On Sun, 23 Jul 2000 13:48:48 -0500, "Greg Cisko" <[email hidden]>
wrote:
I love EA Sports. I love the games they make, and i have quite a
number of them. I was deadset on getting f1 2000. Then i read every
review on here. It really does sound like a shithouse game. Cars
crashing on the warm up laps etc. all the bugs. The only reason its
got better is third party patches etc. GP3 wont have the amount of
basic flaws that f12000 had.
___________________
Macca
"I'd kill myself for you...Id kill you for myself"
Pantera - This Love
GP3 dismissed as worse than F1 2000
A poster called GP3 disappointing with 1996-era physics and said F1 2000 was better despite its flaws. Replies argued over F1 2000's bugs and AI, Monaco GP Racing Simulation 2, and whether GP3 improved with more play. Jan Loebzien said GP3 was GP2 with improvements, which was acceptable but less than hoped.
Automated summary.
I respect your opinion
I have both
I helped with some vrl files to make F1 2000 better (on release 90% of
the AI could not get around Brazil Spa and France) and have played the
game alot, I believe it's a solid base to imrove upon.
But
GP3 is better the dynamic weather is amazing the feel of the car is
superb. The telemetary is ace, the AI is good.
It ain't perfect but it's the best modern F1 sim there is
F1 2001 if they add some features could be better though
Regards Mike
On Sun, 23 Jul 2000 18:38:37 GMT, mracer <[email hidden]> wrote:
Quoted text (13 lines)
>GP3 is unbelievably disappointing. > >It isn't worth the plastic, paper, and ink used to make it. > >The worst offense is the physics, which are pure 1996. > >I won't go into all the things I hate about GP3, the list would be pages >long. > >In summary, it will be deleted from my hard drive. Despite significant >shortcomings, F1 2000 is an exponentially better modern F1 sim. > >It's kind of hard to believe but EA actually has a "best of class" sim.On Sun 23 Jul 2000 07:38:37pm, mracer wrote:
<snip>
>It's kind of hard to believe but EA actually has a "best of class"
>sim.
MGPRS2?
--
David. (GPLRank handicap: -1.01)
"After all, a mere thousand yards - such a harmless little knoll,
really."
(Raymond Mays on Shelsley Walsh)
Agree... slight edge over F1 2k. IMO, of course.
Jan.
=---
David Buttery wrote...
Quoted text (13 lines)
> On Sun 23 Jul 2000 07:38:37pm, mracer wrote: > > <snip> > >It's kind of hard to believe but EA actually has > >a "best of class" sim. > > MGPRS2? > > -- > David. (GPLRank handicap: -1.01) > "After all, a mere thousand yards - such a harmless little knoll, > really." > (Raymond Mays on Shelsley Walsh)On Sun, 23 Jul 2000 18:38:37 GMT, mracer <[email hidden]> wrote:
>In summary, it will be deleted from my hard drive.
Right after you played it just a little more ...?
If you're serious about your rants, shouldn't that
be "it has been deleted from my hard drive"?
LOL. How pathetic!
In article <[email hidden]>,
mracer <[email hidden]> wrote:
pages
> long.
>
> In summary, it will be deleted from my hard drive. Despite significant
> shortcomings, F1 2000 is an exponentially better modern F1 sim.
>
> It's kind of hard to believe but EA actually has a "best of class"sim.
How about sharing at least *some* of your concerns about this title
with us... because last time I checked software wasn't made of paper,
ink and plastic and F1 2000 was utterly & unplayable crap...
--Tel
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
Quoted text (7 lines)
> GP3 is unbelievably disappointing. > > It isn't worth the plastic, paper, and ink used to make it. > > The worst offense is the physics, which are pure 1996. > > I won't go into all the things I hate about GP3, the list would be<snip>
MGPRS2?
--
David. (GPLRank handicap: -1.01)
"After all, a mere thousand yards - such a harmless little knoll,
really."
(Raymond Mays on Shelsley Walsh)
It shouldn't be there in the first place <g>
GP3 is unbelievably disappointing.
It isn't worth the plastic, paper, and ink used to make it.
The worst offense is the physics, which are pure 1996.
I won't go into all the things I hate about GP3, the list would be pages
long.
In summary, it will be deleted from my hard drive. Despite significant
shortcomings, F1 2000 is an exponentially better modern F1 sim.
