NR2002 P4 1.9, G3 TI 500 FPS very bad, 14-20

I am only getting between 15-20 fps with this system. I pray they put Opengl back in this. It does not matter if I run 16 bit or 32 bit with or without antriscopic filtering nothing seem so effect it. So I run it at 1600x1200x32, no AA, avg. 17fps. As I said even if I go down it does not change anything. The sound is worth $50.00 bucks to me, and I love all the other changes, but please put opengl back in or optimize the D3D some more before you put it out. P4 1.9ghz 384 PC800 RDDRAM Hercules Ti500 Geforce 3 , 23.11 drivers. Sounblaster Audigy Platinum EX. Logitech Momo wheel Actlabs Performace Pedals.

I am having the same problems. System: Win XP Pro GF3 22.80 drivers P4 1.5 gig 512 RAMBUSS Sblive! Act Labs Force RS wheel and pedal upgrade. The old N4 runs super smooth on my system even in traffic under OpenGL with Quincunx FSAA enabled. "Morris Jones" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...

Quoted text (7 lines)

> I am only getting between 15-20 fps with this system. > I pray they put Opengl back in this. It does not matter if I run 16 bit or > 32 bit > with or without antriscopic filtering nothing seem so effect it. > So I run it at 1600x1200x32, no AA, avg. 17fps. > As I said even if I go down it does not change anything. > The sound is worth $50.00 bucks to me, and I love all the other changes,

but

Quoted text (13 lines)

> please put opengl back in or optimize the D3D some more before you put it > out. > > P4 1.9ghz > 384 PC800 RDDRAM > Hercules Ti500 Geforce 3 , 23.11 drivers. > Sounblaster Audigy Platinum EX. > Logitech Momo wheel > Actlabs Performace Pedals. > > > >

On Sun, 30 Dec 2001 15:49:33 -0600, "Morris Jones" <[email hidden]> wrote:

Quoted text (19 lines)

>I am only getting between 15-20 fps with this system. >I pray they put Opengl back in this. It does not matter if I run 16 bit or >32 bit >with or without antriscopic filtering nothing seem so effect it. >So I run it at 1600x1200x32, no AA, avg. 17fps. >As I said even if I go down it does not change anything. >The sound is worth $50.00 bucks to me, and I love all the other changes, but >please put opengl back in or optimize the D3D some more before you put it >out. > >P4 1.9ghz >384 PC800 RDDRAM >Hercules Ti500 Geforce 3 , 23.11 drivers. >Sounblaster Audigy Platinum EX. >Logitech Momo wheel >Actlabs Performace Pedals. > > >

Try running it in a window. Fullscreen my framerate stayed around 20. Windowed my framerate goes from 40-60

The selection for a window is not available, how did you do that ?? Bye Coco Floppy wrote:

Quoted text (28 lines)

> On Sun, 30 Dec 2001 15:49:33 -0600, "Morris Jones" > <[email hidden]> wrote: > > >I am only getting between 15-20 fps with this system. > >I pray they put Opengl back in this. It does not matter if I run 16 bit or > >32 bit > >with or without antriscopic filtering nothing seem so effect it. > >So I run it at 1600x1200x32, no AA, avg. 17fps. > >As I said even if I go down it does not change anything. > >The sound is worth $50.00 bucks to me, and I love all the other changes, but > >please put opengl back in or optimize the D3D some more before you put it > >out. > > > >P4 1.9ghz > >384 PC800 RDDRAM > >Hercules Ti500 Geforce 3 , 23.11 drivers. > >Sounblaster Audigy Platinum EX. > >Logitech Momo wheel > >Actlabs Performace Pedals. > > > > > > > > Try running it in a window. > > Fullscreen my framerate stayed around 20. > > Windowed my framerate goes from 40-60

You guys running "fast" systems with a GF3 card, but getting bad FPS in N-2002, should run 3DMark2001 (without making any changes to your settings you're using for N-2002). If you get scores under about 6,000....then the problem is your system settings, not N-2002 D3D rasterizer. TP "Morris Jones" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...

