Race Sim Central
Rec.Autos.Simulators Archive

NASCAR 2003 or NASCAR Racing 4?

18 posts by 11 people · 18 Feb 2006 17:43 UTC - 23 Feb 2006 22:39 UTC

RickSweeney 18 Feb 2006 17:43 UTC#13135
I see posts on NASCAR 2003, but never see anything on 4. Which one is everyone using and why? Which is the better on-line experience? Rick
>"RickSweeney" <[email hidden]> wrote >I see posts on NASCAR 2003, but never see anything on 4. Which one is >everyone using and why? Which is the better on-line experience? Nascar Racing 2003 was the last sim by Papyrus. Nascar Racing 4 is two releases (and a couple of years) before that. It's also probably the worst sim by Papy, even if it wasn't that bad! -- -- Fran�ois M�nard <ymenard> -- This announcement is brought to you by the Shimago-Dominguez Corporation - helping America into the New World...
It has been a while, but I am getting back into sim racing. What are the good add-ons for 2003? Rick "ymenard" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:GhJJf.47530$[email hidden]...
Quoted text (22 lines)> >"RickSweeney" <[email hidden]> wrote >>I see posts on NASCAR 2003, but never see anything on 4. Which one is >>everyone using and why? Which is the better on-line experience? > > > Nascar Racing 2003 was the last sim by Papyrus. Nascar Racing 4 is two > releases (and a couple of years) before that. It's also probably the > worst sim by Papy, even if it wasn't that bad! > > > > > > > > > -- > -- Fran�ois M�nard <ymenard> > -- This announcement is brought to you by the Shimago-Dominguez > Corporation - helping America into the New World... > >
Not being hostile, but depending on what you like, there is not a bad one in the bunch of add ons RickSweeney wrote:
Quoted text (28 lines)> It has been a while, but I am getting back into sim racing. What are > the good add-ons for 2003? > > Rick > > > "ymenard" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:GhJJf.47530$[email hidden]... >>> "RickSweeney" <[email hidden]> wrote >>> I see posts on NASCAR 2003, but never see anything on 4. Which one >>> is everyone using and why? Which is the better on-line experience? >> >> >> Nascar Racing 2003 was the last sim by Papyrus. Nascar Racing 4 is >> two releases (and a couple of years) before that. It's also >> probably the worst sim by Papy, even if it wasn't that bad! >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> -- Fran�ois M�nard <ymenard> >> -- This announcement is brought to you by the Shimago-Dominguez >> Corporation - helping America into the New World...
Mitch_A 18 Feb 2006 19:03 UTC↳ reply to ymenard#13140
My take is that Nascar 1 was great simply because we didnt have anything else. Version 2 and 3 werent much more than patches with a few additional features. Nascar 4 was the first decent Nascar Sim and 2002 and 2003 were not much more than patches to N4 with very few additional features. A fully massaged N4 engine to be sure. So based on the above Id have to say N4 was the best Nascar Sim ever released and NR2003 was more of a fully patched N4 or more as it should have been upon its originally planned release back in the N3 era. To the OP grab NR2003 if you can locate a copy. Id NEVER pay a sawbuck for it though. Mitch "ymenard" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:GhJJf.47530$[email hidden]...
Quoted text (22 lines)> >"RickSweeney" <[email hidden]> wrote >>I see posts on NASCAR 2003, but never see anything on 4. Which one is >>everyone using and why? Which is the better on-line experience? > > > Nascar Racing 2003 was the last sim by Papyrus. Nascar Racing 4 is two > releases (and a couple of years) before that. It's also probably the > worst sim by Papy, even if it wasn't that bad! > > > > > > > > > -- > -- Fran�ois M�nard <ymenard> > -- This announcement is brought to you by the Shimago-Dominguez > Corporation - helping America into the New World... > >
Sting32 wrote: > Not being hostile, but depending on what you like, there is not a bad one in > the bunch of add ons > I thought the best add-on was the uninstall option. <G> GTL and rFactor are the only sims I have installed anymore. I don't even have GPL (Blasphemy!!!) installed. Hell, I'm not even sure if I could figure out how to install it in the proper format anymore with all the patches, upgrades, carsets, tracks, etc. LOL -- Scott B. Husted http://www.Husted.cc
