In article <8dpda8$4pi$[email hidden]>, "GraDee"
<[email hidden]> writes:
So what happens for those of us that CAN'T make add-ons? If everyone followed
your example, I'd have nothing to trade...
Eldred
--
Tiger Stadium R.I.P. 1912-1999
Own Grand Prix Legends? Goto http://gpl.gamestats.com/vroc
Never argue with an idiot. He brings you down to his level, then beats you
with experience...
Remove SPAM-OFF to reply.
Pirated GPL converter posted and charging for add-ons
After someone posted a pirated copy of Noonan's converter, GraDee questioned charging for community add-ons when others give theirs away. Most replied that Noonan deserved payment for years of work, that a demo existed, and that downloading the warez copy was theft.
Automated summary.
Who moderates this newsgroup?
--
Colin Harris
ColinHarris in N3/NL
Proud co-owner - CLONE N.Legends league
http://members.chello.se/clone/index.htm
ICQ 25485061
Bill Walsh <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
> Enjoy
>
>
I do not think he ever actually got it uploaded
Rikanthrax <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
> DONT DNLD IT!!!!!!
> theres a virus in it!!!!
> Rik Anthrax
> -
> -
> it's a GPL kinda day :)
Bill,
Can you repost, mail or tell me where to get it, only parts r02 and
r04 shown on my news server.
TIA,
--
Poopy Face the Turd
[email hidden]
"Suck & fuck & cook & clean,
baby you know what I mean!"
Before I start, I'm not downloading this but something I kind wish to say
abut the converter.
Full credit to Dave for putting in so much hard woks and effort. I
compliment him.
However, I would love to know the reaction if Papy made a converter and made
people pay.
It wouldn't be the same.
Hell even Microsoft give away a free converter.
Maybe I'm wrong again here but people everywhere put alot of work into
thousands if not millions of adons and stuff and give the but free of
change, no questions asked. It works in a knida circle.
If I give this guy my addon for free, he'll let me have his addon for free.
Thats how the net works. We pay for addons with our own. If it weren't like
that nobody would have anything and nobody would bother to pay anything. Its
like the "code" of internet gaming. Even the smallest of download can often
mean hours or days of work for someone.
I'm not into warez and I give full credit to Dave from what he's one but
this isn't really sticking to the "code". It like: People might be willing
to pay for this, lets try it! Not so much: Wow, I've done a good job here ,
everyone will be so pleased to get this.
Again, well done Dave, but that just ain't good nettin'
Don Burnette <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:chNL4.110459$[email hidden]...
Quoted text (19 lines)
> Thiefs, pirates, cheaters. > Maybe this newsgroup should be changed to > rec.autos.simulators.binaries.warez huh? > Noonan put a lot of work into that program, if you want it pay for it. > What do you do when you go into a store for an item, steal it also? > > > -- > Don Burnette > Dburn in N3 and Legends > > > "Bill Walsh" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:[email hidden]... > > Enjoy > > > > > >I do not think he ever actually got it uploaded
GraDee wrote in message <8dpda8$4pi$[email hidden]>...
<snip>
It works in a knida circle.
>If I give this guy my addon for free, he'll let me have his addon for free.
>Thats how the net works. We pay for addons with our own. If it weren't like
>that nobody would have anything and nobody would bother to pay anything.Its
>like the "code" of internet gaming. Even the smallest of download can often
>mean hours or days of work for someone.
>
<another snip>
GraDee, I don't get what you're saying. If you have something you think is
equal value to trade with Dave, why not take your offer to him?
Otherwise, since it has a price attached to it, pay it. Or live without it.
Or did I miss something here?
Regards,
Kurt
Oh come on, I'm sure allmost everybody who likes GPL would have been
thrilled if Papy came up with a converter and would sell it for 15
Pound.
Selling addons is nothing more than normal. look at all the addons
made for games like Baldur's gate, Commandos, Red Alert... did you
ever hear people compaining about having to pay money for these
addons?
Look at how much time Noonan put in his converter, and what a
wonderfull converter it became. Now we can drive on Riverside, Seca,
Indy... only for 15 Pounds.
Posting a copy here in RAS in totally insane. I'd hang the guy who
posted it by his balls if I'd get the chance.
