Race Sim Central
Rec.Autos.Simulators Archive

NSR Shimmering

19 posts by 7 people · 22 Feb 2005 22:09 UTC - 26 Feb 2005 11:49 UTC

Neil Charlton 22 Feb 2005 22:09 UTC#24641
Hi all, I finally got a copy to the UK. Frankly, I'm disappointed for all the reason's listed in the Mr Nobody thread (and then some). I won't regurgitate them - but I would ask if anyone has any ideas on a particular problem that is making a poor experience even less satisfactory. I find that there's an intolerable amount of shimmer at all tracks. It's particularly evident on fences, posts, wall/track joins and worst of all on the cars. As a car pulls away from you, the logo or decal on the back starts to roll and shimmer. The sim experience is (for me ) being totally interrupted by these appalling textures. My hope is that I'm just missing something really simple. I've applied all the tweaks listed on all the bulletin boards. The problem is unaffected by resolution, AA or AF settings. I'm currently running 1024x768, 6xAA, 16xAF, all options maxed fully out on an A8V, FX53, 1Gb, X800XT, 2ZS combination. I have no jaggies at all and the frame rate never drops below 55 even at the back of a full 43 car field. I really hope there are some ideas out there which I haven't yet considered. If I can get the graphics up to N2k3 quality it's worth hanging on for 'the patch'. Thanks in anticipation
"Neil Charlton" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:cvgaie$qj3$[email hidden]...
Quoted text (26 lines)> Hi all, > > I finally got a copy to the UK. Frankly, I'm disappointed for all the > reason's listed in the Mr Nobody thread (and then some). I won't > regurgitate them - but I would ask if anyone has any ideas on a particular > problem that is making a poor experience even less satisfactory. > > I find that there's an intolerable amount of shimmer at all tracks. It's > particularly evident on fences, posts, wall/track joins and worst of all > on the cars. As a car pulls away from you, the logo or decal on the back > starts to roll and shimmer. The sim experience is (for me ) being totally > interrupted by these appalling textures. > > My hope is that I'm just missing something really simple. I've applied all > the tweaks listed on all the bulletin boards. The problem is unaffected by > resolution, AA or AF settings. I'm currently running 1024x768, 6xAA, > 16xAF, all options maxed fully out on an A8V, FX53, 1Gb, X800XT, 2ZS > combination. I have no jaggies at all and the frame rate never drops below > 55 even at the back of a full 43 car field. > > I really hope there are some ideas out there which I haven't yet > considered. If I can get the graphics up to N2k3 quality it's worth > hanging on for 'the patch'. > > Thanks in anticipation >
same here Neil..tried aa, no aa, tweaking the .plr file. Still can't get rid of that shimmer. Cars or trucks look terrible when you are coming up on them from behind. DC
Neil, I am running at 1600x1200x32 but using no FSAA or Aniso and the jaggies are minimal at best. I see nothing like you describe with the bad textures of a car or truck as it pulls away from you. With your system, you should have no problem bumping up that resolution and you will be amazed at how the jaggies disappear. Plus, with your rig, no doubt you can run some kind of FSAA or Aniso even at that high resolution. I have an AMD 3200XP, GeForce 6800 GT card and 1 GB of DDR 400 and the sim really moves along at that resolution. Your rig wont even breath hard :)
"Smokin_Bob" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted text (13 lines)> Neil, > > I am running at 1600x1200x32 but using no FSAA or Aniso and the jaggies > are minimal at best. I see nothing like you describe with the bad > textures of a car or truck as it pulls away from you. > > With your system, you should have no problem bumping up that resolution > and you will be amazed at how the jaggies disappear. Plus, with your > rig, no doubt you can run some kind of FSAA or Aniso even at that high > resolution. I have an AMD 3200XP, GeForce 6800 GT card and 1 GB of DDR > 400 and the sim really moves along at that resolution. Your rig wont > even breath hard :) >
mine looks even worse with aa, af turned off. intel 3.0, x800xt pe card. The shimmering is there whether aa is on or off. Frames are high no matter what also. Using cat 5.1's may be the drivers? DC