It's kind of hard to believe but EA actually has a "best of class" sim.
"mracer" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
> It's kind of hard to believe but EA actually has a "best of class" sim.
I agree. The #1 main reason I was hesitant to get F1 2000 is
because of the crappy NASCAR Revolution. I bought the game
and returned it within the hour. I thought all EA racing sims
would be the same. But I was wrong. F1 2000 is the way
better than I originally imagined.
--
[email hidden]
Hmmmm.
"Its a disgrace."
God I'm heartbroken for you Karl......I'm sure it totally ruined your day.
Gee...fancy wasting all that time downloading a pirate copy of this piece of
trash when you could of spent your time doing something far more
interesting and rewarding instead....like picking the fluff out of your
belly button.
"I pity all of you who ordered it."
You do.?
Well thank you very much for your heartfelt concern bonny lad.
I'm sure I'll be thinking of you when I plonk my hard earned cash down on
the counter on Friday.
I hope you enjoyed your free lunch even if it did turn out to upset your
stomach.
Ian.
"Karl Zosel" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:uSHe5.144121$[email hidden]...
> I just tested it: I totally agree.
> Its a disgrace.
>
> Halsbro just made a deal with Mr Crammond to use his name to sell aslightly
Quoted text (23 lines)
> improved version of GP2. > They used the same UNefficient graphics engine. > > I pity all of you who ordered it. > > mracer <[email hidden]> schreef in berichtnieuws > [email hidden]... > > GP3 is unbelievably disappointing. > > > > It isn't worth the plastic, paper, and ink used to make it. > > > > The worst offense is the physics, which are pure 1996. > > > > I won't go into all the things I hate about GP3, the list would be pages > > long. > > > > In summary, it will be deleted from my hard drive. Despite significant > > shortcomings, F1 2000 is an exponentially better modern F1 sim. > > > > It's kind of hard to believe but EA actually has a "best of class" sim. > > > >
mracer <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
> In summary, it will be deleted from my hard drive.It shouldn't be there in the first place <g>
Jan, pathetic is the way you are going to feel after you thow your money
away buying GP3, even though you have been warned about how bad it is.
Stupidity cannot be cured.
Jan Loebzien wrote:
Quoted text (8 lines)
> On Sun, 23 Jul 2000 18:38:37 GMT, mracer <[email hidden]> wrote: > > >In summary, it will be deleted from my hard drive. > > Right after you played it just a little more ...? > If you're serious about your rants, shouldn't that > be "it has been deleted from my hard drive"? > LOL. How pathetic!I just tested it: I totally agree.
Its a disgrace.
Halsbro just made a deal with Mr Crammond to use his name to sell a slightly
improved version of GP2.
They used the same UNefficient graphics engine.
I pity all of you who ordered it.
mracer <[email hidden]> schreef in berichtnieuws
[email hidden]...
Quoted text (14 lines)
> GP3 is unbelievably disappointing. > > It isn't worth the plastic, paper, and ink used to make it. > > The worst offense is the physics, which are pure 1996. > > I won't go into all the things I hate about GP3, the list would be pages > long. > > In summary, it will be deleted from my hard drive. Despite significant > shortcomings, F1 2000 is an exponentially better modern F1 sim. > > It's kind of hard to believe but EA actually has a "best of class" sim. >Everyone is entitled to make up their own mind, and the opinions here have
been very varying.
Cheers, I'll give that a spin.
Jan.
=---
rrevved wrote...
Quoted text (10 lines)
> <snip> > > Undocumented controller options in F1 2k... now > > there's something I hadn't heard about before. > > -Please elaborate. > > If you have the 1.09 patch: > > Click the alien's face at the right side of the bottom of the screen. > There are some options there.. >Undocumented controller options in F1 2k... now there's something I hadn't
heard about before. -Please elaborate.
Like to know how you're able to mash the throttle in MGPRS2 too, I'm still
driving that one competively. ;-))
Jan.
=---
<[email hidden]> wrote...