I downloaded the warez version of F1 2000, because there is no demo,
and I want to know what I get if I buy something. Liked it and bought
it.
There is a converter demo out, so there is NO reason to download the
full version for 'testing'.
If you have any selfrespect, you download the demo from
www.theuspits.com, try it, and if you like it, you B-U-Y the full
version.
Andre
On Fri, 21 Apr 2000 12:14:28 +0100, "GraDee"
<[email hidden]> wrote:
Quoted text (52 lines)
>Before I start, I'm not downloading this but something I kind wish to say >abut the converter. > >Full credit to Dave for putting in so much hard woks and effort. I >compliment him. >However, I would love to know the reaction if Papy made a converter and made >people pay. >It wouldn't be the same. > >Hell even Microsoft give away a free converter. > >Maybe I'm wrong again here but people everywhere put alot of work into >thousands if not millions of adons and stuff and give the but free of >change, no questions asked. It works in a knida circle. >If I give this guy my addon for free, he'll let me have his addon for free. >Thats how the net works. We pay for addons with our own. If it weren't like >that nobody would have anything and nobody would bother to pay anything. Its >like the "code" of internet gaming. Even the smallest of download can often >mean hours or days of work for someone. > >I'm not into warez and I give full credit to Dave from what he's one but >this isn't really sticking to the "code". It like: People might be willing >to pay for this, lets try it! Not so much: Wow, I've done a good job here , >everyone will be so pleased to get this. > >Again, well done Dave, but that just ain't good nettin' > > > >Don Burnette <[email hidden]> wrote in message >news:chNL4.110459$[email hidden]... >> Thiefs, pirates, cheaters. >> Maybe this newsgroup should be changed to >> rec.autos.simulators.binaries.warez huh? >> Noonan put a lot of work into that program, if you want it pay for it. >> What do you do when you go into a store for an item, steal it also? >> >> >> -- >> Don Burnette >> Dburn in N3 and Legends >> >> >> "Bill Walsh" <[email hidden]> wrote in message >> news:[email hidden]... >> > Enjoy >> > >> > >> >> > >Papyrus have given us track packs & car paint kits for ICR & Nascar - which
we paid for.
I have nothing against this - if the product can come out earlier with a
selection of tracks and then a track pack added with any patches to the
first then I will happily buy it. Its also makes the patches more accessible
to those outside the 'net communities.
Microprose even put together a selection of GP" "community" utils for sale.
Again to hit the more average GP2 fan (who wouldn't be aware of the
downloads)
Paying for N2 is like paying again for the work in N1 that has got carried
through to N2.
I am all for the evolutionary approach to our sims from the makers - but it
has to be paid for.
Sadly Papyrus appear to have abandoned GPL. If Papyrus produced a "Season
Pack" or three for GPL - I am sure plenty here would buy them.
Without Dave I don't believe the converter would have ever happened.
I believe Dave took the view that he could only devote the massive amount of
time it has taken if there was some form of "compensation".
It does make it hard for the rest of the GPL community volunteering their
time, but this project was perhaps beyond the volunteer approach.
Hence it could be regarded as a special case.
Cheers
Tony
"GraDee" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:8dpda8$4pi$[email hidden]...
> Before I start, I'm not downloading this but something I kind wish to say
> abut the converter.
>
> Full credit to Dave for putting in so much hard woks and effort. I
> compliment him.
> However, I would love to know the reaction if Papy made a converter andmade
free.
> Thats how the net works. We pay for addons with our own. If it weren'tlike
> that nobody would have anything and nobody would bother to pay anything.Its
> like the "code" of internet gaming. Even the smallest of download canoften
> mean hours or days of work for someone.
