Race Sim Central
Rec.Autos.Simulators Archive

EA to stop developing games with costly "Sports" Licenses?

12 posts by 7 people · 21 Mar 2006 17:10 UTC - 30 Mar 2006 14:10 UTC

Mitch 21 Mar 2006 18:39 UTC↳ reply to Larry#12366
The question then becomes who will pay the huge Nascar license next? Nascar only has a single mission anymore, make as much money as possible off of everything/anything they can put a fee in front of. If quality mattered to Nascar we'd still get to watch a Rockingham race every year.. Nascar *should* be paying for the free advertising not vica versa. Mitch "Larry" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:hsWTf.6$KE1.2@dukeread02...
Quoted text (7 lines)>I can't quite tell, but wouldn't it be great if the Nascar License was >bought up by someone who cared enough to write a REAL Sim again? > > http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/06_12/b3976086.htm > > -Larry >
Larry 21 Mar 2006 21:09 UTC↳ reply to Mitch#12369
That's actually a good point... -Larry "Mitch" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:pLXTf.2587$[email hidden]... > If quality mattered to Nascar we'd still get to watch a Rockingham race > every year..
mcewena 21 Mar 2006 21:19 UTC↳ reply to Larry#12370
>>Nascar *should* be paying for the free advertising not vica versa. >That's actually a good point... Hope he wasn't wearing a $250 "Dale jr" or "Jeff Gordon" jacket when he wrote it.... ;)
bigspud 22 Mar 2006 19:03 UTC↳ reply to Mitch#12389
On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 18:39:17 GMT, Mitch wrote:
Quoted text (14 lines)> The question then becomes who will pay the huge Nascar license next? Nascar > only has a single mission anymore, make as much money as possible off of > everything/anything they can put a fee in front of. > > If quality mattered to Nascar we'd still get to watch a Rockingham race > every year.. > > Nascar *should* be paying for the free advertising not vica versa. > > Mitch > > > "Larry" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:hsWTf.6$KE1.2@dukeread02... >> [7 quoted lines suppressed]
we can only hope na$car a ea go bust, so we can get real stockcar racing and well made games again.
Larry 22 Mar 2006 19:11 UTC↳ reply to bigspud#12390
I never thought I'd say this, but Nascar IS boring the hell out of me lately. Nascar won't let the boys just race. Too much mommying going on. Rules for rear gears. Rules for transmission gears. Rules for rear springs. Rules for spoilers. Shit, why don't Nascar just own the car stable, issue the car at the beginning of the weekend, and then the teams can wrap them with their sponser names and go race 43 identical pieces of whimped-out Nascar shit. The whole thing has turned into one big IROC event every weekend. I HATE it. And the 5 min of racing per 7 min of commercials doesn't help matters either. At least F1 is interesting this year, for better or worse. That doesn't mean I'm all of a sudden an RC freak. I'm not. I still prefer Oval racing, just not what Nascar has become. -Larry "bigspud" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:enddjsf4fi98.a2n68lbovgok$[email hidden]... > we can only hope na$car a ea go > bust, so we can get real stockcar > racing and well made games again.
bigspud 22 Mar 2006 22:47 UTC↳ reply to Larry#12394
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 14:11:23 -0500, Larry wrote:
Quoted text (26 lines)> I never thought I'd say this, but Nascar IS boring the hell out of me > lately. Nascar won't let the boys just race. Too much mommying going on. > Rules for rear gears. Rules for transmission gears. Rules for rear > springs. Rules for spoilers. > > Shit, why don't Nascar just own the car stable, issue the car at the > beginning of the weekend, and then the teams can wrap them with their > sponser names and go race 43 identical pieces of whimped-out Nascar shit. > > The whole thing has turned into one big IROC event every weekend. I HATE > it. > > And the 5 min of racing per 7 min of commercials doesn't help matters > either. > > At least F1 is interesting this year, for better or worse. > > That doesn't mean I'm all of a sudden an RC freak. I'm not. I still prefer > Oval racing, just not what Nascar has become. > > -Larry > > "bigspud" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:enddjsf4fi98.a2n68lbovgok$[email hidden]... > >> [3 quoted lines suppressed]
