anyone?
how many more americans are you willing to kill over there ?
troll alert
"fredrickson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:mh4if.15903$[email hidden]...
anyone?
how many more americans are you willing to kill over there ?
troll alert
anyone?
how many more americans are you willing to kill over there ?
B Wegner wrote:
LOL...They were moved to Syria and Iran.When we invade those two
countries,we'll find they were moved back to Iraq..LOL
Quoted text (7 lines)
> troll alert > > "fredrickson" <[email hidden] <mailto:[email hidden]>> wrote in message > news:mh4if.15903$[email hidden]... > anyone? > > how many more americans are you willing to kill over there ?
"fredrickson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:mh4if.15903$[email hidden]...
> anyone?
>
> how many more americans are you willing to kill over there ?
What we HAVE found.......Not a lot, but against the UN mandates,...........
1.77 metric tons of enriched uranium
1,500 gallons of chemical weapons agents
17 chemical warheads containing cyclosarin (a nerve agent five times more
deadly than sarin gas)
Over 1,000 radioactive materials in powdered form meant for dispersal over
populated areas
Roadside bombs loaded with mustard and "conventional" sarin gas, assembled
in binary chemical projectiles for maximum potency
Naw Ed, can't be...
If it were true then CNN or CBS would have told me so...
Repeat after me, Bush lied and were in a war that cannot be won....
Cindy Sheehan is the real story not the War.......
Mitch
"Ed Medlin" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:Wdkif.2358$Y%>
"fredrickson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
Quoted text (23 lines)
> news:mh4if.15903$[email hidden]... >> anyone? >> >> how many more americans are you willing to kill over there ? > > What we HAVE found.......Not a lot, but against the UN > mandates,........... > > 1.77 metric tons of enriched uranium > > 1,500 gallons of chemical weapons agents > > 17 chemical warheads containing cyclosarin (a nerve agent five times more > deadly than sarin gas) > > Over 1,000 radioactive materials in powdered form meant for dispersal over > populated areas > > Roadside bombs loaded with mustard and "conventional" sarin gas, assembled > in binary chemical projectiles for maximum potency > > >
"Ed Medlin" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:Wdkif.2358$Y%[email hidden]...
What the UN have not done - stop the production of probably about 1000
times the amount of such stuff elsewhere in the world.
What the U.N. have fundamentally done is dethrown a maniac - had they
have stated that as their primary or even only objective then all this
bullshit would have been avoided. That's what they get for being full of
shit!
Quoted text (25 lines)
> > "fredrickson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:mh4if.15903$[email hidden]... >> anyone? >> >> how many more americans are you willing to kill over there ? > > What we HAVE found.......Not a lot, but against the UN > mandates,........... > > 1.77 metric tons of enriched uranium > > 1,500 gallons of chemical weapons agents > > 17 chemical warheads containing cyclosarin (a nerve agent five times more > deadly than sarin gas) > > Over 1,000 radioactive materials in powdered form meant for dispersal over > populated areas > > Roadside bombs loaded with mustard and "conventional" sarin gas, assembled > in binary chemical projectiles for maximum potency > > >
"Byron Forbes" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:438a5c9a$0$13318$[email hidden]...
uh, the UN had nothing to do with it. The US on the other hand, went it
alone with the help of a couple of countries.
