Race Sim Central
Rec.Autos.Simulators Archive

Re: World Ranking Site

13 posts by 8 people · 05 Jun 2000 - 13 Jun 2000 02:24 UTC

Thanks for the laugh! BTW, your secret is safe with me. ;) Now if I could only get a clock smash at the Ring.......;) -- Berry Kaiser [email hidden] Spammer Jammer Activated
http://gplrank.schuerkamp.de/index.html "Jan Verschueren" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:8SK_4.81340$[email hidden]... > You mean my 32.08 second lap at Monaco disqualifies me? ;-)) > > Can someone post the link to this World Ranking / GPL handicap site again?I
Quoted text (12 lines)> can't find it anymore. > > Jan. > =--- > Tony Jester wrote... > > <snip> > > 3:03xx at Spa in a Ferrari? Na, I don't think so. But please, don't > > tell my wife ;-) > > > > -Tony- > >
Tony Jester 05 Jun 2000 04:58 UTC#265294
Well, my wife really wasn't too excited when I showed her my overall position of 86th in the world. But when I showed her that I was number 1 at Spa, with a time of 3:03.xx, (in the Ferrari, no less) Wow, she was REALLY impressed! Well, I just couldn't bring my self to explain clock smashes to her. At least for now she thinks I'm a real hero. After all, practicing GPL 4 or 5 hours every night almost ruined our marriage several months ago. Got to the point where I had to decide between her, and GPL. I chose her. Of course, racing computer cars IS a lot of fun. But her... well, she's the Real Thing. I made the right choice. But they DO need to change their formula to eliminate online race times from the ranking. 3:03xx at Spa in a Ferrari? Na, I don't think so. But please, don't tell my wife ;-) -Tony-
Jan Verschueren 05 Jun 2000 11:59 UTC#265270
Tony Jester <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted text (16 lines)> Well, my wife really wasn't too excited when I showed her my overall > position of 86th in the world. But when I showed her that I was number > 1 at Spa, with a time of 3:03.xx, (in the Ferrari, no less) Wow, she > was REALLY impressed! Well, I just couldn't bring my self to explain > clock smashes to her. At least for now she thinks I'm a real hero. > After all, practicing GPL 4 or 5 hours every night almost ruined our > marriage several months ago. Got to the point where I had to decide > between her, and GPL. I chose her. Of course, racing computer cars IS > a lot of fun. But her... well, she's the Real Thing. I made the right > choice. But they DO need to change their formula to eliminate online > race times from the ranking. > > 3:03xx at Spa in a Ferrari? Na, I don't think so. But please, don't > tell my wife ;-) > > -Tony-
Jan Verschueren 05 Jun 2000 11:59 UTC#265271
You mean my 32.08 second lap at Monaco disqualifies me? ;-)) Can someone post the link to this World Ranking / GPL handicap site again? I can't find it anymore. Jan. =--- Tony Jester wrote... > <snip> > 3:03xx at Spa in a Ferrari? Na, I don't think so. But please, don't > tell my wife ;-) > > -Tony-
Okay, what's the secret? (with the opposite sex I mean, anyone can have a clock smash! :o) Rob Tony Jester wrote:
Quoted text (16 lines)> Well, my wife really wasn't too excited when I showed her my overall > position of 86th in the world. But when I showed her that I was number > 1 at Spa, with a time of 3:03.xx, (in the Ferrari, no less) Wow, she > was REALLY impressed! Well, I just couldn't bring my self to explain > clock smashes to her. At least for now she thinks I'm a real hero. > After all, practicing GPL 4 or 5 hours every night almost ruined our > marriage several months ago. Got to the point where I had to decide > between her, and GPL. I chose her. Of course, racing computer cars IS > a lot of fun. But her... well, she's the Real Thing. I made the right > choice. But they DO need to change their formula to eliminate online > race times from the ranking. > > 3:03xx at Spa in a Ferrari? Na, I don't think so. But please, don't > tell my wife ;-) > > -Tony-
Don Scurlock 07 Jun 2000 00:04 UTC#264800