>
> I'm not into warez and I give full credit to Dave from what he's one but
> this isn't really sticking to the "code". It like: People might be willing
> to pay for this, lets try it! Not so much: Wow, I've done a good job here,
Quoted text (9 lines)
> people pay. > It wouldn't be the same. > > Hell even Microsoft give away a free converter. > > Maybe I'm wrong again here but people everywhere put alot of work into > thousands if not millions of adons and stuff and give the but free of > change, no questions asked. It works in a knida circle. > If I give this guy my addon for free, he'll let me have his addon forQuoted text (29 lines)
> everyone will be so pleased to get this. > > Again, well done Dave, but that just ain't good nettin' > > > > Don Burnette <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:chNL4.110459$[email hidden]... > > Thiefs, pirates, cheaters. > > Maybe this newsgroup should be changed to > > rec.autos.simulators.binaries.warez huh? > > Noonan put a lot of work into that program, if you want it pay for it. > > What do you do when you go into a store for an item, steal it also? > > > > > > -- > > Don Burnette > > Dburn in N3 and Legends > > > > > > "Bill Walsh" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > > news:[email hidden]... > > > Enjoy > > > > > > > > > > > >There comes a point in time when the hours of effort put into something need
to be rewarded. I personally have not ordered the converter yet, but I dang
sure wouldn't consider downloading it from a Warez site.
I think that's total bs, and anyone that does is nothing more than a common
thief.
If i want a program that is for sell, I buy it.
--
Don Burnette
Dburn in N3 and Legends
"GraDee" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:8dpda8$4pi$[email hidden]...
> Before I start, I'm not downloading this but something I kind wish to say
> abut the converter.
>
> Full credit to Dave for putting in so much hard woks and effort. I
> compliment him.
> However, I would love to know the reaction if Papy made a converter and
made
> people pay.
> It wouldn't be the same.
>
> Hell even Microsoft give away a free converter.
>
> Maybe I'm wrong again here but people everywhere put alot of work into
> thousands if not millions of adons and stuff and give the but free of
> change, no questions asked. It works in a knida circle.
> If I give this guy my addon for free, he'll let me have his addon for
free.
> Thats how the net works. We pay for addons with our own. If it weren't
like
> that nobody would have anything and nobody would bother to pay anything.
Its
> like the "code" of internet gaming. Even the smallest of download can
often
> mean hours or days of work for someone.
>
> I'm not into warez and I give full credit to Dave from what he's one but
> this isn't really sticking to the "code". It like: People might be willing
> to pay for this, lets try it! Not so much: Wow, I've done a good job here
,
> everyone will be so pleased to get this.
>
> Again, well done Dave, but that just ain't good nettin'
>
>
>
> Don Burnette <[email hidden]> wrote in message
> news:chNL4.110459$[email hidden]...
> > Thiefs, pirates, cheaters.
> > Maybe this newsgroup should be changed to
> > rec.autos.simulators.binaries.warez huh?
> > Noonan put a lot of work into that program, if you want it pay for it.
> > What do you do when you go into a store for an item, steal it also?
> >
> >
> > --
> > Don Burnette
> > Dburn in N3 and Legends
> >
> >
> > "Bill Walsh" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
> > news:[email hidden]...
> > > Enjoy
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
I see all your points.
To Eldred though, surely, in the life of anyone who has a keen interest in
sim racing. Has shared a setup or added some tobacco logo's or something.
Just simple things, then there are those who do more complex things.
I can't see what you mean by you having nothing if you followed my example.
My example is that we have a "community". We share, we give , we take.
Like I said so many times, I'm not gonna take the warez version of this
converter, I don't condone this!
However, Dave Noonan is perfectly entitled to everything his asks for in
return for his great product. Its just taking it out of the circle.
Any of the examples you guys have given are of production companies, ver
often taking what is already on the internet for free and giving it to those
without the net. Things like Paintshop for ICR2 couldn't be counted IMO, not
in this context, if the original game was �30. It was �30 *including* the
paintshop. It didn't turn out to be �45! If Papy were to do this people
would be outraged, such as that whole Daytona track thing.
I know I'm fighting a loosing battle here so I won't insist I'm right, I'm
not, its just an opinion of 1 sim racer.
EldredP <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
free.
> >Thats how the net works. We pay for addons with our own. If it weren'tlike
> >that nobody would have anything and nobody would bother to pay anything.Its
> >like the "code" of internet gaming. Even the smallest of download canoften
> >mean hours or days of work for someone.
> >
>
> So what happens for those of us that CAN'T make add-ons? If everyonefollowed
you
> with experience...
> Remove SPAM-OFF to reply.