David Ciemny wrote: > "Smokin_Bob" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:[email hidden]... > > Neil, > > > > I am running at 1600x1200x32 but using no FSAA or Aniso and thejaggies > > are minimal at best. I see nothing like you describe with the bad > > textures of a car or truck as it pulls away from you. > > > > With your system, you should have no problem bumping up thatresolution > > and you will be amazed at how the jaggies disappear. Plus, withyour > > rig, no doubt you can run some kind of FSAA or Aniso even at thathigh > > resolution. I have an AMD 3200XP, GeForce 6800 GT card and 1 GB ofDDR > > 400 and the sim really moves along at that resolution. Your rigwont > > even breath hard :) > > > > mine looks even worse with aa, af turned off. intel 3.0, x800xt pecard. The > shimmering is there whether aa is on or off. Frames are high nomatter what > also. > > Using cat 5.1's may be the drivers? > > DC Sounds like a MIP mapping problem (or lack thereof). There may be a player file setting to enable it. Otherwise, in the Cat's 3D panel, move the MIP Map quality slider towards Performance - this will soften up the MIPs a bit, maybe reduce sparkle. joe image space
I don't know, David, if the drivers would help or not. For me, I am just not seeing the jaggies--but in Thunder 2004, they were terrible, and that is what I compare it to. If I run anything at 1024x768 on this 21" monitor, I get boatloads of jaggies, and the FSAA and Aniso required to deal with it really hurts performance. EA also recommnends NOT using your card to do the FSAA--I was going to try this, but the Cube3d Config utility does not allow this option to show up. And for some odd reason, FSAA gives me extreme physical discomfort--eye strain and severe headaches, I have no idea why.... But if you have a look in your config.ini (Not the *.plr file--this one is in the NSR root directory) file, look for this line= ANISO=1 (Look for this line, it should be defaulted to zero, but you can change it up....) EFFECTS=1 MIPMAPS=1 VSYNC=0 VBSTRATEGY=1 (Vertex Buffer Strategy--possibles are 0,1,2--can help with stuttering--at least in GTR :) I left mine at 1 so far works well ) You have to manually add Aniso to the sim, but it does make a difference--make it as high as 16 if you want, and see if it helps any. I tried it without mip maps and it just looks worse to me.
"Scoob Droolins" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted text (41 lines)> David Ciemny wrote: >> "Smokin_Bob" <[email hidden]> wrote in message >> news:[email hidden]... >> > Neil, >> > >> > I am running at 1600x1200x32 but using no FSAA or Aniso and the > jaggies >> > are minimal at best. I see nothing like you describe with the bad >> > textures of a car or truck as it pulls away from you. >> > >> > With your system, you should have no problem bumping up that > resolution >> > and you will be amazed at how the jaggies disappear. Plus, with > your >> > rig, no doubt you can run some kind of FSAA or Aniso even at that > high >> > resolution. I have an AMD 3200XP, GeForce 6800 GT card and 1 GB of > DDR >> > 400 and the sim really moves along at that resolution. Your rig > wont >> > even breath hard :) >> > >> >> mine looks even worse with aa, af turned off. intel 3.0, x800xt pe > card. The >> shimmering is there whether aa is on or off. Frames are high no > matter what >> also. >> >> Using cat 5.1's may be the drivers? >> >> DC > > Sounds like a MIP mapping problem (or lack thereof). There may be a > player file setting to enable it. Otherwise, in the Cat's 3D panel, > move the MIP Map quality slider towards Performance - this will soften > up the MIPs a bit, maybe reduce sparkle. > > joe > image space >
thx joe will give it a try in a few....reduce the sparkle that is exactly what I am trying to do. DC
"Neil Charlton" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:cvgaie$qj3$[email hidden]... > Hi all, > > I finally got a copy to the UK. Frankly, I'm disappointed for all the > reason's listed in the Mr Nobody thread (and then some). I won'tregurgitate > them - but I would ask if anyone has any ideas on a particular problemthat > is making a poor experience even less satisfactory. > > I find that there's an intolerable amount of shimmer at all tracks. It's > particularly evident on fences, posts, wall/track joins and worst of allon > the cars. As a car pulls away from you, the logo or decal on the backstarts > to roll and shimmer. The sim experience is (for me ) being totally > interrupted by these appalling textures. > > My hope is that I'm just missing something really simple. I've applied all > the tweaks listed on all the bulletin boards. The problem is unaffected by > resolution, AA or AF settings. I'm currently running 1024x768, 6xAA,16xAF, > all options maxed fully out on an A8V, FX53, 1Gb, X800XT, 2ZS combination.I > have no jaggies at all and the frame rate never drops below 55 even at the > back of a full 43 car field. > > I really hope there are some ideas out there which I haven't yetconsidered. > If I can get the graphics up to N2k3 quality it's worth hanging on for'the > patch'. > > Thanks in anticipation I don't see that at all. When you ran 3d config, did you check "use mip maps"? If you didn't, the graphics are going to look like bad. A lot like what you described. -- David G Fisher
