Race Sim Central
Rec.Autos.Simulators Archive

LFS2 is Horrible

12 posts by 9 people · 25 Jun 2005 19:28 UTC - 02 Jul 2005 14:53 UTC

mjones53 25 Jun 2005 19:28 UTC#20291
What happened, why did I just waste my money on it. LFS1 was so much better. Frame rates are horrible, AI is horrible, they either wreck you or you run laps around them. Can I get my money back?
DanK 25 Jun 2005 19:33 UTC↳ reply to mjones53#20292
odd... what type of system do you have? Framerates on mine are actually better than S1. As for the AI, I find it's pretty much the same as S1. Remember, they learn as they go, so it may take a while before they can keep up to you. you might want to check out the live for speed forums at http://forum.rscnet.org/ as there seems to be quite a few people around who can help out. Also, the developers frequently post there. I gotta say I'm really loving the upgrade! The physics are so much better and I quite enjoy the new variety of vehicles & tracks mjones53 wrote: > What happened, why did I just waste my money on it. LFS1 was so much better. > Frame rates are horrible, AI is horrible, they either wreck you or you run > laps around them. Can I get my money back? > >
In article <Bfive.4702$[email hidden]>, [email hidden] (mjones53) wrote: > why did I just waste my money on it. Sounds like there's something wrong. I've had no frame rate problems at 1280x1024 x4fsaa/x8aniso with a 2.1GHz AMD/1Gb/x800Pro, which is a similar spec to yours. Andrew McP
no problem running any other sim, GTR,NR2003, LFS1... P4 3.2ghz 1gig ram 6800GT 256 meg video I'm in like only getting 10-15fps avg. don't understand it. "mjones53" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:Bfive.4702$[email hidden]... > What happened, why did I just waste my money on it. LFS1 was so much > better. Frame rates are horrible, AI is horrible, they either wreck you or > you run laps around them. Can I get my money back? >
Same here, at the start 10 fps, then 15. Almost same computer as you have too. I haven't even got AA of Af on, so it looks like gp2 ;) Update: after throwing away the cfg-file a few times, i've got now 45 fps (on whatever resolution, still strange). Better now, butt still not perfect.. "mjones53" <[email hidden]> schreef in bericht news:1Ymve.9351$[email hidden]...
Quoted text (16 lines)> no problem running any other sim, GTR,NR2003, LFS1... > > P4 3.2ghz > 1gig ram > 6800GT 256 meg video > > I'm in like only getting 10-15fps avg. don't understand it. > > "mjones53" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:Bfive.4702$[email hidden]... >> What happened, why did I just waste my money on it. LFS1 was so much >> better. Frame rates are horrible, AI is horrible, they either wreck you >> or you run laps around them. Can I get my money back? >> > >
"mjones53" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:Bfive.4702$[email hidden]... > What happened, why did I just waste my money on it. LFS1 was so much > better. Frame rates are horrible, AI is horrible, they either wreck you or > you run laps around them. Can I get my money back? > You didn't indicate your system, but I get at least 50fps (close to a full field) at 1280x1024x32. This is with a middling 2.4 GHZ and a 5700 video card. As far as the AI, I don't expect them to be that good, but remember, they learn the track as they go. It might not be a bad idea to run them for 50 or so laps on the track before deciding how good they are or aren't. But still, LFS is primarily an online game, and that's where it shows its worth. Get that frame problem of yours sorted and run the AI a while and I think you'll have a different opinion of the game. Alanb
Alan Bernardo wrote: > As far as the AI, I don't expect them to be that good, but remember, they > learn the track as they go. It might not be a bad idea to run them for 50 > or so laps on the track before deciding how good they are or aren't. > > But still, LFS is primarily an online game, and that's where it shows its > worth. I have found the AI to be surprisingly good especially considering the primarily online focus. They seem to be sufficiently challenging but give *just* enough room. They don't roll over and die like some other sims and they will come back at you if you give them a chance. I'd like to see them defend their line on entry a bit more but other than that I am impressed. I believe this is a significant step for LFS, I wasn't really a fan of S1. There is a good feeling of grip and sensation of speed. I have been driving the lower powered cars and having a blast offline against the AI Cheers Tony
[email hidden] (Tony Rickard) wrote: > I have found the AI to be surprisingly good After initial doubts I'm more impressed. Like all AI, they have their good moments and their bad. But the aggressiveness does seem to ease off as they learn, and I've found myself sandwiched three-wide into a corner on one occasion. One car eased off, the other took the lead, neither hit me. It was quite an impressive manoeuvre, and as time goes on I'm seeing more of this kind of "intelligent" action. Andrew McP
