See the latest issue of Autoweek for this potentially depressing story.
Fears F1 could move to pay-per-view
Following an Autoweek report and news that EM.TV had taken majority control of F1's commercial rights, posters discussed the prospect of pay-per-view F1. Some welcomed digital multi-feed coverage as in Europe, while others predicted sponsors would object to lost audiences. The thread drifted into air racing and satellite TV.
real motorsportoff-topic
Automated summary.
>"Bart Brown" <[email hidden]> wrote
> See the latest issue of Autoweek for this potentially depressing story
Anything to give me Digital F1. I'm really tired of the shitty mondial
feed. It's bad on purpose. I'll pay whatever it costs.
--
-- Fran�ois M�nard <ymenard>
-- May the Downforce be with you...
-- http://www.ymenard.com/
-- This announcement is brought to you by the Shimato Dominguez
Corporation - helping America into the New World...
"ymenard" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:o%vq6.413002$[email hidden]...
..and screw you if you can't afford it. I'm alright, Jacques !
Quoted text (7 lines)
> >"Bart Brown" <[email hidden]> wrote > > See the latest issue of Autoweek for this potentially depressing story > > > Anything to give me Digital F1. I'm really tired of the shitty mondial > feed. It's bad on purpose. I'll pay whatever it costs. >bring-it-on!
Bart Brown <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
> See the latest issue of Autoweek for this potentially depressing story.
Good, it will free up Speedvisions schedule. Maybe they will air racing in
its place that will actually be interesting.
--
Kevin Anderson
[email hidden]
"Bart Brown" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
> See the latest issue of Autoweek for this potentially depressing story.
LOL, don't feed the troll... leave him to his Daisy Duke posters.
"Kevin Anderson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:Cuxq6.134822$[email hidden]...
Quoted text (12 lines)
> Good, it will free up Speedvisions schedule. Maybe they will air racing in > its place that will actually be interesting. > > -- > Kevin Anderson > [email hidden] > > "Bart Brown" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:[email hidden]... > > See the latest issue of Autoweek for this potentially depressing story. > >On Sat, 10 Mar 2001 22:01:06 GMT, "Kevin Anderson"
<[email hidden]> wrote:
>Good, it will free up Speedvisions schedule. Maybe they will air racing in
>its place that will actually be interesting.
Hey, there's an air racing sim coming out soon, just for you!
http://www.xtremeairracing.com/
>"Jagg" <[email hidden]> wrote...
> On Sat, 10 Mar 2001 22:01:06 GMT, "Kevin Anderson"
> <[email hidden]> wrote:
>
> >Good, it will free up Speedvisions schedule. Maybe they will air racingin
> >its place that will actually be interesting.
>
> Hey, there's an air racing sim coming out soon, just for you!
LOL, I think he was more meaning to "air" as in, to broadcast races. But
thanks for the site!
--
-- Fran�ois M�nard <ymenard>
-- May the Downforce be with you...
-- http://www.ymenard.com/
-- This announcement is brought to you by the Shimato Dominguez
Corporation - helping America into the New World...
Does it use the GPL Physics engine?
JB
"Jagg" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
> On Sat, 10 Mar 2001 22:01:06 GMT, "Kevin Anderson"
> <[email hidden]> wrote:
>
> >Good, it will free up Speedvisions schedule. Maybe they will air racingin
> >its place that will actually be interesting.
>
> Hey, there's an air racing sim coming out soon, just for you!
>
> http://www.xtremeairracing.com/
Formula One's EM.TV tales (03/09/2001)
A German media group is now the majority owner of Formula One. EM.TV &
Merchandising exercised its option to acquire 75 percent of the company that
holds the F1 commercial rights, and the automobile manufacturers that
participate now fear there could be an attempt to put F1 races exclusively
on pay-per-view TV.
Since March 2000, EM.TV has owned 50 percent of SLEC Holdings, promoter
Bernie Ecclestone's family trust that holds the commercial rights to F1
until 2110. An option was included giving EM.TV the right to purchase an
additional 25 percent, which it had to exercise before midnight on Feb. 28,
2001.