Quoted text (7 lines)

> I am only getting between 15-20 fps with this system. > I pray they put Opengl back in this. It does not matter if I run 16 bit or > 32 bit > with or without antriscopic filtering nothing seem so effect it. > So I run it at 1600x1200x32, no AA, avg. 17fps. > As I said even if I go down it does not change anything. > The sound is worth $50.00 bucks to me, and I love all the other changes,

but

Quoted text (13 lines)

> please put opengl back in or optimize the D3D some more before you put it > out. > > P4 1.9ghz > 384 PC800 RDDRAM > Hercules Ti500 Geforce 3 , 23.11 drivers. > Sounblaster Audigy Platinum EX. > Logitech Momo wheel > Actlabs Performace Pedals. > > > >

That is hardly correct I get 3DMark 2001 scores of about 5800 with a GF2 Ti200 card (which is about average for that card) I get great frame rates in N2002 Do not act like anyone that gets under 6000 should expect bad frame rates. More "I know it all" rubbish from Tom. "Tom Pabst" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:AcRX7.19041$NE5.120105@rwcrnsc53...

Quoted text (12 lines)

> You guys running "fast" systems with a GF3 card, but getting bad FPS in > N-2002, should run 3DMark2001 (without making any changes to your settings > you're using for N-2002). If you get scores under about 6,000....then the > problem is your system settings, not N-2002 D3D rasterizer. > > TP > > > "Morris Jones" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:[email hidden]... > > I am only getting between 15-20 fps with this system. > > I pray they put Opengl back in this. It does not matter if I run 16 bit

or

Quoted text (7 lines)

> > 32 bit > > with or without antriscopic filtering nothing seem so effect it. > > So I run it at 1600x1200x32, no AA, avg. 17fps. > > As I said even if I go down it does not change anything. > > The sound is worth $50.00 bucks to me, and I love all the other changes, > but > > please put opengl back in or optimize the D3D some more before you put

it

Quoted text (14 lines)

> > out. > > > > P4 1.9ghz > > 384 PC800 RDDRAM > > Hercules Ti500 Geforce 3 , 23.11 drivers. > > Sounblaster Audigy Platinum EX. > > Logitech Momo wheel > > Actlabs Performace Pedals. > > > > > > > > > >

I think the point he was trying to make was to compare their benchmarks in 32Mark2001 and see if they are getting low there as well, if so could by a system problem somewhere. My 3d mark is around 6700 on my Ti200, lot depends on the cpu as well I'm sure. One of the first things I do when I change any system settings is run 3dMark 2001 to see what happens after the change. Just the way I took it anyways, plus the subject was on a Ti500 which should get higher 3dmarks as well. Don Burnette "Cliff Roman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]... > That is hardly correct > > I get 3DMark 2001 scores of about 5800 with a GF2 Ti200 card (which isabout

Quoted text (13 lines)

> average for that card) > > I get great frame rates in N2002 > > Do not act like anyone that gets under 6000 should expect bad frame rates. > More "I know it all" rubbish from Tom. > > > > "Tom Pabst" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:AcRX7.19041$NE5.120105@rwcrnsc53... > > You guys running "fast" systems with a GF3 card, but getting bad FPS in > > N-2002, should run 3DMark2001 (without making any changes to your

settings > > you're using for N-2002). If you get scores under about 6,000....thenthe

Quoted text (9 lines)

> > problem is your system settings, not N-2002 D3D rasterizer. > > > > TP > > > > > > "Morris Jones" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > > news:[email hidden]... > > > I am only getting between 15-20 fps with this system. > > > I pray they put Opengl back in this. It does not matter if I run 16

bit > or > > > 32 bit > > > with or without antriscopic filtering nothing seem so effect it. > > > So I run it at 1600x1200x32, no AA, avg. 17fps. > > > As I said even if I go down it does not change anything. > > > The sound is worth $50.00 bucks to me, and I love all the otherchanges,

Quoted text (19 lines)

> > but > > > please put opengl back in or optimize the D3D some more before you put > it > > > out. > > > > > > P4 1.9ghz > > > 384 PC800 RDDRAM > > > Hercules Ti500 Geforce 3 , 23.11 drivers. > > > Sounblaster Audigy Platinum EX. > > > Logitech Momo wheel > > > Actlabs Performace Pedals. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

Coco wrote: > > The selection for a window is not available, how did you do that ?? > Click Start->Papyrus->NASCAR Racing 2002 Season Demo->Configure 3D Graphics. -- Fester

