Race Sim Central
Rec.Autos.Simulators Archive

Re: GP3 Sucks! What a Piece of Shit

33 posts by 16 people · 23 Jul 2000 - 25 Jul 2000 01:34 UTC

GP3 dismissed as worse than F1 2000

A poster called GP3 disappointing with 1996-era physics and said F1 2000 was better despite its flaws. Replies argued over F1 2000's bugs and AI, Monaco GP Racing Simulation 2, and whether GP3 improved with more play. Jan Loebzien said GP3 was GP2 with improvements, which was acceptable but less than hoped.

game comparisonreview/impressionsGrand Prix 3F1 2000

Automated summary.

Macca 23 Jul 2000#252118
On Sun, 23 Jul 2000 13:48:48 -0500, "Greg Cisko" <[email hidden]> wrote:
Quoted text (11 lines)>"mracer" <[email hidden]> wrote in message >news:[email hidden]... >> It's kind of hard to believe but EA actually has a "best of class" sim. > >I agree. The #1 main reason I was hesitant to get F1 2000 is >because of the crappy NASCAR Revolution. I bought the game >and returned it within the hour. I thought all EA racing sims >would be the same. But I was wrong. F1 2000 is the way >better than I originally imagined. > >
I love EA Sports. I love the games they make, and i have quite a number of them. I was deadset on getting f1 2000. Then i read every review on here. It really does sound like a shithouse game. Cars crashing on the warm up laps etc. all the bugs. The only reason its got better is third party patches etc. GP3 wont have the amount of basic flaws that f12000 had. ___________________ Macca "I'd kill myself for you...Id kill you for myself" Pantera - This Love
I respect your opinion I have both I helped with some vrl files to make F1 2000 better (on release 90% of the AI could not get around Brazil Spa and France) and have played the game alot, I believe it's a solid base to imrove upon. But GP3 is better the dynamic weather is amazing the feel of the car is superb. The telemetary is ace, the AI is good. It ain't perfect but it's the best modern F1 sim there is F1 2001 if they add some features could be better though Regards Mike On Sun, 23 Jul 2000 18:38:37 GMT, mracer <[email hidden]> wrote:
Quoted text (13 lines)>GP3 is unbelievably disappointing. > >It isn't worth the plastic, paper, and ink used to make it. > >The worst offense is the physics, which are pure 1996. > >I won't go into all the things I hate about GP3, the list would be pages >long. > >In summary, it will be deleted from my hard drive. Despite significant >shortcomings, F1 2000 is an exponentially better modern F1 sim. > >It's kind of hard to believe but EA actually has a "best of class" sim.
On Sun 23 Jul 2000 07:38:37pm, mracer wrote: <snip> >It's kind of hard to believe but EA actually has a "best of class" >sim. MGPRS2? -- David. (GPLRank handicap: -1.01) "After all, a mere thousand yards - such a harmless little knoll, really." (Raymond Mays on Shelsley Walsh)
Agree... slight edge over F1 2k. IMO, of course. Jan. =--- David Buttery wrote...
Quoted text (13 lines)> On Sun 23 Jul 2000 07:38:37pm, mracer wrote: > > <snip> > >It's kind of hard to believe but EA actually has > >a "best of class" sim. > > MGPRS2? > > -- > David. (GPLRank handicap: -1.01) > "After all, a mere thousand yards - such a harmless little knoll, > really." > (Raymond Mays on Shelsley Walsh)
On Sun, 23 Jul 2000 18:38:37 GMT, mracer <[email hidden]> wrote: >In summary, it will be deleted from my hard drive. Right after you played it just a little more ...? If you're serious about your rants, shouldn't that be "it has been deleted from my hard drive"? LOL. How pathetic!
Tel 23 Jul 2000#252283
In article <[email hidden]>, mracer <[email hidden]> wrote:
Quoted text (7 lines)> GP3 is unbelievably disappointing. > > It isn't worth the plastic, paper, and ink used to make it. > > The worst offense is the physics, which are pure 1996. > > I won't go into all the things I hate about GP3, the list would be
