It's been years since I've seen ras so united behind a modern F1 title as F1
2001. Not quite everyone, but almost everyone seems to agree that it is the
best modern F1 sim around! Amazing!
Iain
Has F1 2001 united the newsgroup?
Iain Mackenzie remarked that almost everyone agreed F1 2001 was the best modern F1 sim. Most owners agreed once driver problems were solved, though some noted the lack of AI in multiplayer and telemetry. Ian P struggled to get split-axis pedals working, which became a troubleshooting discussion.
Automated summary.
Spooky Isn't it : )
I absolutely love it ISI have hit the spot with this one, it's taken
me 3 days to get it running sweet but now I have wow !!!
Regards Mike
On Tue, 9 Oct 2001 21:02:14 +0100, "Iain Mackenzie"
<[email hidden]> wrote:
>It's been years since I've seen ras so united behind a modern F1 title as F1
>2001. Not quite everyone, but almost everyone seems to agree that it is the
>best modern F1 sim around! Amazing!
>Iain
>
HOORAY EA!!!!!!
Iain Mackenzie wrote:
Quoted text (7 lines)
> It's been years since I've seen ras so united behind a modern F1 title as F1 > 2001. Not quite everyone, but almost everyone seems to agree that it is the > best modern F1 sim around! Amazing! > Iain > > >On Tue, 09 Oct 2001 22:36:25 +0100, Rob Swindells
<[email hidden]> wrote:
>HOORAY EA!!!!!!
>
And EA will continue to refine the game franchise every year just like
they do with all their other sports titles.
"Iain Mackenzie" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:fJIw7.7846$[email hidden]...
> It's been years since I've seen ras so united behind a modern F1 title asF1
> 2001. Not quite everyone, but almost everyone seems to agree that it isthe
> best modern F1 sim around! Amazing!
> Iain
Maybe I'm the lone dissenter, but I wasn't very impressed with the graphics
I saw when it was demo'ed at the USGP last month. No, I didn't get a chance
to try it out but after buying F1 2000 then F1 2000 Championship Season the
game looked almost identical as far as graphics go. Are the changes in
gameplay really that striking? Is there anyone out there who can compare F1
2000 CS to F1 2001?
tia
On Tue, 9 Oct 2001 21:02:14 +0100, "Iain Mackenzie"
<[email hidden]> wrote:
>It's been years since I've seen ras so united behind a modern F1 title as F1
>2001. Not quite everyone, but almost everyone seems to agree that it is the
>best modern F1 sim around! Amazing!
>Iain
>
Perhaps I have been reading ras in another dimenision, it doesnt seem
this way to me.
On Wed, 10 Oct 2001 03:21:39 GMT, Jaker Amjet <[email hidden]>
wrote:
I think there have been a lot of problems, and people have complained
about it when it's not running right. Once the driver issues have been
sorted, everyone seems to be approving...
Rafe Mc, who hasn't even run it himself anyway :D
Quoted text (11 lines)
>On Tue, 9 Oct 2001 21:02:14 +0100, "Iain Mackenzie" ><[email hidden]> wrote: > >>It's been years since I've seen ras so united behind a modern F1 title as F1 >>2001. Not quite everyone, but almost everyone seems to agree that it is the >>best modern F1 sim around! Amazing! >>Iain >> > >Perhaps I have been reading ras in another dimenision, it doesnt seem >this way to me.
Mike Blackmore <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
> Spooky Isn't it : )
>
> I absolutely love it ISI have hit the spot with this one, it's taken
> me 3 days to get it running sweet but now I have wow !!!
>
> Regards Mike
What is a shame is that 80% of the buyers aren't the type to scan
newsgroups, comb the internet and tweak their various .ini and .cfg files.
I can start to understand why the consoles are starting to win out, because
with a stable hardware platform to develop on, things either work or don't
work straight out of the box.
With F1CS, the automatic graphics config buried a low system rating value in
the .ini file. The textures were of course horrible. Manually bumping this
number up gave me a much better looking sim, at the loss of only 1 or 2 fps.
If someone didn't think to edit the file, they would wonder why the game
looks so poor. They would also falsely assume the game is a bad product and
would shelve it.
On the other hand, the very "tweakability" makes PC sims what they are. New
textures, edited tracks, new car models. Wheee!
Still waiting for the F1-2001 demo before I buy it for my marginal PC.
Stephen
I Bought them all, and F1 2001 is a major step up, i really wasn't that
impressed with the previous offerings. That said F1 2001 isnt perfect. No
AI in Multiplayer and not GPL standard Multiplayer :(. The driving model is
great IMO, which is the main thing.
