In article <zy2V5.42973$[email hidden]>,
"ymenard" <[email hidden]> wrote:
> >"David G Fisher" <[email hidden]> wrote
> > The only problem with that line of thinking is that NASCAR 4 is
> > unfortunately a NASCAR sim.
>
> But when you'll be racing a road course online season with 43carsaround the
> Nurburgring, you will consider it more then just a "NASCAR" sim.It's a
> stock-car simulation, a car that has challenges and it's own
> characteristics. It's a beast.
>
> Of course with your biased views, I doubt you will see that. Havefun with
> that F1CS "half-sim".
Frank, Frank, Frank -- please step away from the monitor and put the
keyboard down, because you've obviously lapsed into slack-jawed Papy
adoration, at the expense of good, sound, reasoned judgement.
F1 2000 was a damn fine sim (FAR better than GP3 in the physics
department) so if F1CS qualifies as a "half-sim," then I guess that
would make N4 a bastard sim ("What do you get when you cross a 1967 GP
car with a Winston Cup car . . . ?").
Now wipe the drool from your chin and stand up straight -- you're
embarrassing us.
-- JB
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
Come on Francois... that's a bit harsh. There are positive signs for this
one, not the least of which it's predecessor being not half bad when
patched.
I'm prepared to give this series another go when F1CS2000 arrives.
That's after I try the Nascar4 demo, of course.<g>
Jan.
=---
ymenard wrote...
Quoted text (22 lines)
> > <snip> > > But when you'll be racing a road course online season with 43cars > around the Nurburgring, you will consider it more then just a > "NASCAR" sim. It's a stock-car simulation, a car that has > challenges and it's own characteristics. It's a beast. > > Of course with your biased views, I doubt you will see that. Have > fun with that F1CS "half-sim". > > > > -- > -- Fran�ois M�nard <ymenard> > -- May the Downforce be with you... > -- http://www.WeRace.net > -- People think it must be fun to be a super genius, but they > don't realise how hard it is to put up with all the idiots in > the world. > > >Like I've said before, if you don't see the attraction and the challenge,
you don't understand the problem.
Jan.
=---
David G Fisher wrote...
> The only problem with that line of thinking is that
> NASCAR 4 is unfortunately a NASCAR sim.
>
> David G Fisher
Listed as "in stock":
http://www.bestbuy.com/software/Detail.asp?m=1023&e=11028227
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
The only problem with that line of thinking is that NASCAR 4 is
unfortunately a NASCAR sim.
David G Fisher
"Luke Phillips" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:3a24a07c$0$19402$[email hidden]...
> bah, who cares.... BRING ON NASCAR4 i say :)
>
> Luke
> -=87=-
bah, who cares.... BRING ON NASCAR4 i say :)
Luke
-=87=-
<[email hidden]> wrote in message news:9026s6$7sn$[email hidden]...
Quoted text (7 lines)
> Listed as "in stock": > > http://www.bestbuy.com/software/Detail.asp?m=1023&e=11028227 > > > Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ > Before you buy. its no problem, i dont mind watching passing other than in pits, sure u
might think that they just go round in circles, but at least its within very
close range of each other, unlik f1 when its a close race for the lead -
"he's only 3secs behind, this is riviting stuff, unbelieveable!". BAH
Luke
-=87=-
David G Fisher <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:ir1V5.152453$[email hidden]...
Quoted text (14 lines)
> The only problem with that line of thinking is that NASCAR 4 is > unfortunately a NASCAR sim. > > David G Fisher > > > "Luke Phillips" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:3a24a07c$0$19402$[email hidden]... > > bah, who cares.... BRING ON NASCAR4 i say :) > > > > Luke > > -=87=- > >>"David G Fisher" <[email hidden]> wrote
> The only problem with that line of thinking is that NASCAR 4 is
> unfortunately a NASCAR sim.
But when you'll be racing a road course online season with 43cars around the
Nurburgring, you will consider it more then just a "NASCAR" sim. It's a
stock-car simulation, a car that has challenges and it's own
characteristics. It's a beast.
Of course with your biased views, I doubt you will see that. Have fun with
that F1CS "half-sim".
--
-- Fran�ois M�nard <ymenard>
-- May the Downforce be with you...
-- http://www.WeRace.net
-- People think it must be fun to be a super genius, but they don't realise
how hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world.
David G Fisher wrote:
>
> The only problem with that line of thinking is that NASCAR 4 is
> unfortunately a NASCAR sim.
Depends on which web sites you care to visit, I wouldn't define Nascar3
as "only" a Nascar sim any more :-), but of course, even the combined
talent of the whole "Pit Crew" can't turn it into an F1 sim....:-)
Beers and cheers
(uncle) Goy
"Team Mirage" http://www.teammirage.com/
"The Pits" http://www.theuspits.com/
* Spam is for losers who can't get business any other way *
"Spamkiller" http://www.spamkiller.com
But wait, it has GPL physics! LOL I love that line...you are correct, it is
STILL a Nascar sim...and people seem to be overlooking the fact that GPL has
GPL physics!
