then it's the final readme version, hexscan the exe and you'll see the exe
is not 1.0
Simon Brown <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:mTme5.9375$[email hidden]...
> Hate to keep saying this, but there is a date in the Readme file that says
> July 13th 2000, which means it's the final version.
>
>
Is the leaked GP3 build the final version?
Chris Wright complained that the warez leak had spoiled the build-up to GP3's release and argued it was old, unfinished code. Others pointed out the readme was dated 13 July and the executable reported version 1.00, so the leak was probably final. The thread drifted into GPLRank banter.
Automated summary.
On Sun, 23 Jul 2000 18:35:01 +0100, "Chris Wright"
<[email hidden]> wrote:
>This whole warez fiasco has really tarnished the build up to next Friday for
>the entire r.a.s/race sim community.
A point can be made without resorting to gross misrepresentation of
the facts you know.
>For goodness sake, this is apparently old code which is clearly "work in
>progress" rather than the finished article.
And you know this to be the case how exactly, since you haven't
downloaded, looked at or tried it? Nor have I mind you, but then I'm
not making claims about something of which I have no experience.
>Those of you who have downloaded the game should ask yourselves if you'd be
>happy with your customers/boss receiving your work before it was ready for
>consumption - of course you wouldn't!
He does all the time, to get an idea how things are going. Not a
problem. If my job sucks when the timer is 99% through then it's not
going to get much better. In that case he'd be REAL pissed if I asked
him to pay for it....
>Anyone who is involved in producing computer software knows that a project
>can still resemble a dog's dinner even just prior to completion - it's the
>nature of the beast so to speak.
This is utter nonsense. Having been involved in five beta tests, all
for sims, NONE of them, not a one has been changed radically in the
weeks prior to release. In fact most of them were massively playable
and with most features intact from the first pre-alpha test versions.
>So in the case of GP3, those who have the
>warez copy are, at best viewing the development team's "dirty laundry" as it
>were - it is completely unfair to the guys and gals who have worked long
>hours for our gaming pleasure - to say nothing of the piracy issues.
Perhaps unfair and I'll leave the anti-piracy moral high-ground
grabbing antics well alone, but it's also extremely misleading to make
statements of purported fact about a product which you've never seen.
>Someone posted on r.a.s that we should stop pontificating on morals re:GP3
>warez. This is not a moral issue, it's a simple matter of misleading info
>arising from incomplete code.
Misleading info arising from what is _perhaps_ incomplete code,
although how incomplete is far from clear. That at least is better to
know that misleading info arising from no code whatsoever, no?
>The only time to pass judgement on the efforts of Team Crammond will be next
>Friday morning, when the finished code is safely stored on our hard drives.
Going on what everyone has said up until now, I'll be making a longer
drive than normal to buy it from a shop that accepts returns - that is
why I appreciate the warez comments. I personally believe it'll be
good, but when people here whose opinions I respect very much get THAT
disappointed, I take notice.
>Has no-one ever heard the old theatrical phrase "It'll be alright on the
>night"?
Yes, it's also the name of a program which depicts all the times when
things were far from allright on the night....
John
LOL... my words to Andre aren't even cold and they're already at it.
Jan./one week until a major reality check guys.
=---
Chris Wright wrote...
> This whole warez fiasco <snip>
So.... what version does the warez-exe show then???
This whole warez fiasco has really tarnished the build up to next Friday for
the entire r.a.s/race sim community.
For goodness sake, this is apparently old code which is clearly "work in
progress" rather than the finished article.
Those of you who have downloaded the game should ask yourselves if you'd be
happy with your customers/boss receiving your work before it was ready for
consumption - of course you wouldn't!
Anyone who is involved in producing computer software knows that a project
can still resemble a dog's dinner even just prior to completion - it's the
nature of the beast so to speak. So in the case of GP3, those who have the
warez copy are, at best viewing the development team's "dirty laundry" as it
were - it is completely unfair to the guys and gals who have worked long
hours for our gaming pleasure - to say nothing of the piracy issues.
