I would like to thank Uwe and the team for the inclusion of the 107% rule
against the benchmark. All of a sudden I appear to much closer to the mark
:-)
One thing I think could be useful, would be the ability to view the handicap
of a particular track (like a hole in golf) so that you can see if others
are finding it just as difficult to become negative at that track.
e.g. Mexico would probably be rated about 2nd hardest and Monza 11th (i.e.
"easiest").
I don't know if it is at all possible, or even worthwhile, but it is
something I would have liked as I was trying to gain time at all the tracks.
After all there is no point spending 2 hours at Mexico to gain a second that
few others have achieved when the time could be better spent at Spa gaining
five.
Cheers
Stewart
[email hidden] (bernie eccle) wrote in
<90dcd5$vc1$[email hidden]>:
Stewart, go play with Multiple Choice Hell, you can isolate for
Country, track, and chassis, or any combination. --
Don Scurlock
Vancouver,B.C.
GPLRank -5.09
Come see how you rank, at the GPLRank site
http://gplrank.ringlord.com/
Quoted text (18 lines)
>I would like to thank Uwe and the team for the inclusion of the 107% >rule against the benchmark. All of a sudden I appear to much closer >to the mark >:-) >One thing I think could be useful, would be the ability to view the >handicap of a particular track (like a hole in golf) so that you can >see if others are finding it just as difficult to become negative at >that track. e.g. Mexico would probably be rated about 2nd hardest >and Monza 11th (i.e. "easiest"). >I don't know if it is at all possible, or even worthwhile, but it is >something I would have liked as I was trying to gain time at all the >tracks. After all there is no point spending 2 hours at Mexico to >gain a second that few others have achieved when the time could be >better spent at Spa gaining five. > >Cheers > >Stewart
"Don Scurlock" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:8FFFCF625dscurlock@news...
The rankings at "Best lap times by track" is what I have used to see
where some improvement may be possible.
I'm 630 at Zandvoort but only 992 at Kyalami, a clear indicator of
where I need to do some laps!
�ke L.
+33,10
Quoted text (31 lines)
> [email hidden] (bernie eccle) wrote in > <90dcd5$vc1$[email hidden]>: > > >I would like to thank Uwe and the team for the inclusion of the 107% > >rule against the benchmark. All of a sudden I appear to much closer > >to the mark > >:-) > >One thing I think could be useful, would be the ability to view the > >handicap of a particular track (like a hole in golf) so that you can > >see if others are finding it just as difficult to become negative at > >that track. e.g. Mexico would probably be rated about 2nd hardest > >and Monza 11th (i.e. "easiest"). > >I don't know if it is at all possible, or even worthwhile, but it is > >something I would have liked as I was trying to gain time at all the > >tracks. After all there is no point spending 2 hours at Mexico to > >gain a second that few others have achieved when the time could be > >better spent at Spa gaining five. > > > >Cheers > > > >Stewart > > Stewart, go play with Multiple Choice Hell, you can isolate for > Country, track, and chassis, or any combination. -- > Don Scurlock > Vancouver,B.C. > GPLRank -5.09 > > Come see how you rank, at the GPLRank site > http://gplrank.ringlord.com/ >Thanks guys. I never thought about doing it this way. I've now done so and
it threw out some interesting information. Looks like I should spend a
little more time at Spa (and Mexico and the 'Ring!)
Cheers
Stewart
�ke Larsson <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:xCQW5.1718$O%[email hidden]...