You are correct, I was being a little touchy here since I just got in a stupid argument with my wife. I apologize to Tom. Btw Don, what tweaker do you run for your Ti200 card? I am running a 1.4ghz machine here and a Ti200 card but I am only getting 5800 benchmarks. I have not used any tweak program yet "Don Burnette" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:_CRX7.9082$[email hidden]... > I think the point he was trying to make was to compare their benchmarks in > 32Mark2001 and see if they are getting low there as well, if so could by a > system problem somewhere. > My 3d mark is around 6700 on my Ti200, lot depends on the cpu as well I'm > sure. One of the first things I do when I change any system settings isrun > 3dMark 2001 to see what happens after the change. > > Just the way I took it anyways, plus the subject was on a Ti500 whichshould

Quoted text (17 lines)

> get higher 3dmarks as well. > > Don Burnette > > > > "Cliff Roman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:[email hidden]... > > That is hardly correct > > > > I get 3DMark 2001 scores of about 5800 with a GF2 Ti200 card (which is > about > > average for that card) > > > > I get great frame rates in N2002 > > > > Do not act like anyone that gets under 6000 should expect bad frame

rates.

Quoted text (7 lines)

> > More "I know it all" rubbish from Tom. > > > > > > > > "Tom Pabst" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > > news:AcRX7.19041$NE5.120105@rwcrnsc53... > > > You guys running "fast" systems with a GF3 card, but getting bad FPS

in

Quoted text (23 lines)

> > > N-2002, should run 3DMark2001 (without making any changes to your > settings > > > you're using for N-2002). If you get scores under about 6,000....then > the > > > problem is your system settings, not N-2002 D3D rasterizer. > > > > > > TP > > > > > > > > > "Morris Jones" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > > > news:[email hidden]... > > > > I am only getting between 15-20 fps with this system. > > > > I pray they put Opengl back in this. It does not matter if I run 16 > bit > > or > > > > 32 bit > > > > with or without antriscopic filtering nothing seem so effect it. > > > > So I run it at 1600x1200x32, no AA, avg. 17fps. > > > > As I said even if I go down it does not change anything. > > > > The sound is worth $50.00 bucks to me, and I love all the other > changes, > > > but > > > > please put opengl back in or optimize the D3D some more before you

put

Quoted text (19 lines)

> > it > > > > out. > > > > > > > > P4 1.9ghz > > > > 384 PC800 RDDRAM > > > > Hercules Ti500 Geforce 3 , 23.11 drivers. > > > > Sounblaster Audigy Platinum EX. > > > > Logitech Momo wheel > > > > Actlabs Performace Pedals. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

No problem, we all have those days. Yesterday was mine, had to replace the Eagle RS tires on my SHO - ouch - then my daughter got busted with her friend smoking in her friend's house bathroom. I really don't tweak that much Cliff, I do have GTU ( GeForce Tweak Utility) http://www.geforcetweak.com/ , which I guess gives me the additional tab in d3d to disable vsynch. I have not overclocked this car yet. If you want to see what my settings are at, take a look in alt.binaries.simulators.autos. I posted screenshots of my settings in there this morning. I am using the 23.11 Nvidia drivers. Don Burnette "Cliff Roman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]... > You are correct, I was being a little touchy here since I just got in a > stupid argument with my wife. > > I apologize to Tom. > > Btw Don, what tweaker do you run for your Ti200 card? I am running a1.4ghz > machine here and a Ti200 card but I am only getting 5800 benchmarks. Ihave > not used any tweak program yet > > > "Don Burnette" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:_CRX7.9082$[email hidden]... > > I think the point he was trying to make was to compare their benchmarksin > > 32Mark2001 and see if they are getting low there as well, if so could bya > > system problem somewhere. > > My 3d mark is around 6700 on my Ti200, lot depends on the cpu as wellI'm

Quoted text (35 lines)

> > sure. One of the first things I do when I change any system settings is > run > > 3dMark 2001 to see what happens after the change. > > > > Just the way I took it anyways, plus the subject was on a Ti500 which > should > > get higher 3dmarks as well. > > > > Don Burnette > > > > > > > > "Cliff Roman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > > news:[email hidden]... > > > That is hardly correct > > > > > > I get 3DMark 2001 scores of about 5800 with a GF2 Ti200 card (which is > > about > > > average for that card) > > > > > > I get great frame rates in N2002 > > > > > > Do not act like anyone that gets under 6000 should expect bad frame > rates. > > > More "I know it all" rubbish from Tom. > > > > > > > > > > > > "Tom Pabst" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > > > news:AcRX7.19041$NE5.120105@rwcrnsc53... > > > > You guys running "fast" systems with a GF3 card, but getting bad FPS > in > > > > N-2002, should run 3DMark2001 (without making any changes to your > > settings > > > > you're using for N-2002). If you get scores under about