All the best,
Ash
| Maybe I'm the lone dissenter, but I wasn't very impressed with thegraphics
| I saw when it was demo'ed at the USGP last month. No, I didn't get achance
| to try it out but after buying F1 2000 then F1 2000 Championship Seasonthe
| game looked almost identical as far as graphics go. Are the changes in
| gameplay really that striking? Is there anyone out there who can compareF1
| 2000 CS to F1 2001?
|
| tia
|
When some patches and user made utils come out for it, then
maybe I will like it.
As it is now, I don't think it even comes close to the best modern F1
game category. (the game doesn't even have telemetry.......)
On Wed, 10 Oct 2001 05:27:26 GMT, [email hidden] (Rafe
McAuliffe) wrote:
Quoted text (20 lines)
>On Wed, 10 Oct 2001 03:21:39 GMT, Jaker Amjet <[email hidden]> >wrote: > >>On Tue, 9 Oct 2001 21:02:14 +0100, "Iain Mackenzie" >><[email hidden]> wrote: >> >>>It's been years since I've seen ras so united behind a modern F1 title as F1 >>>2001. Not quite everyone, but almost everyone seems to agree that it is the >>>best modern F1 sim around! Amazing! >>>Iain >>> >> >>Perhaps I have been reading ras in another dimenision, it doesnt seem >>this way to me. > >I think there have been a lot of problems, and people have complained >about it when it's not running right. Once the driver issues have been >sorted, everyone seems to be approving... > >Rafe Mc, who hasn't even run it himself anyway :DOn Wed, 10 Oct 2001 10:01:36 +0100, "Ashley McConnell"
<[email hidden]> wrote:
Conclusion: ISI now has the foundation for a REALLY good F1 sim.. long
live F1 2002 :)
Andre
Quoted text (7 lines)
>I Bought them all, and F1 2001 is a major step up, i really wasn't that >impressed with the previous offerings. That said F1 2001 isnt perfect. No >AI in Multiplayer and not GPL standard Multiplayer :(. The driving model is >great IMO, which is the main thing. > >All the best, >AshWell, after all the praise I've seen here I went out and bought F1 2001.
Installed great, fired it up went on track and got a decent framerate
Athlon 750, 25MB RAM, GeForce 2 pro). I'm not particularly impressed with
the graphics but they'll do. So off around the track, something didn't feel
right. Well I can't believe it, they've screwed up the split axis support...
again !!
Yes, split axis does work, but (and it's a big but) the pedals only work
when they've passed half way through their movement, this makes it very
difficult for me to feel how much power and brakes I'm giving to the car,
very poor. It's a shame really as it's so close to being a great sim :(
--
Ian P
<email invalid due to spam>
Andre Warringa <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
> On Wed, 10 Oct 2001 10:01:36 +0100, "Ashley McConnell"
> <[email hidden]> wrote:
>
> >I Bought them all, and F1 2001 is a major step up, i really wasn't that
> >impressed with the previous offerings. That said F1 2001 isnt perfect.
No
> >AI in Multiplayer and not GPL standard Multiplayer :(. The driving model
is
> >great IMO, which is the main thing.
> >
> >All the best,
> >Ash
>
> Conclusion: ISI now has the foundation for a REALLY good F1 sim.. long
> live F1 2002 :)
>
> Andre
"John Bodin" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
as
> >F1
> >> 2001. Not quite everyone, but almost everyone seems to agree that itis
> >the
> >> best modern F1 sim around! Amazing!
> >> Iain
> >
> >Maybe I'm the lone dissenter, but I wasn't very impressed with thegraphics
> >I saw when it was demo'ed at the USGP last month. No, I didn't get achance
> >to try it out but after buying F1 2000 then F1 2000 Championship Seasonthe
Thanks for the nice reviews and thanks to the others who also responded. It
looks like they have improved quite a bit with this one. Seems that EA has
me reaching for my wallet again. :-)
Quoted text (7 lines)
> On Wed, 10 Oct 2001 01:08:44 GMT, "nobodyspecial" <[email hidden]> > wrote: > > > > >"Iain Mackenzie" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > >news:fJIw7.7846$[email hidden]... > >> It's been years since I've seen ras so united behind a modern F1 titleQuoted text (13 lines)
> >game looked almost identical as far as graphics go. Are the changes in > >gameplay really that striking? > > Yes. > > >Is there anyone out there who can compare F1 > >2000 CS to F1 2001? > > How about comparing my previews for each: > > http://www.bhmotorsports.com/reviews/f1cs1.htm > > http://irlheat.bhmotorsports.com/F12001/No, ISI didn't mess up the split axis support -- you probably haven't
configured your controller correctly. The controller setup in F1 2001
is not as elegant as the visual displays in GPL and Viper Racing, but
you can tune the dead zone and range individually for each axis in F1
2001, so my guess is that you haven't got your controller configured
properly from the in-game controller setup menus.