pages > long. > > In summary, it will be deleted from my hard drive. Despite significant > shortcomings, F1 2000 is an exponentially better modern F1 sim. > > It's kind of hard to believe but EA actually has a "best of class"sim. How about sharing at least *some* of your concerns about this title with us... because last time I checked software wasn't made of paper, ink and plastic and F1 2000 was utterly & unplayable crap... --Tel Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy.
<snip> MGPRS2? -- David. (GPLRank handicap: -1.01) "After all, a mere thousand yards - such a harmless little knoll, really." (Raymond Mays on Shelsley Walsh)
GraDee 23 Jul 2000#526845
It shouldn't be there in the first place <g>
Sue 23 Jul 2000 18:38 UTC#252282
GP3 is unbelievably disappointing. It isn't worth the plastic, paper, and ink used to make it. The worst offense is the physics, which are pure 1996. I won't go into all the things I hate about GP3, the list would be pages long. In summary, it will be deleted from my hard drive. Despite significant shortcomings, F1 2000 is an exponentially better modern F1 sim. It's kind of hard to believe but EA actually has a "best of class" sim.
Greg Cisko 23 Jul 2000 18:47 UTC#252188
"mracer" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]... > It's kind of hard to believe but EA actually has a "best of class" sim. I agree. The #1 main reason I was hesitant to get F1 2000 is because of the crappy NASCAR Revolution. I bought the game and returned it within the hour. I thought all EA racing sims would be the same. But I was wrong. F1 2000 is the way better than I originally imagined. -- [email hidden]
idav 23 Jul 2000 20:17 UTC#252144
Hmmmm. "Its a disgrace." God I'm heartbroken for you Karl......I'm sure it totally ruined your day. Gee...fancy wasting all that time downloading a pirate copy of this piece of trash when you could of spent your time doing something far more interesting and rewarding instead....like picking the fluff out of your belly button. "I pity all of you who ordered it." You do.? Well thank you very much for your heartfelt concern bonny lad. I'm sure I'll be thinking of you when I plonk my hard earned cash down on the counter on Friday. I hope you enjoyed your free lunch even if it did turn out to upset your stomach. Ian. "Karl Zosel" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:uSHe5.144121$[email hidden]... > I just tested it: I totally agree. > Its a disgrace. > > Halsbro just made a deal with Mr Crammond to use his name to sell aslightly
Quoted text (23 lines)> improved version of GP2. > They used the same UNefficient graphics engine. > > I pity all of you who ordered it. > > mracer <[email hidden]> schreef in berichtnieuws > [email hidden]... > > GP3 is unbelievably disappointing. > > > > It isn't worth the plastic, paper, and ink used to make it. > > > > The worst offense is the physics, which are pure 1996. > > > > I won't go into all the things I hate about GP3, the list would be pages > > long. > > > > In summary, it will be deleted from my hard drive. Despite significant > > shortcomings, F1 2000 is an exponentially better modern F1 sim. > > > > It's kind of hard to believe but EA actually has a "best of class" sim. > > > >
GraDee 23 Jul 2000 20:53 UTC#252155
mracer <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]... > In summary, it will be deleted from my hard drive.It shouldn't be there in the first place <g>
Sue 23 Jul 2000 20:57 UTC#252157
Jan, pathetic is the way you are going to feel after you thow your money away buying GP3, even though you have been warned about how bad it is. Stupidity cannot be cured. Jan Loebzien wrote:
Quoted text (8 lines)> On Sun, 23 Jul 2000 18:38:37 GMT, mracer <[email hidden]> wrote: > > >In summary, it will be deleted from my hard drive. > > Right after you played it just a little more ...? > If you're serious about your rants, shouldn't that > be "it has been deleted from my hard drive"? > LOL. How pathetic!