Someone posted on r.a.s that we should stop pontificating on morals re:GP3
warez. This is not a moral issue, it's a simple matter of misleading info
arising from incomplete code.
The only time to pass judgement on the efforts of Team Crammond will be next
Friday morning, when the finished code is safely stored on our hard drives.
Has no-one ever heard the old theatrical phrase "It'll be alright on the
night"?
It is the final version and works good. Tried it out and will buy it when it
hits the stores here. Of course I deleted it after I tried it out.
"Simon Brown" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:mTme5.9375$[email hidden]...
> Hate to keep saying this, but there is a date in the Readme file that says
> July 13th 2000, which means it's the final version.
>
>
Hate to keep saying this, but there is a date in the Readme file that says
July 13th 2000, which means it's the final version.
"Chris Wright" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:8lcm0e$kue$[email hidden]...
> This whole warez fiasco has really tarnished the build up to next Fridayfor
> the entire r.a.s/race sim community.
Why didn't you complain equally loudly when F1 2000 and Official F1
was reped and warez'd???
> For goodness sake, this is apparently old code which is clearly "work in
> progress" rather than the finished article.
What proof do you have of this? This is very similar to asking how
you know GP3 will be worth a shit...
> Those of you who have downloaded the game should ask yourselves if you'dbe
> happy with your customers/boss receiving your work before it was ready for
> consumption - of course you wouldn't!
Nope. I would be equally unhappy of buying a game touted as
version 3 to find out it is really 2.5. I don't do warez (never have)
nor do I condone it. But it is a fact of live on the internet. However
I think releasing a crap game is as bad as warezing one.
> Anyone who is involved in producing computer software knows that a project
> can still resemble a dog's dinner even just prior to completion - it's the
> nature of the beast so to speak. So in the case of GP3, those who have the
> warez copy are, at best viewing the development team's "dirty laundry" asit
> were - it is completely unfair to the guys and gals who have worked long
> hours for our gaming pleasure - to say nothing of the piracy issues.
Again... Exactly what proof do you have that this is not the final copy.
Were you a GP3 beta tester? Are you really Geoff Crammond?
> Someone posted on r.a.s that we should stop pontificating on morals re:GP3
> warez. This is not a moral issue, it's a simple matter of misleading info
> arising from incomplete code.
And what is your proof that the warez GP3 code is incomplete.
--
[email hidden]
> The only time to pass judgement on the efforts of Team Crammond will be
next
> Friday morning, when the finished code is safely stored on our hard
drives.
>
> Has no-one ever heard the old theatrical phrase "It'll be alright on the
> night"?
>
>
>
>
>
>
"Ken Brown" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:T0ne5.66995$[email hidden]...
> It is the final version and works good. Tried it out and will buy it whenit
> hits the stores here. Of course I deleted it after I tried it out.
Of course. Now you can play Mr. Rightous like other people
that have used warez and deleted it.
--
[email hidden]
> "Simon Brown" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
> news:mTme5.9375$[email hidden]...
> > Hate to keep saying this, but there is a date in the Readme file that
says
> > July 13th 2000, which means it's the final version.
> >
> >
>
>
> then it's the final readme version, hexscan the exe and you'll see the exe
> is not 1.0
So.... what version does the warez-exe show then???
"There's something rotten in the state of Denmark"......crap is crap and
there is nothing a beta turning into release version is gonna change. I
don't get it though - I think GP3 delivers what was officially promised -
nothin' less or more. I think the main problem is the "closest to God" hype
about Mr Crammond. Yeah, he made some brilliant things in THE PAST - such as
Revs, which I think is one of my no 1 experiences on a 'puter. F1GP - which
I still have the original for my Amiga was stunning for its time.
However, GP2 was less from stunning, and I guess Mr Crammond aint up with
the task anymore - and this one will be the last one where he could live on
his reputation and name.