Quoted text (7 lines)
> In article <8dpda8$4pi$[email hidden]>, "GraDee" > <[email hidden]> writes: > > >Maybe I'm wrong again here but people everywhere put alot of work into > >thousands if not millions of adons and stuff and give the but free of > >change, no questions asked. It works in a knida circle. > >If I give this guy my addon for free, he'll let me have his addon forQuoted text (8 lines)
> your example, I'd have nothing to trade... > > Eldred > -- > Tiger Stadium R.I.P. 1912-1999 > Own Grand Prix Legends? Goto http://gpl.gamestats.com/vroc > > Never argue with an idiot. He brings you down to his level, then beatsOn Fri, 21 Apr 2000 12:14:28 +0100, "GraDee"
<[email hidden]> wrote:
Papyrus and Microsoft pay salaries to their employees.
Martin
Long Live Nigel Mansell!
Quoted text (7 lines)
>Full credit to Dave for putting in so much hard woks and effort. I >compliment him. >However, I would love to know the reaction if Papy made a converter and made >people pay. >It wouldn't be the same. > >Hell even Microsoft give away a free converter.I downloaded the warez version of F1 2000, because there is no demo,
and I want to know what I get if I buy something. Liked it and bought
it.
There is a converter demo out, so there is NO reason to download the
full version for 'testing'.
If you have any selfrespect, you download the demo from
www.theuspits.com, try it, and if you like it, you B-U-Y the full
version.
>>>>>>>>>.using warez is wrong, no matter what your excuse.
Rik Anthrax
-
-
it's a GPL kinda day :)
Nobody...it is a venue for freedom of speech but, as with all democracies,
citizens such as this cretin slink in with those who have IQs higher than
that of a carrot.
--
Regards,
Bruce Kennewell,
Canberra, Australia.
---------------------------
Colin Harris <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:ODML4.1474$[email hidden]...
> Who moderates this newsgroup?
>
> --
>
> Colin Harris
> ColinHarris in N3/NL
> Proud co-owner - CLONE N.Legends league
> http://members.chello.se/clone/index.htm
> ICQ 25485061
>
> Bill Walsh <[email hidden]> wrote in message
> news:[email hidden]...
> > Enjoy
> >
> >
>
>
Whilst I respect your absolute right to form, hold and even voice your
opinion, I am sure that it is in the minority.
If Mr. Noonan wants to charge for the supply of his converter to the RAS
community, then that is perfectly acceptable to me. Why? Because AUS$30
per copy is a mere pittance in recompense for the time and effort that he
has put into keeping GPL as fresh now as it was the day the demo was
launched in early 1998.
The best of British luck to him, I say.
--
Regards,
Bruce Kennewell,
Canberra, Australia.
---------------------------
GraDee <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:8dpda8$4pi$[email hidden]...
> Before I start, I'm not downloading this but something I kind wish to say
> abut the converter.
>
> Full credit to Dave for putting in so much hard woks and effort. I
> compliment him.
> However, I would love to know the reaction if Papy made a converter and
made
> people pay.
> It wouldn't be the same.
>
> Hell even Microsoft give away a free converter.
>
> Maybe I'm wrong again here but people everywhere put alot of work into
> thousands if not millions of adons and stuff and give the but free of
> change, no questions asked. It works in a knida circle.
> If I give this guy my addon for free, he'll let me have his addon for
free.
> Thats how the net works. We pay for addons with our own. If it weren't
like
> that nobody would have anything and nobody would bother to pay anything.
Its
> like the "code" of internet gaming. Even the smallest of download can
often
> mean hours or days of work for someone.
>
> I'm not into warez and I give full credit to Dave from what he's one but
> this isn't really sticking to the "code". It like: People might be willing
> to pay for this, lets try it! Not so much: Wow, I've done a good job here
,
> everyone will be so pleased to get this.
>
> Again, well done Dave, but that just ain't good nettin'
>
>
>
> Don Burnette <[email hidden]> wrote in message
> news:chNL4.110459$[email hidden]...
> > Thiefs, pirates, cheaters.
> > Maybe this newsgroup should be changed to
> > rec.autos.simulators.binaries.warez huh?
> > Noonan put a lot of work into that program, if you want it pay for it.
> > What do you do when you go into a store for an item, steal it also?
> >
> >
> > --
> > Don Burnette
> > Dburn in N3 and Legends
> >
> >
> > "Bill Walsh" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
> > news:[email hidden]...