Karl Zosel 23 Jul 2000 21:40 UTC#252225
I just tested it: I totally agree. Its a disgrace. Halsbro just made a deal with Mr Crammond to use his name to sell a slightly improved version of GP2. They used the same UNefficient graphics engine. I pity all of you who ordered it. mracer <[email hidden]> schreef in berichtnieuws [email hidden]...
Quoted text (14 lines)> GP3 is unbelievably disappointing. > > It isn't worth the plastic, paper, and ink used to make it. > > The worst offense is the physics, which are pure 1996. > > I won't go into all the things I hate about GP3, the list would be pages > long. > > In summary, it will be deleted from my hard drive. Despite significant > shortcomings, F1 2000 is an exponentially better modern F1 sim. > > It's kind of hard to believe but EA actually has a "best of class" sim. >
Simon Brown 23 Jul 2000 23:56 UTC#252062
Everyone is entitled to make up their own mind, and the opinions here have been very varying.
Cheers, I'll give that a spin. Jan. =--- rrevved wrote...
Quoted text (10 lines)> <snip> > > Undocumented controller options in F1 2k... now > > there's something I hadn't heard about before. > > -Please elaborate. > > If you have the 1.09 patch: > > Click the alien's face at the right side of the bottom of the screen. > There are some options there.. >
Undocumented controller options in F1 2k... now there's something I hadn't heard about before. -Please elaborate. Like to know how you're able to mash the throttle in MGPRS2 too, I'm still driving that one competively. ;-)) Jan. =--- <[email hidden]> wrote...
Quoted text (10 lines)> <snip> > My experience is the opposite. In MGPRS2 I can smash and mash the gas > and brakes, but not so in F12K. Have you played around with the > undocumented controller settings etc. in F12K. F12K has a much better > feel to me. No I have not driven an F1 car before, but I do drive a > car and the feeling of the physics of driving is much closer in F12K. > Hands down winner in this area, and I bet GP3 doesn't match it in this > area either. > -- > Nos
Telemetry (though only usefull with external viewer) and various other subtle differences you may not even notice, depending on your driving style/talent. Let's just say F1 2K goes a little easy on the hamfisted for my taste. Graphically I got to admit F1 2K has it hands down and with the latest patch the AI is not all that bad, it's a very fine line. Jan. =--- <[email hidden]> wrote...
Quoted text (9 lines)> <snip> > In what way? Yes, I have both installed on my computer right now and > IMO F1 2000 is quite a bit better than MGPRS2. AI problems and all. > Once you get throught the first lap in F1 2000 things are not too bad > in the AI area. Most people who complain about it are people without > the machine it needs to run well. Looking forward to F1 2001 and wil > be passing on GP3 myself. > -- > Nos
On Sun, 23 Jul 2000 20:57:37 GMT, mracer <[email hidden]> wrote: >Jan, pathetic is the way you are going to feel after you thow your money >away buying GP3, even though you have been warned about how bad it is. No, pathetic would be to buy the game even though you have been "warned" and _then_ come back here and still complain. E.g "I couldn't believe it would be so bad so I went and bought it, but boy you were right, it's even worse ...". _That_ is stupidity that can't be cured. But since it can't be cured, rest assured some _will_ come back and complain. :-) That said, I think GP3 is a good game, just like GP2 was. I was just hoping for some more improvements. Blaze
Simon Brown 24 Jul 2000 04:15 UTC#251967
You may want to know that on the day F1 2000 was released there were countless "F1 2000 sucks!" posts on newsgroups and forums everywhere. If those people were so wrong why can't you be? Give GP3 a few hours play and it really improves.
Nos 24 Jul 2000 06:27 UTC#251906