Struggling to survive following a dramatic plunge in its share value, EM.TV
is in the midst of a rescue bid by Germany's largest pay-per-view TV
broadcaster, Kirch Gruppe. Evidently EM.TV and Kirch are close to finalizing
their own deal, at a reported cost of $987 million.
But two of the carmakers competing in F1 warned that they could set up a
rival world championship series if this deal gave Kirch effective control of
F1. A consortium of five of these companies, BMW, DaimlerChrysler, Fiat,
Ford and Renault, had been in negotiation with Ecclestone with a view to
acquiring 35 percent of SLEC Holdings itself. Jurgen Hubbert, the
DaimlerChrysler main board member responsible for the Mercedes-Benz brand,
and Wolfgang Reitzle, the CEO of Ford's Premier Automotive Group, said that
the manufacturers could launch their own series if Kirch moved to put Grand
Prix coverage exclusively on pay-per-view.
Kirch has attempted to reassure the manufacturers by indicating that it
would be willing to sell off part of EM.TV's 75 percent stake in SLEC, but
conspicuously not by undertaking to maintain free-to-view TV coverage.
On Sun, 11 Mar 2001 01:30:54 GMT, "ymenard" <[email hidden]>
wrote:
>LOL, I think he was more meaning to "air" as in, to broadcast races. But
>thanks for the site!
Heh...need to brush on my reading comprehension skills.
On Sun, 11 Mar 2001 01:42:33 GMT, "Wosco" <[email hidden]> wrote:
>Does it use the GPL Physics engine?
>
No, but I think it might be worth getting. I believe this is the Air
Reno sim that was supposed to be published by SSI, but was cancelled.
Looks like they are going to self-publish it.
[email hidden] (redTed) wrote:
> I'm alright, Jacques !
:-)
I share the sentiment. Having said that, I'm not too bothered. 90% of the
time F1's little more than an elaborate TV screensaver. Mind you, if
touring car racing went pay per view I'd have the right 'ump.
Andrew McP
I used to love watching the Reno Air races on abc wide world of
sports...until the
started modifying the WWII warbirds so much you could barely tell what plane
was what....
dave henrie
"ymenard" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:izAq6.356024$[email hidden]...
Quoted text (26 lines)
> >"Jagg" <[email hidden]> wrote... > > On Sat, 10 Mar 2001 22:01:06 GMT, "Kevin Anderson" > > <[email hidden]> wrote: > > > > >Good, it will free up Speedvisions schedule. Maybe they will air racing > in > > >its place that will actually be interesting. > > > > Hey, there's an air racing sim coming out soon, just for you! > > LOL, I think he was more meaning to "air" as in, to broadcast races. But > thanks for the site! > > > > > > -- > -- Fran�ois M�nard <ymenard> > -- May the Downforce be with you... > -- http://www.ymenard.com/ > -- This announcement is brought to you by the Shimato Dominguez > Corporation - helping America into the New World... > > >Are you sure it's 2110? Not 2010? Maybe you meant ten past nine?
Chris
--
"AndrewS" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:iZBq6.5748$[email hidden]...
> Formula One's EM.TV tales (03/09/2001)
>
>
> Since March 2000, EM.TV has owned 50 percent of SLEC Holdings, promoter
> Bernie Ecclestone's family trust that holds the commercial rights to F1
> until 2110. An option was included giving EM.TV the right to purchase an
> additional 25 percent, which it had to exercise before midnight on Feb.
28,
> 2001.
>
> Struggling to survive following a dramatic plunge in its share value,
EM.TV
> is in the midst of a rescue bid by Germany's largest pay-per-view TV
> broadcaster, Kirch Gruppe. Evidently EM.TV and Kirch are close to
finalizing
> their own deal, at a reported cost of $987 million.