> > > Enjoy
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
So you are saying that if Dave would not have put out a demo, it would have
been ok for everyone to pirate it?
*COUGH* BS *COUGH*
Rikanthrax <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted text (16 lines)
> I downloaded the warez version of F1 2000, because there is no demo, > and I want to know what I get if I buy something. Liked it and bought > it. > There is a converter demo out, so there is NO reason to download the > full version for 'testing'. > > If you have any selfrespect, you download the demo from > www.theuspits.com, try it, and if you like it, you B-U-Y the full > version. > > >>>>>>>>>. > using warez is wrong, no matter what your excuse. > Rik Anthrax > - > - > it's a GPL kinda day :)No. With the converter, everyone knows what it does. It convert tracks
from other sims to GPL. You know what you get.
F1 2000 is something completely different. How does it run on my
system with 20 AI's? How are the physics? Those are things I want to
find out for myself before I buy a product like this. Opinions about
graphic quality and physics differ greatly, and I want to test it out
myself.
I only read positive posts about Rally Masters. I 'tested' it, and
deleted it after one hour of testing, I absolutely don't like it.
Saved 100 guilders by testing it myself instead of believing all the
positive posts.
Wait a moment, we had this discussion allready with the f1 2000 warez
version...
Andre
On Sat, 22 Apr 2000 16:45:49 GMT, "Cliff Roman" <[email hidden]>
wrote:
Quoted text (25 lines)
>So you are saying that if Dave would not have put out a demo, it would have >been ok for everyone to pirate it? > >*COUGH* BS *COUGH* > > >Rikanthrax <[email hidden]> wrote in message >news:[email hidden]... >> I downloaded the warez version of F1 2000, because there is no demo, >> and I want to know what I get if I buy something. Liked it and bought >> it. >> There is a converter demo out, so there is NO reason to download the >> full version for 'testing'. >> >> If you have any selfrespect, you download the demo from >> www.theuspits.com, try it, and if you like it, you B-U-Y the full >> version. >> >> >>>>>>>>>. >> using warez is wrong, no matter what your excuse. >> Rik Anthrax >> - >> - >> it's a GPL kinda day :) >Online racing on VROC would be hell if everybody could create their own
tracks!!!!!!!!!!
Quoted text (79 lines)
>I have mixed feelings about this. > >I suppose if Dave has never in his life never used a piece of software >that he was not entitled to then he could now justifiably complain. If >not then not. The boot is simply on the other foot in that case and >you have to take as good as you gave. > >There is an enormous amount of camaraderie of support on the web for >people with our interests. 99.999% of it is absolutely free. It's >produced and provided free by enthusiasts, for enthusiasts. If we had >to pay someone every time we got advice, used a utility, down-loaded a >scenery or sound patch or whatever, it would be a sad sad day for >lovers of these sims and for those who enjoy the club friendship >atmosphere that is usually here. > >There have been many great utilities and patches over the years. 100s >I would guess. Of all these only a couple have required payment that I >can remember. ( And I paid for them as at the time I thought they were >worth it. Both involved new tracks for the sims I liked as it happens >). > >In a scene where most are helping everyone else for free, out of a >feeling of common good and friendship, what happens when someone up >and wants to be paid for their particular contribution ? Is this a bit >like a boy scout who suddenly says " hey why should I help people for >nothing when they might pay for this ? " > >I have to say that it doesn't sit entirely well with me. I have spent >many hours over the years doing small things that others have used to >help with their sim racing. There is never any intention of asking for >payment. Lots of other have done much more than me and never asked for >a brass razoo. > >The situation here is that DN is probably the only person who has the >expertise to do what he does. And when there is a monopoly all issues >of fairness get thrown out the window. You either pay the price or do >without as there's nowhere else to go. > >In GP2 this same situation happened. The first people to figure out >how to make new tracks sold them. But then as others found out how to >do it too there were many more tracks available for free than you >could ever ask for. > >The difference here is that no one seems to be sharing information on >how to create GPL tracks. This in itself is a bit selfish imo. > >Remember how in GP2 everyone helped everyone else until there were >dozens of people who could make very good tracks. And the sim racing >world was all the better for it. If DN shared his information, rather >than keep it secret as he seems to do, then we might have any number >of great tracks to race on by now instead of what merge offerings come >up from time to time from his exclusive pen. And having thus made no >effort to help others make tracks he then charges people for his, as >the only viable source for same. > >OK some are saying that this is great. And in a way it is. But it >certainly doesn't make me feel all gooey inside with admiration for >DN. He is a selfish capitalist, like many others are. OK so that's his >right in the world we live in and good luck to him. But don't ask me >to consider him as some kind a philanthropistic god or hero that is >beyond reproach as many here seem to feel he should be regarded. > >Instead of licking the ground DN walks on, think of all the other >great tracks we might already have by now if DN choose to share his >info, as many others have done without any fee involved, instead of >hogging it for himself. We may have Le Mans, Bathurst, etc etc, and >all for free. > >I feel a greater sense of gratitude to all the many others who have >also put in many hours of work for their efforts. But in their cases >they have shared their information around and not asked a cent for >their results. More power to them I say. > >For your information, I have bought and paid for the real converter >from My Noonan. That's the deal and I accept it. > >Cheers > >Phillip McNelleyI have mixed feelings about this.
