(nt)
(nt)
On Thu, 14 Feb 2002 11:00:29 GMT, <[email hidden]> wrote:
>(nt)
I found it quite boring.. there is allready a part 2 of it, which is
not much better. I guess slow hill-climbing and manouvring is simply
utter boring on a pc (while very challenging in real life.. I lend a
Transporter once from my company and took it for a weekend
off-roading, on a field where the Dutch army practice with their
tanks.. about $2500 damage after the weekend but I had a damn good
time!)
Andre
FWIW, I think it's a great 4WD game - easily the best available (not that
that's saying much). The single player mode offers good 'sim' driving and
the 4-player LAN mode is loads of fun!
On Thu, 14 Feb 2002 23:08:22 +1000, "Damien Smith"
<[email hidden]> wrote:
>FWIW, I think it's a great 4WD game - easily the best available (not that
>that's saying much). The single player mode offers good 'sim' driving and
>the 4-player LAN mode is loads of fun!
Don't you think Insane was better? Not as sim-oriented, but definately
more fun than Screamer 4x4 imho..
Andre
What is the part 2? The Cabelo's title is definitely not part 2 of Screamer
4x4 according to the Clever's guys.
Marc
Andre Warringa" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted text (13 lines)
> On Thu, 14 Feb 2002 11:00:29 GMT, <[email hidden]> wrote: > > >(nt) > > I found it quite boring.. there is allready a part 2 of it, which is > not much better. I guess slow hill-climbing and manouvring is simply > utter boring on a pc (while very challenging in real life.. I lend a > Transporter once from my company and took it for a weekend > off-roading, on a field where the Dutch army practice with their > tanks.. about $2500 damage after the weekend but I had a damn good > time!) > > AndreIn article <hNMa8.9642$[email hidden]>, [email hidden]
says...
> (nt)
>
>
>
I think the physics are amazing. It just isn't the type of game that most
people get into.
--
______________________
Todd Walker
http://twalker.d2g.com
Canon Pro90IS
______________________
On Thu, 14 Feb 2002 09:02:14 -0500, "Marc Collins"
<[email hidden]> wrote:
>What is the part 2? The Cabelo's title is definitely not part 2 of Screamer
>4x4 according to the Clever's guys.
Err.. I got them mixed up indeed.. I was talking about Cabello :-/
I did play Screamer 4x4 however, but I really can't remember how it
was like.. says enough I'm affraid :(
Andre
Clever's did that title, but said it was a quickie thing they had to produce
under a very tight deadline. No cockpit view, e.g.
I have the unopened box in front of me. Was waiting to see if I should
bother, but with NR2002 arriving yesterday and RT coming soon, I think I'll
just return it.
Marc
"Andre Warringa" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
> On Thu, 14 Feb 2002 09:02:14 -0500, "Marc Collins"
> <[email hidden]> wrote:
>
> >What is the part 2? The Cabelo's title is definitely not part 2 ofScreamer
Quoted text (7 lines)
> >4x4 according to the Clever's guys. > > Err.. I got them mixed up indeed.. I was talking about Cabello :-/ > I did play Screamer 4x4 however, but I really can't remember how it > was like.. says enough I'm affraid :( > > AndreI love it to bits.
You need a clutch pedal, and a handbrake to really enjoy it though.
Its a challenge, so its not for go fast freaks, but its hella fun to bomb
around the bush, trying to get up impossible slopes :)
I think it's pretty fun, and it was only $20. It has a neat kind of "fear
factor" as when you start to speed up you get a little scared as to what you
might encounter over the next crest :)
Thanks,
Alex
"Andre Warringa" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
> On Thu, 14 Feb 2002 23:08:22 +1000, "Damien Smith"
> <[email hidden]> wrote:
>
> >FWIW, I think it's a great 4WD game - easily the best available (not that
> >that's saying much). The single player mode offers good 'sim' drivingand
> >the 4-player LAN mode is loads of fun!
>
> Don't you think Insane was better? Not as sim-oriented, but definately
> more fun than Screamer 4x4 imho..
>
> Andre