>"RickSweeney" <[email hidden]> wrote > It has been a while, but I am getting back into sim racing. What are the > good add-ons for 2003? Papyrus, before folding, "gave" us tools that kinda modified the game engine to give us other type of physics (Trucks, BGN and some sort of Sports car physics). Just check out the various sites, you won't find much bad mods. Oh and hundreds of quality tracks. -- -- Fran�ois M�nard <ymenard> -- This announcement is brought to you by the Shimago-Dominguez Corporation - helping America into the New World...
ymenard 18 Feb 2006 21:27 UTC↳ reply to Mitch_A#13047
"Mitch_A" <[email hidden]> wrote > My take is that Nascar 1 was great simply because we didnt have anything > else. Version 2 and 3 werent much more than patches with a few additional > features. Nascar 4 was the first decent Nascar Sim and 2002 and 2003 were > not much more than patches to N4 with very few additional features. A > fully massaged N4 engine to be sure. N4 was a complete mess if you take it in context of the time of it's release. N1 and N2 were both masterpiece of gaming at their respective time. N4 had major flaws in the physics, felt fake, felt rushed. It wasn't a typical polished Papy title we used to know, filled with quality and quantity. -- -- Fran�ois M�nard <ymenard> -- This announcement is brought to you by the Shimago-Dominguez Corporation - helping America into the New World...
Larry 19 Feb 2006 06:28 UTC↳ reply to Mitch_A#13053
IMHO, NR2002 was the best "Feature" wise. NR2003 was de-contented considerably, but the overall engine was better. -Larry "Mitch_A" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:ObKJf.58336$[email hidden]...
Quoted text (41 lines)> My take is that Nascar 1 was great simply because we didnt have anything > else. Version 2 and 3 werent much more than patches with a few additional > features. Nascar 4 was the first decent Nascar Sim and 2002 and 2003 were > not much more than patches to N4 with very few additional features. A > fully massaged N4 engine to be sure. > > So based on the above Id have to say N4 was the best Nascar Sim ever > released and NR2003 was more of a fully patched N4 or more as it should > have been upon its originally planned release back in the N3 era. > > To the OP grab NR2003 if you can locate a copy. Id NEVER pay a sawbuck > for it though. > > Mitch > > "ymenard" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:GhJJf.47530$[email hidden]... >> >"RickSweeney" <[email hidden]> wrote >>>I see posts on NASCAR 2003, but never see anything on 4. Which one is >>>everyone using and why? Which is the better on-line experience? >> >> >> Nascar Racing 2003 was the last sim by Papyrus. Nascar Racing 4 is two >> releases (and a couple of years) before that. It's also probably the >> worst sim by Papy, even if it wasn't that bad! >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> -- Fran�ois M�nard <ymenard> >> -- This announcement is brought to you by the Shimago-Dominguez >> Corporation - helping America into the New World... >> >> > >
"GTL and rFactor are the only sims I have installed anymore. I don't even have GPL (Blasphemy!!!) installed." Not blasphemy. I have GTR, GTL, and RBR. (I'm sure rFactor is nice, but I like real cars/tracks.) I used to love GPL, but now I find driving GPL artificial by comparison. And the response to setup changes in GPL downright strange.
[email hidden] (Scott B. Husted) wrote: > Hell, I'm not even sure if I could figure out how to install > it in the proper format anymore My GPL installation went a little pear-shaped after a HD upgrade last year, and I've never really got to the bottom of why. As you say, it's a little complex to put back together from scratch these days... especially when you add in the complication of restoring your setups and remembering which ones you were using at which track. All in all it's easier to just fire up GTL and go thrash a mini to death. But I still have GPL on my PC. I'd feel disloyal if I didn't. :-) Andrew McP
To get EVERYTHING in GPL to 65 mods, up to spec IMHO, with this page, then add the 69 and your set :) Andrew MacPherson wrote:
Quoted text (16 lines)> [email hidden] (Scott B. Husted) wrote: > >> Hell, I'm not even sure if I could figure out how to install >> it in the proper format anymore > > My GPL installation went a little pear-shaped after a HD upgrade last > year, and I've never really got to the bottom of why. As you say, > it's a little complex to put back together from scratch these days... > especially when you add in the complication of restoring your setups > and remembering which ones you were using at which track. > > All in all it's easier to just fire up GTL and go thrash a mini to > death. But I still have GPL on my PC. I'd feel disloyal if I didn't. > :-) > > Andrew McP
Sting32 20 Feb 2006 00:40 UTC↳ reply to Larry#13079
