Race Sim Central
Rec.Autos.Simulators Archive

Re: Thank Grant, not Papy for the D3D patch

13 posts by 12 people · 25 Jun 2000 - 27 Jun 2000 10:44 UTC

don hodgdon 25 Jun 2000#260038
"Eric Busch" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:8j5a8f$81f$[email hidden]...
Quoted text (13 lines)> Hey, I thought my installer was pretty spiffy... > > -- > Eric > > "Michael E. Carver" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:NVo55.354$[email hidden]... > > It's unsupported because Papy "leaked" the patch. By releasing it as > an > > unsupported patch they don't have to convince the Sierra suits that it > > is worthy of release and don't have to wait months for Sierra to test > it > > and build a pretty install wrapper on it.
ROFL!!!!! Yes it was Eric, it worked like a charm! Many thanks to Grant and yourself. -- don New GPL Programs for the Converted Tracks: http://www.ianparker1.freeserve.co.uk/gpl/index.html
koko 25 Jun 2000#260311
Thanks for the precision, giving back to Caesar what belongs to Caesar. so, Cheers to Grant Reeve... cause he's a really good fellow!!! can you tell me who is he ? and hum... he did not get payed for this... see that D... N..... ?? Jim Dombrowski <[email hidden]> a �crit dans le message : KIj55.11499$[email hidden]... > I believe I read Grant Reeve made this patch on his own time. That's > probably why it's unsupported. Because Papy didn't pay anyone to make it. > But everybody's thanking them. Although I know everyone means well, but be > sure to give credit where it's deserved. Both us and Papy are lucky tohave > people like that. > > Jim D. > > >
"Jim Dombrowski" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:KIj55.11499$[email hidden]... > I believe I read Grant Reeve made this patch on his own time.<snip> Well, I just feel like I need to add my voice to the din of praise to whoever was responsible. MANY, MANY THANKS! Jerry Morelock
EldredP 25 Jun 2000#260370
In article <[email hidden]>, "koko" <[email hidden]> writes: >Thanks for the precision, giving back to Caesar what belongs to Caesar. >so, Cheers to Grant Reeve... cause he's a really good fellow!!! >can you tell me who is he ? > >and hum... he did not get payed for this... see that D... N..... ?? > Grant's choice, DN's choice. YOUR choice to spend the money(or not). Eldred -- Tiger Stadium R.I.P. 1912-1999 Homepage - http://www.umich.edu/~epickett GPL hcp. +77.11 Never argue with an idiot. He brings you down to his level, then beats you with experience... Remove SPAM-OFF to reply.
Jim Dombrowski 25 Jun 2000 08:49 UTC#260292
I believe I read Grant Reeve made this patch on his own time. That's probably why it's unsupported. Because Papy didn't pay anyone to make it. But everybody's thanking them. Although I know everyone means well, but be sure to give credit where it's deserved. Both us and Papy are lucky to have people like that. Jim D.
Michael E. Carver 25 Jun 2000 14:45 UTC#260356
On Sun, 25 Jun 2000 08:49:46 GMT Jim Dombrowski <[email hidden]> wrote: % I believe I read Grant Reeve made this patch on his own time. That's % probably why it's unsupported. Because Papy didn't pay anyone to make it. % But everybody's thanking them. Although I know everyone means well, but be % sure to give credit where it's deserved. Both us and Papy are lucky to have % people like that. It's unsupported because Papy "leaked" the patch. By releasing it as an unsupported patch they don't have to convince the Sierra suits that it is worthy of release and don't have to wait months for Sierra to test it and build a pretty install wrapper on it. But you are right Grant worked on it on his own time and deserves the kudos (as well as Papy for giving it to us). Same goes for the disco-fix. Even the official patch was basically done on Randy's own time. These guys are as hooked on real racing simulations as we are.... That's why they can deliver such great products.... Thanks Papy..... (and Papy isn't just a company... but all of the fine folks who work there). -- **************************** Michael E. Carver ************************* Upside out, or inside down...False alarm the only game in town. [email hidden] http://www.teleport.com/~mcarver =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=<[ /./. [- < ]>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Eric Busch 25 Jun 2000 15:59 UTC#260381
Hey, I thought my installer was pretty spiffy... -- Eric "Michael E. Carver" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:NVo55.354$[email hidden]... > It's unsupported because Papy "leaked" the patch. By releasing it as an > unsupported patch they don't have to convince the Sierra suits that it > is worthy of release and don't have to wait months for Sierra to test it > and build a pretty install wrapper on it.
(unknown) 26 Jun 2000#260057