steve
Quoted text (36 lines)
> > "Ed Medlin" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:Wdkif.2358$Y%[email hidden]... >> >> "fredrickson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message >> news:mh4if.15903$[email hidden]... >>> anyone? >>> >>> how many more americans are you willing to kill over there ? >> >> What we HAVE found.......Not a lot, but against the UN >> mandates,........... >> >> 1.77 metric tons of enriched uranium >> >> 1,500 gallons of chemical weapons agents >> >> 17 chemical warheads containing cyclosarin (a nerve agent five times more >> deadly than sarin gas) >> >> Over 1,000 radioactive materials in powdered form meant for dispersal >> over populated areas >> >> Roadside bombs loaded with mustard and "conventional" sarin gas, >> assembled in binary chemical projectiles for maximum potency >> >> >> > > What the UN have not done - stop the production of probably about 1000 > times the amount of such stuff elsewhere in the world. > > What the U.N. have fundamentally done is dethrown a maniac - had they > have stated that as their primary or even only objective then all this > bullshit would have been avoided. That's what they get for being full of > shit!On Sun, 27 Nov 2005 15:25:42 GMT, Ed Medlin wrote:
>
> Roadside bombs loaded with mustard and "conventional" sarin gas
eeeeww, why the mustard???? If it wasn't for the sarin gas in there, I'd
understand the comical aspect, but what do they dip their sausages into
down there? Babarians.
Cheers, uwe
--
GPG Fingerprint: 2E 13 20 22 9A 3F 63 7F 67 6F E9 B1 A8 36 A4 61
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 05:50:18 GMT, "Steve Whitty" <[email hidden]>
wrote:
UN, US, Simbin, ISI... They're all the same thing aren't they? :)
You're off your trolley! :)
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
Quoted text (43 lines)
> >"Byron Forbes" <[email hidden]> wrote in message >news:438a5c9a$0$13318$[email hidden]... >> >> "Ed Medlin" <[email hidden]> wrote in message >> news:Wdkif.2358$Y%[email hidden]... >>> >>> "fredrickson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message >>> news:mh4if.15903$[email hidden]... >>>> anyone? >>>> >>>> how many more americans are you willing to kill over there ? >>> >>> What we HAVE found.......Not a lot, but against the UN >>> mandates,........... >>> >>> 1.77 metric tons of enriched uranium >>> >>> 1,500 gallons of chemical weapons agents >>> >>> 17 chemical warheads containing cyclosarin (a nerve agent five times more >>> deadly than sarin gas) >>> >>> Over 1,000 radioactive materials in powdered form meant for dispersal >>> over populated areas >>> >>> Roadside bombs loaded with mustard and "conventional" sarin gas, >>> assembled in binary chemical projectiles for maximum potency >>> >>> >>> >> >> What the UN have not done - stop the production of probably about 1000 >> times the amount of such stuff elsewhere in the world. >> >> What the U.N. have fundamentally done is dethrown a maniac - had they >> have stated that as their primary or even only objective then all this >> bullshit would have been avoided. That's what they get for being full of >> shit! > >uh, the UN had nothing to do with it. The US on the other hand, went it >alone with the help of a couple of countries. >
"Jeff Vincent" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
LOL.
Quoted text (53 lines)
> On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 05:50:18 GMT, "Steve Whitty" <[email hidden]> > wrote: > >> >>"Byron Forbes" <[email hidden]> wrote in message >>news:438a5c9a$0$13318$[email hidden]... >>> >>> "Ed Medlin" <[email hidden]> wrote in message >>> news:Wdkif.2358$Y%[email hidden]... >>>> >>>> "fredrickson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message >>>> news:mh4if.15903$[email hidden]... >>>>> anyone? >>>>> >>>>> how many more americans are you willing to kill over there ? >>>> >>>> What we HAVE found.......Not a lot, but against the UN >>>> mandates,........... >>>> >>>> 1.77 metric tons of enriched uranium >>>> >>>> 1,500 gallons of chemical weapons agents >>>> >>>> 17 chemical warheads containing cyclosarin (a nerve agent five times >>>> more >>>> deadly than sarin gas) >>>> >>>> Over 1,000 radioactive materials in powdered form meant for dispersal >>>> over populated areas >>>> >>>> Roadside bombs loaded with mustard and "conventional" sarin gas, >>>> assembled in binary chemical projectiles for maximum potency >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> What the UN have not done - stop the production of probably about >>> 1000 >>> times the amount of such stuff elsewhere in the world. >>> >>> What the U.N. have fundamentally done is dethrown a maniac - had they >>> have stated that as their primary or even only objective then all this >>> bullshit would have been avoided. That's what they get for being full of >>> shit! >> >>uh, the UN had nothing to do with it. The US on the other hand, went it >>alone with the help of a couple of countries. >> > > UN, US, Simbin, ISI... They're all the same thing aren't they? :) > > You're off your trolley! :) >
"Steve Whitty" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:uUwif.5534$[email hidden]...
