If somebody have any renseignment on gp4 send me a mail please
[email hidden]
Of course it will last till gp499. but I think no more than that.
Y.M
"Cedric Doisy" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:91oqi6$m5s$[email hidden]...
> If somebody have any renseignment on gp4 send me a mail please
>
> [email hidden]
>
>
Can some body tell me what renseignment means please?
Thankyou
Chris
--
www.geocities.com/simbokza
Remove _your_clothes before replying
"Cedric Doisy" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:91oqi6$m5s$[email hidden]...
> If somebody have any renseignment on gp4 send me a mail please
>
> [email hidden]
>
>
renseignement (it's a french word), the proper traduction should have
been information.
Chris Bloom wrote:
Quoted text (17 lines)
> Can some body tell me what renseignment means please? > > Thankyou > > Chris > > -- > www.geocities.com/simbokza > > Remove _your_clothes before replying > "Cedric Doisy" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:91oqi6$m5s$[email hidden]... > > If somebody have any renseignment on gp4 send me a mail please > > > > [email hidden] > > > >>"Cedric Doisy" <[email hidden]> wrote
> If somebody have any renseignment on gp4 send me a mail please
Oh my this could be so easy :)
Basically it will be released in 2002 but it will feature the cars from the
season 2000. It will still be based on the decade-and-more-old game engine,
and game reviewers will still give it 98% reviews, even though the major
flaws.
--
-- Fran�ois M�nard <ymenard>
-- May the Downforce be with you...
-- http://www.WeRace.net
-- People think it must be fun to be a super genius, but they don't realise
how hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world.
Kinda on the subject, I was browsing through a magazine (SA edition of PC
Format) in the shop the other day and they had a review of GP3 (with total
disregard to the fact that it is still unavailable in the usual PC game
shops here!) where they gave it 94 % (approx). At the bottom of the review
they had a comparison box where it showed they gave a whopping 61% to GPL
when they reviewed it!
Do they know what they are missing?
Chris
--
www.geocities.com/simbokza
Remove _your_clothes before replying
"ymenard" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:%la06.98945$[email hidden]...
> >"Cedric Doisy" <[email hidden]> wrote
> > If somebody have any renseignment on gp4 send me a mail please
>
> Oh my this could be so easy :)
>
> Basically it will be released in 2002 but it will feature the cars from
the
> season 2000. It will still be based on the decade-and-more-old game
engine,
> and game reviewers will still give it 98% reviews, even though the major
> flaws.
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> -- Fran�ois M�nard <ymenard>
> -- May the Downforce be with you...
> -- http://www.WeRace.net
> -- People think it must be fun to be a super genius, but they don't
realise
> how hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world.
>
>
>
Here I must disagree. I think that fact the GPL has only 40,000 copys
speaks for itself. For most people, GPL would be a HORRIBLE purchase.
On Thu, 21 Dec 2000 00:34:20 -0800, "Geordie Boot Boy" <[email hidden]>
wrote:
---
Tyler Eaves
Visit Ultra Coaster Central!
The internet's largest repository
of Ultra Coaster Tracks!
http://www.ultracoastercentral.com
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =-----
Quoted text (21 lines)
>Reviews in games mags IMHO have more to do with the quality of the free >stuff the reviewers get than the quality of the games. > >Alex > >"Chris Bloom" <[email hidden]> wrote in message >news:91rht9$3m3$[email hidden]... >> Kinda on the subject, I was browsing through a magazine (SA edition of PC >> Format) in the shop the other day and they had a review of GP3 (with total >> disregard to the fact that it is still unavailable in the usual PC game >> shops here!) where they gave it 94 % (approx). At the bottom of the >review >> they had a comparison box where it showed they gave a whopping 61% to GPL >> when they reviewed it! >> >> Do they know what they are missing? >> >> Chris >> > > Yes I concur.....(is that like a mangy cur?)
A magazine that targets broad general pc gamers SHOULD give GPL a
low rating. However, if the Magazine was called something like:
Sim Racing Magazine...then you would expect them to cater towards dedicated
sim racers...who, being wise and informed, probably would have
already KNOWN of GPL and so not bothered to purchase the magazine to read
the review...Hence the magazine goes out of business and the editors are
hired by general gaming mags and are forced to critique the umpteenth
version of Mario Karts....ahem I seem to have wandered somewhat off
topic..err...what was the question?
dave henrie
"Tyler Eaves" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
PC
> >> Format) in the shop the other day and they had a review of GP3 (withtotal
> >> disregard to the fact that it is still unavailable in the usual PC game
> >> shops here!) where they gave it 94 % (approx). At the bottom of the
> >review
> >> they had a comparison box where it showed they gave a whopping 61% toGPL
Quoted text (16 lines)
> Here I must disagree. I think that fact the GPL has only 40,000 copys > speaks for itself. For most people, GPL would be a HORRIBLE purchase. > > > > On Thu, 21 Dec 2000 00:34:20 -0800, "Geordie Boot Boy" <[email hidden]> > wrote: > > >Reviews in games mags IMHO have more to do with the quality of the free > >stuff the reviewers get than the quality of the games. > > > >Alex > > > >"Chris Bloom" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > >news:91rht9$3m3$[email hidden]... > >> Kinda on the subject, I was browsing through a magazine (SA edition ofQuoted text (22 lines)
> >> when they reviewed it! > >> > >> Do they know what they are missing? > >> > >> Chris > >> > > > > > > --- > Tyler Eaves > > Visit Ultra Coaster Central! > The internet's largest repository > of Ultra Coaster Tracks! > > http://www.ultracoastercentral.com > > > -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- > http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! > -----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =-----Reviews in games mags IMHO have more to do with the quality of the free
stuff the reviewers get than the quality of the games.
Alex
"Chris Bloom" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:91rht9$3m3$[email hidden]...
> Kinda on the subject, I was browsing through a magazine (SA edition of PC
> Format) in the shop the other day and they had a review of GP3 (with total
> disregard to the fact that it is still unavailable in the usual PC game
> shops here!) where they gave it 94 % (approx). At the bottom of thereview
Quoted text (7 lines)
> they had a comparison box where it showed they gave a whopping 61% to GPL > when they reviewed it! > > Do they know what they are missing? > > Chris >I didn't meen in gpl's case it got very good reviews in the mags I read, I
ment with stuff like gp3 toomrader 3, quake 3 which were all letdowns
compered to there predcesers but got wonderfull reviews.
Alex
"Tyler Eaves" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
PC
> >> Format) in the shop the other day and they had a review of GP3 (withtotal
> >> disregard to the fact that it is still unavailable in the usual PC game
> >> shops here!) where they gave it 94 % (approx). At the bottom of the
> >review
> >> they had a comparison box where it showed they gave a whopping 61% toGPL
