Wrong tread. :-) Ed Solheim

You'll _what_ the PC? "Thief" it?! Sort of like "fireman a fire" or "lumberjack a tree"? -- Regards, Bruce Kennewell, Canberra, Australia. --------------------------- David Cane <david.cane(spam-off)@btinternet.com> wrote in message news:8ddl3d$faa$[email hidden]... > tell ya what. > After the race when everyone is running to the car park to avoid the rush > that they're creating to get home and beat the traffic (themselves), I'll go > to the GP3 stand and nick the CD (and if it's not on CD, I'll thief the PC > and done with it :)) > > Ian P <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:HWoK4.13501$[email hidden]... > > I don't know the answer to your question, but if it's there make sure you > > can slip around the back and have it away with the CD Rom !! ;) > > Probably the only way any of us will ever get to see a demo of it <G> > > > > -- > > Ian Parker > > > > == > > David Cane <[email hidden]> wrote in message > > news:E31K4.223$rv6.13973@news1-hme0... > > > Could anyone who went to Imola (or Sao Paulo) for the GPs tell me > whether > > > GP3 was on show at either? > > > I'm gonna be at Silverstone next weekend and wanna know if it'll be > there. > > > > > > David C > > > > > > -- > > > eMail: [email hidden] > > > > > > > > > > > >

Hey, if we can already "fax" a document, or go to a business lunch in order to "network", then the other verbs, which Bruce has proposed, cannot be far behind. Stephen

:-) Whoooooosh....through to the catcher, you reckon Jim? -- Regards, Bruce Kennewell, Canberra, Australia. --------------------------- Pops <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]... > > Bruce Kennewell wrote the following... > > > You'll _what_ the PC? "Thief" it?! > > Sort of like "fireman a fire" or "lumberjack a tree"? > > -- > > HAR! I love it! But it probably won't take. > > Pops... >

Ed Solheim wrote:

Quoted text (11 lines)

> > "Bruce Kennewell" wrote: > > > You'll _what_ the PC? "Thief" it?! > > Sort of like "fireman a fire" or "lumberjack a tree"? > > ... I'm a lumberjack and thats okey > I sleep all night and work all day.. > > Ooops! > Wrong tread.

There's no such thing a as "wrong thread" when it comes to Monty Python, but I'm wondering, do you also dress up in woman's clothing and hang around in bars ? Personally I draw the line at skipping and jumping and pressing wild flowers Here's my startup page for Netscape btw, http://www.pythonline.com/ Beers and cheers (uncle) Goy "Team Mirage" http://www.teammirage.com/ "The Pits" http://www.theuspits.com/ * Spam is for losers who can't get business any other way * "Spamkiller" http://www.spamkiller.com

Well, I like it. Good old-fashioned, colorful, ever-inventive British slang. (God love it!) In fact, I don't think that's new one at all. I'm surprised you've never come across it before. --DK "Bruce Kennewell" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:38fb09de$[email hidden]...

Quoted text (7 lines)

> You'll _what_ the PC? "Thief" it?! > Sort of like "fireman a fire" or "lumberjack a tree"? > -- > Regards, > Bruce Kennewell, > Canberra, Australia. > ---------------------------

But do you really wear that costume when you go walking in the woods? MS "Ed Solheim" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:a4PK4.5192$[email hidden]...

Quoted text (16 lines)

> "Bruce Kennewell" wrote: > > > You'll _what_ the PC? "Thief" it?! > > Sort of like "fireman a fire" or "lumberjack a tree"? > > ... I'm a lumberjack and thats okey > I sleep all night and work all day.. > > Ooops! > Wrong tread. > > :-) > > Ed Solheim > >

Correct David. For the uninitiated, it is pronounced theave when used in this context. MS "David Karr" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:8dhqt7$lme$[email hidden]...

