Would there be a NOTICEABLE performance difference using either one in GP3?
It is widely known that a Celery @ any mhz is basically about 10% slower
than any coppermine at the same mhz. (not dis'ing celerys, just a fact).
Since GP3 isnt all that CPU intensive, I doubt you would see much of a
difference as long as you have a good 3D card.
"f13dfx" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:hqjh5.93307$[email hidden]...
> Would there be a NOTICEABLE performance difference using either one inGP3?
>
>
"Tim McArthur" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:f9nh5.69749$[email hidden]...
> It is widely known that a Celery @ any mhz is basically about 10% slower
> than any coppermine at the same mhz. (not dis'ing celerys, just a fact).
> Since GP3 isnt all that CPU intensive, I doubt you would see much of a
> difference as long as you have a good 3D card.
The ScreenSavers show on ZDTV last week claimed that a 566MHz Celeron is 48%
slower than a PIII 600.
http://www.zdtv.com/zdtv/screensavers/showtell/jump/0,3658,1501,00.html
--
<remove 7of9 for e-mail replies>
--
Bill Jones e-mail addresses:
Computer Sciences Corp. (work) [email hidden]
New London, Connecticut (play) [email hidden]
(860) 701-1201 WWW: http://pages.cthome.net/billj
>
> "f13dfx" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
> news:hqjh5.93307$[email hidden]...
> > Would there be a NOTICEABLE performance difference using either one in
> GP3?
> >
> >
>
>
Check out this link for a Pentium 3 v o/c'd Celeron 2 test.
http://firingsquad.gamers.com/hardware/p3vc2/default.asp
On Mon, 31 Jul 2000 18:18:53 GMT, "f13dfx" <[email hidden]> wrote:
>Would there be a NOTICEABLE performance difference using either one in GP3?
>
