Race Sim Central
Rec.Autos.Simulators Archive

where are the WMD?

14 posts by 10 people · 26 Nov 2005 21:17 UTC - 02 Dec 2005 09:06 UTC

fredrickson 26 Nov 2005 21:17 UTC#15075
anyone? how many more americans are you willing to kill over there ?
troll alert "fredrickson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:mh4if.15903$[email hidden]... anyone? how many more americans are you willing to kill over there ?
B Wegner 26 Nov 2005 21:22 UTC#532830
troll alert anyone? how many more americans are you willing to kill over there ?
B Wegner wrote:
Quoted text (7 lines)> troll alert > > "fredrickson" <[email hidden] <mailto:[email hidden]>> wrote in message > news:mh4if.15903$[email hidden]... > anyone? > > how many more americans are you willing to kill over there ?
LOL...They were moved to Syria and Iran.When we invade those two countries,we'll find they were moved back to Iraq..LOL
"fredrickson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:mh4if.15903$[email hidden]... > anyone? > > how many more americans are you willing to kill over there ? What we HAVE found.......Not a lot, but against the UN mandates,........... 1.77 metric tons of enriched uranium 1,500 gallons of chemical weapons agents 17 chemical warheads containing cyclosarin (a nerve agent five times more deadly than sarin gas) Over 1,000 radioactive materials in powdered form meant for dispersal over populated areas Roadside bombs loaded with mustard and "conventional" sarin gas, assembled in binary chemical projectiles for maximum potency
Naw Ed, can't be... If it were true then CNN or CBS would have told me so... Repeat after me, Bush lied and were in a war that cannot be won.... Cindy Sheehan is the real story not the War....... Mitch "Ed Medlin" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:Wdkif.2358$Y%> "fredrickson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
Quoted text (23 lines)> news:mh4if.15903$[email hidden]... >> anyone? >> >> how many more americans are you willing to kill over there ? > > What we HAVE found.......Not a lot, but against the UN > mandates,........... > > 1.77 metric tons of enriched uranium > > 1,500 gallons of chemical weapons agents > > 17 chemical warheads containing cyclosarin (a nerve agent five times more > deadly than sarin gas) > > Over 1,000 radioactive materials in powdered form meant for dispersal over > populated areas > > Roadside bombs loaded with mustard and "conventional" sarin gas, assembled > in binary chemical projectiles for maximum potency > > >
"Ed Medlin" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:Wdkif.2358$Y%[email hidden]...
Quoted text (25 lines)> > "fredrickson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:mh4if.15903$[email hidden]... >> anyone? >> >> how many more americans are you willing to kill over there ? > > What we HAVE found.......Not a lot, but against the UN > mandates,........... > > 1.77 metric tons of enriched uranium > > 1,500 gallons of chemical weapons agents > > 17 chemical warheads containing cyclosarin (a nerve agent five times more > deadly than sarin gas) > > Over 1,000 radioactive materials in powdered form meant for dispersal over > populated areas > > Roadside bombs loaded with mustard and "conventional" sarin gas, assembled > in binary chemical projectiles for maximum potency > > >
What the UN have not done - stop the production of probably about 1000 times the amount of such stuff elsewhere in the world. What the U.N. have fundamentally done is dethrown a maniac - had they have stated that as their primary or even only objective then all this bullshit would have been avoided. That's what they get for being full of shit!
"Byron Forbes" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:438a5c9a$0$13318$[email hidden]...
Quoted text (36 lines)> > "Ed Medlin" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:Wdkif.2358$Y%[email hidden]... >> >> "fredrickson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message >> news:mh4if.15903$[email hidden]... >>> anyone? >>> >>> how many more americans are you willing to kill over there ? >> >> What we HAVE found.......Not a lot, but against the UN >> mandates,........... >> >> 1.77 metric tons of enriched uranium >> >> 1,500 gallons of chemical weapons agents >> >> 17 chemical warheads containing cyclosarin (a nerve agent five times more >> deadly than sarin gas) >> >> Over 1,000 radioactive materials in powdered form meant for dispersal >> over populated areas >> >> Roadside bombs loaded with mustard and "conventional" sarin gas, >> assembled in binary chemical projectiles for maximum potency >> >> >> > > What the UN have not done - stop the production of probably about 1000 > times the amount of such stuff elsewhere in the world. > > What the U.N. have fundamentally done is dethrown a maniac - had they > have stated that as their primary or even only objective then all this > bullshit would have been avoided. That's what they get for being full of > shit!
uh, the UN had nothing to do with it. The US on the other hand, went it alone with the help of a couple of countries. steve