For me there's only one: Mr Kaemmer - yes I'm a ICR1&2, Nascar 1,2,3 and GPL
junkie - he is always is a huge leap in front of the competition
So - yeah everyone is disappointed - but who promised anything more?
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
Disclaimer: English aint my native tounge - so be nice...
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
Chris Wright skrev i meddelandet <8lcm0e$kue$[email hidden]>...
>This whole warez fiasco has really tarnished the build up to next Fridayfor
it
next
Quoted text (13 lines)
>the entire r.a.s/race sim community. > >For goodness sake, this is apparently old code which is clearly "work in >progress" rather than the finished article. > >Those of you who have downloaded the game should ask yourselves if you'd be >happy with your customers/boss receiving your work before it was ready for >consumption - of course you wouldn't! > >Anyone who is involved in producing computer software knows that a project >can still resemble a dog's dinner even just prior to completion - it's the >nature of the beast so to speak. So in the case of GP3, those who have the >warez copy are, at best viewing the development team's "dirty laundry" asQuoted text (8 lines)
>were - it is completely unfair to the guys and gals who have worked long >hours for our gaming pleasure - to say nothing of the piracy issues. > >Someone posted on r.a.s that we should stop pontificating on morals re:GP3 >warez. This is not a moral issue, it's a simple matter of misleading info >arising from incomplete code. > >The only time to pass judgement on the efforts of Team Crammond will beQuoted text (11 lines)
>Friday morning, when the finished code is safely stored on our hard drives. > >Has no-one ever heard the old theatrical phrase "It'll be alright on the >night"? > > > > > > >On Sat, 22 Jul 2000 19:51:45 +0200, "Jan Verschueren"
<[email hidden]> wrote:
>LOL... my words to Andre aren't even cold and they're already at it.
>
>Jan./one week until a major reality check guys.
LOL, I hope we both will be proven wrong Jan...
But I'm affraid we won't. We're never wrong :)
Andre
>=---
>Chris Wright wrote...
>> This whole warez fiasco <snip>
>
>
Andre Warringa wrote:
Damn, did the average age on this ng drop to about 12
after this warez version was released?
You kids are really full of it...
--
l8er
ronny
Your mouse has moved. Windows must be restarted for the change
to take effect. Reboot now?
|\ _,,,---,,_ I want to die like my Grandfather,
ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ in his sleep.
|,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Not like the people in his car,
'---''(_/--' `-'\_) screaming their heads off!
Quoted text (10 lines)
> > On Sat, 22 Jul 2000 19:51:45 +0200, "Jan Verschueren" > <[email hidden]> wrote: > > >LOL... my words to Andre aren't even cold and they're already at it. > > > >Jan./one week until a major reality check guys. > > LOL, I hope we both will be proven wrong Jan... > But I'm affraid we won't. We're never wrong :)Watch who you call a kid Mr. Stoehr. Enjoying a friendly in-joke doesn't
make us any younger or less responsible than we are.
Look who's talking BTW, do adults really have a cute sleeping kitten in
their sig? ;-)
Jan.
=---
Ronald Stoehr wrote...
Quoted text (10 lines)
> Andre Warringa wrote: > > <snip> > Damn, did the average age on this ng drop to about 12 > after this warez version was released? > > You kids are really full of it... > > -- > l8er > ronnyYou've been sabotaging that by not driving!! ;-)
Jan.
=---
EldredP wrote...
> <snip>
> I seem to remember you saying I'd be moving up in GPLRank, or somethinglike
you
> with experience...
> Remove SPAM-OFF to reply.
Quoted text (9 lines)
> that...<g> > > Eldred > -- > Tiger Stadium R.I.P. 1912-1999 > Homepage - http://www.umich.edu/~epickett > GPL hcp. +70.45 > > Never argue with an idiot. He brings you down to his level, then beatsIn article <[email hidden]>, [email hidden] (Andre
Warringa) writes:
>LOL, I hope we both will be proven wrong Jan...
