Another rain post. :-) Come on, is GP3 only good for driving in the rain? In fact, make
the whole game only racing in the rain. :-)
"rrevved" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Still, it is the rain part that GP3 fans like the most. :-)
"JeDa" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:zYPe5.421$[email hidden]...
Quoted text (13 lines)
> > Victor Chan <[email hidden]> schreef in berichtnieuws > XTLe5.12926$[email hidden]... > > Another rain post. :-) Come on, is GP3 only good for driving in the rain? > In fact, make > > the whole game only racing in the rain. :-) > > > I Think you dont get it. The post is not about the wet weather, but about > dynamic weather. If GP3 had only wet weather races (as you suggest) it would > be imho as boring as GPL. The dynamic weather makes GP3 a excellent F1 sim > and not just an hotlap sim with great physics such as GPL. > >
Victor Chan <[email hidden]> schreef in berichtnieuws
XTLe5.12926$[email hidden]...
> Another rain post. :-) Come on, is GP3 only good for driving in the rain?In fact, make
> the whole game only racing in the rain. :-)
>I Think you dont get it. The post is not about the wet weather, but about
dynamic weather. If GP3 had only wet weather races (as you suggest) it would
be imho as boring as GPL. The dynamic weather makes GP3 a excellent F1 sim
and not just an hotlap sim with great physics such as GPL.
On Mon, 24 Jul 2000 04:54:48 GMT, "Victor Chan"
<[email hidden]> wrote:
>Still, it is the rain part that GP3 fans like the most. :-)
And what is wrong with that? It *contains* dynamical weather, so it
seems reasonable to take the dynamical weather into account when
evaluating the product.
JoH


