6,000....then

Quoted text (10 lines)

> > the > > > > problem is your system settings, not N-2002 D3D rasterizer. > > > > > > > > TP > > > > > > > > > > > > "Morris Jones" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > > > > news:[email hidden]... > > > > > I am only getting between 15-20 fps with this system. > > > > > I pray they put Opengl back in this. It does not matter if I run

16

Quoted text (32 lines)

> > bit > > > or > > > > > 32 bit > > > > > with or without antriscopic filtering nothing seem so effect it. > > > > > So I run it at 1600x1200x32, no AA, avg. 17fps. > > > > > As I said even if I go down it does not change anything. > > > > > The sound is worth $50.00 bucks to me, and I love all the other > > changes, > > > > but > > > > > please put opengl back in or optimize the D3D some more before you > put > > > it > > > > > out. > > > > > > > > > > P4 1.9ghz > > > > > 384 PC800 RDDRAM > > > > > Hercules Ti500 Geforce 3 , 23.11 drivers. > > > > > Sounblaster Audigy Platinum EX. > > > > > Logitech Momo wheel > > > > > Actlabs Performace Pedals. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

You guys gonna start again :) -Larry "Cliff Roman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]... > That is hardly correct > > I get 3DMark 2001 scores of about 5800 with a GF2 Ti200 card (which isabout

Quoted text (13 lines)

> average for that card) > > I get great frame rates in N2002 > > Do not act like anyone that gets under 6000 should expect bad frame rates. > More "I know it all" rubbish from Tom. > > > > "Tom Pabst" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:AcRX7.19041$NE5.120105@rwcrnsc53... > > You guys running "fast" systems with a GF3 card, but getting bad FPS in > > N-2002, should run 3DMark2001 (without making any changes to your

settings > > you're using for N-2002). If you get scores under about 6,000....thenthe

Quoted text (9 lines)

> > problem is your system settings, not N-2002 D3D rasterizer. > > > > TP > > > > > > "Morris Jones" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > > news:[email hidden]... > > > I am only getting between 15-20 fps with this system. > > > I pray they put Opengl back in this. It does not matter if I run 16

bit > or > > > 32 bit > > > with or without antriscopic filtering nothing seem so effect it. > > > So I run it at 1600x1200x32, no AA, avg. 17fps. > > > As I said even if I go down it does not change anything. > > > The sound is worth $50.00 bucks to me, and I love all the otherchanges,

Quoted text (19 lines)

> > but > > > please put opengl back in or optimize the D3D some more before you put > it > > > out. > > > > > > P4 1.9ghz > > > 384 PC800 RDDRAM > > > Hercules Ti500 Geforce 3 , 23.11 drivers. > > > Sounblaster Audigy Platinum EX. > > > Logitech Momo wheel > > > Actlabs Performace Pedals. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

You guys gonna start again :) -Larry > That is hardly correct > I get 3DMark 2001 scores of about 5800 with a GF2 Ti200 card (which is about

Quoted text (12 lines)

> average for that card) > I get great frame rates in N2002 > Do not act like anyone that gets under 6000 should expect bad frame rates. > More "I know it all" rubbish from Tom. > > You guys running "fast" systems with a GF3 card, but getting bad FPS in > > N-2002, should run 3DMark2001 (without making any changes to your

settings > > you're using for N-2002). If you get scores under about 6,000....then the

Quoted text (9 lines)

> > problem is your system settings, not N-2002 D3D rasterizer. > > TP > > > I am only getting between 15-20 fps with this system. > > > I pray they put Opengl back in this. It does not matter if I run 16

bit > or > > > 32 bit > > > with or without antriscopic filtering nothing seem so effect it. > > > So I run it at 1600x1200x32, no AA, avg. 17fps. > > > As I said even if I go down it does not change anything. > > > The sound is worth $50.00 bucks to me, and I love all the other changes,

Quoted text (11 lines)

> > but > > > please put opengl back in or optimize the D3D some more before you put > it > > > out. > > > P4 1.9ghz > > > 384 PC800 RDDRAM > > > Hercules Ti500 Geforce 3 , 23.11 drivers. > > > Sounblaster Audigy Platinum EX. > > > Logitech Momo wheel > > > Actlabs Performace Pedals.