yup, way too many rules.
TW 22 Mar 2006 23:35 UTC↳ reply to Mitch#12396
On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 18:39:17 GMT, "Mitch" <[email hidden]> wrote: >If quality mattered to Nascar we'd still get to watch a Rockingham race >every year.. Amen. And the Southern 500 would still be Labor Day weekend. So much for tradition huh.
It's still fun to watch but I know what you mean. But back to the topic, what really burns my ass about EA's Microsoft-like tactics is that a truly beautiful sim like the Gran Turismo series can't have Ferraris, Porches (well, they have RUF's), Lamborghinis, etc. What's the deal with that? Does EA have some sort of exclusive license? GT4 owns anything EA could fantasize about on their best day.
Plowboy 27 Mar 2006 20:05 UTC↳ reply to Larry#12296
Larry enlightened us with: > Shit, why don't Nascar just own the car stable, issue the car at the > beginning of the weekend, and then the teams can wrap them with their > sponser names and go race 43 identical pieces of whimped-out Nascar > shit. Have you NOT heard of the revolutionary safer "NASCAR" Humpy wheeler was in charge of developing? That is the plan!!! seems to been due soon too, cant recall saw it on tv, like 08 or 10 or something...
Larry 28 Mar 2006 16:16 UTC↳ reply to Plowboy#12305
Yes, but to fully destroy the sport, they will need to hand the keys of random identically preppared cars to the team as they drive in the gate. Just think! No more trailers! They will have a "Nascar Pro Shop" where you obtain your replacement brake pads. And there will be a little stand called "Body By Jake" where the teams go to have their sponsers shrink-wrapped on. At the end of the race, you turn the car back in and if it's not damaged you get your lease deposit back. This is about the only thing they _haven't_ done. I will say though, F1 is getting a lot worse. -Larry "PlowBoy" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:sAXVf.18768$EZ6.9283@dukeread12...
Quoted text (17 lines)> > > > Larry enlightened us with: > > >> Shit, why don't Nascar just own the car stable, issue the car at the >> beginning of the weekend, and then the teams can wrap them with their >> sponser names and go race 43 identical pieces of whimped-out Nascar >> shit. > > Have you NOT heard of the revolutionary safer "NASCAR" Humpy wheeler was > in charge of developing? That is the plan!!! seems to been due soon too, > cant recall saw it on tv, like 08 or 10 or something... > > >
Plowboy 30 Mar 2006 14:10 UTC↳ reply to Larry#12330
Larry enlightened us with: SNip what I somewhat agree with, :/ > > I will say though, F1 is getting a lot worse. you just had to try and start something, :P (everyone knows poop smells, you usually dont have to discuss it) Hehehee

Sponsors

Affiliate Links

Sim Gaming Expo MOZA Racing Sim-Lab Fanatec TrakRacer Asetek Internet Privacy From NordVPN Dreamhost Capital One Credit Card Application Fanatical CDKeys Amazon Amazon UK Project Motor Racing iRacing Get your racing gloves, boots and more from Demon Tweeks. Enlist at Roberts Space Industries, developers of Star Citizen and Squadron 42


Back from the ashes since July, 2019. First created in 2001 with the merger of Legends Central (founded 1999) and simracing.dk.

A site by a sort of sim racer, for sim racers, about racing sims. News and information on both modern and historic sim racing software titles.

All products and licenses property of their respective owners.


Facebook Threads Bluesky Twitter Mastodon Instagram YouTube Tiktok Twitch Reddit Google News Apple News Subscribe via WordPress Flipboard eBay

Race Sim Central © 1999-2026 | Some links pay RSC a commission. Advertising does not equal endorsement.Cookie Policy