Race Sim Central
Rec.Autos.Simulators Archive

DTR/DTRSC qual procedure

4 posts by 3 people · 19 Nov 2000 16:37 UTC - 21 Nov 2000 00:38 UTC

LegendNo6 19 Nov 2000 16:37 UTC#220585
Having made many attempts on the tiny bull-rings in the DTR games, I have noticed that if you qualify 1st, you can just about kiss an A main win goodbye with the heats running an inverted field. I have found myself either sandbagging my qualifying run or cutting my losses in the lower mains and saving the car. On occasion I can get to the front--but most of the time a slower car puts sends me to the pits with a trashed car. I've never cared for the inverted field format, and most real-life tracks here (in NC anyway) have abandoned it. While it promotes passing--which is good for the fans--it also greatly increases the chances of a slower, inexperienced driver taking the rocket ships out of the race. Has anyone hacked the game to give a more traditional qualifiying procedure (good qualifying=good starting position)? What's the point of qualifiying well if you are facing the rear ends of 14 cars and only 15 laps on a 1/5 mile track to pass them all? I guess the _optimal_ solution would be a button to switch on and off the inverted field and speed the AI cars up to make qualifiying tighter for the pole. This isn't a big complaint, I would just like to be rewarded for good qualifying rather than a handfull of $1, a couple of points, and penalized on the track. Flame away, folks--I have Nomex :-) Dave
Burke Wells 19 Nov 2000 19:46 UTC#220453
Hi Dave, I've noticed this too, as I've been having a blast trying to work my way through career mode. But it really doesn't bother me, since I've found that despite starting 16th in the heat race after snagging the pole, I can usually pull off a win in the heat race and keep my finances in good standing just by trying to be careful and stay out of trouble. Any contact at all with any other cars (especially a bump with the front of the car) results in substantial repair bills, so you really can't be too aggressive in the heat race. But to me, it all balances out, because if you win that heat race, you automatically start on the pole for the "A Main", and if I had the choice, that'd be the one I'd want the pole for (when compared with the heat race). Because depending on the track, the pole position for the A main will usually allow you to "check out" on the rest of the field. (and yes, I'm running on 100% AI strength & full field). Knoxville is kickin' my ass though, because all of the AI dive into the turns low, but then slide up high to the fence, then dive back down to the inside heading for the straight. Makes it very difficult to get a run on somebody without bumping their rear. Oh, and I'm also from NC (near Winston-Salem). Good to see another North Carolinian on here.... Burke [email hidden] "LegendNo6" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted text (30 lines)> Having made many attempts on the tiny bull-rings in the DTR games, I > have noticed that if you qualify 1st, you can just about kiss an A > main win goodbye with the heats running an inverted field. I have > found myself either sandbagging my qualifying run or cutting my losses > in the lower mains and saving the car. On occasion I can get to the > front--but most of the time a slower car puts sends me to the pits > with a trashed car. > > I've never cared for the inverted field format, and most real-life > tracks here (in NC anyway) have abandoned it. While it promotes > passing--which is good for the fans--it also greatly increases the > chances of a slower, inexperienced driver taking the rocket ships out > of the race. > > Has anyone hacked the game to give a more traditional qualifiying > procedure (good qualifying=good starting position)? What's the point > of qualifiying well if you are facing the rear ends of 14 cars and > only 15 laps on a 1/5 mile track to pass them all? > > I guess the _optimal_ solution would be a button to switch on and off > the inverted field and speed the AI cars up to make qualifiying > tighter for the pole. > > This isn't a big complaint, I would just like to be rewarded for good > qualifying rather than a handfull of $1, a couple of points, and > penalized on the track. > > Flame away, folks--I have Nomex :-) > > Dave
LegendNo6 20 Nov 2000 01:09 UTC#220488
