"rrevved" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
> On Sun, 30 Jul 2000 17:16:22 -0400, "chainbreaker"<[email hidden]> wrote:
okipromisenottotellanyone :-)
jerrymorelock
"rrevved" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
>
> Greg, I was just reading through the posts and I guess I
> didn't know until now that you haven't driven GP3.
>
Not Greg, of course, but Ed, where did you get GP3?
Jerry Morelock
"chainbreaker" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:e8QACvm#$GA.349@cpmsnbbsa08...
Excellent question in light of his admonishment of another
person that had the warez version.
--
[email hidden]
Quoted text (10 lines)
> > "rrevved" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:[email hidden]... > > > > Greg, I was just reading through the posts and I guess I > > didn't know until now that you haven't driven GP3. > > > > > Not Greg, of course, but Ed, where did you get GP3?"rrevved" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
>
> Greg, I was just reading through the posts and I guess I
> didn't know until now that you haven't driven GP3.
>
> Is that right?
Yep.
> If it is, c'mon man, how can you be slamming it at every
> opportunity? You are sounding like one of those 'flight engineers',
Because I don't have to drive it to know that is is using dated
graphics, spotty graphics card support & spotty FF support. No
pit chatter and no computer car sounds. I do consider these
to be very reliable assessments of the game. Further I
rufuse to buy another Geoff Crammond game that uses the
SloMo scheme of programming. I was pissed about that
in World Circuit and livid about it in GP2. But at the time
I put up with that because there was nothing better. I always
wondered how my laptimes could be so absolutely fantastic
all the while knowing that the lap really took longer. The
answer is SloMo. I have driven enough F1 racing sims
to know what I rip off a good lap...
F1 2000 is better with *ALL* of it's numerous faults IMHO.
I also believe the driving model in F1 2000 far exceeds
that of GP3.
Thanks for allowing me to explain myself :-)
--
[email hidden]
Argghhh but that the point It's not the unwillingness to sleep with
Greg that's bad that would be natural. It would be your constant need
to go around telling other people that Greg was no good in bed and
that they should not go to bed with him even though you had'nt. : )
Regards Mike
This is surreal, I'm waiting for a post from Dali : )
On Mon, 31 Jul 2000 02:21:50 GMT, xoc455 <[email hidden]> wrote:
Quoted text (36 lines)
>I understand.... >It's like me... I don't have to sleep with you to know you are not >good in bed > > >>"rrevved" <[email hidden]> wrote in message >>news:[email hidden]... >>> >>> Greg, I was just reading through the posts and I guess I >>> didn't know until now that you haven't driven GP3. >>> >>> Is that right? >> >>Yep. >> >>> If it is, c'mon man, how can you be slamming it at every >>> opportunity? You are sounding like one of those 'flight engineers', >> >>Because I don't have to drive it to know that is is using dated >>graphics, spotty graphics card support & spotty FF support. No >>pit chatter and no computer car sounds. I do consider these >>to be very reliable assessments of the game. Further I >>rufuse to buy another Geoff Crammond game that uses the >>SloMo scheme of programming. I was pissed about that >>in World Circuit and livid about it in GP2. But at the time >>I put up with that because there was nothing better. I always >>wondered how my laptimes could be so absolutely fantastic >>all the while knowing that the lap really took longer. The >>answer is SloMo. I have driven enough F1 racing sims >>to know what I rip off a good lap... >> >>F1 2000 is better with *ALL* of it's numerous faults IMHO. >>I also believe the driving model in F1 2000 far exceeds >>that of GP3. >> >>Thanks for allowing me to explain myself :-)I understand....
It's like me... I don't have to sleep with you to know you are not
good in bed
Quoted text (31 lines)
>"rrevved" <[email hidden]> wrote in message >news:[email hidden]... >> >> Greg, I was just reading through the posts and I guess I >> didn't know until now that you haven't driven GP3. >> >> Is that right? > >Yep. > >> If it is, c'mon man, how can you be slamming it at every >> opportunity? You are sounding like one of those 'flight engineers', > >Because I don't have to drive it to know that is is using dated >graphics, spotty graphics card support & spotty FF support. No >pit chatter and no computer car sounds. I do consider these >to be very reliable assessments of the game. Further I >rufuse to buy another Geoff Crammond game that uses the >SloMo scheme of programming. I was pissed about that >in World Circuit and livid about it in GP2. But at the time >I put up with that because there was nothing better. I always >wondered how my laptimes could be so absolutely fantastic >all the while knowing that the lap really took longer. The >answer is SloMo. I have driven enough F1 racing sims >to know what I rip off a good lap... > >F1 2000 is better with *ALL* of it's numerous faults IMHO. >I also believe the driving model in F1 2000 far exceeds >that of GP3. > >Thanks for allowing me to explain myself :-)"xoc455" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
> I understand....
> It's like me... I don't have to sleep with you to know you are not
> good in bed
Quite an astounding bit of logic you have going for yourself
there.
Wow.
--
[email hidden]


































