http://www.speedvision.com/
"David Brock" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
> Wheres Speedvision\Speed Channels new site?
>
>
they had speedtv.com also listed on one of their print adds. It worked a
few weeks ago, then came up with an Apache server page. I haven't checked
it since.
dave henrie
"lee" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:3HQ88.3428$[email hidden]...
Quoted text (8 lines)
> http://www.speedvision.com/ > "David Brock" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:[email hidden]... > > Wheres Speedvision\Speed Channels new site? > > > > > >David Brock wrote:
> Wheres Speedvision\Speed Channels new site?
What new site? The old one's chugging away as normal, except they no longer
post the schedule, which is really, really annoying.
KFG
Dave Henrie wrote:
> they had speedtv.com also listed on one of their print adds. It worked
> a
> few weeks ago, then came up with an Apache server page. I haven't checked
> it since.
> dave henrie
It now autodirects back to speedvision.com
KFG
He's looking for the new site, since speedvision.com shouldn't work at the
11th at 7:59 Pm.
"Kevin F. Gavitt" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:JPR88.53186$[email hidden]...
> David Brock wrote:
>
> > Wheres Speedvision\Speed Channels new site?
>
> What new site? The old one's chugging away as normal, except they nolonger
> post the schedule, which is really, really annoying.
>
> KFG
Wheres Speedvision\Speed Channels new site?
What new site? The old one's chugging away as normal, except they no longer
post the schedule, which is really, really annoying.
I was hoping the new site speedtv.com(i guess this is it) would have the
schedule being posted as I'm getting annoyed to at not having a schedule to
check. This is why I was looking for the new site.
David Brock wrote:
> What new site? The old one's chugging away as normal, except they no
> longer post the schedule, which is really, really annoying.
>
> I was hoping the new site speedtv.com(i guess this is it) would have the
> schedule being posted as I'm getting annoyed to at not having a schedule
> to check. This is why I was looking for the new site.
Tell me about it. It's particularly annoying for those of us that actually
enjoy the more 'obscure' auto racing coverage, such as the SCCA F500
runoff, and even the lawnmower racing and bobsledding.
Is it just me, but is the schedule suddenly heavily weighted to "classic"
stock car racing anyway?
I'd guess that all the shenanigans are going on behind the scenes right now
and that the new site will be "unvieled" in Grand Opening style when the
change occurs.
It's the proper "professional media" way of doing these things, even if it
is a pain for the actual audience.
KFG
"Kevin F. Gavitt" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:lYW88.54285$[email hidden]...
> David Brock wrote:
>
> > What new site? The old one's chugging away as normal, except theyno
> > longer post the schedule, which is really, really annoying.
> >
> > I was hoping the new site speedtv.com(i guess this is it) wouldhave the
> > schedule being posted as I'm getting annoyed to at not having aschedule
> > to check. This is why I was looking for the new site.
>
> Tell me about it. It's particularly annoying for those of us thatactually
> enjoy the more 'obscure' auto racing coverage, such as the SCCA F500
> runoff, and even the lawnmower racing and bobsledding.
>
> Is it just me, but is the schedule suddenly heavily weighted to"classic"
> stock car racing anyway?
>
> I'd guess that all the shenanigans are going on behind the scenesright now
> and that the new site will be "unvieled" in Grand Opening style whenthe
> change occurs.
>
> It's the proper "professional media" way of doing these things, evenif it
> is a pain for the actual audience.
>
> KFG
It's a pain? How's it a pain? It's not a pain for me. It's the way it
should be done. Professionally.
--
------------------
Morgan V. Wooten
[email hidden]
Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com
Morgan V. Wooten wrote:
It *would* have been professional had they maintained services at the old
site until the new one went online.
The entire genesis of this thread is that they ceased publishing their
schedule on the old site about two weeks before the new one went online.
And yes, that's how it's a pain. And it is. And it's unprofessional. If it
were my staff Lucy would have some 'splainin' to do. In my last business
such a thing would have instantly begun to remove money from my pocket.
KFG
