This time it's featured in Gamesdomain's special rallysim article series,
and again it seems the previewer liked it. Also included is an interview
which provides some tidbits about graphical levels and so forth. Good
reading.
http://www.gamesdomain.co.uk/gdreview/depart/jul01/rallyfeature_hrt.html
And no fighting this time, boys! :-)
Ilari Lehtinen
3D artist
Bugbear Entertainment
Thanks I'll have a look :-)
Ilari Lehtinen wrote:
Quoted text (12 lines)
> This time it's featured in Gamesdomain's special rallysim article series, > and again it seems the previewer liked it. Also included is an interview > which provides some tidbits about graphical levels and so forth. Good > reading. > > http://www.gamesdomain.co.uk/gdreview/depart/jul01/rallyfeature_hrt.html > > And no fighting this time, boys! :-) > > Ilari Lehtinen > 3D artist > Bugbear EntertainmentFrom everything I've seen, it certainly seems like it will be a realistic
and fun sim with gorgeous graphics. Can't wait to try it for myself.
I also like this approach:
"GD: Do you regard other sims like Grand Prix Legends and Colin McRae Rally
2 as benchmarks to beat, in terms of physics and graphics?
BugBear: There is no comparison! :-)
Seriously, of course there is always intention to do things better than
others do, but we haven't used any particular games as direct benchmarks.
Rally Trophy will set new benchmarks for others."
Set your own very high standards and don't worry about the rest.
David G Fisher
"Ilari Lehtinen" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:9jur7e$4bg$[email hidden]...
Quoted text (14 lines)
> This time it's featured in Gamesdomain's special rallysim article series, > and again it seems the previewer liked it. Also included is an interview > which provides some tidbits about graphical levels and so forth. Good > reading. > > http://www.gamesdomain.co.uk/gdreview/depart/jul01/rallyfeature_hrt.html > > And no fighting this time, boys! :-) > > Ilari Lehtinen > 3D artist > Bugbear Entertainment > >The perspective scenic background is quite nice! I truely hope that
the racing will match the scenery graphics? Only time will tell..eh??
Good Luck Thom_j.
-Commerical Graphic Arts Consultant- {28+yrs & still running}
"Ilari Lehtinen" wrote:
| This time it's featured in Gamesdomain's special rallysim article series,
| and again it seems the previewer liked it. Also included is an interview
| which provides some tidbits about graphical levels and so forth. Good
| reading.http://www.gamesdomain.co.uk/gdreview/depart/jul01/rallyfeature_hrt.html
| And no fighting this time, boys! :-)
| Ilari Lehtinen
| 3D artist
| Bugbear Entertainment
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.265 / Virus Database: 137 - Release Date: 7/18/2001
Btw Ilari, This was a extremely interesting & profound comparison
in the article:
Up until 12th January, nobody had ever heard of Bugbear Entertainment, but
these days the name is mentioned around the Net with the same hushed and
revered tone normally reserved for Papyrus or the West Brothers. Why?
Because this small Helsinki-based group aims to do for PC rallying what
**Grand Prix Legends** once did for F1 sims.
**=footnote emphasis :-)
"Ilari Lehtinen" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:9jur7e$4bg$[email hidden]...
| This time it's featured in Gamesdomain's special rallysim article series,
| and again it seems the previewer liked it. Also included is an interview
| which provides some tidbits about graphical levels and so forth. Good
| reading.http://www.gamesdomain.co.uk/gdreview/depart/jul01/rallyfeature_hrt.html
| And no fighting this time, boys! :-)
| Ilari Lehtinen
| 3D artist
| Bugbear Entertainment
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.265 / Virus Database: 137 - Release Date: 7/18/2001
>"Ilari Lehtinen" <[email hidden]> wrote
> And no fighting this time, boys! :-)
;-)
Can't wait to throw myself down those cliffs!
I really hope the simulation models the driver's movement in the car. It's
something really lacking from RC2k, the realistic feeling (that adds to the
immersion factor) of the G's.
--
-- Fran�ois M�nard <ymenard>
-- May the Downforce be with you...
-- http://www.ymenard.com/
-- This announcement is brought to you by the Shimato Dominguez
Corporation - helping America into the New World...
Would like Britney to catch you when you go off the cliff? :)
"ymenard" wrote:
| Can't wait to throw myself down those cliffs!
|
| I really hope the simulation models the driver's movement in the car.It's
| something really lacking from RC2k, the realistic feeling (that adds tothe
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.265 / Virus Database: 137 - Release Date: 7/18/2001
Quoted text (10 lines)
| immersion factor) of the G's. | | -- | -- Fran�ois M�nard <ymenard> | >"Ilari Lehtinen" <[email hidden]> wrote | > And no fighting this time, boys! :-) | | ;-) |Driver and co-driver are thrown around to some degree, and this means
your in-car view will be equally .. erm.. stirred and shaken. :)
-Ilari
ymenard wrote:
Quoted text (18 lines)
> > >"Ilari Lehtinen" <[email hidden]> wrote > > And no fighting this time, boys! :-) > > ;-) > > Can't wait to throw myself down those cliffs! > > I really hope the simulation models the driver's movement in the car. It's > something really lacking from RC2k, the realistic feeling (that adds to the > immersion factor) of the G's. > > -- > -- Fran�ois M�nard <ymenard> > -- May the Downforce be with you... > -- http://www.ymenard.com/ > -- This announcement is brought to you by the Shimato Dominguez > Corporation - helping America into the New World...This is second preview I've seen that mentions the Porsche 911. But
in a JoWood forum the developers told us that the Porsche would not be
included.