>
> But two of the carmakers competing in F1 warned that they could set up a
> rival world championship series if this deal gave Kirch effective control
of
> F1. A consortium of five of these companies, BMW, DaimlerChrysler, Fiat,
> Ford and Renault, had been in negotiation with Ecclestone with a view to
> acquiring 35 percent of SLEC Holdings itself. Jurgen Hubbert, the
> DaimlerChrysler main board member responsible for the Mercedes-Benz brand,
> and Wolfgang Reitzle, the CEO of Ford's Premier Automotive Group, said
that
> the manufacturers could launch their own series if Kirch moved to put
Grand
> Prix coverage exclusively on pay-per-view.
>
> Kirch has attempted to reassure the manufacturers by indicating that it
> would be willing to sell off part of EM.TV's 75 percent stake in SLEC, but
> conspicuously not by undertaking to maintain free-to-view TV coverage.
>
>
>
>
>
Absolutely.
These guys ought to get out more and check out some real racing.
Pinnacle my ass <G>
MS
Kevin Anderson <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:Cuxq6.134822$[email hidden]...
> Good, it will free up Speedvisions schedule. Maybe they will air racing in
> its place that will actually be interesting.
welcome to the real world it has been like that in Europe for the last 5
years or so, the things works like that.
You have the race on a "public" channel (free) with, commercials, 2 in car
cams only and lousy commentators
OR
You have the race in 6 channels (main, battles in the back, inboard without
commentary on about 20 cars, pits, data, "patchwork" of all of them) WITHOUT
commercial breaks, with all the week end free practice, time pracrtice, warm
up, press conference afetr the races....good commentators...
On top of this you can "hack" the pay per view channels very easily, but it
is BAAAD, but it works fine...
This system is applied in France, Spain, Italy (?) and Germany, the cost in
France is 50 francs (that's about 8 Euros) for the complete week-end from
thursday until the press conference after the race, even if I had to pay for
it I would when I'm home.
"Bart Brown" <[email hidden]> a �crit dans le message news:
[email hidden]...
> See the latest issue of Autoweek for this potentially depressing story.
>
The day F1 goes pay-per-view will be its nemisis. (Hope that came out
right!)
Sponsors *will* see that the "ratings" are hyped waaaaaaaaaaaay beyond what
it actually is, and budgets will plummit.
ed_
AndrewS wrote
> Formula One's EM.TV tales (03/09/2001)
>
> A German media group is now the majority owner of Formula One. EM.TV &
> Merchandising exercised its option to acquire 75 percent of the companythat
> holds the F1 commercial rights, and the automobile manufacturers that
> participate now fear there could be an attempt to put F1 races exclusively
> on pay-per-view TV. <SNIPPED!>
Bernie vision: That's been planned for aaaaaages.
Bart Brown <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
> See the latest issue of Autoweek for this potentially depressing story.
In article <qkKq6.1673$[email hidden]>, [email hidden]
says...
No, you can't. Not in the UK anyway - you're stuck with the first
option.
:-(
- MP
Quoted text (9 lines)
> You have the race on a "public" channel (free) with, commercials, 2 in car > cams only and lousy commentators > > OR > > You have the race in 6 channels (main, battles in the back, inboard without > commentary on about 20 cars, pits, data, "patchwork" of all of them) WITHOUT > commercial breaks, with all the week end free practice, time pracrtice, warm > up, press conference afetr the races....good commentators...says...
No, you can't. Not in the UK anyway - you're stuck with the first
option.
:-(
- MP
I think Papy actually did first start writing this so it should be pretty
good.
It has been through a lot of hands since SSI , Mattel , Victory.
Wosco wrote in message ...
Quoted text (18 lines)
>Does it use the GPL Physics engine? > >JB > >"Jagg" <[email hidden]> wrote in message >news:[email hidden]... >> On Sat, 10 Mar 2001 22:01:06 GMT, "Kevin Anderson" >> <[email hidden]> wrote: >> >> >Good, it will free up Speedvisions schedule. Maybe they will air racing >in >> >its place that will actually be interesting. >> >> Hey, there's an air racing sim coming out soon, just for you! >> >> http://www.xtremeairracing.com/ > >I think the car manufacturers are not too impressed with the idea of pay per
view as they will lose a high percentage of their viewers and hence
advertising effect.
I do not think it will happen.
there are ALWAYS ways if you have a satellite dish pointed on astra...
