On Sat, 23 Sep 2000 19:14:57 GMT, "prospect02" <[email hidden]>
wrote:
>Hi,
>I'm just wondering what the concensus is about which is the most physically
>correct F1 sim featuring modern cars?
There is no such thing as a consensus in this NG, unless maybe if
there's only one game in a particular genre (i.e. GPL). :-)
It's all a matter of personal preference
Generally spoken, regarding physics and car movement, GP3 driving
seems a little too stiff, artificial and sterile; while F12K feels too
"soft", with exaggerated suspension movement and overly bumpy
circuits.
Even if we had a game that would offer a compromise between these
two styles, which would be close to perfect IMO, there would certainly
be still no consensus. :-)
Jan
prospect02 wrote:
Ed,
With all due respect to you...,but here we go again.....every time a new f1 sim comes out
we have this discussion and every time it will end up people calling each other names simply
because they don't agree with person who replyed before him...so this is a very touchy subject.
For al i can tell,...and i've played a lot of these modern sims...i'm the most happy with Crammonds
last creation GP3.....admitting it's not perfect but gives me a better driving feeling then F12000.
Also the updates available on various sites makes this sim the ultimate F1 sim for me....and there's
no end this upcoming flow of constant updates...look at GP2,people still making upgrades for that
one which was brought on the market in '96 and still very much appriciated by so many people...do i
have to go one??
Buy GP3..you won't be dissapointed.
The thing about GP3 is...the feeling,.you don't have to explain it to people who know it,but on the
other hand you can't explain it to people who don't know it!!
okay,....let the discussion begin.....the game is a foot.
--
Greetings :)RuuD�
+------------------------------+
mailto:[email hidden]
Quoted text (8 lines)
> > Hi, > I'm just wondering what the concensus is about which is the most physically > correct F1 sim featuring modern cars? > > Thanks, > Ed > [email hidden]Hi,
I'm just wondering what the concensus is about which is the most physically
correct F1 sim featuring modern cars?
Thanks,
Ed
[email hidden]
Whatever pleases YOU the most........
"prospect02" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:Ri7z5.19345$[email hidden]...
> Hi,
> I'm just wondering what the concensus is about which is the mostphysically
Quoted text (9 lines)
> correct F1 sim featuring modern cars? > > Thanks, > Ed > [email hidden] > > > >Couldn,t agree more :o)
Didn't like GP3 at first, but with a bit of effort it becomes a very
worthwhile experience (gettin sideways of those curbs at Imola is a blast)
Regards
Marc Davey
"Ruud" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
> prospect02 wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > I'm just wondering what the concensus is about which is the mostphysically
f1 sim comes out
> we have this discussion and every time it will end up people calling eachother names simply
> because they don't agree with person who replyed before him...so this is avery touchy subject.
> For al i can tell,...and i've played a lot of these modern sims...i'm themost happy with Crammonds
> last creation GP3.....admitting it's not perfect but gives me a betterdriving feeling then F12000.
> Also the updates available on various sites makes this sim the ultimate F1sim for me....and there's
> no end this upcoming flow of constant updates...look at GP2,people stillmaking upgrades for that
> one which was brought on the market in '96 and still very much appriciatedby so many people...do i
> have to go one??
> Buy GP3..you won't be dissapointed.
>
>
> The thing about GP3 is...the feeling,.you don't have to explain it topeople who know it,but on the
Quoted text (8 lines)
> > correct F1 sim featuring modern cars? > > > > Thanks, > > Ed > > [email hidden] > > Ed, > With all due respect to you...,but here we go again.....every time a newQuoted text (7 lines)
> other hand you can't explain it to people who don't know it!! > > okay,....let the discussion begin.....the game is a foot. > -- > Greetings :)RuuD� > +------------------------------+ > mailto:[email hidden]On Sat, 23 Sep 2000 22:40:54 +0200, Ruud <[email hidden]> thus
spoke:
>Buy GP3..you won't be dissapointed.
That's a rather big assumption considering that many people were
dissapointed with it. I say buy both F12K and GP3 from EB, keep the
one you like the most and return the other. Or keep both, or wait for
EA's next effort in about two months, or wait for Ubisoft's next
effort (soon too). The possibilities are endless.
--
Nos
with any luck....and a few assumptions...... itll be announced soon....
pez wants to convert the Indianapolis oval from Nascar4 into 'PapyF1 sim'
and see how quick the cars can go....
Nos wrote in message <[email hidden]>...
