The E3 Expo 2001 has ended, but we have a final treat for you. As desert you
can now find 13 new screenshots of the West brother's World Sports Cars on
your favourite site...No! Don't go away, I did mean High Gear.
Check them out at http://www.sportplanet.com/hg/games/screenshots/wsc/.
Enjoy!
--
Kenneth Verburg
Editor-in-chief High Gear
http://www.simracingnews.com
Thirteen new World Sports Cars screenshots after E3
Kenneth Verburg announced 13 new World Sports Cars screenshots on High Gear after E3 2001. Posters admired them, then queried whether two near-identical shots were staged; ymenard later hinted that the explanation was an exciting feature, and others guessed at a replay editor or spectator mode. Tom Pabst teased that he had seen the game but offered 'no comment'.
Automated summary.
Woo this is really fantastic!! Now this looks like one butt kicking race
sim!
Come'on West Brothers we are itchy for WSC! Pleazzzzzzzzzzzzzze <G>
"Kenneth Verburg" wrote:
| The E3 Expo 2001 has ended, but we have a final treat for you. As desertyou
Quoted text (7 lines)
| can now find 13 new screenshots of the West brother's World Sports Cars on | your favourite site...No! Don't go away, I did mean High Gear. | Check them out at http://www.sportplanet.com/hg/games/screenshots/wsc/. | Enjoy! | -- | Kenneth Verburg | Editor-in-chief High GearThese look amazing, as have all the WSC screenshots from the very beginning.
Anyone know anything about the West Bros progress? Presumably the middle of
next year is a realistic date.
"Kenneth Verburg" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:NBTN6.13143$[email hidden]...
> The E3 Expo 2001 has ended, but we have a final treat for you. As desertyou
> can now find 13 new screenshots of the West brother's World Sports Cars on
> your favourite site...No! Don't go away, I did mean High Gear.
>
> Check them out at http://www.sportplanet.com/hg/games/screenshots/wsc/.
>
> Enjoy!
"Kenneth Verburg" <[email hidden]> writes:
> The E3 Expo 2001 has ended, but we have a final treat for you. As desert you
> can now find 13 new screenshots of the West brother's World Sports Cars on
> your favourite site...No! Don't go away, I did mean High Gear.
>
> Check them out at http://www.sportplanet.com/hg/games/screenshots/wsc/.
Can anyone explain picture 8 and 12 for me?
These are not in-game shots I guess.
--
-asbjxrn
whats to explain? A Ferrari 333sp leading some other cars around a track
that 'may' resemble Brands Hatch?
Keep in mind, the time period for WSC is now several years old from when
they first began working on it. I beleive the 'plan' is to have cars from
several era's available.(including A Can Am Mclaren and posibly a GPLish F1
car.)
dave henrie
"Asbj�rn Bj�rnstad" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
> "Kenneth Verburg" <[email hidden]> writes:
>
> > The E3 Expo 2001 has ended, but we have a final treat for you. As desertyou
> > can now find 13 new screenshots of the West brother's World Sports Carson
Quoted text (8 lines)
> > your favourite site...No! Don't go away, I did mean High Gear. > > > > Check them out at http://www.sportplanet.com/hg/games/screenshots/wsc/. > > Can anyone explain picture 8 and 12 for me? > These are not in-game shots I guess. > -- > -asbjxrn"Dave Henrie" <[email hidden]> writes:
> whats to explain? A Ferrari 333sp leading some other cars around a track
> that 'may' resemble Brands Hatch?
> Keep in mind, the time period for WSC is now several years old from when
> they first began working on it. I beleive the 'plan' is to have cars from
> several era's available.(including A Can Am Mclaren and posibly a GPLish F1
> car.)
The three front cars are placed the excact same way in the pictures,
even the cracks in the tarmac are the same. But the two rear cars has
just disappeared. Looks like arranged photos, not frames of a film.
--
-asbjxrn
>"Asbj�rn Bj�rnstad" <[email hidden]> wrote
> The three front cars are placed the excact same way in the pictures,
> even the cracks in the tarmac are the same. But the two rear cars has
> just disappeared. Looks like arranged photos, not frames of a film.
I agree with you. Unless they had parked the first 3 cars, there is
ABSOLUTELY some digital alteration to those pictures.
--
-- Fran�ois M�nard <ymenard>
-- May the Downforce be with you...
-- http://www.ymenard.com/
-- This announcement is brought to you by the Shimato Dominguez
Corporation - helping America into the New World...