On Sun, 27 Nov 2005 15:25:42 GMT, Ed Medlin wrote: > > Roadside bombs loaded with mustard and "conventional" sarin gas eeeeww, why the mustard???? If it wasn't for the sarin gas in there, I'd understand the comical aspect, but what do they dip their sausages into down there? Babarians. Cheers, uwe -- GPG Fingerprint: 2E 13 20 22 9A 3F 63 7F 67 6F E9 B1 A8 36 A4 61
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 05:50:18 GMT, "Steve Whitty" <[email hidden]> wrote:
Quoted text (43 lines)> >"Byron Forbes" <[email hidden]> wrote in message >news:438a5c9a$0$13318$[email hidden]... >> >> "Ed Medlin" <[email hidden]> wrote in message >> news:Wdkif.2358$Y%[email hidden]... >>> >>> "fredrickson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message >>> news:mh4if.15903$[email hidden]... >>>> anyone? >>>> >>>> how many more americans are you willing to kill over there ? >>> >>> What we HAVE found.......Not a lot, but against the UN >>> mandates,........... >>> >>> 1.77 metric tons of enriched uranium >>> >>> 1,500 gallons of chemical weapons agents >>> >>> 17 chemical warheads containing cyclosarin (a nerve agent five times more >>> deadly than sarin gas) >>> >>> Over 1,000 radioactive materials in powdered form meant for dispersal >>> over populated areas >>> >>> Roadside bombs loaded with mustard and "conventional" sarin gas, >>> assembled in binary chemical projectiles for maximum potency >>> >>> >>> >> >> What the UN have not done - stop the production of probably about 1000 >> times the amount of such stuff elsewhere in the world. >> >> What the U.N. have fundamentally done is dethrown a maniac - had they >> have stated that as their primary or even only objective then all this >> bullshit would have been avoided. That's what they get for being full of >> shit! > >uh, the UN had nothing to do with it. The US on the other hand, went it >alone with the help of a couple of countries. >
UN, US, Simbin, ISI... They're all the same thing aren't they? :) You're off your trolley! :) ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
"Jeff Vincent" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted text (53 lines)> On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 05:50:18 GMT, "Steve Whitty" <[email hidden]> > wrote: > >> >>"Byron Forbes" <[email hidden]> wrote in message >>news:438a5c9a$0$13318$[email hidden]... >>> >>> "Ed Medlin" <[email hidden]> wrote in message >>> news:Wdkif.2358$Y%[email hidden]... >>>> >>>> "fredrickson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message >>>> news:mh4if.15903$[email hidden]... >>>>> anyone? >>>>> >>>>> how many more americans are you willing to kill over there ? >>>> >>>> What we HAVE found.......Not a lot, but against the UN >>>> mandates,........... >>>> >>>> 1.77 metric tons of enriched uranium >>>> >>>> 1,500 gallons of chemical weapons agents >>>> >>>> 17 chemical warheads containing cyclosarin (a nerve agent five times >>>> more >>>> deadly than sarin gas) >>>> >>>> Over 1,000 radioactive materials in powdered form meant for dispersal >>>> over populated areas >>>> >>>> Roadside bombs loaded with mustard and "conventional" sarin gas, >>>> assembled in binary chemical projectiles for maximum potency >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> What the UN have not done - stop the production of probably about >>> 1000 >>> times the amount of such stuff elsewhere in the world. >>> >>> What the U.N. have fundamentally done is dethrown a maniac - had they >>> have stated that as their primary or even only objective then all this >>> bullshit would have been avoided. That's what they get for being full of >>> shit! >> >>uh, the UN had nothing to do with it. The US on the other hand, went it >>alone with the help of a couple of countries. >> > > UN, US, Simbin, ISI... They're all the same thing aren't they? :) > > You're off your trolley! :) >
LOL.
"Steve Whitty" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:uUwif.5534$[email hidden]...
Quoted text (41 lines)> > "Byron Forbes" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:438a5c9a$0$13318$[email hidden]... >> >> "Ed Medlin" <[email hidden]> wrote in message >> news:Wdkif.2358$Y%[email hidden]... >>> >>> "fredrickson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message >>> news:mh4if.15903$[email hidden]... >>>> anyone? >>>> >>>> how many more americans are you willing to kill over there ? >>> >>> What we HAVE found.......Not a lot, but against the UN >>> mandates,........... >>> >>> 1.77 metric tons of enriched uranium >>> >>> 1,500 gallons of chemical weapons agents >>> >>> 17 chemical warheads containing cyclosarin (a nerve agent five times >>> more deadly than sarin gas) >>> >>> Over 1,000 radioactive materials in powdered form meant for dispersal >>> over populated areas >>> >>> Roadside bombs loaded with mustard and "conventional" sarin gas, >>> assembled in binary chemical projectiles for maximum potency >>> >>> >>> >> >> What the UN have not done - stop the production of probably about 1000 >> times the amount of such stuff elsewhere in the world. >> >> What the U.N. have fundamentally done is dethrown a maniac - had they >> have stated that as their primary or even only objective then all this >> bullshit would have been avoided. That's what they get for being full of >> shit! > uh, the UN had nothing to do with it. The US on the other hand, went it > alone with the help of a couple of countries.
