Race Sim Central
Rec.Autos.Simulators Archive

Warning: may contain traces of WSC ;)

13 posts by 7 people · 18 Jun 2002 22:28 UTC - 19 Jun 2002 18:56 UTC

David Buttery 18 Jun 2002 22:28 UTC#113975
Interesting to see the WSC thread earlier. I posted on the relevant forum at RSC earlier today, but for those of you who missed it there were three main points: 1) Several people (eg Douglas Ellison in the thread here) have said things along the lines of "I'd like to say something, but for legal reasons I can't". While even this much is better than the total silence we often get, we need more. Someone, somewhere, *must* have the right to talk, and that person or entity ought to get on with it - if the legalities are this difficult will we ever see the finished product? 2) It might have been better not to have made any official or semi- official announcement of WSC at all. If it had remained a rumour, even a strong one, then we'd have had less cause to complain if it never appeared: as it is, we feel desperately cheated. 3) Who's to say WSC is going to have the sportscar market to itself for ever? Let's say it comes out in 2005 - by then sportscar racing might have become wildly popular on PC, in the same way that rallying has done, and there could be good sportscar games from (let's say) EA and Sierra. If that happens, who needs WSC? They can't afford to stay bogged down in legal argument forever, or events will overtake them and they'll simply be an irrelevance. I also suggested (tongue more-or-less in cheek) two ways for us outsiders to proceed: 1) Wait for Racer to be so good that we can use that instead; 2) Inflame the current WSC-related legal arguments so's it ends up in court. When it's a judge asking the questions, you either answer or you get banged up for contempt ;-) PS: No, we are not going to stop complaining. You've brought it on yourselves. If and when WSC is released, and if it's as good as has been promised, we'll all be guzzling down our words - tell then, we reserve our rights to whinge. -- England 1 Argentina 0! Yyyyeeeessssss! :-D England 3 Denmark 0! Also Yyyyeeeessssss! :-D The GPL Scrapyard: http://www.btinternet.com/~gplscrapyard
>"David Buttery" <[email hidden]> wrote > Let's say it comes out in 2005 - LOL "two thousand and five". -- -- Fran�ois M�nard <ymenard> -- http://www.ymenard.8m.com/ -- This announcement is brought to you by the Shimago-Dominguez Corporation - helping America into the New World...
"ymenard" <[email hidden]> wrote on 18 Jun 2002: >>"David Buttery" <[email hidden]> wrote >> Let's say it comes out in 2005 - > > LOL "two thousand and five". Yeah, well - there's a spirit of optimism in England at the moment - anything seems possible, though I admit I might be pushing it a little bit here :-) -- England 1 Argentina 0! Yyyyeeeessssss! :-D England 3 Denmark 0! Also Yyyyeeeessssss! :-D The GPL Scrapyard: http://www.btinternet.com/~gplscrapyard
"David Buttery" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]... > Interesting to see the WSC thread earlier. I posted on the relevant > forum at RSC earlier today, but for those of you who missed it there > were three main points: > >Someone, somewhere, *must* have the right to talk, Indeed. But unfortunately - that person/company doesnt want to talk. If you cant figure out who and why - then you probably dont know enough about the situation to comment. > 2) It might have been better not to have made any official or semi- > official announcement of WSC at all. I know two people who'd agree with that. But who could have forseen the difficulties ahead. > 3) Who's to say WSC is going to have the sportscar market to itself > for ever? It doesnt need it. Its not a title aimed for sporscars - it's a title aimed at ANY cars. > I also suggested (tongue more-or-less in cheek) two ways for us > outsiders to proceed: > > 1) Wait for Racer to be so good that we can use that instead; Or F12k2 with all the pending mods :D Doug
On Wed, 19 Jun 2002 10:35:12 +0100, "Douglas Ellison" <[email hidden]> wrote: > >"David Buttery" <[email hidden]> wrote in message >news:[email hidden]...... >> I also suggested (tongue more-or-less in cheek) two ways for us >> outsiders to proceed: >> >> 1) Wait for Racer to be so good that we can use that instead; > >Or F12k2 with all the pending mods :D I still vote for #1. ;-) Ruud van Gaal Free car sim: http://www.racer.nl/ Pencil art : http://www.marketgraph.nl/gallery/
"Ruud van Gaal" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted text (15 lines)> On Wed, 19 Jun 2002 10:35:12 +0100, "Douglas Ellison" > <[email hidden]> wrote: > > > > >"David Buttery" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > >news:[email hidden]... > ... > >> I also suggested (tongue more-or-less in cheek) two ways for us > >> outsiders to proceed: > >> > >> 1) Wait for Racer to be so good that we can use that instead; > > > >Or F12k2 with all the pending mods :D > > I still vote for #1. ;-)
lol SO who'd modding the GPL Castle Combe into Racer then... hands up :D Doug