Which is it?
On Sat, 28 Jul 2001 20:04:03 +0300, "Ilari Lehtinen"
<[email hidden]> wrote:
Quoted text (13 lines)
>This time it's featured in Gamesdomain's special rallysim article series, >and again it seems the previewer liked it. Also included is an interview >which provides some tidbits about graphical levels and so forth. Good >reading. > >http://www.gamesdomain.co.uk/gdreview/depart/jul01/rallyfeature_hrt.html > >And no fighting this time, boys! :-) > >Ilari Lehtinen >3D artist >Bugbear Entertainment >Porsche and Hillman are both cars that seem to lurk in several previews and
articles. They were included in the original (read: old) design documents
but didn't make it into the final game. So no 911 or Imp.
Ilari Lehtinen
Bugbear Entertainment
"Peter Holt" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted text (23 lines)
> This is second preview I've seen that mentions the Porsche 911. But > in a JoWood forum the developers told us that the Porsche would not be > included. > > Which is it? > > On Sat, 28 Jul 2001 20:04:03 +0300, "Ilari Lehtinen" > <[email hidden]> wrote: > > >This time it's featured in Gamesdomain's special rallysim article series, > >and again it seems the previewer liked it. Also included is an interview > >which provides some tidbits about graphical levels and so forth. Good > >reading. > > > >http://www.gamesdomain.co.uk/gdreview/depart/jul01/rallyfeature_hrt.html > > > >And no fighting this time, boys! :-) > > > >Ilari Lehtinen > >3D artist > >Bugbear Entertainment > > >On Sun, 29 Jul 2001 19:42:04 +0300, "Ilari Lehtinen"
<[email hidden]> wrote:
>. So no 911 or Imp.
>
dammit
On Sun, 29 Jul 2001 19:42:04 +0300, "Ilari Lehtinen"
>. So no 911 or Imp.
dammit
Ilari Lehtinen <[email hidden]> wrote on 29 Jul 2001:
<snip>
>So no 911 or Imp.
Damn damn damn damn damn. OK, all you car designers - we're relying on
you to let us be Walter R�hrl... :-)
--
David. (GPLRank handicap -6.57; Monsters of GPL +271.79)
The GPL Scrapyard: *will be down for a while - hackers at 9ug :-( *
"After all, a mere thousand yards - such a harmless little knoll,
really" - Raymond Mays on Shelsley Walsh.
Now you can regret all those money you spendt on NFS or Gran Tourismo! :-)))
Joke aside tho.... I could do without the Porsche... but the Imp is a big
loss!
(who own 'that' these days anyway? Rover?)
--
ed_
Ian Greenwood said:
> On Sun, 29 Jul 2001 19:42:04 +0300, "Ilari Lehtinen"
> <[email hidden]> wrote:
>
> >. So no 911 or Imp.
> >
>
> dammit
Ed Solheim wrote:
>
> Now you can regret all those money you spendt on NFS or Gran Tourismo! :-)))
>
> Joke aside tho.... I could do without the Porsche... but the Imp is a big
> loss!
> (who own 'that' these days anyway? Rover?)
Sunbeam -> Rootes Group -> Talbot -> BL -> Rover ?
Could be, and yes, I'd love to give the Imp a go myself, but with a
Coventry Climax engine in it, the connection to old style F1 racing
would probably make me a GPL die hard in some people's eyes......:-)
Beers and cheers
(uncle) Goy
"Team Mirage" http://members.prestige.net/bttw/teammirage/
"The Pits" http://www.theuspits.com/
* Spam is for losers who can't get business any other way *
"Spamkiller" http://www.spamkiller.com
In article <[email hidden]>, [email hidden] says...
The Rootes Group were bought out by Chrysler, and then later Chrysler
Europe was sold to Peugeot.
--
Steve
Quoted text (11 lines)
> > > Ed Solheim wrote: > > > > Now you can regret all those money you spendt on NFS or Gran Tourismo! :-))) > > > > Joke aside tho.... I could do without the Porsche... but the Imp is a big > > loss! > > (who own 'that' these days anyway? Rover?) > > Sunbeam -> Rootes Group -> Talbot -> BL -> Rover ?
Steve Loft wrote:
Ok, so it's Peugeot we should despise for the Imp not being in RT then,
and not Rover ?
Good to know :-)
Beers and cheers
(uncle) Goy
"Team Mirage" http://members.prestige.net/bttw/teammirage/
"The Pits" http://www.theuspits.com/
* Spam is for losers who can't get business any other way *
"Spamkiller" http://www.spamkiller.com
