Re: GP3 the next big thing

Andre Perron wrote:

Quoted text (11 lines)

> > in article 8icv6o$eii$[email hidden], Jeffrey Loo at > [email hidden] wrote on 6/16/00 6:20 AM: > > > I hope gp3 would be much better than f12000.. > > > > > > > Thats gonna be easy ! > > Andre

It's allready a winner!!! -- Greetings :)RuuD� +------------------------------+ mailto:[email hidden]

I hope gp3 would be much better than f12000..

I hope gp3 would be much better than f12000..

Thats gonna be easy ! Andre

Works perfectly well for most people. Excellent AI on the 1.06 patch. Just a question of using the latest TNT2 drivers - pretty standard practice I would suggest. Keep trying! Iain

Huh? -I don't get it.... Jan. =---

in article 8icv6o$eii$[email hidden], Jeffrey Loo at [email hidden] wrote on 6/16/00 6:20 AM: > I hope gp3 would be much better than f12000.. > > > Thats gonna be easy ! Andre

that won't be very easy, considering F12000 is such a quality product. I hope they can get the same kind of AI into GP3. Incredible realism. "Jeffrey Loo" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:8icv6o$eii$[email hidden]... > I hope gp3 would be much better than f12000.. > > >

[email hidden] (Harjan Brand) wrote in <O4o25.1472$%[email hidden]>:

Quoted text (12 lines)

>that won't be very easy, considering F12000 is such a quality product. I >hope they can get the same kind of AI into GP3. Incredible realism. > >"Jeffrey Loo" <[email hidden]> wrote in message >news:8icv6o$eii$[email hidden]... >> I hope gp3 would be much better than f12000.. >> >> >> > > >

F12K a quality product ????? Surely it must not be the same F12K which doesn't work in FF, has crappy AI, no support from the editor and doesn't work with TNT2 cards unless you patch them like hell.... Is there another F12K ?

On Fri, 16 Jun 2000 11:44:17 GMT, [email hidden] (txl) wrote:

Quoted text (22 lines)

>[email hidden] (Harjan Brand) wrote in ><O4o25.1472$%[email hidden]>: > >>that won't be very easy, considering F12000 is such a quality product. I >>hope they can get the same kind of AI into GP3. Incredible realism. >> >>"Jeffrey Loo" <[email hidden]> wrote in message >>news:8icv6o$eii$[email hidden]... >>> I hope gp3 would be much better than f12000.. >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > >F12K a quality product ????? > >Surely it must not be the same F12K which doesn't work in FF, has crappy >AI, no support from the editor and doesn't work with TNT2 cards unless you >patch them like hell.... >Is there another F12K ?

Never heard of "sarcasm"? JoH

> Surely it must not be the same F12K which doesn't work in FFWorks perfectly well for most people. > has crappy AIExcellent AI on the 1.06 patch. >doesn't work with TNT2 cards unless you patch them like hell....Just a question of using the latest TNT2 drivers - pretty standard practice I would suggest. > Is there another F12K ?Keep trying! Iain

Isn't r.a.s. just the most knowlegable collection of sim experts anywhere on the planet? Next time someone here tells me I'm an idiot, I'll be thankful. Andre? David G Fisher "Iain Mackenzie" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:WMr25.3875$[email hidden]...

Quoted text (8 lines)

> > Surely it must not be the same F12K which doesn't work in FF > Works perfectly well for most people. > > > has crappy AI > Excellent AI on the 1.06 patch. > > >doesn't work with TNT2 cards unless you patch them like hell.... > Just a question of using the latest TNT2 drivers - pretty standard

practice

Quoted text (8 lines)

> I would suggest. > > > Is there another F12K ? > Keep trying! > > Iain > >

You obviously haven't been following the hundreds of very active previous threads on F12K!! Iain Jan Verschueren <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:pZu25.19160$[email hidden]... > Huh? -I don't get it.... > > Jan.

Huh? -I don't get it.... Jan. =--- David G Fisher wrote... > Isn't r.a.s. just the most knowlegable collection of sim experts anywhereon > the planet? Next time someone here tells me I'm an idiot, I'll bethankful.

Quoted text (8 lines)

> > Andre? > > David G Fisher > > > "Iain Mackenzie"... > <snip>

You're easily pleased then... that being said virtually no developer seems to have noticed the standard for simracing games was raised a notch or two when GPL was released. Jan. =--- Richard S Beckett wrote... x-no-archive: yes If it was GP2 with 3dfx (ie no slomo) and FF support, I'd be very happy. R. Jeffrey Loo wrote in message <8icv6o$eii$[email hidden]>... >I hope gp3 would be much better than f12000..