>But I'm affraid we won't. We're never wrong :)
>
>Andre
I seem to remember you saying I'd be moving up in GPLRank, or something like
that...<g>
Eldred
--
Tiger Stadium R.I.P. 1912-1999
Homepage - http://www.umich.edu/~epickett
GPL hcp. +70.45
Never argue with an idiot. He brings you down to his level, then beats you
with experience...
Remove SPAM-OFF to reply.
In article <Umoe5.1870$9%[email hidden]>, "Greg Cisko"
<[email hidden]> writes:
Actually, many DID...
Eldred
--
Tiger Stadium R.I.P. 1912-1999
Homepage - http://www.umich.edu/~epickett
GPL hcp. +70.45
Never argue with an idiot. He brings you down to his level, then beats you
with experience...
Remove SPAM-OFF to reply.
Quoted text (8 lines)
>"Chris Wright" <[email hidden]> wrote in message >news:8lcm0e$kue$[email hidden]... >> This whole warez fiasco has really tarnished the build up to next Friday >for >> the entire r.a.s/race sim community. > >Why didn't you complain equally loudly when F1 2000 and Official F1 >was reped and warez'd???On Sun 23 Jul 2000 02:13:01am, Mikkel Gram-Hansen wrote:
>Badlands <[email hidden]> wrote in message
>news:oHne5.18925$[email hidden]...
>> "There's something rotten in the state of Denmark"......
>
>Hey hey easy there, take it out on someone else, we are at leat not
>last in the GPL Ranking anymore ;)
You are again now - those damn Yanks have been practising :-(
--
David. (GPLRank handicap: -1.01)
"After all, a mere thousand yards - such a harmless little knoll,
really."
(Raymond Mays on Shelsley Walsh)
David Buttery <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
>
> You are again now - those damn Yanks have been practising :-(
Damned, back to practice.
Greger Huttu if you read this.... there is a danish passport waiting for you
at the ferry from G�teborg to Denmark, please come down here. :-)
Mikkel
Badlands <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:oHne5.18925$[email hidden]...
> "There's something rotten in the state of Denmark"......
Hey hey easy there, take it out on someone else, we are at leat not last in
the GPL Ranking anymore ;)
Mikkel
On Sat, 22 Jul 2000 22:11:49 +0100, "Tim Wheatley"
<[email hidden]> wrote:
>then it's the final readme version, hexscan the exe and you'll see the exe
>is not 1.0
That's right, it's actually "1.00".
You've been sabotaging that by not driving!! ;-)
Jan.
=---
This whole warez fiasco has really tarnished the build up to next Friday for
the entire r.a.s/race sim community.
For goodness sake, this is apparently old code which is clearly "work in
progress" rather than the finished article.
Those of you who have downloaded the game should ask yourselves if you'd be
happy with your customers/boss receiving your work before it was ready for
consumption - of course you wouldn't!
Anyone who is involved in producing computer software knows that a project
can still resemble a dog's dinner even just prior to completion - it's the
nature of the beast so to speak. So in the case of GP3, those who have the
warez copy are, at best viewing the development team's "dirty laundry" as it
were - it is completely unfair to the guys and gals who have worked long
hours for our gaming pleasure - to say nothing of the piracy issues.
Someone posted on r.a.s that we should stop pontificating on morals re:GP3
warez. This is not a moral issue, it's a simple matter of misleading info
arising from incomplete code.
The only time to pass judgement on the efforts of Team Crammond will be next
Friday morning, when the finished code is safely stored on our hard drives.
Has no-one ever heard the old theatrical phrase "It'll be alright on the
night"?
On 23 Jul 2000 17:57:11 GMT, [email hidden] (EldredP) wrote:
You will Eldred, you will...