Quoted text (20 lines)

> Well, I like it. Good old-fashioned, colorful, ever-inventive British > slang. (God love it!) In fact, I don't think that's new one at all. I'm > surprised you've never come across it before. > > --DK > > > "Bruce Kennewell" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:38fb09de$[email hidden]... > > You'll _what_ the PC? "Thief" it?! > > Sort of like "fireman a fire" or "lumberjack a tree"? > > -- > > Regards, > > Bruce Kennewell, > > Canberra, Australia. > > --------------------------- > > > >

Aaah! A fellow Pythonist! -- Regards, Bruce Kennewell, Canberra, Australia. --------------------------- Ed Solheim <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:a4PK4.5192$[email hidden]... > "Bruce Kennewell" wrote: > > > You'll _what_ the PC? "Thief" it?! > > Sort of like "fireman a fire" or "lumberjack a tree"? > > ... I'm a lumberjack and thats okey > I sleep all night and work all day.. > > Ooops! > Wrong tread. > > :-) > > Ed Solheim > >

"Fax" is an abbreviation of "facsimile" and has become an accepted "new verb" in its own right. We do not say "I will facsimile this document to you". We say either "I will fax this document to you" or "I will send you a facsimile of this document". "Network" is also a "new verb" when used in the context to which you refer. However, "networking" existed long before computers were born. -- Regards, Bruce Kennewell, Canberra, Australia. --------------------------- Stephen Ferguson <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:8dh3uc$7rsnf$[email hidden]... > > Pops <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:[email hidden]... > > > > Bruce Kennewell wrote the following... > > > > > You'll _what_ the PC? "Thief" it?! > > > Sort of like "fireman a fire" or "lumberjack a tree"? > > > -- > > > > HAR! I love it! But it probably won't take. > > > > Pops... > > > > Hey, if we can already "fax" a document, or go to a business lunch in order > to "network", then the other verbs, which Bruce has proposed, cannot be far > behind. > > Stephen > >

Bruce Kennewell wrote: > > Aaaaah!! LOVELY! > Thanks Uncle. :-) You're most welcome, you don't happen to have Elle's phone number still....? :-) Beers and cheers (uncle) Goy "Team Mirage" http://www.teammirage.com/ "The Pits" http://www.theuspits.com/ * Spam is for losers who can't get business any other way * "Spamkiller" http://www.spamkiller.com

Yes...good point Stephen (the "telephone" verb). That's one that was so close to my nose that I didn't even see it. :-) -- Regards, Bruce Kennewell, Canberra, Australia. --------------------------- Stephen Ferguson <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:8dhih4$7i79o$[email hidden]... > > Bruce Kennewell <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:[email hidden]... > > "Fax" is an abbreviation of "facsimile" and has become an accepted "new > > verb" in its own right. We do not say "I will facsimile this document to > > you". We say either "I will fax this document to you" or "I will send you > a > > facsimile of this document". > > > > "Network" is also a "new verb" when used in the context to which you > refer. > > However, "networking" existed long before computers were born. > > > > Well, I thought I was just making a humourous comment, but thanks for the > detailed expansion of my one-liner. Personally, I dislike "new verbs" and > refuse to "fax" anything. I also don't "telephone" people, but this might > have more to do with living in a German-speaking country now, where people > call each other rather than telephone. > > Stephen > > > > > Regards, > > Bruce Kennewell, > > Canberra, Australia. > > --------------------------- > > > > Stephen Ferguson <[email hidden]> wrote in message > > news:8dh3uc$7rsnf$[email hidden]... > > > > > > Pops <[email hidden]> wrote in message > > > news:[email hidden]... > > > > > > > > Bruce Kennewell wrote the following... > > > > > > > > > You'll _what_ the PC? "Thief" it?! > > > > > Sort of like "fireman a fire" or "lumberjack a tree"? > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > HAR! I love it! But it probably won't take. > > > > > > > > Pops... > > > > > > > > > > Hey, if we can already "fax" a document, or go to a business lunch in > > order > > > to "network", then the other verbs, which Bruce has proposed, cannot be > > far > > > behind. > > > > > > Stephen > > > > > > > > > > > >

Aaaaah!! LOVELY! Thanks Uncle. :-) -- Regards, Bruce Kennewell, Canberra, Australia. --------------------------- Goy Larsen <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]... > Ed Solheim wrote: > > > > "Bruce Kennewell" wrote: > > > > > You'll _what_ the PC? "Thief" it?! > > > Sort of like "fireman a fire" or "lumberjack a tree"? > > > > ... I'm a lumberjack and thats okey > > I sleep all night and work all day.. > > > > Ooops! > > Wrong tread. > > There's no such thing a as "wrong thread" when it comes to Monty Python, > but I'm wondering, do you also dress up in woman's clothing and hang > around in bars ? > > Personally I draw the line at skipping and jumping and pressing wild > flowers > > Here's my startup page for Netscape btw, http://www.pythonline.com/ > > > Beers and cheers > (uncle) Goy > > "Team Mirage" http://www.teammirage.com/ > "The Pits" http://www.theuspits.com/ > > * Spam is for losers who can't get business any other way * > "Spamkiller" http://www.spamkiller.com