You know, when you call for Wests to 'shut up', think a bit about who is
doing most of the talking. Certainly not the Wests themselves, and also
not Empire.
-Gregor
Todd Walker wrote:
Quoted text (7 lines)
> > They can release screen shots all damn day and it won't make a bit of > difference to their reputations. I firmly stand by my assertion that > WSC is the biggest piece of vaporware to hit the sim racing market > EVER. I say put up or shut up. Quite frankly, I'm tired of hearing > about the damn thing. >Question for you Todd. If you are so bored and annoyed at the news of WSC
why do you keep reading and adding to it. Could you please tell me how you
can justify the line 'Maybe if they spent more time working on the "game"
and less time
> releasing screen shots' when these are the first screenshots for months onthe game, and they have come from E3 where I believe people generally
release scren shots. If they are the hype merchants you seen to firmly
believe they are surely they would have a web site praising all the virtues
of this 'Vapourware' as you put it?
Response please.
Todd Walker <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
you
> >can now find 13 new screenshots of the West brother's World Sports Carson
> >your favourite site...No! Don't go away, I did mean High Gear.
> >
> >Check them out at http://www.sportplanet.com/hg/games/screenshots/wsc/.
> >
> >Enjoy!
>
Quoted text (21 lines)
> Sorry but......YAWN..... > > They can release screen shots all damn day and it won't make a bit of > difference to their reputations. I firmly stand by my assertion that > WSC is the biggest piece of vaporware to hit the sim racing market > EVER. I say put up or shut up. Quite frankly, I'm tired of hearing > about the damn thing. > > Maybe if they spent more time working on the "game" and less time > releasing screen shots... > > Todd Walker > twalker at jam dot rr dot com > http://twalker.d2g.com > > > > On Sun, 20 May 2001 17:59:09 GMT, "Kenneth Verburg" > <[email hidden]> wrote: > > >The E3 Expo 2001 has ended, but we have a final treat for you. As desertI agree. Not to mention the fact that the reflections on the front of the
cars are exactly the same in a few of the shots (eg 12 and 13). I think
these are not real in game shots. But thats just my opinion
"ymenard" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:jn3O6.1011$[email hidden]...
Quoted text (22 lines)
> >"Asbj�rn Bj�rnstad" <[email hidden]> wrote > > The three front cars are placed the excact same way in the pictures, > > even the cracks in the tarmac are the same. But the two rear cars has > > just disappeared. Looks like arranged photos, not frames of a film. > > > I agree with you. Unless they had parked the first 3 cars, there is > ABSOLUTELY some digital alteration to those pictures. > > > > > > -- > -- Fran�ois M�nard <ymenard> > -- May the Downforce be with you... > -- http://www.ymenard.com/ > -- This announcement is brought to you by the Shimato Dominguez > Corporation - helping America into the New World... > > >>"ymenard" <[email hidden]> wrote
> I agree with you. Unless they had parked the first 3 cars, there is
> ABSOLUTELY some digital alteration to those pictures.
I'll have to apologise to the West brothers, as in the two cases I was
WRONG. And the reason why it's not 1) parked cars or 2) a digital
alteration is pretty exciting, but I won't say more ;-D
I'll now eat my words...
<prints his post and eats the paper eh>
--
-- Fran�ois M�nard <ymenard>
-- May the Downforce be with you...
-- http://www.ymenard.com/
-- This announcement is brought to you by the Shimato Dominguez
Corporation - helping America into the New World...
"Raja" <[email hidden]> wrote
> I think these are not real in game shots.
Oh, now I know they are ;-)
--
-- Fran�ois M�nard <ymenard>
-- May the Downforce be with you...
-- http://www.ymenard.com/
-- This announcement is brought to you by the Shimato Dominguez
Corporation - helping America into the New World...
It's probably Eric and Kenneth racing on-line with Chris and Tony (and
someone else). Ahhhh!!!
"ymenard" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:a8dO6.1462$[email hidden]...
Quoted text (13 lines)
> "Raja" <[email hidden]> wrote > > I think these are not real in game shots. > > Oh, now I know they are ;-) > -- > -- Fran�ois M�nard <ymenard> > -- May the Downforce be with you... > -- http://www.ymenard.com/ > -- This announcement is brought to you by the Shimato Dominguez > Corporation - helping America into the New World... > > >
Todd Walker wrote:
Do us all a favour and piss off an die.