"MP" <[email hidden]> a �crit dans le message news:
[email hidden]...
> In article <qkKq6.1673$[email hidden]>, [email hidden]
> says...
> > You have the race on a "public" channel (free) with, commercials, 2 incar
> > cams only and lousy commentators
> >
> > OR
> >
> > You have the race in 6 channels (main, battles in the back, inboardwithout
> > commentary on about 20 cars, pits, data, "patchwork" of all of them)WITHOUT
> > commercial breaks, with all the week end free practice, time pracrtice,warm
Quoted text (8 lines)
> > up, press conference afetr the races....good commentators... > > No, you can't. Not in the UK anyway - you're stuck with the first > option. > > :-( > > - MPDo you think the sponsors are going to carry on pouring their millions into
F1 if it is not going to have the mass global coverage it enjoys at the
moment? I don't think so.
Chris
--
Simbokza GPL FD League
www.simbokza.com
Remove _YOUR_CLOTHES before replying by e-mail
"rik anthrax" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:h4wq6.37863$[email hidden]...
> bring-it-on!
> Bart Brown <[email hidden]> wrote in message
> news:[email hidden]...
> > See the latest issue of Autoweek for this potentially depressing story.
>
>
In article <SeMq6.619$[email hidden]>, [email hidden] says...
> there are ALWAYS ways if you have a satellite dish pointed on astra...
I'd like to know - do you have any links for how to do it, what
equipment you need etc.?
- MP
Quoted text (23 lines)
> "MP" <[email hidden]> a �crit dans le message news: > [email hidden]... > > In article <qkKq6.1673$[email hidden]>, [email hidden] > > says... > > > You have the race on a "public" channel (free) with, commercials, 2 in > car > > > cams only and lousy commentators > > > > > > OR > > > > > > You have the race in 6 channels (main, battles in the back, inboard > without > > > commentary on about 20 cars, pits, data, "patchwork" of all of them) > WITHOUT > > > commercial breaks, with all the week end free practice, time pracrtice, > warm > > > up, press conference afetr the races....good commentators... > > > > No, you can't. Not in the UK anyway - you're stuck with the first > > option. > > > >On Sat, 10 Mar 2001 22:01:06 GMT, "Kevin Anderson"
<[email hidden]> wrote:
>Good, it will free up Speedvisions schedule. Maybe they will air racing in
>its place that will actually be interesting.
Yea, like those lawn tractors!
Not only is the racing better, the lawn tractor guys seem more
exuberant about their sport than the F1 multi-millionaires. ;-)
Tim
> >Good, it will free up Speedvisions schedule. Maybe they will air racingin
Whoohooo another convert...go Team John Deere....
dave henrie
Quoted text (7 lines)
> >its place that will actually be interesting. > > Yea, like those lawn tractors! > Not only is the racing better, the lawn tractor guys seem more > exuberant about their sport than the F1 multi-millionaires. ;-) > > Timvery simple, all you need is a satellite dish to astra, a receiver able to
process MEDIAGUARD coding (nokia has the 9800 for example, but there are
many) and a "special" card to put in if you want it for free, otherwise you
can always subscribe to the regular channels and pay per view.
give me a mail adress for a more "private" conversation.
"MP" <[email hidden]> a �crit dans le message news:
[email hidden]...
in
pracrtice,
Quoted text (13 lines)
> In article <SeMq6.619$[email hidden]>, [email hidden] says... > > there are ALWAYS ways if you have a satellite dish pointed on astra... > > I'd like to know - do you have any links for how to do it, what > equipment you need etc.? > > - MP > > > "MP" <[email hidden]> a �crit dans le message news: > > [email hidden]... > > > In article <qkKq6.1673$[email hidden]>, [email hidden] > > > says... > > > > You have the race on a "public" channel (free) with, commercials, 2Quoted text (10 lines)
> > car > > > > cams only and lousy commentators > > > > > > > > OR > > > > > > > > You have the race in 6 channels (main, battles in the back, inboard > > without > > > > commentary on about 20 cars, pits, data, "patchwork" of all of them) > > WITHOUT > > > > commercial breaks, with all the week end free practice, timeQuoted text (8 lines)
> > warm > > > > up, press conference afetr the races....good commentators... > > > > > > No, you can't. Not in the UK anyway - you're stuck with the first > > > option. > > > > > > >In article <l91r6.1912$[email hidden]>, [email hidden]
says...
