OK, I know I'm too competitive for my own good, but
what is the fastest lap time right now? I'm DL'ing
the track right now.
--
Pat Dotson
Quoted text (9 lines)
> There was another post awhile ago telling how > to decrease the tire wear. Honestly, I think > I like it the way it is. The tires don't wear > quickly unless you skid. I have a feeling that > tire wear at this track is closer to reality > than the stock N4 tire wear settings. If > oval tire wear was set like this, you'd see > a much different driving style. I think it > would be a more realistic driving style.OK I'll start. 1:43.7, but I was heel-toeing all
the way! :) It was a pretty good lap, but I
screwed up in the Gulch and Bridge turns. 1:43
flat shouldn't be a problem. BTW, it wasn't
the stock setup. It was a modified <fast> setup.
Interestingly, that one lap used up about 10% of
the tires.
There was another post awhile ago telling how
to decrease the tire wear. Honestly, I think
I like it the way it is. The tires don't wear
quickly unless you skid. I have a feeling that
tire wear at this track is closer to reality
than the stock N4 tire wear settings. If
oval tire wear was set like this, you'd see
a much different driving style. I think it
would be a more realistic driving style.
--
Pat Dotson
Pat Dotson wrote:
>
> OK, I know I'm too competitive for my own good, but
> what is the fastest lap time right now? I'm DL'ing
> the track right now.
>
> --
> Pat Dotson
Jan,
Just guessing, if I really lean on the tires, they would be
gone in 10 laps. That is with a lot of skidding/sliding,
like most hotlaps are done. I'll try it real quick to
confirm and get back to you.
I think it would be relevant to know what a realistic
lap time for one of these cars would be at this track
in real life. I'd like to try running that lap time
consistently and see what the wear does.
As far as Glen and Sears, seems like you could go through
a whole tank of gas pretty easily if you aren't pushing
it.
--
Pat Dotson
Jan Kohl wrote:
>
> > There was another post awhile ago telling how
> > to decrease the tire wear. Honestly, I think
> > I like it the way it is. The tires don't wear
> > quickly unless you skid. I have a feeling that
> > tire wear at this track is closer to reality
> > than the stock N4 tire wear settings. If
> > oval tire wear was set like this, you'd see
> > a much different driving style. I think it
> > would be a more realistic driving style.
>
> Interesting, Pat...if you get a chance, could you run enough laps to burn
> the
> tires right off the car and tell me how many laps that was? The tire wear
> is
> much higher than normal (to reflect future N4 road-course modifications),
> but if you think it's more realistic, I'd like to see how well it does...for
> example,
> how many laps at Sears/Glen do you get b4 the tires fall off the car?
>
> Cheers!
>
> Jan Kohl
> The Pits - 6 years and counting
> http://www.theuspits.com
Hi Pat,
tirewear at St. Jovite is way off. About 5 times what it should be.
You may wish to change the track_tire_wear parameter in the track's
track.ini to something between 0.90 and 1.0. It's currently set to 4.5,
which is wrong.
A good racelap is probably a 1.40, an excellent one a high 1:39. Qual laps I
don't know, haven't tried qual engine.
Achim
Hi Jan,
don't believe him ;-)
Tires start getting weaker even during outlap - you won't even have full
grip on the first timed lap. You can easily try and set track_tire_wear to
1. Your first hotlap (where normally there should hardly have been any
tirewear yet) will be faster than in the original setting, indicating that
in the original setting even on a moderately driven outlap you burn tire.
Driving the 1:43 laptimes Pat suggests, the tires will indeed be gone in
less than 10 laps, and that's certainly not realistic. If I remember this
correctly, at Sears I can do around 18 fast racelaps before the tires go
yellow and/or need to be changed. Track_tire_wear at Sears is 0.95. I'd go
for a value of 1.0 for this value :-)
Achim
"Jan Kohl" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:IZjM7.57781$[email hidden]...
does...for
Quoted text (16 lines)
> > There was another post awhile ago telling how > > to decrease the tire wear. Honestly, I think > > I like it the way it is. The tires don't wear > > quickly unless you skid. I have a feeling that > > tire wear at this track is closer to reality > > than the stock N4 tire wear settings. If > > oval tire wear was set like this, you'd see > > a much different driving style. I think it > > would be a more realistic driving style. > > Interesting, Pat...if you get a chance, could you run enough laps to burn > the > tires right off the car and tell me how many laps that was? The tire wear > is > much higher than normal (to reflect future N4 road-course modifications), > but if you think it's more realistic, I'd like to see how well itQuoted text (10 lines)
> example, > how many laps at Sears/Glen do you get b4 the tires fall off the car? > > Cheers! > > Jan Kohl > The Pits - 6 years and counting > http://www.theuspits.com > >Joachim Trensz wrote:
>
> don't believe him ;-)
>
> Tires start getting weaker even during outlap - you won't even have full
Yes. The tires wear is greatly exaggerated. I still think
it should be higher than what it typically is in N4.