Quoted text (10 lines)
> <snip> > My experience is the opposite. In MGPRS2 I can smash and mash the gas > and brakes, but not so in F12K. Have you played around with the > undocumented controller settings etc. in F12K. F12K has a much better > feel to me. No I have not driven an F1 car before, but I do drive a > car and the feeling of the physics of driving is much closer in F12K. > Hands down winner in this area, and I bet GP3 doesn't match it in this > area either. > -- > NosTelemetry (though only usefull with external viewer) and various other
subtle differences you may not even notice, depending on your driving
style/talent. Let's just say F1 2K goes a little easy on the hamfisted for
my taste.
Graphically I got to admit F1 2K has it hands down and with the latest patch
the AI is not all that bad, it's a very fine line.
Jan.
=---
<[email hidden]> wrote...
Quoted text (9 lines)
> <snip> > In what way? Yes, I have both installed on my computer right now and > IMO F1 2000 is quite a bit better than MGPRS2. AI problems and all. > Once you get throught the first lap in F1 2000 things are not too bad > in the AI area. Most people who complain about it are people without > the machine it needs to run well. Looking forward to F1 2001 and wil > be passing on GP3 myself. > -- > NosOn Sun, 23 Jul 2000 20:57:37 GMT, mracer <[email hidden]> wrote:
>Jan, pathetic is the way you are going to feel after you thow your money
>away buying GP3, even though you have been warned about how bad it is.
No, pathetic would be to buy the game even though you have
been "warned" and _then_ come back here and still complain.
E.g "I couldn't believe it would be so bad so I went and bought
it, but boy you were right, it's even worse ...".
_That_ is stupidity that can't be cured. But since it can't be
cured, rest assured some _will_ come back and complain. :-)
That said, I think GP3 is a good game, just like GP2 was.
I was just hoping for some more improvements.
Blaze
You may want to know that on the day F1 2000 was released there were
countless "F1 2000 sucks!" posts on newsgroups and forums everywhere. If
those people were so wrong why can't you be?
Give GP3 a few hours play and it really improves.
On Sun, 23 Jul 2000 21:43:56 +0200, "Jan Verschueren"
<[email hidden]> thus spoke:
>Agree... slight edge over F1 2k. IMO, of course.In what way? Yes, I have both installed on my computer right now and
IMO F1 2000 is quite a bit better than MGPRS2. AI problems and all.
Once you get throught the first lap in F1 2000 things are not too bad
in the AI area. Most people who complain about it are people without
the machine it needs to run well. Looking forward to F1 2001 and wil
be passing on GP3 myself.
--
Nos
On Sun, 23 Jul 2000 21:43:56 +0200, "Jan Verschueren"
In what way? Yes, I have both installed on my computer right now and
IMO F1 2000 is quite a bit better than MGPRS2. AI problems and all.
Once you get throught the first lap in F1 2000 things are not too bad
in the AI area. Most people who complain about it are people without
the machine it needs to run well. Looking forward to F1 2001 and wil
be passing on GP3 myself.
--
Nos
On Mon, 24 Jul 2000 10:49:18 +0200, "Jan Verschueren"
My experience is the opposite. In MGPRS2 I can smash and mash the gas
and brakes, but not so in F12K. Have you played around with the
undocumented controller settings etc. in F12K. F12K has a much better
feel to me. No I have not driven an F1 car before, but I do drive a
car and the feeling of the physics of driving is much closer in F12K.
Hands down winner in this area, and I bet GP3 doesn't match it in this
area either.
--
Nos
Cheers, I'll give that a spin.
Jan.
=---
Yup... Just like GP2 was. Is that a Freudian slip???
--
On Mon, 24 Jul 2000 10:49:18 +0200, "Jan Verschueren"
<[email hidden]> thus spoke:
>Let's just say F1 2K goes a little easy on the hamfisted for
>my taste.
My experience is the opposite. In MGPRS2 I can smash and mash the gas
and brakes, but not so in F12K. Have you played around with the
undocumented controller settings etc. in F12K. F12K has a much better
feel to me. No I have not driven an F1 car before, but I do drive a
car and the feeling of the physics of driving is much closer in F12K.
Hands down winner in this area, and I bet GP3 doesn't match it in this
area either.
--
Nos
On Sun, 23 Jul 2000 18:59:21 GMT, Tel <[email hidden]> wrote:
>with us... because last time I checked software wasn't made of paper,
>ink and plastic and F1 2000 was utterly & unplayable crap...
I can hear the trees crying (amongst other natural resources)
which died for the production of this thingy. Software isn't
everything you know....
