at ONE track...ONE track I just squeezed under the 107% cutoff....Thanks
again to UWE for finding ANOTHER way to make those of us on TEAM BACKMARKER
feel insignificant.....:)
--
dave henrie
Free the ICR2 source code!
In article <IUNi5.74817$[email hidden]>,
Dave Henrie <[email hidden]> wrote:
> at ONE track...ONE track I just squeezed under the 107% cutoff....Thanks
>again to UWE for finding ANOTHER way to make those of us on TEAM BACKMARKER
>feel insignificant.....:)
Hey Dave,
be my guest ;->
Uwe
--
Uwe Schuerkamp http://www.schuerkamp.de/
GnuPG Fingerprint: 2093 20B8 B861 9358 A356 B01A E145 9249 5D27 33EA
PGP Fingerprint: 2E 13 20 22 9A 3F 63 7F 67 6F E9 B1 A8 36 A4 61
"Dave Henrie" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:IUNi5.74817$[email hidden]...
> at ONE track...ONE track I just squeezed under the 107% cutoff....Thanks
> again to UWE for finding ANOTHER way to make those of us on TEAMBACKMARKER
> feel insignificant.....:)
Heh.. yeah, but the target of getting your overall aggregate time total
under 107% is a more realistic goal for us mortal human types than achieving
a negative handicap!
Pants
(+8.5 GPLRank hcp)
"Pants" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:8mho51$k4r$[email hidden]...
>
> Heh.. yeah, but the target of getting your overall aggregate time total
> under 107% is a more realistic goal for us mortal human types thanachieving
> a negative handicap!
>
>
> Pants
> (+8.5 GPLRank hcp)
Forgot to add:
(105.577% off the records)
Thus illustrating my point. ;-)
Pants