The verb "to thieve", I've come across. The verb "to thief", I've only ever come across in here. -- Regards, Bruce Kennewell, Canberra, Australia. --------------------------- David Karr <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:8dhqt7$lme$[email hidden]... > Well, I like it. Good old-fashioned, colorful, ever-inventive British > slang. (God love it!) In fact, I don't think that's new one at all. I'm > surprised you've never come across it before. > > --DK > > > "Bruce Kennewell" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:38fb09de$[email hidden]... > > You'll _what_ the PC? "Thief" it?! > > Sort of like "fireman a fire" or "lumberjack a tree"? > > -- > > Regards, > > Bruce Kennewell, > > Canberra, Australia. > > --------------------------- > > >

Alas, no. That disappeared (along with those of many, many others) when my rather large "Little Black Book" was stolen by a gang of envious male persons some years ago. -- Regards, Bruce Kennewell, Canberra, Australia. --------------------------- Goy Larsen <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]... > Bruce Kennewell wrote: > > > > Aaaaah!! LOVELY! > > Thanks Uncle. :-) > > You're most welcome, you don't happen to have Elle's phone number > still....? :-) > > Beers and cheers > (uncle) Goy > > "Team Mirage" http://www.teammirage.com/ > "The Pits" http://www.theuspits.com/ > > * Spam is for losers who can't get business any other way * > "Spamkiller" http://www.spamkiller.com

Bruce Kennewell wrote: > > Alas, no. That disappeared (along with those of many, many others) when my > rather large "Little Black Book" was stolen by a gang of envious male > persons some years ago. Makes you wonder if capital punishment really is enough for some...... Beers and cheers (uncle) Goy "Team Mirage" http://www.teammirage.com/ "The Pits" http://www.theuspits.com/ * Spam is for losers who can't get business any other way * "Spamkiller" http://www.spamkiller.com

Bruce Kennewell wrote: > > Exactly my thoughts at the time of the incident, Uncle. Stir-frying certain > body parts, whilst still attached, of course, seemed most appropriate. Very appropriate I'd say, if of course we are talking about the same body parts... Beers and cheers (uncle) Goy "Team Mirage" http://www.teammirage.com/ "The Pits" http://www.theuspits.com/ * Spam is for losers who can't get business any other way * "Spamkiller" http://www.spamkiller.com

Exactly my thoughts at the time of the incident, Uncle. Stir-frying certain body parts, whilst still attached, of course, seemed most appropriate. -- Regards, Bruce Kennewell, Canberra, Australia. --------------------------- Goy Larsen <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]... > Bruce Kennewell wrote: > > > > Alas, no. That disappeared (along with those of many, many others) when my > > rather large "Little Black Book" was stolen by a gang of envious male > > persons some years ago. > > Makes you wonder if capital punishment really is enough for some...... > > > Beers and cheers > (uncle) Goy > > "Team Mirage" http://www.teammirage.com/ > "The Pits" http://www.theuspits.com/ > > * Spam is for losers who can't get business any other way * > "Spamkiller" http://www.spamkiller.com

I'm sure that we're on the same wave-length here. :-) -- Regards, Bruce Kennewell, Canberra, Australia. --------------------------- Goy Larsen <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]... > Bruce Kennewell wrote: > > > > Exactly my thoughts at the time of the incident, Uncle. Stir-frying certain > > body parts, whilst still attached, of course, seemed most appropriate. > > Very appropriate I'd say, if of course we are talking about the same > body parts... > > > Beers and cheers > (uncle) Goy > > "Team Mirage" http://www.teammirage.com/ > "The Pits" http://www.theuspits.com/ > > * Spam is for losers who can't get business any other way * > "Spamkiller" http://www.spamkiller.com