I suppose if Dave has never in his life never used a piece of software
that he was not entitled to then he could now justifiably complain. If
not then not. The boot is simply on the other foot in that case and
you have to take as good as you gave.
There is an enormous amount of camaraderie of support on the web for
people with our interests. 99.999% of it is absolutely free. It's
produced and provided free by enthusiasts, for enthusiasts. If we had
to pay someone every time we got advice, used a utility, down-loaded a
scenery or sound patch or whatever, it would be a sad sad day for
lovers of these sims and for those who enjoy the club friendship
atmosphere that is usually here.
There have been many great utilities and patches over the years. 100s
I would guess. Of all these only a couple have required payment that I
can remember. ( And I paid for them as at the time I thought they were
worth it. Both involved new tracks for the sims I liked as it happens
).
In a scene where most are helping everyone else for free, out of a
feeling of common good and friendship, what happens when someone up
and wants to be paid for their particular contribution ? Is this a bit
like a boy scout who suddenly says " hey why should I help people for
nothing when they might pay for this ? "
I have to say that it doesn't sit entirely well with me. I have spent
many hours over the years doing small things that others have used to
help with their sim racing. There is never any intention of asking for
payment. Lots of other have done much more than me and never asked for
a brass razoo.
The situation here is that DN is probably the only person who has the
expertise to do what he does. And when there is a monopoly all issues
of fairness get thrown out the window. You either pay the price or do
without as there's nowhere else to go.
In GP2 this same situation happened. The first people to figure out
how to make new tracks sold them. But then as others found out how to
do it too there were many more tracks available for free than you
could ever ask for.
The difference here is that no one seems to be sharing information on
how to create GPL tracks. This in itself is a bit selfish imo.
Remember how in GP2 everyone helped everyone else until there were
dozens of people who could make very good tracks. And the sim racing
world was all the better for it. If DN shared his information, rather
than keep it secret as he seems to do, then we might have any number
of great tracks to race on by now instead of what merge offerings come
up from time to time from his exclusive pen. And having thus made no
effort to help others make tracks he then charges people for his, as
the only viable source for same.
OK some are saying that this is great. And in a way it is. But it
certainly doesn't make me feel all gooey inside with admiration for
DN. He is a selfish capitalist, like many others are. OK so that's his
right in the world we live in and good luck to him. But don't ask me
to consider him as some kind a philanthropistic god or hero that is
beyond reproach as many here seem to feel he should be regarded.
Instead of licking the ground DN walks on, think of all the other
great tracks we might already have by now if DN choose to share his
info, as many others have done without any fee involved, instead of
hogging it for himself. We may have Le Mans, Bathurst, etc etc, and
all for free.
I feel a greater sense of gratitude to all the many others who have
also put in many hours of work for their efforts. But in their cases
they have shared their information around and not asked a cent for
their results. More power to them I say.
For your information, I have bought and paid for the real converter
from My Noonan. That's the deal and I accept it.
Cheers
Phillip McNelley
> It seems that GPL tracks take a long time to make. Much longer than
> GP2 tracks did. It seems beyond the capability of just a couple of
> groups to do much more than produce 1 track in 6 months if we are
> lucky. This being the apparent case it'd be nice if more could be
> working on these projects.
