Re: GP3: what the hell did they work on?

On Wed, 26 Jul 2000 19:01:38 GMT, "Karl Zosel" <[email hidden]> wrote:

Quoted text (11 lines)

>Has anyone any clue why they had to work so long to make GP3? >Graphics engine: the same as GP2 >Gameplay: same as GP2 >Overal menu system: same as GP2 > >Did the weather effects, 3D implementation and FF take sooo long to get >programmed? > >I think Halsbro put hardly ANY money or effort into upgrading GP2.... >... all of it went to advertising.. which usually pays off :( >

As they always do.....Hasbro is pumping out computer versions of old time board games like a bad case of gas...they have no biz in the sim industry....they are gonna ruin the whole thing...beside..I'd not be surprised if Hasbro buys out Papy one day:)

Has anyone any clue why they had to work so long to make GP3? Graphics engine: the same as GP2 Gameplay: same as GP2 Overal menu system: same as GP2 Did the weather effects, 3D implementation and FF take sooo long to get programmed? I think Halsbro put hardly ANY money or effort into upgrading GP2.... ... all of it went to advertising.. which usually pays off :(

On Thu, 27 Jul 2000 02:31:13 GMT, [email hidden] wrote:

Quoted text (7 lines)

>On Wed, 26 Jul 2000 15:46:03 -0400, Xena <[email hidden]> thus >spoke: > >>beside..I'd >> not be surprised if Hasbro buys out Papy one day:) > >Sierra already did that.

Damn..you're right..LOL I stand corrected:)

On Wed, 26 Jul 2000 15:46:03 -0400, Xena <[email hidden]> thus spoke: >beside..I'd > not be surprised if Hasbro buys out Papy one day:) Sierra already did that. -- Nos

spoke: Sierra already did that. -- Nos