-- JB
On Wed, 10 Oct 2001 15:20:56 +0100, "Ian P" <[email hidden]> wrote:
Quoted text (38 lines)
>Well, after all the praise I've seen here I went out and bought F1 2001. >Installed great, fired it up went on track and got a decent framerate > Athlon 750, 25MB RAM, GeForce 2 pro). I'm not particularly impressed with >the graphics but they'll do. So off around the track, something didn't feel >right. Well I can't believe it, they've screwed up the split axis support... >again !! >Yes, split axis does work, but (and it's a big but) the pedals only work >when they've passed half way through their movement, this makes it very >difficult for me to feel how much power and brakes I'm giving to the car, >very poor. It's a shame really as it's so close to being a great sim :( > >-- > >Ian P ><email invalid due to spam> > > >Andre Warringa <[email hidden]> wrote in message >news:[email hidden]... >> On Wed, 10 Oct 2001 10:01:36 +0100, "Ashley McConnell" >> <[email hidden]> wrote: >> >> >I Bought them all, and F1 2001 is a major step up, i really wasn't that >> >impressed with the previous offerings. That said F1 2001 isnt perfect. >No >> >AI in Multiplayer and not GPL standard Multiplayer :(. The driving model >is >> >great IMO, which is the main thing. >> > >> >All the best, >> >Ash >> >> Conclusion: ISI now has the foundation for a REALLY good F1 sim.. long >> live F1 2002 :) >> >> Andre > >On Wed, 10 Oct 2001 15:25:29 GMT, "nobodyspecial" <[email hidden]>
wrote:
Glad to help!
;-)
-- JB
Quoted text (41 lines)
> >"John Bodin" <[email hidden]> wrote in message >news:[email hidden]... >> On Wed, 10 Oct 2001 01:08:44 GMT, "nobodyspecial" <[email hidden]> >> wrote: >> >> > >> >"Iain Mackenzie" <[email hidden]> wrote in message >> >news:fJIw7.7846$[email hidden]... >> >> It's been years since I've seen ras so united behind a modern F1 title >as >> >F1 >> >> 2001. Not quite everyone, but almost everyone seems to agree that it >is >> >the >> >> best modern F1 sim around! Amazing! >> >> Iain >> > >> >Maybe I'm the lone dissenter, but I wasn't very impressed with the >graphics >> >I saw when it was demo'ed at the USGP last month. No, I didn't get a >chance >> >to try it out but after buying F1 2000 then F1 2000 Championship Season >the >> >game looked almost identical as far as graphics go. Are the changes in >> >gameplay really that striking? >> >> Yes. >> >> >Is there anyone out there who can compare F1 >> >2000 CS to F1 2001? >> >> How about comparing my previews for each: >> >> http://www.bhmotorsports.com/reviews/f1cs1.htm >> >> http://irlheat.bhmotorsports.com/F12001/ > >Thanks for the nice reviews and thanks to the others who also responded. It >looks like they have improved quite a bit with this one. Seems that EA has >me reaching for my wallet again. :-)Really? Well care to explain why the hell I can set brake to RZ axis + or -
and throttle to Y axis + or - depending on which part of the axis I move it
in when I configure but theres no way on this planet I can figure out how to
make it use all the axis range. If I set it to RZ + for example I get full
brake with it off and no brake when pressed half way down.
If I use it in combined axis mode all is ok, but I want to use split axis.
There's also a post on one of the forums about someone with a MSFF having
the same problem.
Does anyone in here use a MS wheel using F1 2001 with split axis without
losing half the pedal movement ?
By the way, theres nothing wrong with my controller configuration (MS
precison wheel) which works perfectly in GPL, N4, MBTR,F1RC and GP3.
--
Ian P
<email invalid due to spam>
John Bodin <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
> No, ISI didn't mess up the split axis support -- you probably haven't
> configured your controller correctly. The controller setup in F1 2001
> is not as elegant as the visual displays in GPL and Viper Racing, but
> you can tune the dead zone and range individually for each axis in F1
> 2001, so my guess is that you haven't got your controller configured
> properly from the in-game controller setup menus.
>
> -- JB
>
> On Wed, 10 Oct 2001 15:20:56 +0100, "Ian P" <[email hidden]> wrote:
>
> >Well, after all the praise I've seen here I went out and bought F1 2001.
> >Installed great, fired it up went on track and got a decent framerate
> > Athlon 750, 25MB RAM, GeForce 2 pro). I'm not particularly impressed
with
> >the graphics but they'll do. So off around the track, something didn't
feel
> >right. Well I can't believe it, they've screwed up the split axis
support...