Quoted text (9 lines)> >Tony Jester wrote: >> But they DO need to change their formula to eliminate online >> race times from the ranking. >> >> 3:03xx at Spa in a Ferrari? Na, I don't think so. But please, >> don't tell my wife ;-) >> >> -Tony-
Clock smashed times from online races is a real dilemma. Uwe Schuerkamp, who created GPLRank, is trying to come up with a automated software solution, and a number of site administrators are combing the entries for funny looking times. It's a tricky problem and an ongoing debate with the people involved. What I'm dreaming of is a server based Clock Smash Patch, that would detect whatever it is that happens when smashes happen, and not register lap times for that lap, for that car. Do any of our resident programming geniuses know if this is possible ? Could anyone create it ? Don Scurlock Vancouver,B.C. Come see how you rate, at the GPLRank site http://gplrank.schuerkamp.de/
Peter Ives 08 Jun 2000#264314
In article <8F4BADDB1dscurlock@news>, Don Scurlock <[email hidden]> writes
Quoted text (21 lines)>> >>Tony Jester wrote: >>> But they DO need to change their formula to eliminate online >>> race times from the ranking. >>> >>> 3:03xx at Spa in a Ferrari? Na, I don't think so. But please, >>> don't tell my wife ;-) >>> >>> -Tony- > >Clock smashed times from online races is a real dilemma. Uwe >Schuerkamp, who created GPLRank, is trying to come up with a >automated software solution, and a number of site administrators are >combing the entries for funny looking times. It's a tricky problem >and an ongoing debate with the people involved. What I'm dreaming of >is a server based Clock Smash Patch, that would detect whatever it >is that happens when smashes happen, and not register lap times for >that lap, for that car. Do any of our resident programming geniuses >know if this is possible ? Could anyone create it ? > >
I presume that the timing of laps is done on the server side. If so, then it's a shame that it wasn't left to the client side and then the lap time sent to the server each time one is completed. It would have avoided this problem I'm sure, and would have required very little extra data to be sent to the server as well. -- Peter Ives - (AKA Ivington) No person's opinions can be said to be more correct than another's, because each is the sole judge of his or her own experience.
Uwe Schuerkamp 13 Jun 2000 02:24 UTC#263722
>choice. But they DO need to change their formula to eliminate online >race times from the ranking. > >3:03xx at Spa in a Ferrari? Na, I don't think so. But please, don't >tell my wife ;-) "They" effectively means me. I've added a check so that any time faster than Greger Huttu's time by a certain, definable amount (on a per-track basis) will not be accepted by the update program. I *hope* it works. ;-) Uwe -- Uwe Schuerkamp //////////////////////////// http://www.schuerkamp.de/ Herford, Germany \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ (52.0N/8.5E) Ever wondered what's wrong with the world? http://bnetwork.com/ PGP Fingerprint: 2E 13 20 22 9A 3F 63 7F 67 6F E9 B1 A8 36 A4 61

Sponsors

Affiliate Links

Sim Gaming Expo MOZA Racing Sim-Lab Fanatec TrakRacer Asetek Internet Privacy From NordVPN Dreamhost Capital One Credit Card Application Fanatical CDKeys Amazon Amazon UK Project Motor Racing iRacing Get your racing gloves, boots and more from Demon Tweeks. Enlist at Roberts Space Industries, developers of Star Citizen and Squadron 42


Back from the ashes since July, 2019. First created in 2001 with the merger of Legends Central (founded 1999) and simracing.dk.

A site by a sort of sim racer, for sim racers, about racing sims. News and information on both modern and historic sim racing software titles.

All products and licenses property of their respective owners.


Facebook Threads Bluesky Twitter Mastodon Instagram YouTube Tiktok Twitch Reddit Google News Apple News Subscribe via WordPress Flipboard eBay

Race Sim Central © 1999-2026 | Some links pay RSC a commission. Advertising does not equal endorsement.Cookie Policy