Hi guys,
Picked up a returned GeForce 4 Ti 4600 128 at Best Buy for $360
the other day. Here is the report on framerate in N2002. Sitting in
the pit at Atlanta in a testing session at 1200x1600x16 the fps with
my old Geforce Ultra 2 64 meg is 65, with the GeForce 4 ti 4600 107. I
am using openGL and have the rend_ogl.ini file altered so the
anisotropic level is set to 0. I also have do not have any
antialiasing turned on. I have found that running at a higher res
gives me a better picture without the framerate hit associated with
the aa.
My hardware is an Athlon 1800 XP w/512 DDR Ram.
Thanks Steve Paradise
Member Redline Racing League
http://rrlnrs.com/
CFRL
http://www.users.qwest.net/~ctsgreig/cfrl/
Thanks for the info StP!
Achim
"StP" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted text (17 lines)
> Hi guys, > Picked up a returned GeForce 4 Ti 4600 128 at Best Buy for $360 > the other day. Here is the report on framerate in N2002. Sitting in > the pit at Atlanta in a testing session at 1200x1600x16 the fps with > my old Geforce Ultra 2 64 meg is 65, with the GeForce 4 ti 4600 107. I > am using openGL and have the rend_ogl.ini file altered so the > anisotropic level is set to 0. I also have do not have any > antialiasing turned on. I have found that running at a higher res > gives me a better picture without the framerate hit associated with > the aa. > My hardware is an Athlon 1800 XP w/512 DDR Ram. > Thanks Steve Paradise > Member Redline Racing League > http://rrlnrs.com/ > CFRL > > http://www.users.qwest.net/~ctsgreig/cfrl/Wow...and thanks for doing a controlled comparison!! I guess I should start
saving now! Where does the Ti 4600 rank in the GeForce 4 hierarchy?
Marc
"StP" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted text (17 lines)
> Hi guys, > Picked up a returned GeForce 4 Ti 4600 128 at Best Buy for $360 > the other day. Here is the report on framerate in N2002. Sitting in > the pit at Atlanta in a testing session at 1200x1600x16 the fps with > my old Geforce Ultra 2 64 meg is 65, with the GeForce 4 ti 4600 107. I > am using openGL and have the rend_ogl.ini file altered so the > anisotropic level is set to 0. I also have do not have any > antialiasing turned on. I have found that running at a higher res > gives me a better picture without the framerate hit associated with > the aa. > My hardware is an Athlon 1800 XP w/512 DDR Ram. > Thanks Steve Paradise > Member Redline Racing League > http://rrlnrs.com/ > CFRL > > http://www.users.qwest.net/~ctsgreig/cfrl/ Top big dog...for the moment anyway...
dh
"Marc Collins" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:7kAi8.125749$[email hidden]...
> Wow...and thanks for doing a controlled comparison!! I guess I shouldstart
Quoted text (25 lines)
> saving now! Where does the Ti 4600 rank in the GeForce 4 hierarchy? > > Marc > > "StP" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:[email hidden]... > > Hi guys, > > Picked up a returned GeForce 4 Ti 4600 128 at Best Buy for $360 > > the other day. Here is the report on framerate in N2002. Sitting in > > the pit at Atlanta in a testing session at 1200x1600x16 the fps with > > my old Geforce Ultra 2 64 meg is 65, with the GeForce 4 ti 4600 107. I > > am using openGL and have the rend_ogl.ini file altered so the > > anisotropic level is set to 0. I also have do not have any > > antialiasing turned on. I have found that running at a higher res > > gives me a better picture without the framerate hit associated with > > the aa. > > My hardware is an Athlon 1800 XP w/512 DDR Ram. > > Thanks Steve Paradise > > Member Redline Racing League > > http://rrlnrs.com/ > > CFRL > > > > http://www.users.qwest.net/~ctsgreig/cfrl/ > >> I also have do not have any
>antialiasing turned on. I have found that running at a higher res
>gives me a better picture without the framerate hit associated with
>the aa.
Have you found this to be true with the new card, or is
it based on experiments with the old?
bob
The first benchmarks I saw compared the 4600 to a GF3 ti 500 and it was
somewhat faster in the standard modes...BUT when they enabled FSAA then the
old GF3 bogged down but the new card had a much smaller loss of fps. So on
equal computers, it WILL be faster, but if you want fsaa, the price your
screen updates pay won't be near so bad.
dave henrie
<[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