"David G Fisher" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted text (52 lines)> > "Neil Charlton" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:cvgaie$qj3$[email hidden]... >> Hi all, >> >> I finally got a copy to the UK. Frankly, I'm disappointed for all the >> reason's listed in the Mr Nobody thread (and then some). I won't > regurgitate >> them - but I would ask if anyone has any ideas on a particular problem > that >> is making a poor experience even less satisfactory. >> >> I find that there's an intolerable amount of shimmer at all tracks. It's >> particularly evident on fences, posts, wall/track joins and worst of all > on >> the cars. As a car pulls away from you, the logo or decal on the back > starts >> to roll and shimmer. The sim experience is (for me ) being totally >> interrupted by these appalling textures. >> >> My hope is that I'm just missing something really simple. I've applied >> all >> the tweaks listed on all the bulletin boards. The problem is unaffected >> by >> resolution, AA or AF settings. I'm currently running 1024x768, 6xAA, > 16xAF, >> all options maxed fully out on an A8V, FX53, 1Gb, X800XT, 2ZS >> combination. > I >> have no jaggies at all and the frame rate never drops below 55 even at >> the >> back of a full 43 car field. >> >> I really hope there are some ideas out there which I haven't yet > considered. >> If I can get the graphics up to N2k3 quality it's worth hanging on for > 'the >> patch'. >> >> Thanks in anticipation > > I don't see that at all. > > When you ran 3d config, did you check "use mip maps"? > > If you didn't, the graphics are going to look like bad. A lot like what > you > described. > -- > David G Fisher > >
Yes - I have it selected Dave. If I capture a still frame, the thing looks almost as impressive as N2k3 - no problems with the picture at all. It's when the whell is moved, or other vehicles are in motion, that the sparkling/shimmering happens. I'll try the Aniso = 1 and mipmap in 3D config suggestions and get back. Thanks for the help. Regards
I doubt if any of you guys have this problem but when I went into my nVIDIA control panel, I discovered every single possible optimization routine enabled!!! Well, enough of that, so I disabled the optimizations and ended up with a noticeably better image quality, and no reduction in FPS. The Aniso tip I mentioned earlier--you can set it to 1,2,4,8 (?), 16...(?). Not only is it an 'on or off' deal, but you can adjust the level as well, or at least that is the impression I got. This sim is really starting to shine on this system. I also had a play with the 'Detroit Locker' modification to the *.svm (setups) file--I used a DiffPower of 18 and a DiffPreload of 1, and the driving felt a lot 'looser' in the corners, but still I could feel the mass of the car (virtually, of course), and the tires grabbing the pavement. With this modification, it became nearly impossible (for me) to powerslide the thing anywhere. Actually, it felt great--unfortunately, I don't feel like updating 60000 *.svm files to make them do this, nor do I want to muck up the *.hdv files as that would cause a multiplayer mismatch. I SURE HOPE EA puts the correct differential in the sim--it is very good, in my opinion, out of the box, but with that little adjustment--wow, is all I can say. Why they left out the correct Diff, I will never know-maybe so the newbies could slide it around like a dirt tracker and have fun that way. It is noticebly more difficult to drive with the mod to the svm file, but at least both wheels spin when you give it the gas. How can you miss something like this??? Even this was brought up in the demo discussion and they still leave it in??? I hope EA makes new hdv or svm files, cause I sure in the Sam Hill am not looking forward to doing this for EVERY SINGLE SETUP I USE :) Of course, if I have to, I will--but why should I, or anyone else, fix that differential issue ??? Well, enough for now. I think my graphics are set very well, and the race I did last night at Atlanta was amazing--especially as I pull out of the pits and 30 cars go blasting by!! That was awesome!!!! Like very much so far.....