> very simple, all you need is a satellite dish to astra, a receiver able to
> process MEDIAGUARD coding (nokia has the 9800 for example, but there are
> many) and a "special" card to put in if you want it for free, otherwise you
> can always subscribe to the regular channels and pay per view.
Thanks - would the Nokia work for Sky Digital as well or would I need to
run them both?
Also which "Cam" would it need?
- MP
Quoted text (9 lines)
> "MP" <[email hidden]> a �crit dans le message news: > [email hidden]... > > In article <SeMq6.619$[email hidden]>, [email hidden] says... > > > there are ALWAYS ways if you have a satellite dish pointed on astra... > > > > I'd like to know - do you have any links for how to do it, what > > equipment you need etc.? > > > > - MPIn article <[email hidden]>, Tim O
<[email hidden]> writes:
I've actually *watched* these races before. Sort of like watching GPL
F3's...<g>
Let's see how much flak I get for THAT comment...or see if people understand my
meaning... :)
Eldred
--
Dale Earnhardt, Sr. R.I.P. 1951-2001
Homepage - http://www.umich.edu/~epickett
F1 hcp. +28.67...F2 +151.26...
Never argue with an idiot. He brings you down to his level, then beats you
with experience...
Remove SPAM-OFF to reply.
Quoted text (7 lines)
>>Good, it will free up Speedvisions schedule. Maybe they will air racing in >>its place that will actually be interesting. > >Yea, like those lawn tractors! >Not only is the racing better, the lawn tractor guys seem more >exuberant about their sport than the F1 multi-millionaires. ;-) >I've noticed that the UK tends to be backwards when it comes to any form of mass
communication beyond the printing press. It's really rather surprising that Her
Royal Majesty permits her subjects on the internet, really.
That's not a flame, just an observation.
MP wrote:
Quoted text (18 lines)
> In article <qkKq6.1673$[email hidden]>, [email hidden] > says... > > You have the race on a "public" channel (free) with, commercials, 2 in car > > cams only and lousy commentators > > > > OR > > > > You have the race in 6 channels (main, battles in the back, inboard without > > commentary on about 20 cars, pits, data, "patchwork" of all of them) WITHOUT > > commercial breaks, with all the week end free practice, time pracrtice, warm > > up, press conference afetr the races....good commentators... > > No, you can't. Not in the UK anyway - you're stuck with the first > option. > > :-( > > - MPQueen Victoria is no longer reigning you know, get with the times.
--
Ian P
<email invalid due to spam>
Mike Donnelly Jr <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
> I've noticed that the UK tends to be backwards when it comes to any form
of mass
> communication beyond the printing press. It's really rather surprising
that Her
> Royal Majesty permits her subjects on the internet, really.
>
> That's not a flame, just an observation.
>
Really? In certain (commercial) areas, you'd be hard pressed to tell.
Then there's America - 57 channels and nothing on.
Ian P wrote:
Quoted text (16 lines)
> Queen Victoria is no longer reigning you know, get with the times. > > -- > Ian P > <email invalid due to spam> > > Mike Donnelly Jr <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:[email hidden]... > > I've noticed that the UK tends to be backwards when it comes to any form > of mass > > communication beyond the printing press. It's really rather surprising > that Her > > Royal Majesty permits her subjects on the internet, really. > > > > That's not a flame, just an observation. > >You must know some different commercial areas to me ;)
Only 57 channels of nothing, we've got double that !! <G>
--
Ian P
<email invalid due to spam>
Mike Donnelly Jr <[email hidden]> wrote
> Really? In certain (commercial) areas, you'd be hard pressed to tell.
>
> Then there's America - 57 channels and nothing on.


































