Race Sim Central
Rec.Autos.Simulators Archive

Negative rank with GPL and default setups

18 posts by 12 people · 26 May 2001 17:43 UTC - 27 May 2001 21:43 UTC

Steve 26 May 2001 17:43 UTC#182708
Has anybody tried running the default setups for all the tracks and gotten a negative rank in GPL. Steve!
No, have you tried a lap at the Nurburgring backwards in a Ferrari? ;) "Stephen" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:RWRP6.3813$[email hidden]... > Has anybody tried running the default setups for all > the tracks and gotten a negative rank in GPL. > Steve! > >
"Stephen" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:RWRP6.3813$[email hidden]... > Has anybody tried running the default setups for all > the tracks and gotten a negative rank in GPL. > Steve! > > I actually intend to do this at some point and have a driver just to keep track of PBs in default setups. Considering I have an overall GPL rank of 10 though I'm not quite up to it yet. I've been trying to be methodical about the whole affair and am working to a master plan that has kept my rank lower than it could be. It was my original intent to drive nothing but the Ferrari until I had gone 0, but online racing has put that out the window. My current plan is to go zero by going 0 track by track, leaving the 'ring until LAST, ( which is why I'm not 0 yet). Then I wish to go 0 chassis by chassis to get a good Monster Rank. THEN I wish to start all over again using only default setups. I suppose I could put a bee in my own bonnet by posting my default driver to GPL rank. KFG
Yep. See my GPLrank: -25.770 (I'm called "Racecraft") "Stephen" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:RWRP6.3813$[email hidden]... > Has anybody tried running the default setups for all > the tracks and gotten a negative rank in GPL. > Steve! > >
Can't match Rob Swindells - 25.770, but my +19.8 is all with the default setups. I always use default setups. "Stephen" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:RWRP6.3813$[email hidden]... > Has anybody tried running the default setups for all > the tracks and gotten a negative rank in GPL. > Steve!
When you say default do you mean with the default fuel load as well? "Simon Brown" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:w1UP6.19218$[email hidden]...
Quoted text (10 lines)> Can't match Rob Swindells - 25.770, but my +19.8 is all with the default > setups. I always use default setups. > > "Stephen" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:RWRP6.3813$[email hidden]... > > Has anybody tried running the default setups for all > > the tracks and gotten a negative rank in GPL. > > Steve! > >
On Sat, 26 May 2001 18:46:51 GMT, "Kevin Gavitt" <[email hidden]> wrote: [snip]
Quoted text (8 lines)>It was my original intent to drive nothing but the Ferrari until I had gone >0, but online racing has put that out the window. My current plan is to go >zero by going 0 track by track, leaving the 'ring until LAST, ( which is why >I'm not 0 yet). > >Then I wish to go 0 chassis by chassis to get a good Monster Rank. > >THEN I wish to start all over again using only default setups.
Then, you'll gasp, ponder for a moment why you've squandered your life playing a video game, poop your pants and keel over dead. Sorry, I'm just teasing. Good luck! :-)
Adjusting the fuel load only and nothing else. Steve! "Alex Cameron" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:1TUP6.571072$[email hidden]...
Quoted text (16 lines)> When you say default do you mean with the default fuel load as well? > > "Simon Brown" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:w1UP6.19218$[email hidden]... > > Can't match Rob Swindells - 25.770, but my +19.8 is all with the default > > setups. I always use default setups. > > > > "Stephen" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > > news:RWRP6.3813$[email hidden]... > > > Has anybody tried running the default setups for all > > > the tracks and gotten a negative rank in GPL. > > > Steve! > > > > > >
In article <vSSP6.53163$[email hidden]>, "Kevin Gavitt" <[email hidden]> writes:
Quoted text (22 lines)>I actually intend to do this at some point and have a driver just to keep >track of PBs in default setups. > >Considering I have an overall GPL rank of 10 though I'm not quite up to it >yet. > >I've been trying to be methodical about the whole affair and am working to a >master plan that has kept my rank lower than it could be. > >It was my original intent to drive nothing but the Ferrari until I had gone >0, but online racing has put that out the window. My current plan is to go >zero by going 0 track by track, leaving the 'ring until LAST, ( which is why >I'm not 0 yet). > >Then I wish to go 0 chassis by chassis to get a good Monster Rank. > >THEN I wish to start all over again using only default setups. > >I suppose I could put a bee in my own bonnet by posting my default driver to >GPL rank. > >KFG
Interesting. I may try this myself. I envision my 'default' driver to have a rank of about +70...<g> Eldred -- Dale Earnhardt, Sr. R.I.P. 1951-2001 Homepage - http://www.umich.edu/~epickett F1 hcp. +25.37...F2 +151.26... Never argue with an idiot. He brings you down to his level, then beats you with experience... Remove SPAM-OFF to reply.