What version of nVidia control panel? "Smokin_Bob" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted text (40 lines)>I doubt if any of you guys have this problem but when I went into my > nVIDIA control panel, I discovered every single possible optimization > routine enabled!!! Well, enough of that, so I disabled the > optimizations and ended up with a noticeably better image quality, and > no reduction in FPS. > > The Aniso tip I mentioned earlier--you can set it to 1,2,4,8 (?), > 16...(?). Not only is it an 'on or off' deal, but you can adjust the > level as well, or at least that is the impression I got. > > This sim is really starting to shine on this system. I also had a play > with the 'Detroit Locker' modification to the *.svm (setups) file--I > used a DiffPower of 18 and a DiffPreload of 1, and the driving felt a > lot 'looser' in the corners, but still I could feel the mass of the car > (virtually, of course), and the tires grabbing the pavement. With this > modification, it became nearly impossible (for me) to powerslide the > thing anywhere. Actually, it felt great--unfortunately, I don't feel > like updating 60000 *.svm files to make them do this, nor do I want to > muck up the *.hdv files as that would cause a multiplayer mismatch. > > I SURE HOPE EA puts the correct differential in the sim--it is very > good, in my opinion, out of the box, but with that little > adjustment--wow, is all I can say. Why they left out the correct Diff, > I will never know-maybe so the newbies could slide it around like a > dirt tracker and have fun that way. It is noticebly more difficult to > drive with the mod to the svm file, but at least both wheels spin when > you give it the gas. How can you miss something like this??? Even > this was brought up in the demo discussion and they still leave it > in??? > > I hope EA makes new hdv or svm files, cause I sure in the Sam Hill am > not looking forward to doing this for EVERY SINGLE SETUP I USE :) Of > course, if I have to, I will--but why should I, or anyone else, fix > that differential issue ??? > > Well, enough for now. I think my graphics are set very well, and the > race I did last night at Atlanta was amazing--especially as I pull out > of the pits and 30 cars go blasting by!! That was awesome!!!! Like > very much so far..... >
I am using the 66.93 drivers on a 6800 GT card. I just got the card a month or so ago, and am really happy with it so far. I had a couple of Radeons before it, and they weren't bad, but I did want to upgrade.
I see the shimmering at Daytona as well. I do have mipmaps on. That's interesting about ansio not working unless you manually turn it on in the cfg file. Jeez, YAFCFC. Yet Another Friggin Config File Change I hope I NEVER have to reinstall this thing again. I'll NEVER get it back the same! -Larry "David G Fisher" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted text (16 lines)> > "Neil Charlton" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:cvgaie$qj3$[email hidden]... > > I don't see that at all. > > When you ran 3d config, did you check "use mip maps"? > > If you didn't, the graphics are going to look like bad. A lot like what > you > described. > -- > David G Fisher > > >
Which optimizations are you speaking of? -Larry "Smokin_Bob" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted text (9 lines)>I doubt if any of you guys have this problem but when I went into my > nVIDIA control panel, I discovered every single possible optimization > routine enabled!!! Well, enough of that, so I disabled the > optimizations and ended up with a noticeably better image quality, and > no reduction in FPS. > > The Aniso tip I mentioned earlier--you can set it to 1,2,4,8 (?), > 16...(?). Not only is it an 'on or off' deal, but you can adjust the > level as well, or at least that is the impression I got.
Anisotropic works without doing anything with the config file. -- David G Fisher "Larry" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:oqMTd.11948$7z6.9058@lakeread04... > I see the shimmering at Daytona as well. I do have mipmaps on. > > That's interesting about ansio not working unless you manually turn it on in > the cfg file. > > Jeez, YAFCFC. > > Yet Another Friggin Config File Change > > I hope I NEVER have to reinstall this thing again. I'll NEVER get it back > the same! > > -Larry > > "David G Fisher" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:[email hidden]... > > > > "Neil Charlton" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > > news:cvgaie$qj3$[email hidden]... > > > > I don't see that at all. > > > > When you ran 3d config, did you check "use mip maps"? > > > > If you didn't, the graphics are going to look like bad. A lot like what > > you > > described. > > -- > > David G Fisher > > > > > > > >
Larry, In the performance options of the control panel....Trilinear optimization, anisotropic optimization, etc. Basically all the stuff that makes image quality suffer at the hands of performance. There is right mouse button click help on the options if you want to know what they do. David, You are exactly correct--your card can do it as well. That is just another thing to try in case the card, for whatever reason, doesnt like it. EA wants the FSAA off on the card, but I do not know what they feel about the aniso. Just set it back to zero for sure.