My first post may have been a little too harsh. Some tracks lend themselves well to the inverted field format, some don't--just like real life. I guess that is why some real life tracks use the inverted field, some have gone away from it. I would really like to have the option, but if not--guess I'll be in bull ring rush hour traffic forever. I don't like the inverted field in real life (even though I would benefit most from it), I guess that just carries over to racing games. Hey, Burke, if you have the original DTR, try racing the Sprints at Wakeeny Speedway (the 1/6 mile oval) witha full field. Talk about out of control. I don't think they even make a short enough gear set... And have you tried a figure-8 Sprint race yet? OK so maybe it's not realistic, but interesting to say the least :-) On Sun, 19 Nov 2000 14:43:34 -0500, "Burke Wells" <[email hidden]> wrote:
Quoted text (26 lines)>Hi Dave, > >I've noticed this too, as I've been having a blast trying to work my way >through career mode. But it really doesn't bother me, since I've found that >despite starting 16th in the heat race after snagging the pole, I can >usually pull off a win in the heat race and keep my finances in good >standing just by trying to be careful and stay out of trouble. Any contact >at all with any other cars (especially a bump with the front of the car) >results in substantial repair bills, so you really can't be too aggressive >in the heat race. But to me, it all balances out, because if you win that >heat race, you automatically start on the pole for the "A Main", and if I >had the choice, that'd be the one I'd want the pole for (when compared with >the heat race). Because depending on the track, the pole position for the A >main will usually allow you to "check out" on the rest of the field. (and >yes, I'm running on 100% AI strength & full field). > >Knoxville is kickin' my ass though, because all of the AI dive into the >turns low, but then slide up high to the fence, then dive back down to the >inside heading for the straight. Makes it very difficult to get a run on >somebody without bumping their rear. > >Oh, and I'm also from NC (near Winston-Salem). Good to see another North >Carolinian on here.... > >Burke >[email hidden]
Doug Gordon 21 Nov 2000 00:38 UTC#220334
At the tracks I used to go to, they had a "one second rule", where if you ran more than one second quicker in a race than your qualifying time, you were disqualified. This was how they kept guys from sandbagging. If you had a bad qualifying run and later thought you might run too fast in the race, you could always opt to start at the rear, and then the rule didn't apply. Doug G "LegendNo6" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted text (30 lines)> Having made many attempts on the tiny bull-rings in the DTR games, I > have noticed that if you qualify 1st, you can just about kiss an A > main win goodbye with the heats running an inverted field. I have > found myself either sandbagging my qualifying run or cutting my losses > in the lower mains and saving the car. On occasion I can get to the > front--but most of the time a slower car puts sends me to the pits > with a trashed car. > > I've never cared for the inverted field format, and most real-life > tracks here (in NC anyway) have abandoned it. While it promotes > passing--which is good for the fans--it also greatly increases the > chances of a slower, inexperienced driver taking the rocket ships out > of the race. > > Has anyone hacked the game to give a more traditional qualifiying > procedure (good qualifying=good starting position)? What's the point > of qualifiying well if you are facing the rear ends of 14 cars and > only 15 laps on a 1/5 mile track to pass them all? > > I guess the _optimal_ solution would be a button to switch on and off > the inverted field and speed the AI cars up to make qualifiying > tighter for the pole. > > This isn't a big complaint, I would just like to be rewarded for good > qualifying rather than a handfull of $1, a couple of points, and > penalized on the track. > > Flame away, folks--I have Nomex :-) > > Dave

Sponsors

Affiliate Links

Sim Gaming Expo MOZA Racing Sim-Lab Fanatec TrakRacer Asetek Internet Privacy From NordVPN Dreamhost Capital One Credit Card Application Fanatical CDKeys Amazon Amazon UK Project Motor Racing iRacing Get your racing gloves, boots and more from Demon Tweeks. Enlist at Roberts Space Industries, developers of Star Citizen and Squadron 42


Back from the ashes since July, 2019. First created in 2001 with the merger of Legends Central (founded 1999) and simracing.dk.

A site by a sort of sim racer, for sim racers, about racing sims. News and information on both modern and historic sim racing software titles.

All products and licenses property of their respective owners.


Facebook Threads Bluesky Twitter Mastodon Instagram YouTube Tiktok Twitch Reddit Google News Apple News Subscribe via WordPress Flipboard eBay

Race Sim Central © 1999-2026 | Some links pay RSC a commission. Advertising does not equal endorsement.Cookie Policy