Quoted text (11 lines)
> > Sorry but......YAWN..... > > They can release screen shots all damn day and it won't make a bit of > difference to their reputations. I firmly stand by my assertion that > WSC is the biggest piece of vaporware to hit the sim racing market > EVER. I say put up or shut up. Quite frankly, I'm tired of hearing > about the damn thing. > > Maybe if they spent more time working on the "game" and less time > releasing screen shots...
"Asbjørn Bjørnstad" wrote:
Maybe it's drawing less cars behind?
Quoted text (15 lines)
> > "Dave Henrie" <[email hidden]> writes: > > > whats to explain? A Ferrari 333sp leading some other cars around a track > > that 'may' resemble Brands Hatch? > > Keep in mind, the time period for WSC is now several years old from when > > they first began working on it. I beleive the 'plan' is to have cars from > > several era's available.(including A Can Am Mclaren and posibly a GPLish F1 > > car.) > > The three front cars are placed the excact same way in the pictures, > even the cracks in the tarmac are the same. But the two rear cars has > just disappeared. Looks like arranged photos, not frames of a film. > -- > -asbjxrnGuys....I was at E3 last year...and this year......and these are my candid
remarks regarding the "speculation" on WSC and Empire and Chris and Tony and
Derek Bell losing a race to me at Brands in a pair of 962's last
week.......in an not-to-be-named hotel room with about 40 "spectators"
jammed into the room:
"No comment!"
Tom Pabst
Gerry Aitken <[email hidden]> writes:
It's not maybe, it's excactly what it does. :-)
I was just wondering why, it's obviously not a in-car shot,
but a track camera. (Which would indicate a replay.)
--
-asbjxrn
Quoted text (9 lines)
> "Asbjxrn Bjxrnstad" wrote: > > > The three front cars are placed the excact same way in the pictures, > > even the cracks in the tarmac are the same. But the two rear cars has > > just disappeared. Looks like arranged photos, not frames of a film. > > -- > > -asbjxrn > > Maybe it's drawing less cars behind?On Mon, 21 May 2001 18:29:03 GMT, "ymenard" <[email hidden]>
scribbled:
Dynamic race replay editor?
(ie, remove certain cars, change angles and all that on the fly)
-Slash
--
"Ebert Victorious" - The Onion
Quoted text (13 lines)
>>"ymenard" <[email hidden]> wrote >> I agree with you. Unless they had parked the first 3 cars, there is >> ABSOLUTELY some digital alteration to those pictures. > > >I'll have to apologise to the West brothers, as in the two cases I was >WRONG. And the reason why it's not 1) parked cars or 2) a digital >alteration is pretty exciting, but I won't say more ;-D > > >I'll now eat my words... > ><prints his post and eats the paper eh>Damn. You suck man ;)
"Tom Pabst" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:mxiO6.24292$%[email hidden]...
> Guys....I was at E3 last year...and this year......and these are my candid
> remarks regarding the "speculation" on WSC and Empire and Chris and Tonyand
Quoted text (11 lines)
> Derek Bell losing a race to me at Brands in a pair of 962's last > week.......in an not-to-be-named hotel room with about 40 "spectators" > jammed into the room: > > "No comment!" > > Tom Pabst > > > >That was my thought too.
(but is that pretty exiting?)
/Carl
Slash <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted text (24 lines)
> On Mon, 21 May 2001 18:29:03 GMT, "ymenard" <[email hidden]> > scribbled: > > >>"ymenard" <[email hidden]> wrote > >> I agree with you. Unless they had parked the first 3 cars, there is > >> ABSOLUTELY some digital alteration to those pictures. > > > > > >I'll have to apologise to the West brothers, as in the two cases I was > >WRONG. And the reason why it's not 1) parked cars or 2) a digital > >alteration is pretty exciting, but I won't say more ;-D > > > > > >I'll now eat my words... > > > ><prints his post and eats the paper eh> > > Dynamic race replay editor? > > (ie, remove certain cars, change angles and all that on the fly) > > -Slash > -- > "Ebert Victorious" - The Onion"No comment."
Tom
-:)
Maybe it's drawing less cars behind?
>
> It's not maybe, it's excactly what it does. :-)
> I was just wondering why, it's obviously not a in-car shot,
> but a track camera. (Which would indicate a replay.)
> --
> -asbjxrn
or a live "spectator" feed?
cheers
JM
Maybe it's drawing less cars behind?
or a live "spectator" feed?
cheers
JM


