IF YOU WOULD PRACTICE THE RING SOME MORE INSTEAD OF BEING A SMARTASS
:)
Andre
>
>Eldred
Quoted text (10 lines)
>In article <[email hidden]>, [email hidden] (Andre >Warringa) writes: > >>LOL, I hope we both will be proven wrong Jan... >>But I'm affraid we won't. We're never wrong :) >> >>Andre > >I seem to remember you saying I'd be moving up in GPLRank, or something like >that...<g>On Sun, 23 Jul 2000 18:37:10 +0100, "Chris Wright"
<[email hidden]> wrote:
>This whole warez fiasco has really tarnished the build up to next Friday for
>the entire r.a.s/race sim community.
A bit of a sweeping generalisation - I don't see to many people
feeling "tarnished".
>For goodness sake, this is apparently old code which is clearly "work in
>progress" rather than the finished article.
Many people say it isn't, but actually a quick search on Deja reveals
a discussion going on to the extent that although the version number
shows "V1.0" and the file dates are recent, the reasons for this may
be that the group that released this to the world hacked the software
to change the version number in order to get recognition from their
peers for releasing it first.
So it still seems possible that the version going around could be old,
with some difference in Friday's release version.
Cheers!
John
On Mon 24 Jul 2000 11:36:12am, EldredP wrote:
<snip>
>Life intruded...<g><snip>
Hang on... you're a GPL driver, and you have a life? Something's not
quite right here :-)
--
David. (GPLRank handicap: -1.17)
"After all, a mere thousand yards - such a harmless little knoll,
really."
(Raymond Mays on Shelsley Walsh)
In article <[email hidden]>, "Jan Verschueren"
<[email hidden]> writes:
>Look who's talking BTW, do adults really have a cute sleeping kitten in
>their sig? ;-)
Is THAT what that is? I couldn't even figure it out...<shrug>
Eldred
--
Tiger Stadium R.I.P. 1912-1999
Homepage - http://www.umich.edu/~epickett
GPL hcp. +69.95
Never argue with an idiot. He brings you down to his level, then beats you
with experience...
Remove SPAM-OFF to reply.
In article <[email hidden]>, Andre Warringa
<[email hidden]> writes:
So - that just comes EASIER... :)
Besides, realistically I could only make up about 30 seconds. That still won't
get me in the top 400 - maybe not even the top 500...I don't remember.
Eldred
--
Tiger Stadium R.I.P. 1912-1999
Homepage - http://www.umich.edu/~epickett
GPL hcp. +69.95
Never argue with an idiot. He brings you down to his level, then beats you
with experience...
Remove SPAM-OFF to reply.
Quoted text (12 lines)
>>>LOL, I hope we both will be proven wrong Jan... >>>But I'm affraid we won't. We're never wrong :) >>> >>>Andre >> >>I seem to remember you saying I'd be moving up in GPLRank, or something like >>that...<g> > >You will Eldred, you will... > >IF YOU WOULD PRACTICE THE RING SOME MORE INSTEAD OF BEING A SMARTASS >:)In article <[email hidden]>, "Jan Verschueren"
<[email hidden]> writes:
Life intruded...<g>
Eldred
--
Tiger Stadium R.I.P. 1912-1999
Homepage - http://www.umich.edu/~epickett
GPL hcp. +69.95
Never argue with an idiot. He brings you down to his level, then beats you
with experience...
Remove SPAM-OFF to reply.
Quoted text (9 lines)
>You've been sabotaging that by not driving!! ;-) > >Jan. >=--- >EldredP wrote... >> <snip> >> I seem to remember you saying I'd be moving up in GPLRank, or something >like >> that...<g>Your assumption that the code is incomplete is pure speculation. The readme
is dated 13th July, the exe is (or so i've read) version 1.00 and all the
known bugs that the team were reportedly working on before release are not
present.
Credits also claim it to be ver 1.0, but whether it is or isn't, it ain't gonna
be much different. Wait til someone posts a review of the retail version b4 u
buy..