If you want to make a really good track in GP2, it may take well over 6
months. That's at least what it took me to do everything satisfactory. The
fact that it takes an individual such a long time is masked by the fact
that many people may release tracks in the meantime. As GP2's trackeditor
was an open development, many more people could make tracks.
Then again, the tracks are more complex in GPL.
We'll see ;-)
If the server couldn't be sure that everyone was using the same
version of the same track then I have to agree with you.
If the situation is ....
share the track making info around and have lots of the word's great
tracks to race on, build by many idividuals, but loose racing
integritity ... or ...
have relatively few tracks built by only 1 or 2 grouips but maintain
racing integrity ...
then I have to agree that racing integritity is parramount.
This doesn't stop me from wishing there was a way we could have more
of the world's great tracks, build by many track makers, AND maintain
racing integrity though, AND that these tracks were available to
everyone for free.
It seems that GPL tracks take a long time to make. Much longer than
GP2 tracks did. It seems beyond the capability of just a couple of
groups to do much more than produce 1 track in 6 months if we are
lucky. This being the apparent case it'd be nice if more could be
working on these projects.
Wouldn't it be great to race GPL cars on the modern Suzuka track,
Bathurst, to name jsut a couple ?
Cheers
Phillip McN
>Online racing on VROC would be hell if everybody could create their own
>tracks!!!!!!!!!!
Chris Bloom <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
> I wasn't replying to Mark Stahl I was replying to Toby Rikard
> who wrote:
>
> Microprose even put together a selection of GP" "community"
Aha! I see, said the blind man! Please accept my apologies for jumping in
and spouting off.
Sincerely...
Pops...
There is a lot of rationalization going on here. The issue is not "good
netting"
or what ever Microprose or some one else might put out for free. If some one
offers something you would like for money, it's your choice to buy it or not.
If
you get it without buying it, you are stealing it and are a thief. All the
rationalizing in the world will not change that. Whether the product is worth
the charge or whether something like it can be legally obtained for free is for
you to add to the mix in making the decision whether to buy it. No one owes it
to you.
In this case, Dave Noonan's converter is worth more that he charges for it; it
has opened up GPL to an extent that few of us even imagined. Any one who
downloads a pirated version is a thief, and trying to make excuses for doing so
does not say good things for their character. Just my $0.02.
Bill Yowell
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>well said Bill!!!
Rik Anthrax
-
-
it's a GPL kinda day :)
Hey Chris...
Mark Stahl wrote...
"Hell even Microsoft give away a free converter"
MicroSOFT...not MicroPROSE!
Pops...
Chris Bloom <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
> What utilitys did Microprose put out after GP2.
GraDee-
i kind of see what you're saying here, but as someone who only did a small
amount of programming in a former life and has essentially no chance of
paying dave back with a utility of my own, i was actually kind of glad in a
strange way to be able to pay Mr. Noonan for his hard work, and encourage
him to do more of the same. this is saying alot coming from a cheap-ass
student like myself :)
BTW, my news server does not have any actual files in this thread. hopefully
they were cancelled. shame on whoever posted them, if indeed they were
posted.
>>Before I start, I'm not downloading this but something I kind wish to sayabut the converter.
Full credit to Dave for putting in so much hard woks and effort. I
compliment him.
However, I would love to know the reaction if Papy made a converter and made
people pay.
It wouldn't be the same.
Hell even Microsoft give away a free converter.
Maybe I'm wrong again here but people everywhere put alot of work into
thousands if not millions of adons and stuff and give the but free of
change, no questions asked. It works in a knida circle.
If I give this guy my addon for free, he'll let me have his addon for free.
Thats how the net works. We pay for addons with our own. If it weren't like
that nobody would have anything and nobody would bother to pay anything. Its
like the "code" of internet gaming. Even the smallest of download can often
mean hours or days of work for someone.
I'm not into warez and I give full credit to Dave from what he's one but
this isn't really sticking to the "code". It like: People might be willing
to pay for this, lets try it! Not so much: Wow, I've done a good job here ,
everyone will be so pleased to get this.
Again, well done Dave, but that just ain't good nettin'
What utilitys did Microprose put out after GP2. As far as I
remember they didn't release one byte of software for GP2 after
it had been released.