I don't get it either, but David, you're an idiot. And you're welcome. Andre On Fri, 16 Jun 2000 19:11:17 GMT, "Jan Verschueren" <[email hidden]> wrote:

Quoted text (18 lines)

>Huh? -I don't get it.... > >Jan. >=--- >David G Fisher wrote... >> Isn't r.a.s. just the most knowlegable collection of sim experts anywhere >on >> the planet? Next time someone here tells me I'm an idiot, I'll be >thankful. >> >> Andre? >> >> David G Fisher >> >> >> "Iain Mackenzie"... >> <snip> >

Not really, I made my mind up about F1 2K and enjoyed it as a diversion so far. I should have paid some more attention, because I haven't yet tried racing the AI in v1.06... thanks for the info. But, the basic predicament remains... I don't have time to read all posts on RAS. I certainly don't have time to browse older threads, so would you mind, briefly, explaining DGF's reaction? Jan. =--- Iain Mackenzie wrote... > You obviously haven't been following the hundreds of very active previous > threads on F12K!! > Iain

You'll have to ask Greg, but I guess that he is being sarcastic to the extreme as a reaction to the rather silly comments on this thread bearing in mind that he (and I) have been staunch supporters of F12K throughout some ill-informed arguments on RAS. (There have also been some informed debates as well. Just thought I'd say that before anyone starts a flame!) Iain Jan Verschueren <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:noy25.21156$[email hidden]... > Not really, I made my mind up about F1 2K and enjoyed it as a diversion so > far. I should have paid some more attention, because I haven't yet tried > racing the AI in v1.06... thanks for the info. > > But, the basic predicament remains... I don't have time to read all postson > RAS. I certainly don't have time to browse older threads, so would youmind, > briefly, explaining DGF's reaction? > > Jan. > =--- > Iain Mackenzie wrote... > > You obviously haven't been following the hundreds of very activeprevious > > threads on F12K!! > > Iain > > >

Can't think why Michael!! Iain

On Sat, 17 Jun 2000 08:15:54 +0100 Iain Mackenzie <[email hidden]> wrote: % You'll have to ask Greg, but I guess that he is being sarcastic to the % extreme as a reaction to the rather silly comments on this thread bearing in % mind that he (and I) have been staunch supporters of F12K throughout some % ill-informed arguments on RAS. (There have also been some informed debates % as well. Just thought I'd say that before anyone starts a flame!) % Iain Sorry haven't used this one in ages <G> ) ( ( ( ( ) () @@ ) (( ( ( ( )( @@ ( )) ) ( ( ( ( ()( /---\ (()( ( _______ ) ) )(@ !O O! )@@ ( ) ) ) < ____) ) ( ( )( ()@ \ o / (@@@@@ ( ()( ) /--| |( o| ( ) ) ((@@(@@ !o! @@@@(@@@@@)() ( | > \___| ) ( @)@@)@ /---\-/---\ )@@@@@()( ) | /---------+ (@@@@)@@@( // /-----\ \\ @@@)@@@@@( . | | \ =========______/|@@@@@@@@@@@@@(@@@ // @ /---\ @ \\ @(@@@(@@@ . | \ \\=========------\|@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ O @@@ /-\ @@@ O @@(@@)@@ @ | \ \----+--\-))) @@@@@@@@@@ !! @@@ /-\ @@@ !! @@)@@@ .. . | |\______|_)))/ . @@@@@@ !! @@ /---\ @@ !! @@(@@@ @ . \__========== * . @@ /MM /\O O/\ MM\ @@@@@@@. . | |-\ \ ( . @ !!! !! \-/ !! !!! @@@@@ . | | \ \ ) . . @@@@ !! !! .(. @. .. . | | \ \ ( / .( . \)). ( |O )( O! @@@@ . ) . | | / / ) ( )). (( .) !! ((( !! @@ (. ((. . . | | / / () )) )) .( ( ( ) ). ( !! )( !! ) (( )) .. | |_< / ( ) ( ( ) ) (( ) )).) ((/ | ( | \( )) ((. ).___<_____\\__\__ (___)_))_((_(____))__(_(___.oooO_____Oooo.(_(_)_)((_ _______________________________________________________________ -- **************************** Michael E. Carver ************************* Upside out, or inside down...False alarm the only game in town. [email hidden] http://www.teleport.com/~mcarver =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=<[ /./. [- < ]>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

> Sorry haven't used this one in ages <G> Can't think why Michael!! Iain

Oooops! Should have been David. Apologies Greg! Iain > You'll have to ask Greg