"Stephen" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:Y7VP6.3887$[email hidden]...
Quoted text (10 lines)> Adjusting the fuel load only and nothing else. > Steve! > > "Alex Cameron" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:1TUP6.571072$[email hidden]... > > When you say default do you mean with the default fuel load as well? > > > > "Simon Brown" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > > news:w1UP6.19218$[email hidden]... > > > Can't match Rob Swindells - 25.770, but my +19.8 is all with the
default
Quoted text (8 lines)> > > setups. I always use default setups. > > > > > > "Stephen" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > > > news:RWRP6.3813$[email hidden]... > > > > Has anybody tried running the default setups for all > > > > the tracks and gotten a negative rank in GPL. > > > > Steve! > > >
In that case my GPL Rank with default settings would be much lower. When *I* refer to default i mean * default.* KFG
Hehe, no, afraid not :) All my PB's were done with about 5-9 L worth of fuel (depending on the track). "Alex Cameron" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:1TUP6.571072$[email hidden]... > When you say default do you mean with the default fuel load as well? >
I suppose you could say I'm not really using the default setups then, since I adjust the fuel load. Depends on how you see it. God, imagine trying to get a decent GPLRank with full tanks! :o( My definition of torture... "Simon Brown" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:4rXP6.20150$[email hidden]... > Hehe, no, afraid not :) All my PB's were done with about 5-9 L worth of > fuel (depending on the track). >
Simon Brown wrote in message <6uXP6.20158$[email hidden]>...
Quoted text (13 lines)>I suppose you could say I'm not really using the default setups then, since >I adjust the fuel load. Depends on how you see it. > >God, imagine trying to get a decent GPLRank with full tanks! :o( My >definition of torture... > >"Simon Brown" <[email hidden]> wrote in message >news:4rXP6.20150$[email hidden]... >> Hehe, no, afraid not :) All my PB's were done with about 5-9 L worth of >> fuel (depending on the track). >> > >
Or, you could run 76 laps to get the fuel down. Ben
Maxx 27 May 2001 11:00 UTC↳ reply to Steve#182568
On Sat, 26 May 2001 17:43:13 GMT, "Stephen" <[email hidden]> wrote: >Has anybody tried running the default setups for all >the tracks and gotten a negative rank in GPL. >Steve! Steve, I did a piece on this a while ago here in r.a.s. and did a few sub Papy time laps to show, in theory that it could be done. The text is part of the GPLEGS stuff which is now on the web here : http://users.bart.nl/~hansvd/school/ The Default laps themselves are on Eldreds site here : http://www-personal.umich.edu/~epickett/gpl.html These are with fuel adjusted of course, which I'm sure is what you meants. Maxx
Exactly. Hotlaps with full fuel is nonsense! Ben Coleman wrote: > Or, you could run 76 laps to get the fuel down. > > Ben -- Rob Swindells ///////////// Caps Lock
yup I can never bother to fiddle with the setup , apart frompissing some fuel out & I'm on -16 Luc Simon Brown <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:w1UP6.19218$[email hidden]...
Quoted text (10 lines)> Can't match Rob Swindells - 25.770, but my +19.8 is all with the default > setups. I always use default setups. > > "Stephen" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:RWRP6.3813$[email hidden]... > > Has anybody tried running the default setups for all > > the tracks and gotten a negative rank in GPL. > > Steve! > >
"Rob Swindells" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted text (15 lines)> Exactly. Hotlaps with full fuel is nonsense! > > Ben Coleman wrote: > > > Or, you could run 76 laps to get the fuel down. > > > > Ben > > -- > Rob Swindells > ///////////// > Caps > Lock > >
Default is default. Anything else is "cheating." KFG
Thom j. 27 May 2001 21:43 UTC↳ reply to L Wong#182471
Sorry I cant let this go by Luc!! Do you stand or sqwat?? OMG I am sooooooooooo bad!! hahaha "L Wong" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:9erjgh$7en$[email hidden]... | yup | I can never bother to fiddle with the setup , apart frompissing some fuel | out & I'm on -16 | Luc

Sponsors

Affiliate Links

Sim Gaming Expo MOZA Racing Sim-Lab Fanatec TrakRacer Asetek Internet Privacy From NordVPN Dreamhost Capital One Credit Card Application Fanatical CDKeys Amazon Amazon UK Project Motor Racing iRacing Get your racing gloves, boots and more from Demon Tweeks. Enlist at Roberts Space Industries, developers of Star Citizen and Squadron 42


Back from the ashes since July, 2019. First created in 2001 with the merger of Legends Central (founded 1999) and simracing.dk.

A site by a sort of sim racer, for sim racers, about racing sims. News and information on both modern and historic sim racing software titles.

All products and licenses property of their respective owners.


Facebook Threads Bluesky Twitter Mastodon Instagram YouTube Tiktok Twitch Reddit Google News Apple News Subscribe via WordPress Flipboard eBay

Race Sim Central © 1999-2026 | Some links pay RSC a commission. Advertising does not equal endorsement.Cookie Policy