Hi guys, I am running an ECS K7S5A MB with 512 DDR Ram, Windows XP home, Athlon 1800XP CPU, GeForce 2 Ultra 64mb. In cockpit view sitting in the pits at Atlanta in N2002 I am getting 50fps with resloution set at 1200x1600x16.Something else has gotta be wrong Steve Paradise "Morris Jones" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted text (16 lines)

> I am only getting between 15-20 fps with this system. > I pray they put Opengl back in this. It does not matter if I run 16 bit or > 32 bit > with or without antriscopic filtering nothing seem so effect it. > So I run it at 1600x1200x32, no AA, avg. 17fps. > As I said even if I go down it does not change anything. > The sound is worth $50.00 bucks to me, and I love all the other changes, but > please put opengl back in or optimize the D3D some more before you put it > out. > > P4 1.9ghz > 384 PC800 RDDRAM > Hercules Ti500 Geforce 3 , 23.11 drivers. > Sounblaster Audigy Platinum EX. > Logitech Momo wheel > Actlabs Performace Pedals.

P4 1.4 396m Rambus, GF2U. although I'm only running 1280x960x16 (way better looking than 1024x768) I am getting 40-70 fps. [40fps back of field] I dont like the 23.11 drivers (require detonator destroyer). Im using the 21.81/.84's (Mirror doesnt work w/ the 21.84's for me) Charlie "StP" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...

Quoted text (16 lines)

> Hi guys, > I am running an ECS K7S5A MB with 512 DDR Ram, Windows XP home, > Athlon 1800XP CPU, GeForce 2 Ultra 64mb. In cockpit view sitting in > the pits at Atlanta in N2002 I am getting 50fps with resloution set at > 1200x1600x16.Something else has gotta be wrong > Steve Paradise > > > > > > > > > > "Morris Jones" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

news:<[email hidden]>... > > I am only getting between 15-20 fps with this system. > > I pray they put Opengl back in this. It does not matter if I run 16 bitor > > 32 bit > > with or without antriscopic filtering nothing seem so effect it. > > So I run it at 1600x1200x32, no AA, avg. 17fps. > > As I said even if I go down it does not change anything. > > The sound is worth $50.00 bucks to me, and I love all the other changes,but > > please put opengl back in or optimize the D3D some more before you putit

Quoted text (9 lines)

> > out. > > > > P4 1.9ghz > > 384 PC800 RDDRAM > > Hercules Ti500 Geforce 3 , 23.11 drivers. > > Sounblaster Audigy Platinum EX. > > Logitech Momo wheel > > Actlabs Performace Pedals. >

In article <[email hidden]>, "Cliff Roman" <[email hidden]> writes:

Quoted text (8 lines)

>You are correct, I was being a little touchy here since I just got in a >stupid argument with my wife. > >I apologize to Tom. > >Btw Don, what tweaker do you run for your Ti200 card? I am running a 1.4ghz >machine here and a Ti200 card but I am only getting 5800 benchmarks. I have >not used any tweak program yet

Geez, you guys are FLYING! I have a 1.2G Athlon with a V5, and my score was only 1284?!? Damn... I haven't downloaded the N2k2 demo, so I can't give you those numbers too... Eldred -- Dale Earnhardt, Sr. R.I.P. 1951-2001 Homepage - http://www.umich.edu/~epickett GPLRank - under construction... Never argue with an idiot. He brings you down to his level, then beats you with experience... Remove SPAM-OFF to reply.

Tom, I get 40fps at 1280x1076 and i have a gf3 and an althon xp 1700+ at 140fsb (1549). My 2001 3dmark score is 8014. I would think my framerate would be higher. "Charlie Buscher" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:ng6Y7.3766$%[email hidden]... > P4 1.4 396m Rambus, GF2U. although I'm only running 1280x960x16 (waybetter > looking than 1024x768) I am getting 40-70 fps. [40fps back of field] Idont

Quoted text (26 lines)