On Sun, 23 Jul 2000 21:43:56 +0200, "Jan Verschueren" <[email hidden]> thus spoke: >Agree... slight edge over F1 2k. IMO, of course.In what way? Yes, I have both installed on my computer right now and IMO F1 2000 is quite a bit better than MGPRS2. AI problems and all. Once you get throught the first lap in F1 2000 things are not too bad in the AI area. Most people who complain about it are people without the machine it needs to run well. Looking forward to F1 2001 and wil be passing on GP3 myself. -- Nos
N.. 24 Jul 2000#526894
On Sun, 23 Jul 2000 21:43:56 +0200, "Jan Verschueren" In what way? Yes, I have both installed on my computer right now and IMO F1 2000 is quite a bit better than MGPRS2. AI problems and all. Once you get throught the first lap in F1 2000 things are not too bad in the AI area. Most people who complain about it are people without the machine it needs to run well. Looking forward to F1 2001 and wil be passing on GP3 myself. -- Nos
N.. 24 Jul 2000#526895
On Mon, 24 Jul 2000 10:49:18 +0200, "Jan Verschueren" My experience is the opposite. In MGPRS2 I can smash and mash the gas and brakes, but not so in F12K. Have you played around with the undocumented controller settings etc. in F12K. F12K has a much better feel to me. No I have not driven an F1 car before, but I do drive a car and the feeling of the physics of driving is much closer in F12K. Hands down winner in this area, and I bet GP3 doesn't match it in this area either. -- Nos
Greg Cisko 24 Jul 2000#526897
Yup... Just like GP2 was. Is that a Freudian slip??? --
Nos 24 Jul 2000 12:10 UTC#251761
On Mon, 24 Jul 2000 10:49:18 +0200, "Jan Verschueren" <[email hidden]> thus spoke: >Let's just say F1 2K goes a little easy on the hamfisted for >my taste. My experience is the opposite. In MGPRS2 I can smash and mash the gas and brakes, but not so in F12K. Have you played around with the undocumented controller settings etc. in F12K. F12K has a much better feel to me. No I have not driven an F1 car before, but I do drive a car and the feeling of the physics of driving is much closer in F12K. Hands down winner in this area, and I bet GP3 doesn't match it in this area either. -- Nos
Uwe Schuerkamp 24 Jul 2000 19:24 UTC#251522
On Sun, 23 Jul 2000 18:59:21 GMT, Tel <[email hidden]> wrote: >with us... because last time I checked software wasn't made of paper, >ink and plastic and F1 2000 was utterly & unplayable crap... I can hear the trees crying (amongst other natural resources) which died for the production of this thingy. Software isn't everything you know.... Regards, Uwe -- Uwe Schuerkamp //////////////////////////// http://www.schuerkamp.de/ Herford, Germany \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ (52.0N/8.5E) Ever wondered what's wrong with the world? http://bnetwork.com/ PGP Fingerprint: 2E 13 20 22 9A 3F 63 7F 67 6F E9 B1 A8 36 A4 61
Kevin Gavitt 24 Jul 2000 20:25 UTC#251468
"Tel" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:8lffa7$8lj$[email hidden]...
Quoted text (23 lines)> In article <[email hidden]>, > mracer <[email hidden]> wrote: > > GP3 is unbelievably disappointing. > > > > It isn't worth the plastic, paper, and ink used to make it. > > > > The worst offense is the physics, which are pure 1996. > > > > I won't go into all the things I hate about GP3, the list would be > pages > > long. > > > > In summary, it will be deleted from my hard drive. Despite significant > > shortcomings, F1 2000 is an exponentially better modern F1 sim. > > > > It's kind of hard to believe but EA actually has a "best of class" > sim. > > How about sharing at least *some* of your concerns about this title > with us... because last time I checked software wasn't made of paper, > ink and plastic and F1 2000 was utterly & unplayable crap... > > --Tel
I have just run to my software shelf and I have found it to be full of paper, plastic, ink, and a few odd bits of aluminum. Hey, where did all my software go?!
Greg Cisko 24 Jul 2000 22:42 UTC#251436