JB
"David G Fisher" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:ir1V5.152453$[email hidden]...
Quoted text (14 lines)
> The only problem with that line of thinking is that NASCAR 4 is > unfortunately a NASCAR sim. > > David G Fisher > > > "Luke Phillips" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:3a24a07c$0$19402$[email hidden]... > > bah, who cares.... BRING ON NASCAR4 i say :) > > > > Luke > > -=87=- > >OK so you clearly dislike F1 (while you are chewing tobacco
no doubt), so why are you even reading this stuff?
--
[email hidden]
"Luke Phillips" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:3a24a5a1$0$19414$[email hidden]...
> its no problem, i dont mind watching passing other than in pits, sure u
> might think that they just go round in circles, but at least its within
very
> close range of each other, unlik f1 when its a close race for the lead -
> "he's only 3secs behind, this is riviting stuff, unbelieveable!". BAH
>
> Luke
> -=87=-
>
>
> David G Fisher <[email hidden]> wrote in message
> news:ir1V5.152453$[email hidden]...
> > The only problem with that line of thinking is that NASCAR 4 is
> > unfortunately a NASCAR sim.
> >
> > David G Fisher
> >
> >
> > "Luke Phillips" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
> > news:3a24a07c$0$19402$[email hidden]...
> > > bah, who cares.... BRING ON NASCAR4 i say :)
> > >
> > > Luke
> > > -=87=-
> >
> >
>
>
"ymenard" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:zy2V5.42973$[email hidden]...
> Of course with your biased views, I doubt you will see that. Have funwith
> that F1CS "half-sim".
Oh boy this guy is unbelievable...
OK so *NOW* what is wrong with F1CS??? (you sound like a gore
lawyer too).
--
[email hidden]
I agree. The whole going around in circles for hours as entertainment
escapes me, but the cars themselves are not as fun to drive as say Cart
cars, in my opinion. This is a GAME I will not buy.
And it is a game, by the way.
> The only problem with that line of thinking is that NASCAR 4 is
> unfortunately a NASCAR sim.
>
> David G Fisher
><[email hidden]> wrote
> Frank, Frank, Frank -- please step away from the monitor and put the
> keyboard down, because you've obviously lapsed into slack-jawed Papy
> adoration, at the expense of good, sound, reasoned judgement.
Bah I'm the first in line to slap them also.
> F1 2000 was a damn fine sim
It wasn't fine. There is no good F1 modern sim at the moment. There never
was. Gp2 was as close to that when released, but at the moment none exist.
They are stink, they all have major faults that just make me cringe.
> ("What do you get when you cross a 1967 GP
> car with a Winston Cup car . . . ?").
Nothing, you just don't understand that N4 has no relation to GPL, but
relation to the new game engine which both title share.
--
-- Fran�ois M�nard <ymenard>
-- May the Downforce be with you...
-- http://www.WeRace.net
-- People think it must be fun to be a super genius, but they don't realise
how hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world.
I have another thread and I beleive rrevved confirmed it..the
$19 title is the old F12k. not the F12k 1/2 champ season
dave henrie
<[email hidden]> wrote in message news:9026s6$7sn$[email hidden]...
> Listed as "in stock":
>
DOH! The deceptive ba$tard$! Thanks for the cautionary note, Dave.
-- JB
In article <Q0gV5.94746$[email hidden]>,
"Dave Henrie" <[email hidden]> wrote:
> I have another thread and I beleive rrevved confirmed it..the
> $19 title is the old F12k. not the F12k 1/2 champ season
> dave henrie
> <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:9026s6$7sn$[email hidden]...
> > Listed as "in stock":
> >
>
>
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
"Dave Henrie" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:Q0gV5.94746$[email hidden]...
> I have another thread and I beleive rrevved confirmed it..the
> $19 title is the old F12k. not the F12k 1/2 champ season
> dave henrie
Thanks for the alert- I was just about to grab it for that price.
"ymenard" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:ZGeV5.1796$i%[email hidden]...
> It wasn't fine. There is no good F1 modern sim at the moment. Therenever
> was. Gp2 was as close to that when released, but at the moment none exist.
> They are stink, they all have major faults that just make me cringe.
That is because you are a mental case.
--
[email hidden]
>"Greg Cisko" <[email hidden]> wrote
> "ymenard" <[email hidden]> wrote
> > There is no good F1 modern sim at the moment
> > They are stink, they all have major faults that just make me cringe.
>
> That is because you are a mental case.
LOL if you say so ;-)
--
-- Fran�ois M�nard <ymenard>
-- May the Downforce be with you...
-- http://www.WeRace.net
-- People think it must be fun to be a super genius, but they don't realise
how hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world.