I know there was a third party release of stuff gathered from
the internet called "Grand Prix Magic". This just had carsets
and helmets and stuff. There was also the first "new" tracks
which was a seperate release from IA or something?
Neither of these had anything to do with Microprose though.
Chris
In article <QkXL4.2585$[email hidden]>, "Tony
Rickard" <[email hidden]> wrote:
>Microprose even put together a selection of GP" "community"utils for sale.
>Again to hit the more average GP2 fan (who wouldn't be aware ofthe
>downloads)
* Sent from RemarQ http://www.remarq.com The Internet's Discussion Network *
The fastest and easiest way to search and participate in Usenet - Free!
Hey Chris...
"Hell even Microsoft give away a free converter"
MicroSOFT...not MicroPROSE!
Pops...
There is a lot of rationalization going on here. The issue is not "good netting"
or what ever Microprose or some one else might put out for free. If some one
offers something you would like for money, it's your choice to buy it or not. If
you get it without buying it, you are stealing it and are a thief. All the
rationalizing in the world will not change that. Whether the product is worth
the charge or whether something like it can be legally obtained for free is for
you to add to the mix in making the decision whether to buy it. No one owes it
to you.
In this case, Dave Noonan's converter is worth more that he charges for it; it
has opened up GPL to an extent that few of us even imagined. Any one who
downloads a pirated version is a thief, and trying to make excuses for doing so
does not say good things for their character. Just my $0.02.
Bill Yowell
Mark Stahl wrote:
Quoted text (39 lines)
> GraDee- > > i kind of see what you're saying here, but as someone who only did a small > amount of programming in a former life and has essentially no chance of > paying dave back with a utility of my own, i was actually kind of glad in a > strange way to be able to pay Mr. Noonan for his hard work, and encourage > him to do more of the same. this is saying alot coming from a cheap-ass > student like myself :) > > BTW, my news server does not have any actual files in this thread. hopefully > they were cancelled. shame on whoever posted them, if indeed they were > posted. > > >>Before I start, I'm not downloading this but something I kind wish to say > abut the converter. > > Full credit to Dave for putting in so much hard woks and effort. I > compliment him. > However, I would love to know the reaction if Papy made a converter and made > people pay. > It wouldn't be the same. > > Hell even Microsoft give away a free converter. > > Maybe I'm wrong again here but people everywhere put alot of work into > thousands if not millions of adons and stuff and give the but free of > change, no questions asked. It works in a knida circle. > If I give this guy my addon for free, he'll let me have his addon for free. > Thats how the net works. We pay for addons with our own. If it weren't like > that nobody would have anything and nobody would bother to pay anything. Its > like the "code" of internet gaming. Even the smallest of download can often > mean hours or days of work for someone. > > I'm not into warez and I give full credit to Dave from what he's one but > this isn't really sticking to the "code". It like: People might be willing > to pay for this, lets try it! Not so much: Wow, I've done a good job here , > everyone will be so pleased to get this. > > Again, well done Dave, but that just ain't good nettin'I wasn't replying to Mark Stahl I was replying to Toby Rikard
who wrote:
Microprose even put together a selection of GP" "community"
utils for sale. Again to hit the more average GP2 fan (who
wouldn't be aware of the downloads)
Maybe my message got in the wrong part of the thread:0
Chris
In article <[email hidden]>, "Pops"
<[email hidden]> wrote:
message
* Sent from RemarQ http://www.remarq.com The Internet's Discussion Network *
The fastest and easiest way to search and participate in Usenet - Free!
Quoted text (11 lines)
>Hey Chris... > >Mark Stahl wrote... > >"Hell even Microsoft give away a free converter" > >MicroSOFT...not MicroPROSE! > >Pops... > >Chris Bloom <[email hidden]> wrote inQuoted text (7 lines)
>news:[email hidden]... >> What utilitys did Microprose put out after GP2. > > > > >Apology accepted:)
In article <[email hidden]>, "Pops"
<[email hidden]> wrote:
>
>Aha! I see, said the blind man! Please accept my apologiesfor jumping in
* Sent from RemarQ http://www.remarq.com The Internet's Discussion Network *
The fastest and easiest way to search and participate in Usenet - Free!


