Alone.....with others??
"JTB" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted text (48 lines)> > "Steve Whitty" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:uUwif.5534$[email hidden]... >> >> "Byron Forbes" <[email hidden]> wrote in message >> news:438a5c9a$0$13318$[email hidden]... >>> >>> "Ed Medlin" <[email hidden]> wrote in message >>> news:Wdkif.2358$Y%[email hidden]... >>>> >>>> "fredrickson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message >>>> news:mh4if.15903$[email hidden]... >>>>> anyone? >>>>> >>>>> how many more americans are you willing to kill over there ? >>>> >>>> What we HAVE found.......Not a lot, but against the UN >>>> mandates,........... >>>> >>>> 1.77 metric tons of enriched uranium >>>> >>>> 1,500 gallons of chemical weapons agents >>>> >>>> 17 chemical warheads containing cyclosarin (a nerve agent five times >>>> more deadly than sarin gas) >>>> >>>> Over 1,000 radioactive materials in powdered form meant for dispersal >>>> over populated areas >>>> >>>> Roadside bombs loaded with mustard and "conventional" sarin gas, >>>> assembled in binary chemical projectiles for maximum potency >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> What the UN have not done - stop the production of probably about >>> 1000 times the amount of such stuff elsewhere in the world. >>> >>> What the U.N. have fundamentally done is dethrown a maniac - had they >>> have stated that as their primary or even only objective then all this >>> bullshit would have been avoided. That's what they get for being full of >>> shit! >> uh, the UN had nothing to do with it. The US on the other hand, went it >> alone with the help of a couple of countries. > > Alone.....with others?? > >
You know what I meant. :) realised after I hit the send button, but unfortunately can't edit these posts.... cheers steve
"Steve Whitty" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:HPbjf.7304$[email hidden]...
Quoted text (59 lines)> > "JTB" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:[email hidden]... >> >> "Steve Whitty" <[email hidden]> wrote in message >> news:uUwif.5534$[email hidden]... >>> >>> "Byron Forbes" <[email hidden]> wrote in message >>> news:438a5c9a$0$13318$[email hidden]... >>>> >>>> "Ed Medlin" <[email hidden]> wrote in message >>>> news:Wdkif.2358$Y%[email hidden]... >>>>> >>>>> "fredrickson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message >>>>> news:mh4if.15903$[email hidden]... >>>>>> anyone? >>>>>> >>>>>> how many more americans are you willing to kill over there ? >>>>> >>>>> What we HAVE found.......Not a lot, but against the UN >>>>> mandates,........... >>>>> >>>>> 1.77 metric tons of enriched uranium >>>>> >>>>> 1,500 gallons of chemical weapons agents >>>>> >>>>> 17 chemical warheads containing cyclosarin (a nerve agent five times >>>>> more deadly than sarin gas) >>>>> >>>>> Over 1,000 radioactive materials in powdered form meant for dispersal >>>>> over populated areas >>>>> >>>>> Roadside bombs loaded with mustard and "conventional" sarin gas, >>>>> assembled in binary chemical projectiles for maximum potency >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> What the UN have not done - stop the production of probably about >>>> 1000 times the amount of such stuff elsewhere in the world. >>>> >>>> What the U.N. have fundamentally done is dethrown a maniac - had >>>> they have stated that as their primary or even only objective then all >>>> this bullshit would have been avoided. That's what they get for being >>>> full of shit! >>> uh, the UN had nothing to do with it. The US on the other hand, went it >>> alone with the help of a couple of countries. >> >> Alone.....with others?? >> >> > You know what I meant. :) realised after I hit the send button, but > unfortunately can't edit these posts.... > > > cheers > > steve >
Sometimes I forget that the U.N. doesn't realise all they're sipposed to be is something for NATO to hide behind so that the world thinks it's run by.................the world. Bloody U.N. - give 'em an inch....................... As is plain to see though, if NATO (or more precisely - the U.S.) can't hide behind the U.N., it's a luxury they're happy to forego. :)

Sponsors

Affiliate Links

Sim Gaming Expo MOZA Racing Sim-Lab Fanatec TrakRacer Asetek Internet Privacy From NordVPN Dreamhost Capital One Credit Card Application Fanatical CDKeys Amazon Amazon UK Project Motor Racing iRacing Get your racing gloves, boots and more from Demon Tweeks. Enlist at Roberts Space Industries, developers of Star Citizen and Squadron 42


Back from the ashes since July, 2019. First created in 2001 with the merger of Legends Central (founded 1999) and simracing.dk.

A site by a sort of sim racer, for sim racers, about racing sims. News and information on both modern and historic sim racing software titles.

All products and licenses property of their respective owners.


Facebook Threads Bluesky Twitter Mastodon Instagram YouTube Tiktok Twitch Reddit Google News Apple News Subscribe via WordPress Flipboard eBay

Race Sim Central © 1999-2026 | Some links pay RSC a commission. Advertising does not equal endorsement.Cookie Policy