Martyn_D
Simon Brown wrote:
> Your assumption that the code is incomplete is pure speculation. The readme
> is dated 13th July, the exe is (or so i've read) version 1.00 and all the
> known bugs that the team were reportedly working on before release are not
> present.
The worst thing about warez is reading your posts about warez.
--
Todd S.
"Chris Wright" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:8lcm0e$kue$[email hidden]...
> This whole warez fiasco has really tarnished the build up to next Friday
for
> the entire r.a.s/race sim community.
>
> For goodness sake, this is apparently old code which is clearly "work in
> progress" rather than the finished article.
>
> Those of you who have downloaded the game should ask yourselves if you'd
be
> happy with your customers/boss receiving your work before it was ready for
> consumption - of course you wouldn't!
>
> Anyone who is involved in producing computer software knows that a project
> can still resemble a dog's dinner even just prior to completion - it's the
> nature of the beast so to speak. So in the case of GP3, those who have the
> warez copy are, at best viewing the development team's "dirty laundry" as
it
> were - it is completely unfair to the guys and gals who have worked long
> hours for our gaming pleasure - to say nothing of the piracy issues.
>
> Someone posted on r.a.s that we should stop pontificating on morals re:GP3
> warez. This is not a moral issue, it's a simple matter of misleading info
> arising from incomplete code.
>
> The only time to pass judgement on the efforts of Team Crammond will be
next
> Friday morning, when the finished code is safely stored on our hard
drives.
>
> Has no-one ever heard the old theatrical phrase "It'll be alright on the
> night"?
>
>
>
>
>
>
On Sun, 23 Jul 2000 18:37:10 +0100, Chris Wright <[email hidden]> wrote:
>This whole warez fiasco has really tarnished the build up to next Friday for
>the entire r.a.s/race sim community.
>
>For goodness sake, this is apparently old code which is clearly "work in
>progress" rather than the finished article.
>
Hi Chris,
while I have come to value you as a regular RAS contributing
editor, I fear you will have various parts of your body buried
in a another part of your body come next Friday ;-)
Just to put things clear, I would just *love* to be proven
wrong on this one, next Friday, as you state.
Regards & bye for now,
Uwe
--
Uwe Schuerkamp //////////////////////////// http://www.schuerkamp.de/
Herford, Germany \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ (52.0N/8.5E)
Ever wondered what's wrong with the world? http://bnetwork.com/
PGP Fingerprint: 2E 13 20 22 9A 3F 63 7F 67 6F E9 B1 A8 36 A4 61
In article <[email hidden]>,
[email hidden] (David Buttery) writes:
><snip>
>>Life intruded...<g>
><snip>
>
>Hang on... you're a GPL driver, and you have a life? Something's not
>quite right here :-)
Oops...Um, er.... I'll get back to you... :)
Well, I didn't say it was *much* of a life...
Eldred
--
Tiger Stadium R.I.P. 1912-1999
Homepage - http://www.umich.edu/~epickett
GPL hcp. +69.95
Never argue with an idiot. He brings you down to his level, then beats you
with experience...
Remove SPAM-OFF to reply.
EldredP wrote:
>
> In article <[email hidden]>, "Jan Verschueren"
> <[email hidden]> writes:
>
> >Look who's talking BTW, do adults really have a cute sleeping kitten in
> >their sig? ;-)
Oh, and it's not MANLY, isn't it, you tough mean piece of manhood...
;^)
>
> Is THAT what that is? I couldn't even figure it out...<shrug>
Switch to a fixed font, that'll help...
--
l8er
ronny
Your mouse has moved. Windows must be restarted for the change
to take effect. Reboot now?
I hate |\ _,,,---,,_ I want to die like my Grandfather,
Kids! /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ in his sleep.
|,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Not like the people in his car,
'---''(_/--' `-'\_) screaming their heads off!


































