Race Sim Central
Rec.Autos.Simulators Archive

N4 + Celeron results?

3 posts by 3 people · 12 Feb 2001 18:56 UTC - 13 Feb 2001 00:03 UTC

Roger Little 12 Feb 2001 18:56 UTC#204394
I am a little disappointed with the performance of N4 on my system. I only get about 25-35 fps during a race with 25 computer opponents. I have all graphics options on except for the following: world detail slider at around 70%, draw ahead at 70%, mirror turned off, 20 drawn ahead, 3 behind. I am running in OpenGL at 1024x768x16 resolution with vsync and FSAA turned off. My system: Celeron 566@875 Mhz Abit BH6 mobo 256 MB generic PC133 RAM GeForce2 GTS Sidewinder FFB wheel Windows2000 and WindowsME, runs the same in both Is this about right for this sytem? Could people with similar hardware please post how well N4 runs on their system? Would a 1GHZ Thunderbird be much better? Thanks.
Sounds a little slow to me. I run at a higher resolution than that with an ASUS 7100 MX and get upwards of 40fps. Mirror is a big draw if it's all the way up, also specular highlights I believe it's called takes up some fps. "Roger Little" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]... > I am a little disappointed with the performance of N4 on my system. Ionly > get about 25-35 fps during a race with 25 computer opponents. I have all > graphics options on except for the following: world detail slider at > around 70%, draw ahead at 70%, mirror turned off, 20 drawn ahead, 3behind. > I am running in OpenGL at 1024x768x16 resolution with vsync and FSAAturned
Quoted text (13 lines)> off. > > My system: > Celeron 566@875 Mhz > Abit BH6 mobo > 256 MB generic PC133 RAM > GeForce2 GTS > Sidewinder FFB wheel > Windows2000 and WindowsME, runs the same in both > > Is this about right for this sytem? Could people with similar hardware > please post how well N4 runs on their system? Would a 1GHZ Thunderbird be > much better? Thanks.
I am running the same cpu, same motherboard, have 128 mb of pc100 ram, and have a GeForce2 MX 32 mb card running win98 and DX8a. I am averaging probably around 34-45 fps - full field of ai, world and detail slider at 50%, draw ahead around 60%, 12 cars drawn ahead and 3 behind. I am running OpenGL 1024x768x16, also with vsync and fsaa disabled. You did not mention what vid card drivers? I am using the latest official det3 drivers from nvidia, version 6.50. -- Don Burnette "Roger Little" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]... > I am a little disappointed with the performance of N4 on my system. I only > get about 25-35 fps during a race with 25 computer opponents. I have all > graphics options on except for the following: world detail slider at > around 70%, draw ahead at 70%, mirror turned off, 20 drawn ahead, 3 behind. > I am running in OpenGL at 1024x768x16 resolution with vsync and FSAA turned > off. > > My system: > Celeron 566@875 Mhz > Abit BH6 mobo > 256 MB generic PC133 RAM > GeForce2 GTS > Sidewinder FFB wheel > Windows2000 and WindowsME, runs the same in both > > Is this about right for this sytem? Could people with similar hardware > please post how well N4 runs on their system? Would a 1GHZ Thunderbird be > much better? Thanks.

Sponsors

Affiliate Links

Sim Gaming Expo MOZA Racing Sim-Lab Fanatec TrakRacer Asetek Internet Privacy From NordVPN Dreamhost Capital One Credit Card Application Fanatical CDKeys Amazon Amazon UK Project Motor Racing iRacing Get your racing gloves, boots and more from Demon Tweeks. Enlist at Roberts Space Industries, developers of Star Citizen and Squadron 42


Back from the ashes since July, 2019. First created in 2001 with the merger of Legends Central (founded 1999) and simracing.dk.

A site by a sort of sim racer, for sim racers, about racing sims. News and information on both modern and historic sim racing software titles.

All products and licenses property of their respective owners.


Facebook Threads Bluesky Twitter Mastodon Instagram YouTube Tiktok Twitch Reddit Google News Apple News Subscribe via WordPress Flipboard eBay

Race Sim Central © 1999-2026 | Some links pay RSC a commission. Advertising does not equal endorsement.Cookie Policy