On Fri, 28 Jul 2000 15:36:44 +0100, "Tony Whitley" <t o n y . w h i t
l e y @ n S t P l A w M o r l d . c o m> wrote:
hahaha ..if it is true...they'll never admit it...:)
According to reliable sources the retail version of Gp3 is 8 week old
beta code. The developers of Gp3 were stunned to find out that Gold Cd
was switched and the wrong version was duplicated for the global
population. The warez guys actually have the Final version of Gp3 in
their hands while everyone else has beta copies. .Film at 11!!!!.
lol
Mrv <[email hidden]> schreef in berichtnieuws
[email hidden]...
> According to reliable sources the retail version of Gp3 is 8 week old
> beta code. The developers of Gp3 were stunned to find out that Gold Cd
> was switched and the wrong version was duplicated for the global
> population. The warez guys actually have the Final version of Gp3 in
> their hands while everyone else has beta copies. .Film at 11!!!!.
>
lol
Good Grief!! Can that be possibly TRUE? Wouldn't that mean that
someone at a duplicating plant purposely switched the CD's in a nasty
hoax? Or could THIS be a nasty hoax?
I don't know enough about any of this to recognize garf from
gospel, but the scenario above seems pretty far-fetched. Glen Priest
* Sent from RemarQ http://www.remarq.com The Internet's Discussion Network *
The fastest and easiest way to search and participate in Usenet - Free!
Of course it's true, you read it on Usenet!
Tony Whitley
Glen Priest <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
> Good Grief!! Can that be possibly TRUE? Wouldn't that mean that
> someone at a duplicating plant purposely switched the CD's in a nasty
> hoax? Or could THIS be a nasty hoax?
> I don't know enough about any of this to recognize garf from
> gospel, but the scenario above seems pretty far-fetched. Glen Priest
