Re: Is Silverstone too easy??

"Speedy Fast" <[email hidden]> wrote > Hmm on my second ever race at Silverstone I managed to put my Lotus on > the front row with a mid 91sec. I haven't come close to this in any > other circuit. Since then I have run a mid 90 second. GPL has AI that will become better with you Speedy. The more you race, the better you get, the better the AI gets also. Since it was only the second time at the circuit, the AI isn't totally up to your speed standards. Wait until you can do 1:26's and the rest of the field smokes you ;-) -- -- Fran�ois M�nard <ymenard> -- May the Downforce be with you... -- http://www.WeRace.net -- People think it must be fun to be a super genius, but they don't realise how hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world.

On Fri, 21 Apr 2000 22:55:43 GMT, "ymenard" <[email hidden]> wrote:

Quoted text (11 lines)

>"Speedy Fast" <[email hidden]> wrote >> Hmm on my second ever race at Silverstone I managed to put my Lotus on >> the front row with a mid 91sec. I haven't come close to this in any >> other circuit. Since then I have run a mid 90 second. > > >GPL has AI that will become better with you Speedy. The more you race, the >better you get, the better the AI gets also. Since it was only the second >time at the circuit, the AI isn't totally up to your speed standards. > >Wait until you can do 1:26's and the rest of the field smokes you ;-)

is this true at every circuit?

the AI is designed to go faster as you get faster, check your read me... this can be altered using the AI Tweaker in the files section here http://gpl.gamestats.com/ JM Speedy Fast wrote:

Quoted text (16 lines)

> On Fri, 21 Apr 2000 22:55:43 GMT, "ymenard" <[email hidden]> > wrote: > > >"Speedy Fast" <[email hidden]> wrote > >> Hmm on my second ever race at Silverstone I managed to put my Lotus on > >> the front row with a mid 91sec. I haven't come close to this in any > >> other circuit. Since then I have run a mid 90 second. > > > > > >GPL has AI that will become better with you Speedy. The more you race, the > >better you get, the better the AI gets also. Since it was only the second > >time at the circuit, the AI isn't totally up to your speed standards. > > > >Wait until you can do 1:26's and the rest of the field smokes you ;-) > > is this true at every circuit?

I think the AI at Silverstone is a little slower than the AI at the other circuits, relative to the maximum possible speeds there. This makes it easier to qualify on the pole relative to the AI, and easier to beat them. I believe the AI is a bit slower because the Papyrus engineer that developed the AI lines (the *.lp files in the track folders) for all the circuits didn't really like Silverstone and didn't race there very much, so he never really nailed a couple of the corners. Therefore the AI lines are a bit slow in a couple of corners and as a result the AI lap times are somewhat farther away from Wolfi/Greger-type times than at the other tracks. In fact, in general Silverstone seemed to be one of the less popular tracks at Papyrus, although some people liked it quite a bit. Personally, I love Silverstone! I guess it just suits my style. Alison On Sat, 22 Apr 2000 02:39:06 GMT, john moore <[email hidden]> wrote:

Quoted text (23 lines)

>the AI is designed to go faster as you get faster, check your read me... >this can be altered using the AI Tweaker in the files section here >http://gpl.gamestats.com/ >JM > >Speedy Fast wrote: > >> On Fri, 21 Apr 2000 22:55:43 GMT, "ymenard" <[email hidden]> >> wrote: >> >> >"Speedy Fast" <[email hidden]> wrote >> >> Hmm on my second ever race at Silverstone I managed to put my Lotus on >> >> the front row with a mid 91sec. I haven't come close to this in any >> >> other circuit. Since then I have run a mid 90 second. >> > >> > >> >GPL has AI that will become better with you Speedy. The more you race, the >> >better you get, the better the AI gets also. Since it was only the second >> >time at the circuit, the AI isn't totally up to your speed standards. >> > >> >Wait until you can do 1:26's and the rest of the field smokes you ;-) >> >> is this true at every circuit?

Alison From: [email hidden] Reply-To: [email hidden] Remove the spam blocker NOSPAM to email me. http://eaglewoman.maximumspeed.com

On Mon, 24 Apr 2000 05:05:38 GMT, Alison Hine <[email hidden]> wrote:

Quoted text (16 lines)

>I think the AI at Silverstone is a little slower than the AI at the >other circuits, relative to the maximum possible speeds there. This >makes it easier to qualify on the pole relative to the AI, and easier to >beat them. > >I believe the AI is a bit slower because the Papyrus engineer that >developed the AI lines (the *.lp files in the track folders) for all the >circuits didn't really like Silverstone and didn't race there very much, >so he never really nailed a couple of the corners. Therefore the AI >lines are a bit slow in a couple of corners and as a result the AI lap >times are somewhat farther away from Wolfi/Greger-type times than at the >other tracks. > >In fact, in general Silverstone seemed to be one of the less popular >tracks at Papyrus, although some people liked it quite a bit. >Personally, I love Silverstone! I guess it just suits my style.

I like it because its easier. For this reason I find it pushes me to the limit a lot more. FWIW I pretty much like every turn at Silvastun.

Time to crank open the rpy 2 lp convertor then ! (Now whose driving line shall we have?) Phil Alison Hine wrote:

Quoted text (7 lines)

> I believe the AI is a bit slower because the Papyrus engineer that > developed the AI lines (the *.lp files in the track folders) for all the > circuits didn't really like Silverstone and didn't race there very much, > so he never really nailed a couple of the corners. Therefore the AI > lines are a bit slow in a couple of corners and as a result the AI lap > times are somewhat farther away from Wolfi/Greger-type times than at the > other tracks.

EldredP's, then I too can finally win from the AI! :) Just making fun here Eldred, no offense :) Andre On Wed, 26 Apr 2000 15:05:14 +0100, Phil Flack <[email hidden]> wrote:

Quoted text (13 lines)

>Time to crank open the rpy 2 lp convertor then ! (Now whose driving >line shall we have?) > >Phil > >Alison Hine wrote: >> I believe the AI is a bit slower because the Papyrus engineer that >> developed the AI lines (the *.lp files in the track folders) for all the >> circuits didn't really like Silverstone and didn't race there very much, >> so he never really nailed a couple of the corners. Therefore the AI >> lines are a bit slow in a couple of corners and as a result the AI lap >> times are somewhat farther away from Wolfi/Greger-type times than at the >> other tracks.

In article <[email hidden]>, [email hidden] (Andre Warringa) writes:

Quoted text (22 lines)

>EldredP's, then I too can finally win from the AI! :) >Just making fun here Eldred, no offense :) > >Andre > >On Wed, 26 Apr 2000 15:05:14 +0100, Phil Flack <[email hidden]> >wrote: > >>Time to crank open the rpy 2 lp convertor then ! (Now whose driving >>line shall we have?) >> >>Phil >> >>Alison Hine wrote: >>> I believe the AI is a bit slower because the Papyrus engineer that >>> developed the AI lines (the *.lp files in the track folders) for all the >>> circuits didn't really like Silverstone and didn't race there very much, >>> so he never really nailed a couple of the corners. Therefore the AI >>> lines are a bit slow in a couple of corners and as a result the AI lap >>> times are somewhat farther away from Wolfi/Greger-type times than at the >>> other tracks. >

HUH? :::re-reads post::: Oh, I get it *now*.....:::thinks about it some more:::....hey, waitaminute! <g> Eldred -- Tiger Stadium R.I.P. 1912-1999 Own Grand Prix Legends? Goto http://gpl.gamestats.com/vroc Never argue with an idiot. He brings you down to his level, then beats you with experience... Remove SPAM-OFF to reply.