Wow, I thought optimized meant better quality. You're saying it means better performance? That's kinda confusing :) -Larry "Smokin_Bob" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted text (15 lines)> Larry, > > In the performance options of the control panel....Trilinear > optimization, anisotropic optimization, etc. Basically all the stuff > that makes image quality suffer at the hands of performance. There is > right mouse button click help on the options if you want to know what > they do. > > David, > > You are exactly correct--your card can do it as well. That is just > another thing to try in case the card, for whatever reason, doesnt like > it. EA wants the FSAA off on the card, but I do not know what they feel > about the aniso. Just set it back to zero for sure. >
Larry, No kidding--had me fooled for weeks :) I suppose it all depends on the wording, optimized for speed or quality...
"David G Fisher" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted text (40 lines)> Anisotropic works without doing anything with the config file. > > > -- > David G Fisher > > "Larry" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:oqMTd.11948$7z6.9058@lakeread04... >> I see the shimmering at Daytona as well. I do have mipmaps on. >> >> That's interesting about ansio not working unless you manually turn it on > in >> the cfg file. >> >> Jeez, YAFCFC. >> >> Yet Another Friggin Config File Change >> >> I hope I NEVER have to reinstall this thing again. I'll NEVER get it back >> the same! >> >> -Larry >> >> "David G Fisher" <[email hidden]> wrote in message >> news:[email hidden]... >> > >> > "Neil Charlton" <[email hidden]> wrote in message >> > news:cvgaie$qj3$[email hidden]... >> > >> > I don't see that at all. >> > >> > When you ran 3d config, did you check "use mip maps"? >> > >> > If you didn't, the graphics are going to look like bad. A lot like what >> > you >> > described. >> > -- >> > David G Fisher >> > >> >
Same experience her Dave - config has no effect on Aniso. The graphic card setting do have an effect. Unfortunately, messing with it doesn't help the shimmering at all (for me) but going to the highest level greatly improved the quality of the winshield support bar shadows on the dash! I found something else interesting - I can reproduce one aspect of the problem for those with different systems to compare. Start a full race, at the back of the grid, odds are you'll be behind a dodge. All the dodges have the DODGE logo on the rear bumper. As the field pulls out of the pits, the logo will appear to 'roll and shimmer'. It as if the game's worked out that the car is further away and the logo is therefore smaller and must be rescaled (which is correct) but then redraws it totally ineptly. One pixel shifts in the pattern give the rolling and shimmering effect. I must have tried everything by now but the ONLY thing that's made any difference at all is to put image quality in the game at low. Things don't look too good now but the logo no longer rolls as the car pulls away. Similarly, sit in the pits with a fence post near you. As you slightly move the wheel, you can see drawn pixels roll up and down the fence post as it attempts to redraw at a slightly different position. Like I said, I 'm currently running 1024x768, 6xAA, 16xAF all details maxed for quality but NONE of these settings affect the problem. The only thing that helps, as I've just said, is lowering the game's image quality setting. I'd like to say that this experiment tells me that graphically, they've done a poor job on NSR but as I can't really as I don't know enough about how this particular aspect works. It could also be just my own physiology that makes these artifacts so distracting and hence spoils the experience for me. Reading between the lines of an earlier thread regarding EAs patch intentions, it doesn't appear that they intend to address any of the graphical issues in the near future (cars, textures etc). I think this is a real shame as sorting out the quality and accuracy of the cars, fixing the diff/height issue and sorting the flags fiasco would make this thing a contender. Regards

Sponsors

Affiliate Links

Sim Gaming Expo MOZA Racing Sim-Lab Fanatec TrakRacer Asetek Internet Privacy From NordVPN Dreamhost Capital One Credit Card Application Fanatical CDKeys Amazon Amazon UK Project Motor Racing iRacing Get your racing gloves, boots and more from Demon Tweeks. Enlist at Roberts Space Industries, developers of Star Citizen and Squadron 42


Back from the ashes since July, 2019. First created in 2001 with the merger of Legends Central (founded 1999) and simracing.dk.

A site by a sort of sim racer, for sim racers, about racing sims. News and information on both modern and historic sim racing software titles.

All products and licenses property of their respective owners.


Facebook Threads Bluesky Twitter Mastodon Instagram YouTube Tiktok Twitch Reddit Google News Apple News Subscribe via WordPress Flipboard eBay

Race Sim Central © 1999-2026 | Some links pay RSC a commission. Advertising does not equal endorsement.Cookie Policy