My guess is that Grant did it "in his own time" while on the clock at Papy. The patch appears on the OFFICIAL Papyrus Web site, and it's listed as a "BETA" patch. That indicates at least SOME level of support form Papy -- this is NOT an "unsupported" or "unsanctioned" piece of software, as some would lead us to believe. If it was done on Grant's own PERSONAL time, then I thank him for sharing that amazing labor of love with us, but my guess is that it was created as a part of the learning/development process for applying the GPL engine to the upcoming N4 release. Either way, thanks are required, so thanks to Grant for the work (regardless of how or why it came about), and thanks to Papy for making it available to us in beta form. -- JB In article <KIj55.11499$[email hidden]>, "Jim Dombrowski" <[email hidden]> wrote: > I believe I read Grant Reeve made this patch on his own time. That's > probably why it's unsupported. Because Papy didn't pay anyone to makeit. > But everybody's thanking them. Although I know everyone means well,but be > sure to give credit where it's deserved. Both us and Papy are luckyto have > people like that. > > Jim D. > > Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy.
Don Scurlock 26 Jun 2000 03:41 UTC#260081
[email hidden] (don hodgdon) wrote in <8j68rn$tpf$[email hidden]>: >"Eric Busch" <[email hidden]> wrote in message >> Hey, I thought my installer was pretty spiffy... A couple clicks, a cut, a paste. I wish I could change a few other things in my life that easily. -- Don Scurlock Vancouver,B.C. GPLRank -1.90 Come see how you rate, at the GPLRank site http://newgplrank.schuerkamp.de/
Duff 26 Jun 2000 11:32 UTC#260233
On Sun, 25 Jun 2000 13:13:26 +0200, "koko" <[email hidden]> wrote: >Thanks for the precision, giving back to Caesar what belongs to Caesar. >so, Cheers to Grant Reeve... cause he's a really good fellow!!! >can you tell me who is he ? > >and hum... he did not get payed for this... see that D... N..... ?? > And yet you'll pay for an RS Shifter patch?
Michael E. Carver 26 Jun 2000 14:04 UTC#260115
On Sun, 25 Jun 2000 12:00:52 -0400 Eric Busch <[email hidden]> wrote: % Hey, I thought my installer was pretty spiffy... errrrr excuse, me.... it should have read.... "build a bloated unnecessary install wrapper vs. the spiffy Papy installer...." I will be more careful next time. <G> % "Michael E. Carver" <[email hidden]> wrote in message % news:NVo55.354$[email hidden]... % > It's unsupported because Papy "leaked" the patch. By releasing it as % an % > unsupported patch they don't have to convince the Sierra suits that it % > is worthy of release and don't have to wait months for Sierra to test % it % > and build a pretty install wrapper on it. -- **************************** Michael E. Carver ************************* Upside out, or inside down...False alarm the only game in town. [email hidden] http://www.teleport.com/~mcarver =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=<[ /./. [- < ]>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Goy Larsen 26 Jun 2000 15:16 UTC#260007
koko wrote: > > Thanks for the precision, giving back to Caesar what belongs to Caesar. > so, Cheers to Grant Reeve... cause he's a really good fellow!!! > can you tell me who is he ? > > and hum... he did not get payed for this... see that D... N..... ?? Neither did D... N... for his work on other stuff he has done, so what's your point ? Beers and cheers (uncle) Goy "Team Mirage" http://www.teammirage.com/ "The Pits" http://www.theuspits.com/ * Spam is for losers who can't get business any other way * "Spamkiller" http://www.spamkiller.com
Brett C. Cammack 27 Jun 2000 10:44 UTC#259804
Eric Busch reported previously that the implementation for N4 is completely different than for GPL and that Grant did this simply so he could use GPL on his Geoforce2-equipped computer. I believe what we are actually seeing is the back-filling of GPL with features that were developed during the creation of N4. They developed or figured something out during the N4 development process and one of the GPL people decided it wouldn't be too hard to port it into GPL. I suspect that was particularly true for the "no-disco" patch where, in refining the on-line play code for N4 they discovered a flaw, corrected it, and then backfilled the fix into GPL. I do not, in any way, want to diminish their contribution. I simply want to explain that they're taking advantage of the R&D funding for N4 to bring GPL along and take it closer to what they want to play with themselves. Indeed a "labor of love" which I certainly appreciate! Regards, Brett C. Cammack That's Racing! Motorsports Pompano Beach, FL

Sponsors

Affiliate Links

Sim Gaming Expo MOZA Racing Sim-Lab Fanatec TrakRacer Asetek Internet Privacy From NordVPN Dreamhost Capital One Credit Card Application Fanatical CDKeys Amazon Amazon UK Project Motor Racing iRacing Get your racing gloves, boots and more from Demon Tweeks. Enlist at Roberts Space Industries, developers of Star Citizen and Squadron 42


Back from the ashes since July, 2019. First created in 2001 with the merger of Legends Central (founded 1999) and simracing.dk.

A site by a sort of sim racer, for sim racers, about racing sims. News and information on both modern and historic sim racing software titles.

All products and licenses property of their respective owners.


Facebook Threads Bluesky Twitter Mastodon Instagram YouTube Tiktok Twitch Reddit Google News Apple News Subscribe via WordPress Flipboard eBay

Race Sim Central © 1999-2026 | Some links pay RSC a commission. Advertising does not equal endorsement.Cookie Policy