Or maybe he has considerably developed his abilities since the Benetton
days.
Wow - I'm watching the F1 race from Sunday again and am just amazed by the car
control in the rain by (some of) these guys. Schumacher is the MASTER of the
wet. LOL - these cars are sliding around like the '67 F1 cars in GPL :)
--David Cook
The one thing that you have to admit the stuff we see from Schumacher we
used to see form Alesi while he was still at Ferrari. I really feel a lot of
Schumachers confidence and ability in the wet comes from the Ferrari wet
handling. I remember Schumachers performance in the wet in his Benetton days
all to well, he was good but not a 'rainmeister'. I have to admit his catch
into the chicane looked great, but maybe that's just not possible with other
cars.
"David L. Cook" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
> Wow - I'm watching the F1 race from Sunday again and am just amazed by thecar
> control in the rain by (some of) these guys. Schumacher is the MASTER ofthe
> wet. LOL - these cars are sliding around like the '67 F1 cars in GPL :)
>
> --David Cook
That's a possibility and not a stupid one either. But where's Jeans rain
expertise. I remember him going around 3-4 secs quicker than anyone else at
Argentina in a very slow Ferrari.
"Claude Beaudouin" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
> Or maybe he has considerably developed his abilities since the Benetton
> days.
I can only speculate. [There's a lot of that in R.A.S.]
Maybe Jean is not quite as driven or as hungry as he used to be. With
time, other factors enter in one's mind which tend to reduce the sharp
focus formerly reserved for only one activity.
Or there are limitations to his car which preclude his showing his
talents in the wet.
Claude Beaudouin wrote:
From what I can see and from what the Speedvision commentators
(Sam Posey, David Hobbs) say, the car definately precludes his
showing his rain or dry talents.
dave henrie
Quoted text (9 lines)
> > I can only speculate. [There's a lot of that in R.A.S.] > > Maybe Jean is not quite as driven or as hungry as he used to be. With > time, other factors enter in one's mind which tend to reduce the sharp > focus formerly reserved for only one activity. > > Or there are limitations to his car which preclude his showing his > talents in the wet.Dave Henrie wrote:
That's an understatement :-)
Beers and cheers
(uncle) Goy
"Team Mirage" http://www.teammirage.com/
"The Pits" http://www.theuspits.com/
* Spam is for losers who can't get business any other way *
"Spamkiller" http://www.spamkiller.com
Quoted text (15 lines)
> > Claude Beaudouin wrote: > > > > I can only speculate. [There's a lot of that in R.A.S.] > > > > Maybe Jean is not quite as driven or as hungry as he used to be. With > > time, other factors enter in one's mind which tend to reduce the sharp > > focus formerly reserved for only one activity. > > > > Or there are limitations to his car which preclude his showing his > > talents in the wet. > > From what I can see and from what the Speedvision commentators > (Sam Posey, David Hobbs) say, the car definately precludes his > showing his rain or dry talents.In article <[email hidden]>, [email hidden] (sa)
writes:
Didn't he do the same thing at Monaco one year? The announcers couldn't
*believe* the lead he was pulling out...
Eldred
--
Tiger Stadium R.I.P. 1912-1999
Own Grand Prix Legends? Goto http://gpl.gamestats.com/vroc
Never argue with an idiot. He brings you down to his level, then beats you
with experience...
Remove SPAM-OFF to reply.
Quoted text (17 lines)
>In article <R8sW4.2674$[email hidden]>, [email hidden] says... >> >>The one thing that you have to admit the stuff we see from Schumacher we >>used to see form Alesi while he was still at Ferrari. I really feel a lot of >>Schumachers confidence and ability in the wet comes from the Ferrari wet >>handling. I remember Schumachers performance in the wet in his Benetton days >>all to well, he was good but not a 'rainmeister'. I have to admit his catch >>into the chicane looked great, but maybe that's just not possible with other >>cars. > >Sorry but I dont share your viewpoint. Schumacher has always been excellent >in >the wet. Remeber Spa in 95? He stated from the back and won in the rain. >There >he blew by Hill while on Slicks while Damon was on rain tires. I'll never >forget that day... >
>There
>he blew by Hill while on Slicks while Damon was on rain tires. I'll never
>forget that day...
Actually Hill passed Schuey when he was on wets and Schu on slicks. They
nearly collided at Les Combes and Schu went off allowing Hill through.
Still a great drive though :-)
--
Cheers!
Graeme Nash
// Just did my first 1m26 at Monza and feeling good :-)
In article <R8sW4.2674$[email hidden]>, [email hidden] says...
Sorry but I dont share your viewpoint. Schumacher has always been excellent in
the wet. Remeber Spa in 95? He stated from the back and won in the rain. There
he blew by Hill while on Slicks while Damon was on rain tires. I'll never
forget that day...
Quoted text (8 lines)
> >The one thing that you have to admit the stuff we see from Schumacher we >used to see form Alesi while he was still at Ferrari. I really feel a lot of >Schumachers confidence and ability in the wet comes from the Ferrari wet >handling. I remember Schumachers performance in the wet in his Benetton days >all to well, he was good but not a 'rainmeister'. I have to admit his catch >into the chicane looked great, but maybe that's just not possible with other >cars.Quoted text (12 lines)
> >"David L. Cook" <[email hidden]> wrote in message >news:[email hidden]... >> Wow - I'm watching the F1 race from Sunday again and am just amazed by the >car >> control in the rain by (some of) these guys. Schumacher is the MASTER of >the >> wet. LOL - these cars are sliding around like the '67 F1 cars in GPL :) >> >> --David Cook > >Graeme Nash wrote:
And then we have Suzuka in 94, Hill beat Schumi in terrible conditions,
so no, Schumi hasn't *always* been the "rain master" :-)
Beers and cheers
(uncle) Goy
"Team Mirage" http://www.teammirage.com/
"The Pits" http://www.theuspits.com/
* Spam is for losers who can't get business any other way *
"Spamkiller" http://www.spamkiller.com


