On Sun, 26 Jun 2005 07:53:36 +0200, Guido Mielekamp wrote: > Same here, at the start 10 fps, then 15. Almost same computer as you have > too. I haven't even got AA of Af on, so it looks like gp2 ;) > Update: after throwing away the cfg-file a few times, i've got now 45 fps > (on whatever resolution, still strange). > Better now, butt still not perfect.. It's called "alpha" for a reason, you know ;-) Took it for a spin this morning (a couple of laps at the japanese tri-oval in the F3 car), and so far I really like what I have seen. The sensation of speed really is very good with the wind noise and all the visual cues. I find the braking cockpit moving a bit overdone, but then again I guess there is a slider for this effect buried in the menues somewhere. You gotta love the ability to tweak the settings without having to leave the track; much better than anything I've seen so far in commercial releases (ISI, are you listening? ;-) Will try LFS2 online tonight, I expect nothing but fun! cheers, uwe -- GPG Fingerprint: 2E 13 20 22 9A 3F 63 7F 67 6F E9 B1 A8 36 A4 61
"Uwe Sch�rkamp" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted text (27 lines)> On Sun, 26 Jun 2005 07:53:36 +0200, Guido Mielekamp wrote: >> Same here, at the start 10 fps, then 15. Almost same computer as you have >> too. I haven't even got AA of Af on, so it looks like gp2 ;) >> Update: after throwing away the cfg-file a few times, i've got now 45 fps >> (on whatever resolution, still strange). >> Better now, butt still not perfect.. > > It's called "alpha" for a reason, you know ;-) > > Took it for a spin this morning (a couple of laps at the japanese > tri-oval in the F3 car), and so far I really like what I have > seen. The sensation of speed really is very good with the wind noise > and all the visual cues. I find the braking cockpit moving a bit > overdone, but then again I guess there is a slider for this effect > buried in the menues somewhere. > > You gotta love the ability to tweak the settings without having to > leave the track; much better than anything I've seen so far in > commercial releases (ISI, are you listening? ;-) > > Will try LFS2 online tonight, I expect nothing but fun! > > cheers, uwe > > > > --
Drop into my server-- Octopus Overlords League if you feel so inclined. :) I'll be running Formula cars at the Aston GP track. Qualification is set for 20 minutes, and race for one hour. Guest can add 2 AIs if there's no one else on the track. :) Server will be up all day and night, Eastern, US. Running S2 licensed. Alanb
"Tony Rickard" wrote... > <snip> They seem to be sufficiently challenging but give > *just* enough room. They are very good, but seem to have one obvious blind spot: try overtaking them to the outside. Unless you have somewhere paved to go that's not actually part of the racing surface, you're done for. At Blackwood, e.g., if you get a run to the outside on the front straight they will simply mash you into the wall before the braking zone at T1. What is fairly annoying in this respect is they'll happily push you off track, but will stand their ground when the situation is reversed, even if the overlap is minimal. Can't even begin to count the number of times I've been clipped this way. Jan. =---
With "mirrors off" I am running 1280x960 and 60 fps with AMD 1.74GHz ATI 8500 128Mb 512Mb ram But, I haven't upgraded to an S2 license, just running Alpha 0.5 with S1 license. Duane On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 19:48:55 -0500, "mjones53" <[email hidden]> wrote:
Quoted text (15 lines)>no problem running any other sim, GTR,NR2003, LFS1... > >P4 3.2ghz >1gig ram >6800GT 256 meg video > >I'm in like only getting 10-15fps avg. don't understand it. > >"mjones53" <[email hidden]> wrote in message >news:Bfive.4702$[email hidden]... >> What happened, why did I just waste my money on it. LFS1 was so much >> better. Frame rates are horrible, AI is horrible, they either wreck you or >> you run laps around them. Can I get my money back? >> >

Sponsors

Affiliate Links

Sim Gaming Expo MOZA Racing Sim-Lab Fanatec TrakRacer Asetek Internet Privacy From NordVPN Dreamhost Capital One Credit Card Application Fanatical CDKeys Amazon Amazon UK Project Motor Racing iRacing Get your racing gloves, boots and more from Demon Tweeks. Enlist at Roberts Space Industries, developers of Star Citizen and Squadron 42


Back from the ashes since July, 2019. First created in 2001 with the merger of Legends Central (founded 1999) and simracing.dk.

A site by a sort of sim racer, for sim racers, about racing sims. News and information on both modern and historic sim racing software titles.

All products and licenses property of their respective owners.


Facebook Threads Bluesky Twitter Mastodon Instagram YouTube Tiktok Twitch Reddit Google News Apple News Subscribe via WordPress Flipboard eBay

Race Sim Central © 1999-2026 | Some links pay RSC a commission. Advertising does not equal endorsement.Cookie Policy