"Jan Loebzien" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]... > That said, I think GP3 is a good game, just like GP2 was. > I was just hoping for some more improvements. Yup... Just like GP2 was. Is that a Freudian slip??? -- [email hidden]
Greg Cisko 24 Jul 2000 22:43 UTC#251437
"Macca" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]... > I love EA Sports. I love the games they make, and i have quite a > number of them. I was deadset on getting f1 2000. Then i read every > review on here. It really does sound like a shithouse game. Cars > crashing on the warm up laps etc. all the bugs. The only reason its > got better is third party patches etc. GP3 wont have the amount of > basic flaws that f12000 had. Apparently you are correct. It will have whatever GP2 had. -- [email hidden]
Greg Cisko 24 Jul 2000 22:45 UTC#251288
"rrevved" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]... > On Mon, 24 Jul 2000 19:07:58 +0200, "Jan Verschueren"<[email hidden]> wrote: > > >Undocumented controller options in F1 2k... now there's something Ihadn't > >heard about before. -Please elaborate. > > > > If you have the 1.09 patch: Or the 1.06 patch. Supposedly they removed the crash FF effects in the 1.09 patch. This makes the patch un suitable for me :-) -- [email hidden] > Click the alien's face at the right side of the bottom of the screen. > There are some options there.. > > >Like to know how you're able to mash the throttle in MGPRS2 too, I'm still > >driving that one competively. ;-)) > > > >Jan. > >=--- > ><[email hidden]> wrote... > >> <snip> > >> My experience is the opposite. In MGPRS2 I can smash and mash the gas > >> and brakes, but not so in F12K. Have you played around with the > >> undocumented controller settings etc. in F12K. F12K has a much better > >> feel to me. No I have not driven an F1 car before, but I do drive a > >> car and the feeling of the physics of driving is much closer in F12K. > >> Hands down winner in this area, and I bet GP3 doesn't match it in this > >> area either. > >> -- > >> Nos > > >
On Mon, 24 Jul 2000 17:44:03 -0500, "Greg Cisko" <[email hidden]> wrote: >Yup... Just like GP2 was. Is that a Freudian slip??? No slip, it is like GP2, nothing wrong with that. GP2 was a good game. GP3 has everything that GP2 had, plus some improvements. I was hoping some for some _more_ improvements though. Blaze
Nos 25 Jul 2000 01:34 UTC#251270
On Mon, 24 Jul 2000 19:07:58 +0200, "Jan Verschueren" <[email hidden]> thus spoke: >Undocumented controller options in F1 2k... now there's something I hadn't >heard about before. -Please elaborate. Did you not get the 1.09 patch? If you did then click on the alien icon on the far right. Now click the top arrow to the right. >Like to know how you're able to mash the throttle in MGPRS2 too, I'm still >driving that one competively. ;-)) Compared to F12K it's a piece of cake. It's a good sim, but the physics are crap compared to F12K. -- Nos

Sponsors

Affiliate Links

Sim Gaming Expo MOZA Racing Sim-Lab Fanatec TrakRacer Asetek Internet Privacy From NordVPN Dreamhost Capital One Credit Card Application Fanatical CDKeys Amazon Amazon UK Project Motor Racing iRacing Get your racing gloves, boots and more from Demon Tweeks. Enlist at Roberts Space Industries, developers of Star Citizen and Squadron 42


Back from the ashes since July, 2019. First created in 2001 with the merger of Legends Central (founded 1999) and simracing.dk.

A site by a sort of sim racer, for sim racers, about racing sims. News and information on both modern and historic sim racing software titles.

All products and licenses property of their respective owners.


Facebook Threads Bluesky Twitter Mastodon Instagram YouTube Tiktok Twitch Reddit Google News Apple News Subscribe via WordPress Flipboard eBay

Race Sim Central © 1999-2026 | Some links pay RSC a commission. Advertising does not equal endorsement.Cookie Policy