"Douglas Ellison" <[email hidden]> wrote on 19 Jun 2002: >>Someone, somewhere, *must* have the right to talk, > > Indeed. But unfortunately - that person/company doesnt want to > talk. If you cant figure out who and why - then you probably dont > know enough about the situation to comment. You're right - I don't know much, or indeed anything, about the situation, and I ought to thank you now for at least saying *something* here - as I've said before, even "sorry, but for whatever reason there can't be anything more made public now" is better than the complete silence there's been recently. However, I utterly reject the notion that because I don't know what's going on that gives me no right to discuss the matter. If we followed that logic, no-one would ever discuss what politicians were doing :-) >> 3) Who's to say WSC is going to have the sportscar market to >> itself for ever? > > It doesnt need it. Its not a title aimed for sporscars - it's a > title aimed at ANY cars. Which suggests that the title "World Sports Cars" might not be the one on the box when it's actually released... -- England 1 Argentina 0! Yyyyeeeessssss! :-D England 3 Denmark 0! Also Yyyyeeeessssss! :-D The GPL Scrapyard: http://www.btinternet.com/~gplscrapyard
I'm not saying you dont know so dont talk about it.. BUT - it is unfair to demand information when those who'd LOVE to give you information are not allowed to - and those who dont want to give you information aint shifting. Fundamentally - in terms of information - the situation sucks. Relax - it's all good :D Doug
"Douglas Ellison" <[email hidden]> wrote on 19 Jun 2002: > I'm not saying you dont know so dont talk about it.. BUT - it is > unfair to demand information when those who'd LOVE to give you > information are not allowed to - and those who dont want to give > you information aint shifting. Okay, that seems fair (what *you* said, not what *they're* doing!) - I really am trying to avoid the "you *MUST* tell us what's going on" stuff, because it's unfair and I understand it ain't gonna produce any results. There is just the tiniest chance, though (let's say 0.00000000001%) that whoever can but doesn't want to might be influenced by what the waiting crowds are saying. Oh, all right, 0.00000000001% is ludicrously optimistic, but hey - we're an optimistic nation in England right now ;-) > Fundamentally - in terms of information - the situation sucks. Agreed. It's atrocious PR by "them who know". Maybe it's a subtle filtering device - by this time all the people who like arcade games have been filtered out, so that when WSC is released all that's left are the hardcore fans... > Relax - it's all good :D > > Doug I'll take your word for it. -- England 1 Argentina 0! Yyyyeeeessssss! :-D England 3 Denmark 0! Also Yyyyeeeessssss! :-D The GPL Scrapyard: http://www.btinternet.com/~gplscrapyard
On Wed, 19 Jun 2002 14:22:11 GMT, Ruud van Gaal <[email hidden]> wrote:
Quoted text (16 lines)> On Wed, 19 Jun 2002 10:35:12 +0100, "Douglas Ellison" ><[email hidden]> wrote: > >> >>"David Buttery" <[email hidden]> wrote in message >>news:[email hidden]... > ... >>> I also suggested (tongue more-or-less in cheek) two ways for us >>> outsiders to proceed: >>> >>> 1) Wait for Racer to be so good that we can use that instead; >> >>Or F12k2 with all the pending mods :D > > I still vote for #1. ;-) >
Me too, but the waiting gets a bit long either way. Now if Racer was "true" open source, this might be different ;-) Allison said it, and I'll say it again: if half of the mod / sim community would put in six months worth of effort into Racer, there would be no need for WSC. I'd like to see WSC, make no mistake, but Racer has become so good recently that Ruud (or we, if it was "open source" ;-) is not too far away from achieving deity status amongst us mere mortals. ;-) Uwe PS: And still, he would be able to make money from it. And everyone else who feels like improving it. -- Uwe Schuerkamp //////////////////////////// http://www.schuerkamp.de/ Herford, Germany \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ (52.0N/8.5E) PGP Fingerprint: 2E 13 20 22 9A 3F 63 7F 67 6F E9 B1 A8 36 A4 61

Sponsors

Affiliate Links

Sim Gaming Expo MOZA Racing Sim-Lab Fanatec TrakRacer Asetek Internet Privacy From NordVPN Dreamhost Capital One Credit Card Application Fanatical CDKeys Amazon Amazon UK Project Motor Racing iRacing Get your racing gloves, boots and more from Demon Tweeks. Enlist at Roberts Space Industries, developers of Star Citizen and Squadron 42


Back from the ashes since July, 2019. First created in 2001 with the merger of Legends Central (founded 1999) and simracing.dk.

A site by a sort of sim racer, for sim racers, about racing sims. News and information on both modern and historic sim racing software titles.

All products and licenses property of their respective owners.


Facebook Threads Bluesky Twitter Mastodon Instagram YouTube Tiktok Twitch Reddit Google News Apple News Subscribe via WordPress Flipboard eBay

Race Sim Central © 1999-2026 | Some links pay RSC a commission. Advertising does not equal endorsement.Cookie Policy