Quoted text (13 lines)
>On Sat, 23 Sep 2000 22:40:54 +0200, Ruud <[email hidden]> thus >spoke: > > >>Buy GP3..you won't be dissapointed. > >That's a rather big assumption considering that many people were >dissapointed with it. I say buy both F12K and GP3 from EB, keep the >one you like the most and return the other. Or keep both, or wait for >EA's next effort in about two months, or wait for Ubisoft's next >effort (soon too). The possibilities are endless. >-- >NosOn Sat, 23 Sep 2000 22:42:00 GMT, [email hidden] (Nos) wrote:
That's a good idea. I bought both also, but kept only one.
Matt
Quoted text (11 lines)
>On Sat, 23 Sep 2000 22:40:54 +0200, Ruud <[email hidden]> thus >spoke: > > >>Buy GP3..you won't be dissapointed. > >That's a rather big assumption considering that many people were >dissapointed with it. I say buy both F12K and GP3 from EB, keep the >one you like the most and return the other. Or keep both, or wait for >EA's next effort in about two months, or wait for Ubisoft's next >effort (soon too). The possibilities are endless.On Sun, 24 Sep 2000 23:51:59 GMT, teehole <holysmokes!@spammy.net>
thus spoke:
> That's a good idea. I bought both also, but kept only one.
>
> Matt
Which one? I like both so have both.
--
Nos
"pez" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:8qjkem$ep8$[email hidden]...
> with any luck....and a few assumptions...... itll be announced soon....
>
? OK, so which version?
The Ubisoft one?
Michael
[snip]
Having just attended the inaugural USGP at Indy today, I have to say
that EA's F1 2000 is the most physically correct F1 sim featuring
modern cars simply because it features cars from THIS season, plus ALL
the tracks on the 2000 calendar (INCLUDING Indy).
;-)
All that aside, though, as a sim nut, I personally would rate F1 2000
as the current top F1 sim overall -- it's the closest thing to GPL with
wings that you'll find right now.
-- JB
In article <Ri7z5.19345$[email hidden]>,
"prospect02" <[email hidden]> wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm just wondering what the concensus is about which is the mostphysically
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
Quoted text (7 lines)
> correct F1 sim featuring modern cars? > > Thanks, > Ed > [email hidden] > >
Steven Crook-Dawkins <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
I also think faster hardware makes programmers think they can get away with
sloppy programming. Take GP3 for example, minimum spec is P2 266 yet GP2
ran fine on my Pentium 75. This group has been full of posts the last
couple of months about how similar GP3 is to GP2 yet it needs a machine 4
times faster to run it! Thats even without wet weather.
Chris
Quoted text (13 lines)
> On my P2-350, GP2. > > Talk about GP3 and F1-2000 all you like, but they are useless unless you > > bought your PC in the last 12 months. > > I hate this with PC games - my videocard is out of date before its out > of the > box! Before you all brand me a "laggard", do you really believe your > getting > value here? I mean, doesn't this constant requirement to buy new > hardware > simply prevent innovative coding?On Mon, 25 Sep 2000 01:36:12 GMT, [email hidden] (Nos) wrote:
I kept F12000, have more fun with that. But GPL is in "revive-mode"
again! (sigh....<g>).
Matt
>> That's a good idea. I bought both also, but kept only one.
>
>Which one? I like both so have both.
On my P2-350, GP2.
Talk about GP3 and F1-2000 all you like, but they are useless unless you
bought your PC in the last 12 months.
I hate this with PC games - my videocard is out of date before its out
of the
box! Before you all brand me a "laggard", do you really believe your
getting
value here? I mean, doesn't this constant requirement to buy new
hardware
simply prevent innovative coding? For example, NFS Porsche was the first
game that truly stunned me with its graphic ability - and I suspect its
the only
one that truly exercises my Voodoo 3 card. But why should developers
worry about pushing the technology when a new processor or Videocard
is around the corner with more basic built in features
I kind of envy those Playstation owners who have enjoyed true value
out of there �150 ($200?) box over the last 3-4 years. Plus they got to
play Gran turismo.
Does the Playstation run CMR2? I dread to think what the PC minimum
spec will be.
teehole wrote:
--
Steven Crook-Dawkins - Research Assistant - University of York.
Email Disclaimer
----------------------
The information in this email is confidential.
It is intended solely for the addressee.
Access to this email by anyone else is
unauthorised.
The views expressed in this email are those of
the author, and should not be attributed to the
University of York, BAE SYSTEMS or any
other party.


