Should you really be able to hotlap the way we do without
wearing out the tires in 10 laps or more?
What I thought was cool about how much tire wear there is
at St. Jovite is that when you spin or slide sideways
for a long time, the tires are basically shot. With
normal N4 tire wear you could just keep going without
much effect.
Maybe N4 needs a steeper curve between slides within
reasonable slip angles, and slides at greater slip angles.
--
Pat Dotson
I can do around 20 laps on a set of tires with the current settings. That is
doing lap times around 1:45. I could do 1:42 or 1:43's for about 4 laps and
then the tire would be junk.
I also like the current settings. It gets us out of the hotlapper mentality.
It is almost like a endurance race now - who is quickest, smoothest and
easiest on equipment and tires.
"Jan Kohl" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:IZjM7.57781$[email hidden]...
does...for
Quoted text (16 lines)
> > There was another post awhile ago telling how > > to decrease the tire wear. Honestly, I think > > I like it the way it is. The tires don't wear > > quickly unless you skid. I have a feeling that > > tire wear at this track is closer to reality > > than the stock N4 tire wear settings. If > > oval tire wear was set like this, you'd see > > a much different driving style. I think it > > would be a more realistic driving style. > > Interesting, Pat...if you get a chance, could you run enough laps to burn > the > tires right off the car and tell me how many laps that was? The tire wear > is > much higher than normal (to reflect future N4 road-course modifications), > but if you think it's more realistic, I'd like to see how well itQuoted text (10 lines)
> example, > how many laps at Sears/Glen do you get b4 the tires fall off the car? > > Cheers! > > Jan Kohl > The Pits - 6 years and counting > http://www.theuspits.com > >Hi Pat,
I agree that N4 doesn't perfectly calculate _all_ parameters which affect
tirewear. But IMHO, overall it's a good compromise. I can clearly feel the
tires become more slippery at Watkins Glen or Sears every two or three laps
laps, although I give high priority to smooth driving.
Maybe locked brakes and hard slides don't have the effect they should have
(especially since you don't get a pad (correct term?) in the tire), but I
think trying to introduce this through increased general tirewear would
reduce overall realism WRT tirewear and race strategies.
Achim
"Pat Dotson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted text (21 lines)
> Joachim Trensz wrote: > > > > don't believe him ;-) > > > > Tires start getting weaker even during outlap - you won't even have full > > Yes. The tires wear is greatly exaggerated. I still think > it should be higher than what it typically is in N4. > Should you really be able to hotlap the way we do without > wearing out the tires in 10 laps or more? > > What I thought was cool about how much tire wear there is > at St. Jovite is that when you spin or slide sideways > for a long time, the tires are basically shot. With > normal N4 tire wear you could just keep going without > much effect. > > Maybe N4 needs a steeper curve between slides within > reasonable slip angles, and slides at greater slip angles. > -- > Pat DotsonHi Alan,
hotlapping mentality never works in N4, as tirewear _always_ is an issue.
Those who preserve the tires better always will have an advantage, unless
you set the race distance to a very low value. Everything above 5 laps at
St. Jovite will already make tires an issue (at fast speeds) even if you set
the tirewear parameter as I suggest it (and what the other N4 roadtracks are
set to).
With St. Jovite's original setting, tirewear becomes an issue on lap 2 even
when you drive cleanly. IMO, good grip should be there for one or two fast
laps. At St. Jovite's original settings, in Qualifying you have less grip on
the first timed lap than you have on the outlap, if you drive the outlap in
a way that brings the tires up to any raceworthy temperature.
Maybe overall tirewear in N4 doesn't take into account some parameters in
the way it should take them into account, I don't know that, but I think St.
Jovite with tirewear set to between 0.90 and 1.00 will be a realistic
racetrack allowing for realistic strategies and driving.
Achim
"Alan Orton" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:yuFM7.12076$[email hidden]...
> I can do around 20 laps on a set of tires with the current settings. Thatis
> doing lap times around 1:45. I could do 1:42 or 1:43's for about 4 lapsand
> then the tire would be junk.
