EA code monkeys should be ashamed
of what they have done.If I can play N4 at 1600x1200 with
all the details and never drop below 40fps at Martinsville
then something is wrong.
Aside from the poor graphics implantation the rest
of the game seemed quite nice. The best sound yet in a modern
era F1 sim, and you can actually turn the blasted music off.
Take the graphics from F1RC, the replay mode from papy,
the sound and physics model from F1 2001,the rain fx from
GP3,then you would have game.
Tim
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.286 / Virus Database: 152 - Release Date: 10/9/01
"Tim Y" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:3AZx7.3752$[email hidden]...
The graphics are poor ? Really ?
I thought they were bloody nice. Smooth gameplay, good graphics.
Quoted text (7 lines)
> EA code monkeys should be ashamed > of what they have done.If I can play N4 at 1600x1200 with > all the details and never drop below 40fps at Martinsville > then something is wrong. > Aside from the poor graphics implantation the rest > of the game seemed quite nice. The best sound yet in a modern > era F1 sim, and you can actually turn the blasted music off.On Sat, 13 Oct 2001 19:25:12 +0100, "redTed" <[email hidden]> wrote:
Tim, read the f1 2001 posts from the last couple of days, it mentions
how to solve your fps problems. With all detail settings on high f1
2001 looks very good. In a way even better than f1rc, less cartoony,
more realistic.
Andre
Quoted text (13 lines)
> >"Tim Y" <[email hidden]> wrote in message >news:3AZx7.3752$[email hidden]... >> EA code monkeys should be ashamed >> of what they have done.If I can play N4 at 1600x1200 with >> all the details and never drop below 40fps at Martinsville >> then something is wrong. >> Aside from the poor graphics implantation the rest >> of the game seemed quite nice. The best sound yet in a modern >> era F1 sim, and you can actually turn the blasted music off. > >The graphics are poor ? Really ? >I thought they were bloody nice. Smooth gameplay, good graphics.
"redTed" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:9qa11j$mgq67$[email hidden]...
Tim
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.286 / Virus Database: 152 - Release Date: 10/9/01
Quoted text (20 lines)
> > "Tim Y" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:3AZx7.3752$[email hidden]... > > EA code monkeys should be ashamed > > of what they have done.If I can play N4 at 1600x1200 with > > all the details and never drop below 40fps at Martinsville > > then something is wrong. > > Aside from the poor graphics implantation the rest > > of the game seemed quite nice. The best sound yet in a modern > > era F1 sim, and you can actually turn the blasted music off. > > The graphics are poor ? Really ? > I thought they were bloody nice. Smooth gameplay, good graphics. > > OK I will admit that I can play it at a 1600x12000 > but I have to turn off all the detail except my car. > (to keep the wheels round) Besides I didn't say > the actual graphics were bad I said the coding was poor > with the end result being subpar performance when the > detail levels are turned to the max settingsHaven't tried this yet, pics look promising.
http://dynamic2.gamespy.com/~hg/forums/showthread.php?s=2905d063021cce18713d
f3375cd945c9&threadid=25204
J. Janasov
"Tim Y" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:9p0y7.3773$[email hidden]...


































