Does this bug the s#$t out of anyone else?
Why, why, why?
With damage, this racer would easily be great... as it stands, IMO, it's
good, but lacking.
Now, you just have a bunch of mobile guardrails..
"andrew" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Motor manufacturers grant licences to games companies usually under the
premise that they do not show the crap getting beaten or trashed out of it
Doug
Quoted text (8 lines)
> Does this bug the s#$t out of anyone else? > > Why, why, why? > > With damage, this racer would easily be great... as it stands, IMO, it's > good, but lacking. > > Now, you just have a bunch of mobile guardrails..On Thu, 8 Nov 2001 14:00:16 -0000, "Douglas Ellison"
<[email hidden]> wrote:
A shame! First I thought it was because I was in Arcade mode, then in
Gran Turismo mode... no change. A dark spot on the fine game,
certainly. It's so much fun just blasting the engine, jumping from a
bridge, at times. :)
Ruud van Gaal
Free car sim : http://www.marketgraph.nl/gallery/racer/
Pencil art : http://www.marketgraph.nl/gallery/
Quoted text (13 lines)
> >"andrew" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]... >> Does this bug the s#$t out of anyone else? >> >> Why, why, why? >> >> With damage, this racer would easily be great... as it stands, IMO, it's >> good, but lacking. >> >> Now, you just have a bunch of mobile guardrails.. > >Motor manufacturers grant licences to games companies usually under the >premise that they do not show the crap getting beaten or trashed out of itThat may be true, but then I'd rather have a game full of ficticious cars that
*can* be damaged!
Don't get me wrong - GT3 is still a *whole* buncha fun....
Douglas Ellison wrote:
Quoted text (14 lines)
> "andrew" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]... > > Does this bug the s#$t out of anyone else? > > > > Why, why, why? > > > > With damage, this racer would easily be great... as it stands, IMO, it's > > good, but lacking. > > > > Now, you just have a bunch of mobile guardrails.. > > Motor manufacturers grant licences to games companies usually under the > premise that they do not show the crap getting beaten or trashed out of it > > Doug>"Douglas Ellison" <[email hidden]> wrote
> Motor manufacturers grant licences to games companies usually under the
> premise that they do not show the crap getting beaten or trashed out of it
That's the PR reason, there's also the fact that the developers took that
excuse to be lazy and not implement any kind of damage modelling.
--
-- Fran�ois M�nard <ymenard>
-- May the Downforce be with you...
-- http://www.ymenard.com/
-- This announcement is brought to you by the Shimato Dominguez
Corporation - helping America into the New World...
Lazy - or it wasn't in the budget.
Too bad, it's fairly good otherwise...
ymenard wrote:


































