Race Sim Central
Rec.Autos.Simulators Archive

Re: N3, N4 (screens and movie)... what's with the looseness????

8 posts by 6 people · 11 May 2000 - 12 May 2000 12:06 UTC

Tim O 11 May 2000#271002
On Fri, 12 May 2000 00:03:04 GMT, "Jan Verschueren" <[email hidden]> wrote: >Hmmm so any car in straigth line decelleration (nose down) is loose by >definition? -Interesting to know. ;-) > >Seriously, I fail to see how pitch can be used to deduce the handling of the >cars on track. It's an indication of weight shift for sure, but afaik does >not imply a loose condition. You may not have seen the way the real life cars are set up for certain ovals, but they look like the rear suspension is collapsed. I haven't D/L'd the video, but they don't run ass-high at any tracks in reality. Maybe he was getting at something along those lines??? Tim
Andrew Turner 11 May 2000 22:37 UTC#271068
In N3, all cars seem to be running really loose (that is, nose-down in turns).. And yet, not a lot of squealing. I noticed the same effect in the screens and video of N4. What gives? Do cars really run this way? Andrew
Alan Orton 12 May 2000 00:41 UTC#270939
Are you talking about pitch or yaw? When watching the cars on TV they do have the rear hanging out when driving on the edge. Andrew wrote:
Quoted text (11 lines)> > In N3, all cars seem to be running really loose (that is, nose-down in > turns).. > > And yet, not a lot of squealing. > > I noticed the same effect in the screens and video of N4. > > What gives? Do cars really run this way? > > Andrew
Jan Verschueren 12 May 2000 02:03 UTC#271030
Hmmm so any car in straigth line decelleration (nose down) is loose by definition? -Interesting to know. ;-) Seriously, I fail to see how pitch can be used to deduce the handling of the cars on track. It's an indication of weight shift for sure, but afaik does not imply a loose condition. Mind you, the drivers seem to lose the back end quite often in the clip. ;-) Jan. =--- Andrew wrote...
Quoted text (10 lines)> In N3, all cars seem to be running really loose (that is, nose-down in > turns).. > > And yet, not a lot of squealing. > > I noticed the same effect in the screens and video of N4. > > What gives? Do cars really run this way? > > Andrew
Charlie B (Hans) 12 May 2000 04:10 UTC#270981
Even in N2 and N3 the car hangs out through the turns. Just take a look at replay at atlanta etc. from TV1 view.... Alan Orton wrote in message <[email hidden]>...
Quoted text (15 lines)>Are you talking about pitch or yaw? >When watching the cars on TV they do have the rear hanging out when >driving on the edge. >Andrew wrote: >> >> In N3, all cars seem to be running really loose (that is, nose-down in >> turns).. >> >> And yet, not a lot of squealing. >> >> I noticed the same effect in the screens and video of N4. >> >> What gives? Do cars really run this way? >> >> Andrew
Andrew Turner 12 May 2000 11:15 UTC#270916
Yes, sorry, I should have clarified - by nose-down, I did indeed mean that the cars seem to be YAWING to the left, that is, the fronts of the cars appear to be closer to the bottom of the track than the rears of the cars. Around turns, anyway. I believe this is incorrect; maybe in dirt track racing or outlaws or something, but It shouldn't be happening with these cars. Andrew Andrew <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:RCGS4.185639$[email hidden]...
Quoted text (12 lines)> In N3, all cars seem to be running really loose (that is, nose-down in > turns).. > > And yet, not a lot of squealing. > > I noticed the same effect in the screens and video of N4. > > What gives? Do cars really run this way? > > Andrew > >
Gregor Veble 12 May 2000 11:55 UTC#270927
Andrew wrote:
Quoted text (10 lines)> > Yes, sorry, I should have clarified - by nose-down, I did indeed mean that > the cars seem to be YAWING to the left, that is, the fronts of the cars > appear to be closer to the bottom of the track than the rears of the cars. > Around turns, anyway. I believe this is incorrect; maybe in dirt track > racing or outlaws or something, but It shouldn't be happening with these > cars. > > Andrew >
This is just as it should be. All types of tyres have their maximum grip at a given slip angle, which is at the order of magnitude about 5 degrees for F1 slicks from previous seasons at the typical loads. I can imagine the Nascar tyres having higher optimal slip angles (closer to 10 degrees) just to cure some of the nervousness of the tyres wih higher cornering stiffness (the amount of force per degee of slip angle). Obviously, the car will acquire a yaw angle due to this tyre property, no matter what car it is. GPL era cars have even higher optimal slip angles (lower cornering stiffness), while CART cars have them lower. Yet it is always there. You can see it in real life footage if you are careful, although it is harder to notice due to the moving cameras. -Gregor

Sponsors

Affiliate Links

Sim Gaming Expo MOZA Racing Sim-Lab Fanatec TrakRacer Asetek Internet Privacy From NordVPN Dreamhost Capital One Credit Card Application Fanatical CDKeys Amazon Amazon UK Project Motor Racing iRacing Get your racing gloves, boots and more from Demon Tweeks. Enlist at Roberts Space Industries, developers of Star Citizen and Squadron 42


Back from the ashes since July, 2019. First created in 2001 with the merger of Legends Central (founded 1999) and simracing.dk.

A site by a sort of sim racer, for sim racers, about racing sims. News and information on both modern and historic sim racing software titles.

All products and licenses property of their respective owners.


Facebook Threads Bluesky Twitter Mastodon Instagram YouTube Tiktok Twitch Reddit Google News Apple News Subscribe via WordPress Flipboard eBay

Race Sim Central © 1999-2026 | Some links pay RSC a commission. Advertising does not equal endorsement.Cookie Policy