the 05 mod that floated around , was the best! Larry wrote:
Quoted text (43 lines)> IMHO, NR2002 was the best "Feature" wise. NR2003 was de-contented > considerably, but the overall engine was better. > > -Larry > > "Mitch_A" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:ObKJf.58336$[email hidden]... >> My take is that Nascar 1 was great simply because we didnt have >> anything else. Version 2 and 3 werent much more than patches with a >> few additional features. Nascar 4 was the first decent Nascar Sim >> and 2002 and 2003 were not much more than patches to N4 with very >> few additional features. A fully massaged N4 engine to be sure. >> >> So based on the above Id have to say N4 was the best Nascar Sim ever >> released and NR2003 was more of a fully patched N4 or more as it >> should have been upon its originally planned release back in the N3 >> era. To the OP grab NR2003 if you can locate a copy. Id NEVER pay a >> sawbuck for it though. >> >> Mitch >> >> "ymenard" <[email hidden]> wrote in message >> news:GhJJf.47530$[email hidden]... >>>> "RickSweeney" <[email hidden]> wrote >>>> I see posts on NASCAR 2003, but never see anything on 4. Which one >>>> is everyone using and why? Which is the better on-line experience? >>> >>> >>> Nascar Racing 2003 was the last sim by Papyrus. Nascar Racing 4 is >>> two releases (and a couple of years) before that. It's also >>> probably the worst sim by Papy, even if it wasn't that bad! >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> -- Fran�ois M�nard <ymenard> >>> -- This announcement is brought to you by the Shimago-Dominguez >>> Corporation - helping America into the New World...
Rick, The best online experience comes from NascarRacing 2003 Season http://search.ebay.com//search/search.dll?from=R40&satitle=Nascar+Racing+2003+Season. I have raced and supported servers for all the Nascar SIMs and only one is in demand from people wanting to pay money for servers and that's Nascar Racing 2003 Season. By far it is the most complete SIM ever produced. Released in February of 2003 with an additional 3 physics released within the patch in September of 2003. Sim Racing Connection will direct you to all the resources you need http://simracingconnection.com/. Most server companies support many mods and FLOG http://flog.com supports 14 mods that included Craftmans Trucks, TransAm and Busch Grand National. The owners of the physics engine, who are all former Papyrus people, allowed Redline Developments http://www.redlinedevelopments.com/ to make a sports car racing SIM/MOD of the 1990 IMSA GTO/FIA Group season with four different physics. It is also supported with cheat detection through the VROC http://new.vroc.net/ race matching system which is also loaded when you install GTP. Download it here: http://download.boomtown.net/en_uk/articles/art.view.php?id=7164 Nascar Racing 2003 Season still has dozens if not hundreds of full leagues as it has the most complete features for league managers. Many SIMs have come out saying they where the next great thing but the formula that NR2003 has hit the nail on the head. With over 400 tracks it will take the new SIMs at least a year to catch up to NR2003 if then. No doubt there are other SIM coming that will someday displace NR2003, but if you want to have fun SIM racing with a SIM that is well support and with many still existing leagues, NR2003 is "still the one." rFactor http://rFactor.net is the heir apparent and there is allot of development being done by the MOD community that will someday bring it up to the quality of NR2003, but it ain't happened yet. NR2003 is the now and rFactor is the future. If you want to judge a SIMs popularity just look at the SIMs the game server leasing companies support. GTR and GTL are only a tiny blip on the radar compared to NR2003 and the future rFactor. That's because the knowledgeable league managers evaluate these SIM and give their members the best racing experience. Niles Anders RickSweeney wrote: > I see posts on NASCAR 2003, but never see anything on 4. Which one is > everyone using and why? Which is the better on-line experience? > > Rick > >
Plowboy 20 Feb 2006 21:51 UTC↳ reply to Sting32#13008
lol I see I forgot to post the link the other day? nobody cared? FWIW,,, http://adc.speedgeezers.com/gplhtml/GPLInstallAnd65Mod Sting32 enlightened us with:
Quoted text (20 lines)> To get EVERYTHING in GPL to 65 mods, up to spec IMHO, with this page, > then add the 69 and your set :) > > Andrew MacPherson wrote: >> [email hidden] (Scott B. Husted) wrote: >> >>> Hell, I'm not even sure if I could figure out how to install >>> it in the proper format anymore >> >> My GPL installation went a little pear-shaped after a HD upgrade last >> year, and I've never really got to the bottom of why. As you say, >> it's a little complex to put back together from scratch these days... >> especially when you add in the complication of restoring your setups >> and remembering which ones you were using at which track. >> >> All in all it's easier to just fire up GTL and go thrash a mini to >> death. But I still have GPL on my PC. I'd feel disloyal if I didn't. >> :-) >> >> Andrew McP
Niles, thanks much for the link to Sim Racing Connection. This will be a good read and resource. Rick "Niles Anders" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:8blKf.11566$Ug4.294@dukeread12...
Quoted text (49 lines)> Rick, > > The best online experience comes from NascarRacing 2003 Season > http://search.ebay.com//search/search.dll?from=R40&satitle=Nascar+Racing+2003+Season. I > have raced and supported servers for all the Nascar SIMs and only one is > in demand from people wanting to pay money for servers and that's Nascar > Racing 2003 Season. By far it is the most complete SIM ever produced. > Released in February of 2003 with an additional 3 physics released within > the patch in September of 2003. > > Sim Racing Connection will direct you to all the resources you need > http://simracingconnection.com/. Most server companies support many mods > and FLOG http://flog.com supports 14 mods that included Craftmans Trucks, > TransAm and Busch Grand National. The owners of the physics engine, who > are all former Papyrus people, allowed Redline Developments > http://www.redlinedevelopments.com/ to make a sports car racing SIM/MOD of > the 1990 IMSA GTO/FIA Group season with four different physics. It is also > supported with cheat detection through the VROC http://new.vroc.net/ race > matching system which is also loaded when you install GTP. Download it > here: http://download.boomtown.net/en_uk/articles/art.view.php?id=7164 > > Nascar Racing 2003 Season still has dozens if not hundreds of full leagues > as it has the most complete features for league managers. Many SIMs have > come out saying they where the next great thing but the formula that > NR2003 has hit the nail on the head. With over 400 tracks it will take the > new SIMs at least a year to catch up to NR2003 if then. > > No doubt there are other SIM coming that will someday displace NR2003, but > if you want to have fun SIM racing with a SIM that is well support and > with many still existing leagues, NR2003 is "still the one." > > rFactor http://rFactor.net is the heir apparent and there is allot of > development being done by the MOD community that will someday bring it up > to the quality of NR2003, but it ain't happened yet. NR2003 is the now and > rFactor is the future. > > If you want to judge a SIMs popularity just look at the SIMs the game > server leasing companies support. GTR and GTL are only a tiny blip on the > radar compared to NR2003 and the future rFactor. That's because the > knowledgeable league managers evaluate these SIM and give their members > the best racing experience. > > Niles Anders > > RickSweeney wrote: >> I see posts on NASCAR 2003, but never see anything on 4. Which one is >> everyone using and why? Which is the better on-line experience? >> >> Rick
Tim 23 Feb 2006 22:39 UTC↳ reply to Sting32#12978
If you like racing on 35 BR tracks :( I'm still reeling ... "Sting32" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:ae8Kf.49316$[email hidden]... > the 05 mod that floated around , was the best!

Sponsors

Affiliate Links

Sim Gaming Expo MOZA Racing Sim-Lab Fanatec TrakRacer Asetek Internet Privacy From NordVPN Dreamhost Capital One Credit Card Application Fanatical CDKeys Amazon Amazon UK Project Motor Racing iRacing Get your racing gloves, boots and more from Demon Tweeks. Enlist at Roberts Space Industries, developers of Star Citizen and Squadron 42


Back from the ashes since July, 2019. First created in 2001 with the merger of Legends Central (founded 1999) and simracing.dk.

A site by a sort of sim racer, for sim racers, about racing sims. News and information on both modern and historic sim racing software titles.

All products and licenses property of their respective owners.


Facebook Threads Bluesky Twitter Mastodon Instagram YouTube Tiktok Twitch Reddit Google News Apple News Subscribe via WordPress Flipboard eBay

Race Sim Central © 1999-2026 | Some links pay RSC a commission. Advertising does not equal endorsement.Cookie Policy