Race Sim Central
Rec.Autos.Simulators Archive

Virtual Memory Settings for N4

9 posts by 8 people · 07 Mar 2001 03:35 UTC - 08 Mar 2001 00:53 UTC

KingstonCoffeeGuy 07 Mar 2001 03:35 UTC#197599
I've seen some posts about setting up your virtual memory for N4 so that the Min and Max are the same - double the RAM of the computer. But the numbers in the settings when I change to manual don't make sense. What should the settings be for Min & Max if I have 64mb of RAM? Thanks in advance
Slick 07 Mar 2001 10:03 UTC↳ reply to G_Major#197539
Why should you do this? -- Oliver "George Major" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:r9jp6.2186$[email hidden]... > Min128 and max 128 are for you. This will make a pernament swap file. Defrag > the Hard Drive BEFORE doing this! > > > >
It really doesn't help anything.....there are no definite answers on how big you should set the swap file. I have 256MB ram and the swap is 600MB. -- Mika Takala "Slick" <[email hidden]> kirjoitti viestiss� news:98516g$ped$[email hidden]... > Why should you do this? > > -- > > Oliver > > > "George Major" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:r9jp6.2186$[email hidden]... > > Min128 and max 128 are for you. This will make a pernament swap file. > Defrag > > the Hard Drive BEFORE doing this! > > > > > > > > > >
Two schools of thought: originally, it was thought that Win9x (don't know abt. Me) didn't recognize a swap file larger than 256Mb, but the flight-sim wonks suggested a permanent s.f. of 600 (or more!) Mb. I tried it & sure enuf, it works like a sumbitch! Re-loads are *much* faster, but initial loads show little improvement (it's basically a fast disk cache; making it permanent speed it up even more). You should also add the line "ConservativeSwapfileUseage=1" in the [386Enh] stanza of yer system.ini file. To take advantage of all this, you should really have an ATA 100 or 133 (bus speed) HD and header on yer mobo. (You need a special cable, too.) --Steve Smith Mika Takala <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:9857ko$2oe$[email hidden]... > It really doesn't help anything.....there are no definite answers on howbig
Quoted text (27 lines)> you should set the swap file. I have 256MB ram and the swap is 600MB. > > -- > Mika Takala > > "Slick" <[email hidden]> kirjoitti viestiss� > news:98516g$ped$[email hidden]... > > Why should you do this? > > > > -- > > > > Oliver > > > > > > "George Major" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > > news:r9jp6.2186$[email hidden]... > > > Min128 and max 128 are for you. This will make a pernament swap file. > > Defrag > > > the Hard Drive BEFORE doing this! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
PG 07 Mar 2001 17:30 UTC↳ reply to Steve Smith#197586
Don't need a special cable if you have a Asus Cusl2 motherboard :-) Stephen Smith <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:CZqp6.196591$[email hidden]... > Two schools of thought: originally, it was thought that Win9x (don't know > abt. Me) didn't recognize a swap file larger than 256Mb, but theflight-sim
Quoted text (7 lines)> wonks suggested a permanent s.f. of 600 (or more!) Mb. I tried it & sure > enuf, it works like a sumbitch! Re-loads are *much* faster, but initial > loads show little improvement (it's basically a fast disk cache; making it > permanent speed it up even more). You should also add the line > "ConservativeSwapfileUseage=1" in the [386Enh] stanza of yer system.ini > file. To take advantage of all this, you should really have an ATA 100 or > 133 (bus speed) HD and header on yer mobo. (You need a special cable,
too.)
Quoted text (24 lines)> > --Steve Smith > > Mika Takala <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:9857ko$2oe$[email hidden]... > > It really doesn't help anything.....there are no definite answers on how > big > > you should set the swap file. I have 256MB ram and the swap is 600MB. > > > > -- > > Mika Takala > > > > "Slick" <[email hidden]> kirjoitti viestiss� > > news:98516g$ped$[email hidden]... > > > Why should you do this? > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Oliver > > > > > > > > > "George Major" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > > > news:r9jp6.2186$[email hidden]... > > > > Min128 and max 128 are for you. This will make a pernament swap
file.
Quoted text (12 lines)> > > Defrag > > > > the Hard Drive BEFORE doing this! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Philster 07 Mar 2001 23:39 UTC↳ reply to Slick#197402
I find that there's a lot less disk thrashing if you have a fix value. If you don't put a fix value, over a period of time (after an hour of playing for example), the HD is being access for a fraction of a sec and it can get really annoying when your game starts stuttering. -- Philippe "Philster" Sergerie
On Wed, 7 Mar 2001 11:03:27 +0100, "Slick" <[email hidden]> wrote: >Why should you do this? If the max and min sizes are the same, Windows won't mindlessly keep trying to do "housekeeping" and shrink the damned thing down towards the minimum size at really inconvenient times. That takes a bunch of CPU cycles away from sims like GPL and N4 who need every cycle they can get their hands on. The size is really whatever you feel like setting it for. Twice Ram size is a good starting place as it's not overlarge, yet large enough that it probably won't be too small for most situations. Regards, Brett C. Cammack brettDOTcammack@worldnetDOTattDOTnet (remove the DOTs from my return address to reply privately)
I'll do that but so far I didn't notice any slowdowns... I do think that there might be a memory leak since fps drop from high 40's to low 30's after a 70 laps at Glen... -- Oliver "Brett C. Cammack" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]... > On Wed, 7 Mar 2001 11:03:27 +0100, "Slick" <[email hidden]> wrote: > >Why should you do this? > > If the max and min sizes are the same, Windows won't mindlessly keep > trying to do "housekeeping" and shrink the damned thing down towards > the minimum size at really inconvenient times. That takes a bunch of > CPU cycles away from sims like GPL and N4 who need every cycle they > can get their hands on. > > The size is really whatever you feel like setting it for. Twice Ram > size is a good starting place as it's not overlarge, yet large enough > that it probably won't be too small for most situations. > > Regards, > Brett C. Cammack > brettDOTcammack@worldnetDOTattDOTnet > (remove the DOTs from my return address to reply privately)

Sponsors

Affiliate Links

Sim Gaming Expo MOZA Racing Sim-Lab Fanatec TrakRacer Asetek Internet Privacy From NordVPN Dreamhost Capital One Credit Card Application Fanatical CDKeys Amazon Amazon UK Project Motor Racing iRacing Get your racing gloves, boots and more from Demon Tweeks. Enlist at Roberts Space Industries, developers of Star Citizen and Squadron 42


Back from the ashes since July, 2019. First created in 2001 with the merger of Legends Central (founded 1999) and simracing.dk.

A site by a sort of sim racer, for sim racers, about racing sims. News and information on both modern and historic sim racing software titles.

All products and licenses property of their respective owners.


Facebook Threads Bluesky Twitter Mastodon Instagram YouTube Tiktok Twitch Reddit Google News Apple News Subscribe via WordPress Flipboard eBay

Race Sim Central © 1999-2026 | Some links pay RSC a commission. Advertising does not equal endorsement.Cookie Policy