Regards,
Uwe
--
Uwe Schuerkamp //////////////////////////// http://www.schuerkamp.de/
Herford, Germany \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ (52.0N/8.5E)
Ever wondered what's wrong with the world? http://bnetwork.com/
PGP Fingerprint: 2E 13 20 22 9A 3F 63 7F 67 6F E9 B1 A8 36 A4 61
"Tel" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:8lffa7$8lj$[email hidden]...
I have just run to my software shelf and I have found it to be full of
paper, plastic, ink, and a few odd bits of aluminum.
Hey, where did all my software go?!
Quoted text (23 lines)
> In article <[email hidden]>, > mracer <[email hidden]> wrote: > > GP3 is unbelievably disappointing. > > > > It isn't worth the plastic, paper, and ink used to make it. > > > > The worst offense is the physics, which are pure 1996. > > > > I won't go into all the things I hate about GP3, the list would be > pages > > long. > > > > In summary, it will be deleted from my hard drive. Despite significant > > shortcomings, F1 2000 is an exponentially better modern F1 sim. > > > > It's kind of hard to believe but EA actually has a "best of class" > sim. > > How about sharing at least *some* of your concerns about this title > with us... because last time I checked software wasn't made of paper, > ink and plastic and F1 2000 was utterly & unplayable crap... > > --Tel"Jan Loebzien" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
> That said, I think GP3 is a good game, just like GP2 was.
> I was just hoping for some more improvements.
Yup... Just like GP2 was. Is that a Freudian slip???
--
[email hidden]
"Macca" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
> I love EA Sports. I love the games they make, and i have quite a
> number of them. I was deadset on getting f1 2000. Then i read every
> review on here. It really does sound like a shithouse game. Cars
> crashing on the warm up laps etc. all the bugs. The only reason its
> got better is third party patches etc. GP3 wont have the amount of
> basic flaws that f12000 had.
Apparently you are correct. It will have whatever GP2 had.
--
[email hidden]
"rrevved" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
> On Mon, 24 Jul 2000 19:07:58 +0200, "Jan Verschueren"<[email hidden]> wrote:
>
> >Undocumented controller options in F1 2k... now there's something Ihadn't
> >heard about before. -Please elaborate.
> >
>
> If you have the 1.09 patch:
Or the 1.06 patch. Supposedly they removed the crash FF effects
in the 1.09 patch. This makes the patch un suitable for me :-)
--
[email hidden]
> Click the alien's face at the right side of the bottom of the screen.
> There are some options there..
>
> >Like to know how you're able to mash the throttle in MGPRS2 too, I'm
still
> >driving that one competively. ;-))
> >
> >Jan.
> >=---
> ><[email hidden]> wrote...
> >> <snip>
> >> My experience is the opposite. In MGPRS2 I can smash and mash the gas
> >> and brakes, but not so in F12K. Have you played around with the
> >> undocumented controller settings etc. in F12K. F12K has a much better
> >> feel to me. No I have not driven an F1 car before, but I do drive a
> >> car and the feeling of the physics of driving is much closer in F12K.
> >> Hands down winner in this area, and I bet GP3 doesn't match it in this
> >> area either.
> >> --
> >> Nos
> >
>
On Mon, 24 Jul 2000 17:44:03 -0500, "Greg Cisko" <[email hidden]>
wrote:
>Yup... Just like GP2 was. Is that a Freudian slip???
No slip, it is like GP2, nothing wrong with that.
GP2 was a good game. GP3 has everything that
GP2 had, plus some improvements. I was hoping
some for some _more_ improvements though.
Blaze
On Mon, 24 Jul 2000 19:07:58 +0200, "Jan Verschueren"
<[email hidden]> thus spoke:
>Undocumented controller options in F1 2k... now there's something I hadn't
>heard about before. -Please elaborate.
Did you not get the 1.09 patch? If you did then click on the alien
icon on the far right. Now click the top arrow to the right.
>Like to know how you're able to mash the throttle in MGPRS2 too, I'm still
>driving that one competively. ;-))
Compared to F12K it's a piece of cake. It's a good sim, but the
physics are crap compared to F12K.
--
Nos


