Alone.....with others??
Quoted text (41 lines)
> > "Byron Forbes" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:438a5c9a$0$13318$[email hidden]... >> >> "Ed Medlin" <[email hidden]> wrote in message >> news:Wdkif.2358$Y%[email hidden]... >>> >>> "fredrickson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message >>> news:mh4if.15903$[email hidden]... >>>> anyone? >>>> >>>> how many more americans are you willing to kill over there ? >>> >>> What we HAVE found.......Not a lot, but against the UN >>> mandates,........... >>> >>> 1.77 metric tons of enriched uranium >>> >>> 1,500 gallons of chemical weapons agents >>> >>> 17 chemical warheads containing cyclosarin (a nerve agent five times >>> more deadly than sarin gas) >>> >>> Over 1,000 radioactive materials in powdered form meant for dispersal >>> over populated areas >>> >>> Roadside bombs loaded with mustard and "conventional" sarin gas, >>> assembled in binary chemical projectiles for maximum potency >>> >>> >>> >> >> What the UN have not done - stop the production of probably about 1000 >> times the amount of such stuff elsewhere in the world. >> >> What the U.N. have fundamentally done is dethrown a maniac - had they >> have stated that as their primary or even only objective then all this >> bullshit would have been avoided. That's what they get for being full of >> shit! > uh, the UN had nothing to do with it. The US on the other hand, went it > alone with the help of a couple of countries.
"JTB" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
You know what I meant. :) realised after I hit the send button, but
unfortunately can't edit these posts....
cheers
steve
Quoted text (48 lines)
> > "Steve Whitty" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:uUwif.5534$[email hidden]... >> >> "Byron Forbes" <[email hidden]> wrote in message >> news:438a5c9a$0$13318$[email hidden]... >>> >>> "Ed Medlin" <[email hidden]> wrote in message >>> news:Wdkif.2358$Y%[email hidden]... >>>> >>>> "fredrickson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message >>>> news:mh4if.15903$[email hidden]... >>>>> anyone? >>>>> >>>>> how many more americans are you willing to kill over there ? >>>> >>>> What we HAVE found.......Not a lot, but against the UN >>>> mandates,........... >>>> >>>> 1.77 metric tons of enriched uranium >>>> >>>> 1,500 gallons of chemical weapons agents >>>> >>>> 17 chemical warheads containing cyclosarin (a nerve agent five times >>>> more deadly than sarin gas) >>>> >>>> Over 1,000 radioactive materials in powdered form meant for dispersal >>>> over populated areas >>>> >>>> Roadside bombs loaded with mustard and "conventional" sarin gas, >>>> assembled in binary chemical projectiles for maximum potency >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> What the UN have not done - stop the production of probably about >>> 1000 times the amount of such stuff elsewhere in the world. >>> >>> What the U.N. have fundamentally done is dethrown a maniac - had they >>> have stated that as their primary or even only objective then all this >>> bullshit would have been avoided. That's what they get for being full of >>> shit! >> uh, the UN had nothing to do with it. The US on the other hand, went it >> alone with the help of a couple of countries. > > Alone.....with others?? > >
"Steve Whitty" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:HPbjf.7304$[email hidden]...
Sometimes I forget that the U.N. doesn't realise all they're sipposed to
be is something for NATO to hide behind so that the world thinks it's run
by.................the world. Bloody U.N. - give 'em an
inch....................... As is plain to see though, if NATO (or more
precisely - the U.S.) can't hide behind the U.N., it's a luxury they're
happy to forego. :)


