>
> I also like the current settings. It gets us out of the hotlappermentality.
burn
> > the
> > tires right off the car and tell me how many laps that was? The tirewear
> > is
> > much higher than normal (to reflect future N4 road-coursemodifications),
Quoted text (16 lines)
> It is almost like a endurance race now - who is quickest, smoothest and > easiest on equipment and tires. > > "Jan Kohl" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:IZjM7.57781$[email hidden]... > > > There was another post awhile ago telling how > > > to decrease the tire wear. Honestly, I think > > > I like it the way it is. The tires don't wear > > > quickly unless you skid. I have a feeling that > > > tire wear at this track is closer to reality > > > than the stock N4 tire wear settings. If > > > oval tire wear was set like this, you'd see > > > a much different driving style. I think it > > > would be a more realistic driving style. > > > > Interesting, Pat...if you get a chance, could you run enough laps toQuoted text (14 lines)
> > but if you think it's more realistic, I'd like to see how well it > does...for > > example, > > how many laps at Sears/Glen do you get b4 the tires fall off the car? > > > > Cheers! > > > > Jan Kohl > > The Pits - 6 years and counting > > http://www.theuspits.com > > > > > >
"Joachim Trensz"
>
> Maybe locked brakes and hard slides don't have the effect they should have
> (especially since you don't get a pad (correct term?) I believe we Yanks refer to that as a 'Flat Spot' i.e. "he
flat-spotted the tars."
dave henrie
In article <[email hidden]>, Pat Dotson
<[email hidden]> writes:
>As far as Glen and Sears, seems like you could go through
>a whole tank of gas pretty easily if you aren't pushing
>it.
>
Geez - I can't get through a whole tank at *Talladega*...<g>
Eldred
--
Dale Earnhardt, Sr. R.I.P. 1951-2001
Homepage - http://www.umich.edu/~epickett
GPLRank - under construction...
Never argue with an idiot. He brings you down to his level, then beats you
with experience...
Remove SPAM-OFF to reply.
In article <yuFM7.12076$[email hidden]>, "Alan Orton"
<[email hidden]> writes:
>I also like the current settings. It gets us out of the hotlapper mentality.
>It is almost like a endurance race now - who is quickest, smoothest and
>easiest on equipment and tires.
This from a guy who's quicker in F2's(honda, yet) than a lot of people in
F1's...<g>
Eldred
--
Dale Earnhardt, Sr. R.I.P. 1951-2001
Homepage - http://www.umich.edu/~epickett
GPLRank - under construction...
Never argue with an idiot. He brings you down to his level, then beats you
with experience...
Remove SPAM-OFF to reply.
Thanks for the info Dave
Achim
"Dave Henrie" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:N7RM7.85345$[email hidden]...
>
> "Joachim Trensz"
> >
> > Maybe locked brakes and hard slides don't have the effect they shouldhave
> > (especially since you don't get a pad (correct term?)
> I believe we Yanks refer to that as a 'Flat Spot' i.e. "he
> flat-spotted the tars."
> dave henrie
>
>
On Mon, 26 Nov 2001 07:42:57 +0100, "Joachim Trensz"
<[email hidden]> wrote:
Hey, Where are you guys finding the tire wear? My StJovite shows no
tire wear in the track ini.
Sam
Quoted text (13 lines)
>Hi Pat, > >tirewear at St. Jovite is way off. About 5 times what it should be. > >You may wish to change the track_tire_wear parameter in the track's >track.ini to something between 0.90 and 1.0. It's currently set to 4.5, >which is wrong. > >A good racelap is probably a 1.40, an excellent one a high 1:39. Qual laps I >don't know, haven't tried qual engine. > >Achim >Hi Sam,
the parameter's name is track_tire_wear, it's in the [track] section of the
track.ini
Achim
"Samuel Senior" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
laps I
Quoted text (12 lines)
> On Mon, 26 Nov 2001 07:42:57 +0100, "Joachim Trensz" > <[email hidden]> wrote: > > >Hi Pat, > > > >tirewear at St. Jovite is way off. About 5 times what it should be. > > > >You may wish to change the track_tire_wear parameter in the track's > >track.ini to something between 0.90 and 1.0. It's currently set to 4.5, > >which is wrong. > > > >A good racelap is probably a 1.40, an excellent one a high 1:39. QualQuoted text (8 lines)
> >don't know, haven't tried qual engine. > > > >Achim > > > Hey, Where are you guys finding the tire wear? My StJovite shows no > tire wear in the track ini. > Sam >On Thu, 29 Nov 2001 00:30:41 +0100, "Joachim Trensz"
<[email hidden]> wrote:
>Hi Sam,
>
>the parameter's name is track_tire_wear, it's in the [track] section of the
>track.ini
>
>AchimAchim,
My track ini track section reads as follows:
[ track ]
track_name = St-Jovite
track_name_short = St-Jovite
track_num_turns = 15
track_length = 2.650m
track_altitude = 230.0
; Above, note track length given in miles,
; while altitude given in meters.
Can I just tyoe in a line somewhere? Apparently my download of this
track was incomplete, as I had to add on covers later, also. Thanx.
Sam
Joachim is talking N4...
"Samuel Senior" <[email hidden]> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:[email hidden]...
> On Thu, 29 Nov 2001 00:30:41 +0100, "Joachim Trensz"
> <[email hidden]> wrote:
>
> >Hi Sam,
> >
> >the parameter's name is track_tire_wear, it's in the [track] section ofthe


































