In article <8ganet$f2o$[email hidden]>, [email hidden] writes:
Maybe it's just not *attainable*...? Interesting site - did you just do that
with a spreadsheet converted to an HTML table?
Eldred
--
Tiger Stadium R.I.P. 1912-1999
Own Grand Prix Legends? Goto http://gpl.gamestats.com/vroc
Never argue with an idiot. He brings you down to his level, then beats you
with experience...
Remove SPAM-OFF to reply.
... why not shoot for within 5 or 10%?
Just thought it would be interesting to figure out what the percentages
would reveal. My goal is to get within 10% on all tracks, and then go
for 5%.
For an example, see:
http://www1.xe.net/~wtonsmann/GPL/WilfsGPLGoals.htm
Cheers, wtonsmann
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
Great idea....
Only trouble is based on your sheet I need one about as wide as bus to find
the percentage I am on for most tracks ;O)
Peter Hooper
<[email hidden]> wrote in message news:8ganet$f2o$[email hidden]...
Quoted text (15 lines)
> ... why not shoot for within 5 or 10%? > > Just thought it would be interesting to figure out what the percentages > would reveal. My goal is to get within 10% on all tracks, and then go > for 5%. > > For an example, see: > > http://www1.xe.net/~wtonsmann/GPL/WilfsGPLGoals.htm > > Cheers, wtonsmann > > > Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ > Before you buy.On Mon 22 May 2000 08:26:26am, wrote:
>... why not shoot for within 5 or 10%?<snip>
A lot easier at some tracks than others. For example, I'm within the 5%
target at Spa, Silverstone, Monza and the Glen (and nearly at Rouen) -
the easier tracks, you notice! But I can't even break the 110% barrier
at Zandvoort, the Ring or Mexico.
--
David.
"After all, a mere thousand yards - such a harmless little knoll,
really."
(Raymond Mays on Shelsley Walsh)