> like the 23.11 drivers (require detonator destroyer). Im using the > 21.81/.84's (Mirror doesnt work w/ the 21.84's for me) > > Charlie > > "StP" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:[email hidden]... > > Hi guys, > > I am running an ECS K7S5A MB with 512 DDR Ram, Windows XP home, > > Athlon 1800XP CPU, GeForce 2 Ultra 64mb. In cockpit view sitting in > > the pits at Atlanta in N2002 I am getting 50fps with resloution set at > > 1200x1600x16.Something else has gotta be wrong > > Steve Paradise > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Morris Jones" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:<[email hidden]>... > > > I am only getting between 15-20 fps with this system. > > > I pray they put Opengl back in this. It does not matter if I run 16

bit > or > > > 32 bit > > > with or without antriscopic filtering nothing seem so effect it. > > > So I run it at 1600x1200x32, no AA, avg. 17fps. > > > As I said even if I go down it does not change anything. > > > The sound is worth $50.00 bucks to me, and I love all the otherchanges,

Quoted text (14 lines)

> but > > > please put opengl back in or optimize the D3D some more before you put > it > > > out. > > > > > > P4 1.9ghz > > > 384 PC800 RDDRAM > > > Hercules Ti500 Geforce 3 , 23.11 drivers. > > > Sounblaster Audigy Platinum EX. > > > Logitech Momo wheel > > > Actlabs Performace Pedals. > > > >

"EldredP" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]... > In article <[email hidden]>, "Cliff Roman"<[email hidden]>

Quoted text (8 lines)

> writes: > > >You are correct, I was being a little touchy here since I just got in a > >stupid argument with my wife. > > > >I apologize to Tom. > > > >Btw Don, what tweaker do you run for your Ti200 card? I am running a

1.4ghz > >machine here and a Ti200 card but I am only getting 5800 benchmarks. Ihave > >not used any tweak program yet > > Geez, you guys are FLYING! I have a 1.2G Athlon with a V5, and my scorewas > only 1284?!? Damn... I haven't downloaded the N2k2 demo, so I can't giveyou > those numbers too... > I get 6700 on my XP1600 ( 1.4ghz) Don Burnette

EldredP <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]... > > Geez, you guys are FLYING! I have a 1.2G Athlon with a V5, and my scorewas > only 1284?!? Damn... I haven't downloaded the N2k2 demo, so I can't giveyou > those numbers too... > Video card. Let's be honest...the V5 is old these days and just can't keep up with the GF2 and 3 cards and the new ATI cards even. That's where those guys are getting the high 3DMark scores. The V5 is your bottleneck. I have a T-Bird 1.1G w/ GF2 Ultra and can score 3900 on it. -- - Will DeRivera - GPL Rank 103.93 - http://www.numic.net - http://www.luxt.com - Hi, I'm a sig virus. - Please add me to the end of your sig and help me take over the world.

Cliff Roman <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]... > That is hardly correct > > I get 3DMark 2001 scores of about 5800 with a GF2 Ti200 card (which isabout

Quoted text (7 lines)

> average for that card) > > I get great frame rates in N2002 > > Do not act like anyone that gets under 6000 should expect bad frame rates. > More "I know it all" rubbish from Tom. >

hahaha...no joke. I can't even hit 4000 in 3DMark 2k1 and do fine in my games, N4/N2k2 included. -- - Will DeRivera - GPL Rank 103.93 - http://www.numic.net - http://www.luxt.com - Hi, I'm a sig virus. - Please add me to the end of your sig and help me take over the world.

In article <1bvY7.7340$%[email hidden]>, "Will DeRivera" <[email hidden]> writes:

Quoted text (14 lines)

>EldredP <[email hidden]> wrote in message >news:[email hidden]... >> >> Geez, you guys are FLYING! I have a 1.2G Athlon with a V5, and my score >was >> only 1284?!? Damn... I haven't downloaded the N2k2 demo, so I can't give >you >> those numbers too... >> > >Video card. Let's be honest...the V5 is old these days and just can't keep >up with the GF2 and 3 cards and the new ATI cards even. That's where those >guys are getting the high 3DMark scores. The V5 is your bottleneck. I have a >T-Bird 1.1G w/ GF2 Ultra and can score 3900 on it.

Well, shi-...um, shoot. I guess I'm just going to have to live with it. The card's less than a year old, and I can't afford to spend MORE money on ANOTHER video card... :( But I'm curious whay kind of framerate I'd get on the demo. Maybe I'll download it just to compare... Eldred -- Dale Earnhardt, Sr. R.I.P. 1951-2001 Homepage - http://www.umich.edu/~epickett GPLRank - under construction... Never argue with an idiot. He brings you down to his level, then beats you with experience... Remove SPAM-OFF to reply.