> >again !!
> >Yes, split axis does work, but (and it's a big but) the pedals only work
> >when they've passed half way through their movement, this makes it very
> >difficult for me to feel how much power and brakes I'm giving to the car,
> >very poor. It's a shame really as it's so close to being a great sim :(
> >
> >--
> >
> >Ian P
> ><email invalid due to spam>
> There's also a post on one of the forums about someone with a MSFF having
> the same problem.
>
> Does anyone in here use a MS wheel using F1 2001 with split axis without
> losing half the pedal movement ?
>
Yes. Me, for one.
I posted this message in another thread.
I suggest downloading DxDeadzone and Dx Tweak from
http://www.wingmanteam.com/Latest_Software/Gadgets/gadgets.htm. You can
eliminate all deadzones so you have a nice foundation on which to start
configuring your controller. It worked a treat for me with a Microsoft FF
Wheel.
Good luck.
Strange, Ian, it works fine with split axis and no tweaks to throttle or
brake axis here.
Darned weird these 'puters.
Could it be a dx8 version issue?
Clutching at straws
Tony
"Ian P" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:9q263g$hbr$[email hidden]...
> Really? Well care to explain why the hell I can set brake to RZ axis +or -
> and throttle to Y axis + or - depending on which part of the axis I moveit
> in when I configure but theres no way on this planet I can figure out howto
> make it use all the axis range. If I set it to RZ + for example I get full
> brake with it off and no brake when pressed half way down.
>
> If I use it in combined axis mode all is ok, but I want to use splitaxis.
>
I have the same problem.
On Wed, 10 Oct 2001 20:04:35 +0100, "Ian P" <[email hidden]> wrote:
Quoted text (17 lines)
>Really? Well care to explain why the hell I can set brake to RZ axis + or - >and throttle to Y axis + or - depending on which part of the axis I move it >in when I configure but theres no way on this planet I can figure out how to >make it use all the axis range. If I set it to RZ + for example I get full >brake with it off and no brake when pressed half way down. > > If I use it in combined axis mode all is ok, but I want to use split axis. > >There's also a post on one of the forums about someone with a MSFF having >the same problem. > >Does anyone in here use a MS wheel using F1 2001 with split axis without >losing half the pedal movement ? > > >By the way, theres nothing wrong with my controller configuration (MS >precison wheel) which works perfectly in GPL, N4, MBTR,F1RC and GP3.Someone posted saying try DX tweak, well I did and still the same.
Definitely weird these puters ;)
I've tried altering the ingame sensitivity and deadzones but that doesn't
help either.
I've been playing it anyway, I'm very impressed with the sim, just wish
there was some way of fixing this annoying (bug ?) error.
--
Ian P
<email invalid due to spam>
Tony Rickard <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:ax2x7.14770$[email hidden]...
> Strange, Ian, it works fine with split axis and no tweaks to throttle or
> brake axis here.
>
> Darned weird these 'puters.
>
> Could it be a dx8 version issue?
>
> Clutching at straws
>
> Tony
Ian
Have you checked the plr file? Does it say deadzone is zero in that?
Iain
"Ian P" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:9q2i1j$psj$[email hidden]...
Quoted text (29 lines)
> Someone posted saying try DX tweak, well I did and still the same. > Definitely weird these puters ;) > > I've tried altering the ingame sensitivity and deadzones but that doesn't > help either. > > I've been playing it anyway, I'm very impressed with the sim, just wish > there was some way of fixing this annoying (bug ?) error. > > -- > > Ian P > <email invalid due to spam> > > > Tony Rickard <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:ax2x7.14770$[email hidden]... > > Strange, Ian, it works fine with split axis and no tweaks to throttle or > > brake axis here. > > > > Darned weird these 'puters. > > > > Could it be a dx8 version issue? > > > > Clutching at straws > > > > Tony > >It says joystick deadzone = 0.05, but the deadzone I have is about 50%.
There must be something that ells it to use the full range of pedal
movement, I just can't find it <G>
--
Ian P
<email invalid due to spam>
Iain Mackenzie <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:w6bx7.913$[email hidden]...
> Ian
> Have you checked the plr file? Does it say deadzone is zero in that?
> Iain
Could it be the MSFF (it was MSFF wasnt it?) software or something? It MAY
work in GPL fine because it is calibrated seperately (and can therefore
define the upper and lower limits), but may be being misreported by the
driver somehow.
On a lighter note, my MSFF works great <G> :)
Ash - clutching at straws
"Ian P" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:9q49d6$ojd$[email hidden]...


































